Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Jim Hampton"
writes: Subject: GOOD NEWS-------France heat wave deaths top 14,000 From: "Jim Hampton" Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 03:24:13 GMT Hello, Reg Well, I'm sure you'll get some flames on that comment, but it sure is nice to hear some honesty once in a while. I've read comments carried in news organizations some years ago. A number of Europeans were appalled by the number of homeless in the United States. Oh, some of the "conservatives" have broadcast a lot of hot air and some folks will call anyone disagreeing with their position "card - carrying - liberals", but the fact is there has to be some reasonable compromise to keep as many folks happy as possible. Also, it is necessary for any civilized nation to provide some level of support for those citizens unable to take care of themselves. Mind me, I am not saying that we are or are not doing that toady. However, it is fortunate that we have a very powerful weapon here. It is called the vote. If enough folks get upset, it will show despite the 30 second sound bites and handshaking LOL ![]() 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA "Reg Edwards" wrote in message ... The death toll in France from August's blistering heat wave was nearly 15,000 . . . . ============================ It must not be forgotten the health of French nation has considerable improved since August. The undoubted evidence for this is a much reduced death rate amongst the elderly which will last for several years. The same sort of statistics apply to other countries which suffered from the heatwave but didn't bother to publish them, ie., for political reasons they kept it secret. The French government should be congratulated on its honesty as it should be on other matters of international interest and importance. Vive la France ! Vive l'Europe ! ---- Reg, G4FGQ Jim: I consider myself to be a conservative, and I find the heat wave death toll in France to be appalling. However, I don't view this tragedy as any particular human failing; it is, indeed, an act of God. And while I won't indulge in any attempt to interpret this tragedy, it must be obvious that mortal men can do things to prevent a recurrence of such an incident. This does not counteract God's will, it just serves to demonstrate that we've learned the lesson God intended to reveal to us. In our advanced Western culture, in spite of our social and technological advancement and the great wealth we enjoy, we are still beset with age-old social problems, such as the homeless, the ill, and the impoverished. Unfortunately, here in the United States and other "advanced" Western societies, we have, in fact, created a lot of these social problems in our attempt to solve them. By creating Welfare States which promise to be the answer to each and every conceivable social problem, we have created vast numbers of dependents who have arisen through the weakness of those who were first served by a "caring society." Shortly thereafter, it became clear to the supposedly well-meaning "liberals" who originated the Welfare State that in order to maintain and increase their political power, and therefore advance their allegedly "progressive" concept of social engineering, they simply permitted the number of dependent people expand through the promise that they would be cared for by the State as long as the liberal, socialist political ideology remained in political power. That was the power of the vote to which you referred -- and that kind of voting has given us a society which has run amok. I work every day with people who genuinely deserve all the assistance they can receive from the working public, because they genuinely, legitimately cannot provide for themselves. However, when I go off work and am waiting in line at the supermarket, and the lady in front of me with several young children pays for her groceries with food stamps, I am not filled with the same compassion I have for my mentally retarded, physically disabled, and elderly clients. I consider people who "work the system" just because the system exists to be engaged in the worst kind of immorality; they are little more than thieves. In virtually every case, they became dependent on society simply because a system was in place which allowed them to behave in an irresponsible manner -- with hard-working people like you and me picking up the tab in perpetuity. I have no sympathy for them, only abject disgust for their despicable behaviour and the system which not only supports it, but even "celebrates" it as individual "choice." Naturally, the children, while they themselves are innocent, are used as the excuse for keeping the system in place, and therefore ensuring that it will always keep the cycle of dependency going. Throughout the decline of our Western culture, we have always heard that conservatives like myself are "mean-spirited," that we are uncaring, hard-hearted monsters who would starve children and cause death and destruction in any conceivable way. However, the opposite is true; it is the liberals who are creating the downfall of our society. As the expense of maintaining the Welfare State increases, the burden of the declining numbers of producers will increase as the numbers of dependents also rises. At some point, the system will collapse, and then what? The "haves" and the have-nots will go to war against each other. I'm not talking about a war of words and ideas; I'm talking about a shooting and killing war. Such an end would be the ultimate immorality of the liberal, socialist ideology, even though the violence will be blamed on the remaining conservative producers who simply reached their breaking point. Fortunately, there is still a way out of the dismal future we face. Our society needs to make a fundamental change in which we stop viewing social perfection as the ability of the state to provide for everyone, to the ability of the state to know it's place -- to give us the freedom to achieve to the best of our ability without necessarily making government the instrument of individual achievement and success. We need to take the first step in that direction by putting an immediate end to all state and federal welfare programs which directly provide sustenance to those who choose an illegitimate, immoral lifestyle. We need to close down our borders to those who cross them simply because they know that once they do, their children automatically become bona-fide American citizens which then qualify the parents to receive public assistance. We need to bring an end to each and every political concept which supports immoral and unproductive lifestyles, and let people know that they are the only ones who bear the burden of their actions. You are correct that we need to vote -- and the ones who need to exercise that right to vote are the ones who will ultimately pay for the Welfare State -- and in numbers large enough to overrule those who seek to benefit from it. We must regain and hold a socially conservative majority in our government. If we don't, and continue along our present course, it won't be too long before achieve terminal velocity as we proceed down the slippery slope of our own destruction. If this change doesn't happen in my lifetime, I hope I'm not around when we hit bottom. 73 de Larry, K3LT Who is John Galt? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Larry Roll K3LT wrote in message I consider myself to be a conservative, and I find the heat wave death toll in France to be appalling. However, I don't view this tragedy as any particular human failing; it is, indeed, an act of God. And while I won't indulge in any attempt to interpret this tragedy, it must be obvious that mortal men can do things to prevent a recurrence of such an incident. This does not counteract God's will, it just serves to demonstrate that we've learned the lesson God intended to reveal to us. I have a hard time understanding why a "loving God" would perform such an act that would destroy lives. I don't think these things have anything to do with God. I work every day with people who genuinely deserve all the assistance they can receive from the working public, because they genuinely, legitimately cannot provide for themselves. However, when I go off work and am waiting in line at the supermarket, and the lady in front of me with several young children pays for her groceries with food stamps, I am not filled with the same compassion I have for my mentally retarded, physically disabled, and elderly clients. I consider people who "work the system" just because the system exists to be engaged in the worst kind of immorality; they are little more than thieves. I felt the same way the time I drove up to the post office in my un-air conditioned, manual shift, Volkswagen and two ladies drove up in a nice air conditioned luxury car that cost many times what my little volks did, with their $75 braided hair do's. I went in to mail my bill payments, they went in to buy food stamps.. In virtually every case, they became dependent on society simply because a system was in place which allowed them to behave in an irresponsible manner -- with hard-working people like you and me picking up the tab in perpetuity. I have no sympathy for them, only abject disgust for their despicable behaviour and the system which not only supports it, but even "celebrates" it as individual "choice." Naturally, the children, while they themselves are innocent, are used as the excuse for keeping the system in place, and therefore ensuring that it will always keep the cycle of dependency going. Ditto to this and the rest you posted. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I have a hard time understanding why a "loving God" would perform such an act that would destroy lives. I don't think these things have anything to do with God. I have a simple problem with the logic.... To assume that God was the cause of the heatwave to kill 14,000 means you have to accept the fact that God delivers judgement on nations that He feels are in error.... that is, have broken his laws. One of his most basic 10 laws is "thou shalt not kill" (and, actually, it has been interpreted that this really means "thou shalt not *murder*")... this being so, why hasn't the nation of islam been completely struck down by lightning bolts? Why haven't nations like Israel suffered judgement? Why did the United States have to unseat saddam hussein after he gassed tens of thousands of his own people, threw men into woodchippers, had mass graves and.. well, you know the rest of the atrocities... At the very least, to accept the idea that God renders judgement upon nations is also to accept the idea that he does so *selectively*, randomly, and not in proportion to the sins He sees they are commiting. Whatever the french have done to the United States, it pales in comparison to mass atrocities that are now currently happening through the entire world. My $.02 worth. Clint |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Dean Arthur
writes: Fire & Brimstone wrote: -LSB-75-METERS" BIG-AL -003894.5-LSB-75-METERS@ BIG-AL -003894.5-LSB-75-METERS wrote in : PARIS, France (AP) -- The death toll in France from August's blistering heat wave was nearly 15,000, according to a government report released Thursday that exceeded prior official estimates by 3,000 victims. No, Not good news, 30,000 would've been good news. 15,000 is a good start though. Save the kids, though. Necessary material for cleaning sewer pipes. Sent down with scrub brushes to keep pipe walls clean - but need test to determine if doing job. Smell not good enough as they all smell like s__t to begin with. This is without a doubt the most horrible muck I've ever read in this newsgroup -- or anywhere bloddy else, for that matter. May God have mercy on your soul. 73 de Larry, K3LT |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment | |||
Rare Books on Electronics and Radio and Commmunications | Equipment | |||
GOOD NEWS-------France heat wave deaths top 14,000 | Homebrew | |||
GOOD NEWS | General | |||
GOOD NEWS-------France heat wave deaths top 14,000 | Homebrew |