Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Gray Shockley
writes: Zenith bought them out for their computer(s) and terminals and then Zenith tossed out nearly all of Heath except those items. About two years ago, I was in a Home Depot and came across some sensory-motion fictures that were labeled as "Zenith-Heath". What that is (or was) about, I have no idea. Both Home Depot and Lowes carries the big line of Heath-Zenith door chimes, both wired and wireless. Wife and I put two wireless Heath-Zenith transmitters and three indoor chimes in our southern house a couple years ago. Been working fine here ever since. All that hardware seems to be made in China, certainly not Benton Harbor. :-) LHA |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Jim Hampton"
writes: My gut feeling is that a lot of mags have or will drop. Yep - first "ham radio" over a dozen tears ago, and now "73". Yes, there will (likely) always be antenna construction articles, articles on safety, DXing, and a (very) limited amount of homebrewing. Do you remember the construction articles of the 50s and 60s? And the '70s, '80s, '90s... Still plenty of construction going on. But a lot of it winds up on websites instead of magazine pages. Homebrewing is, in part, the victim of affluence and less expensive manufacturing methods. Back then, there were a lot of home brew projects. Sure - and most of them were the result of work done by hams in their own workshops. Even Heathkit threw in the towel a couple of decades ago. Heathkit ran into several problems, but the main one was that the basic advantage of kitbuilding was the cost savings resulting from eliminating labor cost. When electronics assembly required lots of hand labor, that savings gave Heath an edge. But kits are not dead. See http://www.elecraft.com for a look at what's available today. Over 5000 Elecraft rigs have been built (3500+ K2s and 1500+ K1s, plus accessories and now the new KX1). How much did anyone learn dropping in an integrated circuit that contained the whole if amplifier? Are you against PROGRESS? ;-) That plus postal rates going threw the roof hasn't made it any easier for magazines. One wonders sometimes if it wouldn't be less expensive to send us CDs. I've dropped all magazine subscriptions except tv guide (sign of the times LOL). Even when I assembled my first computer (a Heathkit H-8, which I still have), there were modifications to be performed. I had to chuckle when Kilobaud had an article on increasing the transfer rate from the tape deck to/from the computer from 1200 baud to 2400 baud. I was already running 4800 baud (and could get it to sync, but not transfer, at 9600 baud. I think the cheap cassette deck had something to do with it.). HAW! Which raises a question - is my computer "homebrew"? It was built from parts obtained from a variety of sources. But no soldering or metalwork involved. Those days are long gone; today we have satellite tv and BPL (hopefully, not for long on the BPL!!!). I sure hope so. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Phil Kane"
writes: On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 17:41:41 -0500, Gray Shockley wrote: If memory serves, Heath didn't throw in the towel, per se. Zenith bought them out for their computer(s) and terminals and then Zenith tossed out nearly all of Heath except those items. Didn't Shlumberger get into the picture before Zenith, or was it after Zenith? Memory says that Schlumberger acquired them first, then Zenith. The Heath-Zenith home appliance/gadget corporate headquarters moved to someplace else (southeast?) according to what I remember from the doorbell packages. Zenith quit the TV receiver manufacture some time ago; they were a close second to Admiral Corporation, also in the Chicago area. My first kit was a Heath Q-1. Mine also, 1951. The CRT in the kit was WW2 surplus, 5BP1, container still marked with Army lettering. :-) My first Heathkit was their VTVM (Vacuum-Tube Voltmeter for those who never played with one). One of the best test instruments of its time (1950s). It's still good. My Heath VTVM was purchased in late 1953, shipped to my battalion mailbox in Tokyo, Japan, while assigned to ADA. Used it for checking "Hi-Fi" music electronic kits purchased at the legendary Akihabara district of Tokyo, even then a mecca for electronics-radios-components covering many square blocks. Mine traveled with me back to Illinois then California. Slight drift in the resistor values makes it a tad out of spec now and the rotary switches will probably never survive another cleaning (oxide build-up on the rotary contacts has always been a problem with old electronics). The Heath SB-310 receiver kit, purchased and built two decades later, has almost useless rotary switch contacts now. LHA |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 9fGib.553559$Oz4.501772@rwcrnsc54, JonJacobJingleHimerSchmidt
writes: I heard in the later years that Wayne required a certain format for articles or columns and if the author did not follow the format, then the article or column did not get published. Nearly ALL periodicals and publishers have minimum standards on manuscript format acceptible for consideration of publication. Those same periodicals and publishers explain those in free documents called "Writer's Guides." The quasi-standard format for all written formats in North America is letter size paper (8 1/2" x 11"), a minimum margin of 1" all sides, double-spacing conventional type font with pitch about 10 characters per inch, one side of the paper only. Submission of a manuscript to a publisher is FAR from any guarantee of acceptance whether it follows a publisher's format or not. Unless one has a specific contract to submit work to a publisher, ALL manuscripts must pass through a series of reviews at the publisher. It is a given that NO technically oriented publication will accept crayon on cardboard format manuscripts, handwritten or hand-printed text on non-standard paper stock. Anyone who wishes to submit an article for publication should first contact a publisher's Editor by separate inquiry letter. Nearly every publisher will return a Writer's Guide to the format used by a publisher. Submissions are guaranteed absolutely nothing except some form of consideration AT the publication. Leonard H. Anderson Associate Editor at Ham Radio Magazine for two years |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I believe Zenith was acquired by Goldstar,
http://www.zenith.com "Len Over 21" wrote in message ... In article , "Phil Kane" writes: On Sun, 12 Oct 2003 17:41:41 -0500, Gray Shockley wrote: If memory serves, Heath didn't throw in the towel, per se. Zenith bought them out for their computer(s) and terminals and then Zenith tossed out nearly all of Heath except those items. Didn't Shlumberger get into the picture before Zenith, or was it after Zenith? Memory says that Schlumberger acquired them first, then Zenith. The Heath-Zenith home appliance/gadget corporate headquarters moved to someplace else (southeast?) according to what I remember from the doorbell packages. Zenith quit the TV receiver manufacture some time ago; they were a close second to Admiral Corporation, also in the Chicago area. My first kit was a Heath Q-1. Mine also, 1951. The CRT in the kit was WW2 surplus, 5BP1, container still marked with Army lettering. :-) My first Heathkit was their VTVM (Vacuum-Tube Voltmeter for those who never played with one). One of the best test instruments of its time (1950s). It's still good. My Heath VTVM was purchased in late 1953, shipped to my battalion mailbox in Tokyo, Japan, while assigned to ADA. Used it for checking "Hi-Fi" music electronic kits purchased at the legendary Akihabara district of Tokyo, even then a mecca for electronics-radios-components covering many square blocks. Mine traveled with me back to Illinois then California. Slight drift in the resistor values makes it a tad out of spec now and the rotary switches will probably never survive another cleaning (oxide build-up on the rotary contacts has always been a problem with old electronics). The Heath SB-310 receiver kit, purchased and built two decades later, has almost useless rotary switch contacts now. LHA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|