Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 I can understand why Novice and Technician Plus required five words per minute -- the treaty and all -- but why did General require thirteen words per minute and Amateur Extra twenty words per minute? Is there a real reason? Jack. =2D --=20 Jack Twilley jmt at twilley dot org http colon slash slash www dot twilley dot org slash tilde jmt slash =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/jNLQGPFSfAB/ezgRAnT0AJ9JwznusaVpDFgsbvd7gSlS6+zffACgqPSs Eax4C1KwKboU55NhahcuAsY=3D =3DjOXm =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Jack Twilley
writes: I can understand why Novice and Technician Plus required five words per minute -- the treaty and all -- but why did General require thirteen words per minute and Amateur Extra twenty words per minute? Is there a real reason? 12 to 13 wpm is generally agreed to be above the speed where things such as "counting dits" work for most people. It's the beginning of the skills which take one to higher speeds 20 wpm derives from the old 1923-24 "Amateur Extra First Class" which chose 20 as double the old 10 wpm standard. It was reintroduced in 1951 when the current Amateur Extra class was created. Both speeds are far below those required of experienced professional Morse operators. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "N2EY" wrote in message ... In article , Jack Twilley writes: I can understand why Novice and Technician Plus required five words per minute -- the treaty and all -- but why did General require thirteen words per minute and Amateur Extra twenty words per minute? Is there a real reason? 12 to 13 wpm is generally agreed to be above the speed where things such as "counting dits" work for most people. It's the beginning of the skills which take one to higher speeds 20 wpm derives from the old 1923-24 "Amateur Extra First Class" which chose 20 as double the old 10 wpm standard. It was reintroduced in 1951 when the current Amateur Extra class was created. Both speeds are far below those required of experienced professional Morse operators. 73 de Jim, N2EY One more thing Jim. 20 wpm is above another 'threshold', which is at about 18wpm for most folks. So you gotta know it to do it. Dan/W4NTI |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim, N2EY, wrote:
20 wpm derives from the old 1923-24 "Amateur Extra First Class" which chose 20 as double the old 10 wpm standard. It was reintroduced in 1951 when the current Amateur Extra class was created. Both speeds are far below those required of experienced professional Morse operators. Are there any 'professional' Morse operators left who earn their living by sending by hand and receiving by ear? I am under the impression it is now strictly an amateur endeavor. Jim, K7JEB |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim,
I had a 2nd class radiotelegraph license back in 1967. One needed to be 21 (I was still a teenager) plus have sufficient service time to qualify for the 1st (I forget, but it seems it was one year at sea running communications under the supervision of a 1st telegraph). The second was 20 words per minute and the 1st was 25 words per minute. From what I have heard, the 25 was sufficient to get you a not too good paying job on the slow side circuits whilst you had to be 100% copy and reliable at 30 to get the good jobs on the main circuits. Of course, this would pre-date 1967 by quite a few years ![]() From what I recall, back in the 60s you tended to hear the newcomers at 5 to 10 words per minute, a minor number in the 13 to 20 range, a number in the 30 word per minute range, and a surprising number in the 40 plus word per minute range. I did run into one guy that I had a problem with until he realized I wasn't the guy he was used to hearing at KG6NAC and finally slowed down to about 50 (which was really pushing limits for me at that time). I originally called cq at about 40 to 45 and he responded at around 60. Fortunately, I got most of his call but that was a bit much. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA "N2EY" wrote in message ... In article , Jack Twilley writes: I can understand why Novice and Technician Plus required five words per minute -- the treaty and all -- but why did General require thirteen words per minute and Amateur Extra twenty words per minute? Is there a real reason? 12 to 13 wpm is generally agreed to be above the speed where things such as "counting dits" work for most people. It's the beginning of the skills which take one to higher speeds 20 wpm derives from the old 1923-24 "Amateur Extra First Class" which chose 20 as double the old 10 wpm standard. It was reintroduced in 1951 when the current Amateur Extra class was created. Both speeds are far below those required of experienced professional Morse operators. 73 de Jim, N2EY --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.525 / Virus Database: 322 - Release Date: 10/9/03 |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message thlink.net...
"N2EY" wrote in message ... In article , Jack Twilley writes: I can understand why Novice and Technician Plus required five words per minute -- the treaty and all -- but why did General require thirteen words per minute and Amateur Extra twenty words per minute? Is there a real reason? 12 to 13 wpm is generally agreed to be above the speed where things such as "counting dits" work for most people. It's the beginning of the skills which take one to higher speeds 20 wpm derives from the old 1923-24 "Amateur Extra First Class" which chose 20 as double the old 10 wpm standard. It was reintroduced in 1951 when the current Amateur Extra class was created. Both speeds are far below those required of experienced professional Morse operators. 73 de Jim, N2EY One more thing Jim. 20 wpm is above another 'threshold', which is at about 18wpm for most folks. So you gotta know it to do it. Dan/W4NTI Welp Dan, as I strap on my dragon armor and jousting butt-plug, please orient me toward the 1951 anachronism of the 1923 AEFC standard. didididididit. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Hampton" wrote in message ...
Jim, I had a 2nd class radiotelegraph license back in 1967. One needed to be 21 (I was still a teenager) plus have sufficient service time to qualify for the 1st (I forget, but it seems it was one year at sea running communications under the supervision of a 1st telegraph). The second was 20 words per minute and the 1st was 25 words per minute. From what I have heard, the 25 was sufficient to get you a not too good paying job on the slow side circuits whilst you had to be 100% copy and reliable at 30 to get the good jobs on the main circuits. Of course, this would pre-date 1967 by quite a few years ![]() Phil Kane has posted that there was a *shortage* of licensed radiotelegraph ops for the maritime services during the Vietnam conflict. Supplies going to VN went mostly by ship, all of which were US flag vessels.... Any connection to incentive licensing is pure speculation. From what I recall, back in the 60s you tended to hear the newcomers at 5 to 10 words per minute, a minor number in the 13 to 20 range, a number in the 30 word per minute range, and a surprising number in the 40 plus word per minute range. I did run into one guy that I had a problem with until he realized I wasn't the guy he was used to hearing at KG6NAC and finally slowed down to about 50 (which was really pushing limits for me at that time). I originally called cq at about 40 to 45 and he responded at around 60. Fortunately, I got most of his call but that was a bit much. It's still that way today. 'tother night I had a nice QRQ ragchew with a French amateur on the low end of 80. Had the bug weight waay back! I recall a post sometime back where a veteran described a code test for US Navy "A" school, circa 1958. The test was to receive, on a standard Navy mill, 5 letter groups at 24 wpm. For a solid hour. Maximum of 3 errors in the entire hour. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brian" wrote in message om... "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com wrote in message thlink.net... "N2EY" wrote in message ... In article , Jack Twilley writes: I can understand why Novice and Technician Plus required five words per minute -- the treaty and all -- but why did General require thirteen words per minute and Amateur Extra twenty words per minute? Is there a real reason? 12 to 13 wpm is generally agreed to be above the speed where things such as "counting dits" work for most people. It's the beginning of the skills which take one to higher speeds 20 wpm derives from the old 1923-24 "Amateur Extra First Class" which chose 20 as double the old 10 wpm standard. It was reintroduced in 1951 when the current Amateur Extra class was created. Both speeds are far below those required of experienced professional Morse operators. 73 de Jim, N2EY One more thing Jim. 20 wpm is above another 'threshold', which is at about 18wpm for most folks. So you gotta know it to do it. Dan/W4NTI Welp Dan, as I strap on my dragon armor and jousting butt-plug, please orient me toward the 1951 anachronism of the 1923 AEFC standard. didididididit. Lets see if you can understand this then; If I want any crap out of you, I will squeeze your head. Have a lousy day. Dan/W4NTI |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article AJejb.26585$Rd4.4023@fed1read07, "K7JEB"
writes: Jim, N2EY, wrote: 20 wpm derives from the old 1923-24 "Amateur Extra First Class" which chose 20 as double the old 10 wpm standard. It was reintroduced in 1951 when the current Amateur Extra class was created. Both speeds are far below those required of experienced professional Morse operators. Are there any 'professional' Morse operators left who earn their living by sending by hand and receiving by ear? I am under the impression it is now strictly an amateur endeavor. There are still a few ships using Morse and a few shore stations, but you have to look for them really hard. I don't think there are any left in the USA. The maritime services got away from using Morse for the same reasons railroads got away from steam locomotives: Cost to operate. Back when the transition was being made, diesel electric locomotives cost more to build or buy than the equivalent horsepower in steam, and coal cost less than its diesel fuel equivalent. But diesels did not require turntables, tenders, large amounts of water and distribution thereof, or disposal of ashes. The volume and weight of fuel for a given number of horsepower-hours was less for a diesel, and the fuel was a clean, easy to handle liquid. Diesel maintenance was less and in warm weather diesels could be shut down and started up on a few minutes' notice. Multiple diesel units could be coupled together for more horespower without requiring another engine crew to operate. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
30 Steps for all New Hams | Policy |