Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Of course if they don't *generate* any RFI on MHP frequencies they won't
likely get any comnpalints! Yes, and if they continue not to generate signals on low VHF, they will continue not get any complaints. If they would reduce their emissions on the ham bands to about 60 dB less than FCC, amateur radio wouldn't get a significant amount of interference and ARRL could move on to new challenges. 73, Ed Hare, W1RFI |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
But is is almost certain they they will claim success for their
"tests" in that "We got no complaints from low VHF users" when they generated no such interference during testing-but are sure to when BPL is widely implemented. Why would they use a different BPL system than the one they used successfully for their marketing trial? 73, Ed Hare, W1RFI |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
All this may wind up in a court somewhere, which means your
documented efforts could be very important. If this were to end up in court, I would want to see a professional EMC lab make the measurements. 73, Ed Hare, W1RFI |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Opposing BPL | Policy | |||
Opposing BPL | Antenna | |||
Opposing BPL | Policy |