Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 17th 03, 12:53 PM
W1RFI
 
Posts: n/a
Default Opposing BPL

Of course if they don't *generate* any RFI on MHP frequencies they won't
likely get any comnpalints!


Yes, and if they continue not to generate signals on low VHF, they will
continue not get any complaints. If they would reduce their emissions on the
ham bands to about 60 dB less than FCC, amateur radio wouldn't get a
significant amount of interference and ARRL could move on to new challenges.

73,
Ed Hare, W1RFI

  #2   Report Post  
Old October 18th 03, 09:45 PM
W1RFI
 
Posts: n/a
Default

But is is almost certain they they will claim success for their
"tests" in that "We got no complaints from low VHF users" when they
generated no such interference during testing-but are sure to when BPL
is widely implemented.


Why would they use a different BPL system than the one they used successfully
for their marketing trial?

73,
Ed Hare, W1RFI

  #3   Report Post  
Old October 18th 03, 09:48 PM
W1RFI
 
Posts: n/a
Default

All this may wind up in a court somewhere, which means your
documented efforts could be very important.


If this were to end up in court, I would want to see a professional EMC lab
make the measurements.

73,
Ed Hare, W1RFI
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Opposing BPL Jim Hampton Policy 15 October 20th 03 03:24 AM
Opposing BPL W1RFI Antenna 0 October 16th 03 01:02 AM
Opposing BPL dt Policy 0 October 15th 03 05:13 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017