Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Code" wrote in message ...
Should Morse code be retained as a requirement to obtain an amateur radio license in the U.S.? 73 Code Yes or No YES! 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Code" wrote
Should Morse code be retained as a requirement to obtain an amateur radio license in the U.S.? It's hasn't been a requirement for over a decade. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"KØHB" wrote in message
.net... "Code" wrote Should Morse code be retained as a requirement to obtain an amateur radio license in the U.S.? It's hasn't been a requirement for over a decade. 73, de Hans, K0HB Here here! 73 de Bert WA2SI |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Code" wrote in :
Should Morse code be retained as a requirement to obtain an amateur radio license in the U.S.? 73 Code Yes or No No N3KIP |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:07:10 -0500, "Code" wrote:
Should Morse code be retained as a requirement to obtain an amateur radio license in the U.S.? 73 Code Yes or No Morse is not required to obtain an amateur radio license in the US. It is only required to obtain the General class license (and by inference the Extra class license, which has the General class license as a prerequisite). Morse has not been a licensing requirement in the US for several years now. Raymond Sirois KU2S SysOp: The Lost Chord BBS 607-733-5745 telnet://thelostchord.dns2go.com:6000 |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Code" wrote: Should Morse code be retained as a requirement to obtain an amateur radio license in the U.S.? To "retain" something, it has to exist. Morse code, as "a requirement to obtain an amateur radio license," hasn't existed for quite a few years. Perhaps you should rephrase that to fit the current reality. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Code" writes:
Should Morse code be retained as a requirement to obtain an amateur radio license in the U.S.? 73 Code Yes or No Yes. All U.S. Amateur Radio licensing requirements should be restored to those which were in place prior to February 15, 1991. All "no-code" Technician- class licenses should be retroactively suspended for two years, in order to give those who hold them the time to meet the newly-reinstated licensing requirements. At the end of the two year "grace" period, those licenses would be revoked. Of course, this would not apply to anyone who upgraded to General, Advanced, or Amateur Extra prior to April 1, 2000, having taken and passed the requisite 5, 13, and 20 WPM code tests for their respective license classes. 73 de Larry, K3LT |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
No. It served its purpose once upon a time, but as a =requirement= for
a ham radio license it is no longer needed. -- -- //Steve// Steve Silverwood, KB6OJS Of course not, now that Ham Radio is nothing more than a CB Service lets dump it. Hell while were at it lets dump all testing. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve Silverwood" wrote in message ... In article , says... Should Morse code be retained as a requirement to obtain an amateur radio license in the U.S.? 73 Code Yes or No No. It served its purpose once upon a time, but as a =requirement= for a ham radio license it is no longer needed. Snoooooooooooooooooooooore ....... 73 Tom KI3R |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
Radio Amateurs of Canada - Morse Code Survey Results Published | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||
ATTN: Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st | Policy |