Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
According to a story in the Washington Post, by Dan Eggen, on Tuesday, Dec.
30, 2003: An FBI intelligence bulletin sent to law enforcement agencies last week warned that "terrorist operatives may rely on almanacs to assist with target selection and pre-operational planning" because they include detailed information on bridges, tunnels and other U.S. landmarks, officials said. OK, fault me and sneer at me all you want but, isn't the above just going way too far? (the rest of the story can be read on the Washington Post website--just do a search on the word almanac and it should be around the second item in the list). I mean, I understand the fear, the tendency to jump to safety, but even if terrorists are using almanacs, do we want to be "caught" with one if we are thought to be acting "suspicious" as is mentioned in the article? Sheesh, what about ham radio?! One of the most widely used communication mediums in this country and maybe the world, right? What do we open ourselves up for by being on the air and "just talking?" -- Kim W5TIT |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kim W5TIT" wrote in message
... According to a story in the Washington Post, by Dan Eggen, on Tuesday, Dec. 30, 2003: An FBI intelligence bulletin sent to law enforcement agencies last week warned that "terrorist operatives may rely on almanacs to assist with target selection and pre-operational planning" because they include detailed information on bridges, tunnels and other U.S. landmarks, officials said. OK, fault me and sneer at me all you want but, isn't the above just going way too far? (the rest of the story can be read on the Washington Post website--just do a search on the word almanac and it should be around the second item in the list). I mean, I understand the fear, the tendency to jump to safety, but even if terrorists are using almanacs, do we want to be "caught" with one if we are thought to be acting "suspicious" as is mentioned in the article? Sheesh, what about ham radio?! One of the most widely used communication mediums in this country and maybe the world, right? What do we open ourselves up for by being on the air and "just talking?" -- Kim W5TIT Follow-Up: Went to the bookstore to grab a copy of "Execution" (a business book) and, while I was at it, I went ahead and purchased a "World Almanac 2004." While I was checking out, the sales associate grinned when he scanned the Almanac. Turns out they've been selling like hotcakes! As an aside, anyone know if ham radio is ever in a almanac? I thought there'd be some stuff on hobbies, but haven't found it yet. Jim, N2EY, would probably make some bucks if he'd write and publish a Almanac of Ham Radio! Kim W5TIT |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Kim W5TIT"
writes: Jim, N2EY, would probably make some bucks if he'd write and publish a Almanac of Ham Radio! There's a bunch of folks already doing that. They're at 225 Main Street, Newington, CT, 06111. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kim W5TIT" wrote in message ...
"Kim W5TIT" wrote in message ... According to a story in the Washington Post, by Dan Eggen, on Tuesday, Dec. 30, 2003: An FBI intelligence bulletin sent to law enforcement agencies last week warned that "terrorist operatives may rely on almanacs to assist with target selection and pre-operational planning" because they include detailed information on bridges, tunnels and other U.S. landmarks, officials said. OK, fault me and sneer at me all you want but, isn't the above just going way too far? (the rest of the story can be read on the Washington Post website--just do a search on the word almanac and it should be around the second item in the list). I mean, I understand the fear, the tendency to jump to safety, but even if terrorists are using almanacs, do we want to be "caught" with one if we are thought to be acting "suspicious" as is mentioned in the article? Sheesh, what about ham radio?! One of the most widely used communication mediums in this country and maybe the world, right? What do we open ourselves up for by being on the air and "just talking?" -- Kim W5TIT Follow-Up: Went to the bookstore to grab a copy of "Execution" (a business book) and, while I was at it, I went ahead and purchased a "World Almanac 2004." While I was checking out, the sales associate grinned when he scanned the Almanac. Turns out they've been selling like hotcakes! I usually get a personal copy about every 4 or 5 years. Used to get them annually when I was in the contingency business, among other publications. As an aside, anyone know if ham radio is ever in a almanac? I thought there'd be some stuff on hobbies, but haven't found it yet. Jim, N2EY, would probably make some bucks if he'd write and publish a Almanac of Ham Radio! The flying horse pubs were a nice compilation of ham info worldwide, but with the advent of the QRZ and other online databases... |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Kim W5TIT wrote:
According to a story in the Washington Post, by Dan Eggen, on Tuesday, Dec. 30, 2003: An FBI intelligence bulletin sent to law enforcement agencies last week warned that "terrorist operatives may rely on almanacs to assist with target selection and pre-operational planning" because they include detailed information on bridges, tunnels and other U.S. landmarks, officials said. OK, fault me and sneer at me all you want but, isn't the above just going way too far? (the rest of the story can be read on the Washington Post website--just do a search on the word almanac and it should be around the second item in the list). I mean, I understand the fear, the tendency to jump to safety, but even if terrorists are using almanacs, do we want to be "caught" with one if we are thought to be acting "suspicious" as is mentioned in the article? Sheesh, what about ham radio?! One of the most widely used communication mediums in this country and maybe the world, right? What do we open ourselves up for by being on the air and "just talking?" The NSA has amateur radio classified as an activity that could be abused by foreign nationals in espionage activities (prior to September 2001 - I'm not certain if this has been changed after that time). |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"D. Stussy" wrote in message . org...
On Tue, 30 Dec 2003, Kim W5TIT wrote: According to a story in the Washington Post, by Dan Eggen, on Tuesday, Dec. 30, 2003: An FBI intelligence bulletin sent to law enforcement agencies last week warned that "terrorist operatives may rely on almanacs to assist with target selection and pre-operational planning" because they include detailed information on bridges, tunnels and other U.S. landmarks, officials said. OK, fault me and sneer at me all you want but, isn't the above just going way too far? (the rest of the story can be read on the Washington Post website--just do a search on the word almanac and it should be around the second item in the list). I mean, I understand the fear, the tendency to jump to safety, but even if terrorists are using almanacs, do we want to be "caught" with one if we are thought to be acting "suspicious" as is mentioned in the article? Sheesh, what about ham radio?! One of the most widely used communication mediums in this country and maybe the world, right? What do we open ourselves up for by being on the air and "just talking?" The NSA has amateur radio classified as an activity that could be abused by foreign nationals in espionage activities (prior to September 2001 - I'm not certain if this has been changed after that time). So did the Koreans. At least when I was there, no MOBILE hamming allowed. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|