Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Alun" wrote in message ... "Dee D. Flint" wrote in gy.com: "Alun" wrote in message ... I'm guessing that code CSCEs issued now will turn out to be good until element 1 is abolished. 73 de Alun, N3KIP Only if the code requirement is abolished in less than 365 days. Keep in mind that some of the petitions filed do call for keeping code for General or Extra while letting the Techs have some limited HF privileges. With the speed with the FCC is not moving, less than a year from now seems rather iffy. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Well, you'd like to think so, I'm sure. Regardless of my wishes or your wishes, the government will take the time that it deems appropriate. Having dealt with a few government programs at times in my life, the snail's pace seems more typical than the speeding bullet pace. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in
gy.com: "Alun" wrote in message ... "Dee D. Flint" wrote in gy.com: "Alun" wrote in message ... I'm guessing that code CSCEs issued now will turn out to be good until element 1 is abolished. 73 de Alun, N3KIP Only if the code requirement is abolished in less than 365 days. Keep in mind that some of the petitions filed do call for keeping code for General or Extra while letting the Techs have some limited HF privileges. With the speed with the FCC is not moving, less than a year from now seems rather iffy. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Well, you'd like to think so, I'm sure. Regardless of my wishes or your wishes, the government will take the time that it deems appropriate. Having dealt with a few government programs at times in my life, the snail's pace seems more typical than the speeding bullet pace. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE However, the code test was abolished by the ITU way back on July 5th last year. More than one year from _now_ would be more than eighteen months, which doesn't seem likely to me, nor is that fast by any stretch. I am down for May 1st in the pool, which is only about 10 months. That maybe a little short, but I would be very surprised indeed if it went over 15 months, which would be this November. As I said, you would like to think it would take longer, but that is because you don't want it to happen. Perhaps I have picked an earlier date because I take the opposite view, but I doubt if I am out by more than a few months. 73 de Alun, N3KIP |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message igy.com...
"Alun" wrote in message ... "Dee D. Flint" wrote in gy.com: "Alun" wrote in message ... I'm guessing that code CSCEs issued now will turn out to be good until element 1 is abolished. 73 de Alun, N3KIP Only if the code requirement is abolished in less than 365 days. Keep in mind that some of the petitions filed do call for keeping code for General or Extra while letting the Techs have some limited HF privileges. With the speed with the FCC is not moving, less than a year from now seems rather iffy. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Well, you'd like to think so, I'm sure. Regardless of my wishes or your wishes, the government will take the time that it deems appropriate. Having dealt with a few government programs at times in my life, the snail's pace seems more typical than the speeding bullet pace. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE D2, you are so incredibly wise. You immediately spotted and understood the corruption in the N2EY/W5TIT exchanges, and knew to stay away. You knew that Morse Code testing is healthy, wealhty, and wise for the ARS, and must be retained under all circumstances. And now you know the mind of the US government. We are so incredibly lucky to have you post to RRAP. You are practically a Shaman, and we hang on your every word as to the future of the ARS. Thak you. We are not worthy. |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Carl Zager wrote:
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message igy.com... "Alun" wrote in message ... I'm guessing that code CSCEs issued now will turn out to be good until element 1 is abolished. 73 de Alun, N3KIP Only if the code requirement is abolished in less than 365 days. Keep in mind that some of the petitions filed do call for keeping code for General or Extra while letting the Techs have some limited HF privileges. With the speed with the FCC is not moving, less than a year from now seems rather iffy. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE And ... a code CSCE is only "good" as follows: 1. For upgrade to General, one year. However, once a General, then the ^^^^^^^^ NO! It's good for 365 days, which is NOT always equal to one year, especially when a leap year is involved. element is part of the General package and allows upgrade to Extra without the one-year deadline or retaking. 2. Without upgrade to General/Extra, the element allows "Tech Plus" privileges, which were the bands and frequencies alloted to the Novice ticket, for as long as the holder remains a Technician. |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Alun wrote:
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in gy.com: "Alun" wrote in message ... "Dee D. Flint" wrote in gy.com: "Alun" wrote in message ... I'm guessing that code CSCEs issued now will turn out to be good until element 1 is abolished. 73 de Alun, N3KIP Only if the code requirement is abolished in less than 365 days. Keep in mind that some of the petitions filed do call for keeping code for General or Extra while letting the Techs have some limited HF privileges. With the speed with the FCC is not moving, less than a year from now seems rather iffy. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Well, you'd like to think so, I'm sure. Regardless of my wishes or your wishes, the government will take the time that it deems appropriate. Having dealt with a few government programs at times in my life, the snail's pace seems more typical than the speeding bullet pace. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE However, the code test was abolished by the ITU way back on July 5th last year. More than one year from _now_ would be more than eighteen months, which doesn't seem likely to me, nor is that fast by any stretch. So? That in no way means that the U.S. Government (FCC) EVER HAS TO adopt a completely code-free license structure at all. They could decide to keep everything status-quo, despite what the U.S. amateur community wants. What I say by this: That "it" could NEVER come. I am down for May 1st in the pool, which is only about 10 months. That maybe a little short, but I would be very surprised indeed if it went over 15 months, which would be this November. As I said, you would like to think it would take longer, but that is because you don't want it to happen. Perhaps I have picked an earlier date because I take the opposite view, but I doubt if I am out by more than a few months. |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alun wrote:
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in gy.com: "Alun" wrote in message .. . "Dee D. Flint" wrote in odigy.com: "Alun" wrote in message . 4... I'm guessing that code CSCEs issued now will turn out to be good until element 1 is abolished. 73 de Alun, N3KIP Only if the code requirement is abolished in less than 365 days. Keep in mind that some of the petitions filed do call for keeping code for General or Extra while letting the Techs have some limited HF privileges. With the speed with the FCC is not moving, less than a year from now seems rather iffy. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Well, you'd like to think so, I'm sure. Regardless of my wishes or your wishes, the government will take the time that it deems appropriate. Having dealt with a few government programs at times in my life, the snail's pace seems more typical than the speeding bullet pace. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE However, the code test was abolished by the ITU way back on July 5th last year. More than one year from _now_ would be more than eighteen months, which doesn't seem likely to me, nor is that fast by any stretch. I am down for May 1st in the pool, which is only about 10 months. That maybe a little short, but I would be very surprised indeed if it went over 15 months, which would be this November. As I said, you would like to think it would take longer, but that is because you don't want it to happen. Perhaps I have picked an earlier date because I take the opposite view, but I doubt if I am out by more than a few But what does all this have to do with Kim's callsign? - Mike KB3EIA - |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
D. Stussy wrote:
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Carl Zager wrote: "Dee D. Flint" wrote in message igy.com... "Alun" wrote in message ... I'm guessing that code CSCEs issued now will turn out to be good until element 1 is abolished. 73 de Alun, N3KIP Only if the code requirement is abolished in less than 365 days. Keep in mind that some of the petitions filed do call for keeping code for General or Extra while letting the Techs have some limited HF privileges. With the speed with the FCC is not moving, less than a year from now seems rather iffy. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE And ... a code CSCE is only "good" as follows: 1. For upgrade to General, one year. However, once a General, then the ^^^^^^^^ NO! It's good for 365 days, which is NOT always equal to one year, especially when a leap year is involved. Are leap seconds taken into account? - Mike KB3EIA - |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brian" wrote in message om... "Dee D. Flint" wrote in message igy.com... "Alun" wrote in message ... "Dee D. Flint" wrote in gy.com: "Alun" wrote in message ... I'm guessing that code CSCEs issued now will turn out to be good until element 1 is abolished. 73 de Alun, N3KIP Only if the code requirement is abolished in less than 365 days. Keep in mind that some of the petitions filed do call for keeping code for General or Extra while letting the Techs have some limited HF privileges. With the speed with the FCC is not moving, less than a year from now seems rather iffy. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Well, you'd like to think so, I'm sure. Regardless of my wishes or your wishes, the government will take the time that it deems appropriate. Having dealt with a few government programs at times in my life, the snail's pace seems more typical than the speeding bullet pace. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE D2, you are so incredibly wise. You immediately spotted and understood the corruption in the N2EY/W5TIT exchanges, and knew to stay away. You knew that Morse Code testing is healthy, wealhty, and wise for the ARS, and must be retained under all circumstances. And now you know the mind of the US government. We are so incredibly lucky to have you post to RRAP. You are practically a Shaman, and we hang on your every word as to the future of the ARS. Thak you. We are not worthy. I see you've had a bad day. Afterall I was merely posting my observations of the government inertia. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Coslo wrote in :
Alun wrote: "Dee D. Flint" wrote in gy.com: "Alun" wrote in message . .. "Dee D. Flint" wrote in rodigy.com: "Alun" wrote in message .4... I'm guessing that code CSCEs issued now will turn out to be good until element 1 is abolished. 73 de Alun, N3KIP Only if the code requirement is abolished in less than 365 days. Keep in mind that some of the petitions filed do call for keeping code for General or Extra while letting the Techs have some limited HF privileges. With the speed with the FCC is not moving, less than a year from now seems rather iffy. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Well, you'd like to think so, I'm sure. Regardless of my wishes or your wishes, the government will take the time that it deems appropriate. Having dealt with a few government programs at times in my life, the snail's pace seems more typical than the speeding bullet pace. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE However, the code test was abolished by the ITU way back on July 5th last year. More than one year from _now_ would be more than eighteen months, which doesn't seem likely to me, nor is that fast by any stretch. I am down for May 1st in the pool, which is only about 10 months. That maybe a little short, but I would be very surprised indeed if it went over 15 months, which would be this November. As I said, you would like to think it would take longer, but that is because you don't want it to happen. Perhaps I have picked an earlier date because I take the opposite view, but I doubt if I am out by more than a few But what does all this have to do with Kim's callsign? - Mike KB3EIA - Not much. There again, there does seem to be a correlation between pro-code testing and anti-t*ts! Put me down as anti-code testing and pro-t*ts!!! |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nice one, Alun - tit for tat!
![]() 73, Leo (Seated in the same fan section as Alun - oh, yeah!) On 16 Jan 2004 05:23:15 GMT, Alun wrote: Mike Coslo wrote in : But what does all this have to do with Kim's callsign? - Mike KB3EIA - Not much. There again, there does seem to be a correlation between pro-code testing and anti-t*ts! Put me down as anti-code testing and pro-t*ts!!! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL you can Kiss my $39.00 a Year Good Bye | Policy | |||
GOOD NEWS-------France heat wave deaths top 14,000 | Policy | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
A good wattmeter ? | Equipment | |||
Tech+ to General upgrade question | Policy |