Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keith,
Don't worry about the neighbors on this one. This could indeed become a tacky situation. Since amateurs are supposed to used the minimum amount of power for reliable communications, some coordination via the internet/telephone may be in order. You pick a frequency with a lot of interference from BPL. This means that both ends will have to use substantial power. Where there is an egress, there also exists an ingress; i.e., amateur transmissions will cause problems for BPL. At this point, complaints may well be made. The amateur will also have to enter a complaint. At this point, push is gonna come to shove. I suspect that some government/public communications will also have a problem. Obviously, they don't want to run much up into VHF or there would be a *ton* of problems, but there will have to be a point that someone either says we need reasonable coordination and protection - or - to heck with it, big money gets everything. Notice how (at least in my newspaper today) they are starting to talk about cutting social security? Not because it is going broke; rather, because the feds are 'borrowing' these funds to keep the deficite only rediculous rather than insane. The feds have to pay it back (and they already want to welch on it). It is about time that we see in print what the government *really* wants. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA "Keith" wrote in message ... Broadband over Power Lines has been approved for a NPRM by the full 5 commissioners of the FCC. What this means for all short wave listeners is that once BPL is deployed a SWL is not protected by any interference caused by BPL transmissions. SWL's use part 15 devices and most accept any interference. If BPL interfered with local Radio or TV broadcast then the licensee of those stations could complain, however I doubt if any SWL in America will be able to get a international broadcaster to complain to a utility company about BPL interference. Basically this could lead to the death of shortwave listening and ham radio is equally threatened. Ham radio and CB operators will face irate neighbors who have their BPL Internet connection interfered with by transmissions. I can easily see enraged neighbors calling their congress person complaining about the 'CBer' wiping out all the Internet connections in their neighborhoods and congress quickly passing a law placing the burden on the Ham Radio and CB Operator not to interfere with Internet BPL. The FCC has allowed the beginning of the end of HF operation by allowing BPL to use HF frequencies. IMHO -- Best Regards, Keith NW Oregon Radio http://kilowatt-radio.org/ http://linux.com http://freebsd.org http://apple.com --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.588 / Virus Database: 372 - Release Date: 2/13/04 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Keith wrote in message ...
Broadband over Power Lines has been approved for a NPRM by the full 5 commissioners of the FCC. What this means for all short wave listeners is that once BPL is deployed a SWL is not protected by any interference caused by BPL transmissions. SWL's use part 15 devices and most accept any interference. If BPL interfered with local Radio or TV broadcast then the licensee of those stations could complain, however I doubt if any SWL in America will be able to get a international broadcaster to complain to a utility company about BPL interference. Basically this could lead to the death of shortwave listening and ham radio is equally threatened. Ham radio and CB operators will face irate neighbors who have their BPL Internet connection interfered with by transmissions. I can easily see enraged neighbors calling their congress person complaining about the 'CBer' wiping out all the Internet connections in their neighborhoods and congress quickly passing a law placing the burden on the Ham Radio and CB Operator not to interfere with Internet BPL. The FCC has allowed the beginning of the end of HF operation by allowing BPL to use HF frequencies. IMHO WRONG but never mind. w3rv |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Keith" wrote in message ... Broadband over Power Lines has been approved for a NPRM by the full 5 commissioners of the FCC. What this means for all short wave listeners is that once BPL is deployed a SWL is not protected by any interference caused by BPL transmissions. SWL's use part 15 devices and most accept any interference. [snip] It's my guess that interference and the FCC are the least of BPL's problems. Now let's see if it's fast and reliable enough to get people to pay for it. Frank Dresser |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NPRM and VEC | General | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Three (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse coderequirement. | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||
7 MHz band expansion approved | Dx |