Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , PAMNO
(N2EY) writes: In article , (Len Over 21) writes: In article , writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , (N2EY) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , Alun writes: Everything RAN just fine...using the word "ran" (or "run") as in an adminstrative action or organizing, starting, keeping it going, and finally take-down. How do you know? The L.A. TIMES reported that, several TV news programs reported that, and at least one official with the Marathon said so to me. Is everyone required to wait for the "official" word from the ARRL on the verdict?!?!? You are mighty peevish again, perceiving personal insults at the slightest provocation. Not me. You're the one shouting and calling names. I didn't name anyone in the Marathon. :-) The very first marathons didn't need any ham radio to help them. Why do you keep implying that marathons MUST have ham radio help to be successful? My marathon PR (personal record) is 3 hours 57 minutes 37 seconds. Have you written the Guiness editors yet? You sound jealous, Len. Of what? :-) You haven't proved anything about ham radio being NECESSARY to stage and operate any marathon. What's your marathon PR, Len? I don't do Public Relations any more, Good. Your style here indicates you'd be very bad at it. Tsk, tsk, tsk..."you sound jealous." :-) Consider that Sports CARS are in Road Races...on roads. They're not allowed in the LA Marathon. Never said they were. Road Races are run by sports cars on roads. Marathoners run on foot. TAFKARJ sounds like he is developing Road Rage... :-) They're called road races, Len. I KNOW some sports car racing events are called ROAD RACES. Try not to be too much like the Schoolmaster who was once assigned to the far Amana Colonies... As suspected, you were not involved in the LA Marathon in any way except as a distant spectator. Do you now need the EXACT distance from my TV set to the northernmost point on the marathon route?!?!?! You're getting to be as nuts as the gunnery nurse. I has WRITTEN IN PUBLIC that I WATCHED the marathon. Are your eyes shot from all that running exertion that you can't read? But, you never answered about "carrying a code key" while running. Do you? You've never said anything about "working DX" while running either. Is RUNNING (on foot) something REQUIRED in amateur radio? Or are you personally disturbed because no one ackhnowledges your fleetness of foot and renowned running time? Go rent a DVD of "The Running Man." Consider that the star managed to get elected to Governor of a state. Aim high, TAFKARJ. Governorship is far better than ham radio...you could win and tell MILLIONS what to do and how to behave! Now, what in the world has all this fuss and bother you are stirring to do with AMATEUR RADIO? Sorry to divert you from all those splended AMATEUR RADIO subjects like national economy, politics, morality, kosher food. You keep up the good work and keep on essaying in the newsgroup every day. Folks are hanging on every word...or is that wanting to hang you for all those words? :-) Walk the plonk... LHA / WMD |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Dave Heil
writes: . Were they all just plain wrong? No, but you are. LHA / WMD |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Dave Heil
writes: You can buy an Orion too, Leonard. I can also by an H2 and pay cash. Don't care to. You can think of it as a very expensive SWL receiver. No, I think of it as an updated version of the defunct Kachina. Poor baby, still miffed because I KNOW how SDRs work and you don't have a clue? Ah, but you can do 20 wpm and operate! Wow! Blazing along at 1/3 the speed of an old, obsolete Model 15 Teletype. Go for it! :-) LHA / WMD |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Dave Heil
writes: I am forte-laden, Leonard. One of mine is that I'm a radio amateur. You aren't. Right...I'm a professional radio person and have been since 1952. [didn't you get an oriongasm on the last sit-down in fron of your orion? Tsk, tsk, tsk... ] LHA / WMD |
#46
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Mike Coslo
writes: N2EY wrote: Mike Coslo wrote in message ... A local bike race decided to try using cell phones as an experiment last year. The hams were along, with the knowledge that we might be "redundant in the future. They found out: Every person had to be called separately. When a message had to go to the whole group, everyone had to be called. Those who were out of coverage range did not get the messages. Coverage over the entire course was pretty bad. Using cell phones was an immediate and complete failure. they realized this on the first call that had to go to everyone. They couldn't figure all that out ahead of time? Amazingly enough, no! Cell phones are seductive little things. After all you can call around the world, send pictures of whatever, and even look up your email on the web with them. So how on earth can such a wonderful instrument *not* be good at running a race? Imagine, each and every participant with their own little radio, ready for direct contact. Well, there you have it: They did not understand their communications needs. Any conclusion may be reached with insufficient thought! Can I steal that phrase? It's the perfect companion to this one: "If it happens, it must be possible." Sounds to me like the hams were smart enough to simply let them try it and see the problems first-hand. Yup. All of us that had done events before just chuckled and waited. First call for our help came through a couple minutes after the start. Fortunate that you folks were there. Those same problems surfaced in groups searching for wreckage from the space shuttle disaster last year. Of course cell phones *do* have uses in those situations. Where one specific person needs to talk to another specific person, and both are in the coverage area, they're perfect. Sure enough. But when many people need to hear instructions at the same time, or if the area is large and rural, You need a multi-mode system, and not just line of site low power stuff. Seems to me that *both* have a role. Cell phones work for some things, but the idea that they can replace radio operators is best advanced by those that don't really know how that particular job is done. You mean like folks who comment on marathons without ever having been involved in one other than as a spectator? Or like folks who comment on amateur radio without ever having been involved other than as a spectator? Well, when you put it *that* way, yup! We call 'em "sidewalk superintendents" or "armchair athletes". http://www.lamarathon.com/2004/volunteers.php Some hams and ham equipment spotted in the pix. Of course. http://www.doitsports.com/volunteer/info.tcl?job_id=488 (sign up for radio operators - only licensed hams need apply) Really? I thunk all you needed was a cell phone and the ability to say "can you hear me now?....how about now? 8^) That's what some "professionals" would have us believe... Any conclusion is possible given insufficient......... oh wait, I already said that, didn't I? Bears repeating. http://www.cert-la.com/ (scroll down a bit to where it says "ham radio operators wanted") Do you think maybe they put that in as an affirmative action sort of thing? Maybe they just wanted to get the Hams to shut their yap's? ;^) Naw, it's simpler than that. Besides their considerable skills and experience, ham volunteers at events like the LA Marathon provide their own equipment and usually their own transportation and other support. Try hiring 200 "communications professionals" for a day just to supply radio communications and see what happens to the race entry fee. (LA says 200 hams, NYC marathon says 400, but of course NYC is a lot bigger race). The price for professional radio operators would be from 80 to 160 thousand dollars for an 8 hour day, according to my BOE scribbling. Marathon day is a lot longer than 8 hours. Figure that the staff is on the course at least two hours before the starting gun, and that the slowest particiapnts will finish in more than 5-6 hours, plus awards ceremony, cleanup, etc., and it's not an 8 hour day for anybody. With 20,000 participants, that's 4 to 8 dollars tacked on to the entry fee. Which reminds me...time to put the running shoes on.. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "N2EY" wrote in message ... In article , Mike Coslo writes: The price for professional radio operators would be from 80 to 160 thousand dollars for an 8 hour day, according to my BOE scribbling. Marathon day is a lot longer than 8 hours. Figure that the staff is on the course at least two hours before the starting gun, and that the slowest particiapnts will finish in more than 5-6 hours, plus awards ceremony, cleanup, etc., and it's not an 8 hour day for anybody. With 20,000 participants, that's 4 to 8 dollars tacked on to the entry fee. Which reminds me...time to put the running shoes on.. 73 de Jim, N2EY You left out another block of time. For a large event, there needs to be a planning/coordination meeting in advance of the marathon that the communications staff would need to attend. Paid operators won't attend that for free either. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#49
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alun wrote in message . ..
(William) wrote in om: Alun wrote in message . .. (N2EY) wrote in om: Alun wrote in message .. . snip I think access to education is already a problem and likely to get worse. At the same time it's probably about the only antidote to offshore production. Then it should be a major priority, rather than trips to Mars ans such. Or foreign adventuring. True. We could just sit on our fat asses and let the world implode. Then we'd have lots of dxpeditions cleverly disguised as UN peace missions with 400,000 qso's per foray. As opposed to dxpeditions disguised as invasions? You tell me. The sun never sets on the _______________ Empire. |
#50
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400  June 11, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400  June 11, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1389 – March 26, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | General |