Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#61
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#62
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Len Over 21 wrote: In article , PAMNO (N2EY) writes: Seems to me that at the bottom of it all is the fact that people will pay the inflated tuitions because colege is seen as an absolute necessity these days. "Colege?" An MSEE who failed English? :-) Is a college or university degree necessary for being an radio amateur? Is an amateur radio license test equal to a college or university examination? Walk the plonk, TAFKARJ... I seem to remember you using terms like "Atila" and "beligerant" and you used them more than once, indicating not a typographical error but in inability to spell the words. You're quite a fellow, Len. Dave K8MN |
#64
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anonymous wrote in message news:O0FTRUFS38060.5117592593@anonymous...
how's things in colorado, billy, me boy? Dunno. Haven't been there since about 85. How are things in la-la land? |
#65
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Heil wrote in message ...
Len Over 21 wrote: In article , PAMNO (N2EY) writes: Seems to me that at the bottom of it all is the fact that people will pay the inflated tuitions because colege is seen as an absolute necessity these days. "Colege?" An MSEE who failed English? :-) Is a college or university degree necessary for being an radio amateur? Is an amateur radio license test equal to a college or university examination? Walk the plonk, TAFKARJ... I seem to remember you using terms like "Atila" and "beligerant" and you used them more than once, indicating not a typographical error but in inability to spell the words. You're quite a fellow, Len. Dave K8MN in inability |
#66
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
N2EY wrote:
In article , Mike Coslo writes: N2EY wrote: Mike Coslo wrote in message ... A local bike race decided to try using cell phones as an experiment last year. The hams were along, with the knowledge that we might be "redundant in the future. They found out: Every person had to be called separately. When a message had to go to the whole group, everyone had to be called. Those who were out of coverage range did not get the messages. Coverage over the entire course was pretty bad. Using cell phones was an immediate and complete failure. they realized this on the first call that had to go to everyone. They couldn't figure all that out ahead of time? Amazingly enough, no! Cell phones are seductive little things. After all you can call around the world, send pictures of whatever, and even look up your email on the web with them. So how on earth can such a wonderful instrument *not* be good at running a race? Imagine, each and every participant with their own little radio, ready for direct contact. Well, there you have it: They did not understand their communications needs. And they really don't have to. Problem is that so many people think that they are "high-tech" when they use a cell phone or surf the web, when in truth, they don't know one thing about what they are doing. Ask the average person about how a cell phone works, or how that computer works, and odds are they will draw a blank. That's okay, as knowledge isn't mandated, but if they try to put together a comm support network with the level of knowledge that they *do* have, they are more likely than not to suffer failure. In other words, they are reaching a conclusion with insufficient thought. My thoughts are to learn to do it correctly, or allow someone that *does* know to do their job. - Mike KB3EIA - |
#67
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
N2EY wrote:
In article , Mike Coslo writes: Fortunate that you folks were there. A young lady that fell and got a pavement rash certainly thought so. We got there first aid, a repair truck, and back in the race. Year before that, a fellow had a collision with a rear view mirror on a car and messed his hand up. And while maybe it *could* have been done by "professionals", the fact is that it *was* done by amateurs. Some folks get all bent out of shape by such plain, simple facts. Whatever else can be said about hams, in general, they provide inexpensive and reliable support for public events in which they give free time to support charities or other nonprofit groups. Not possible to dispute. That some people have a problem with that is a bigger statement about those people than it is about Hams. - Mike KB3EIA - |
#68
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , (William) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... Ah, but you can do 20 wpm and operate! Wow! Blazing along at 1/3 the speed of an old, obsolete Model 15 Teletype. Go for it! :-) LHA / WMD Someone musta flipped over his rock. I don't think so. Mr. Foreign Service Dave just wants attention to himself so he can order folks around during his misdirectional postings. He can't come up with any convincing arguments against morse code test elimination so he loves to bait and misdirect the NCTA. He wants a Chat Room atmosphere where he can vie with TAFKARJ for King of the Chat Room. Mr. Former Service desires attention for himself and his past involvement in military and civilian radio so he can attempt to impress mere radio amateurs. As to misdirection, witness the subject of the L.A. Marathon, introduced by you and your quick change of direction when confronted by fact. The PCTA regulars all want to misdirect into Chat Room fights for ascendency. That way they think they can hurt others by trying to show they are all expert at NON-amateur radio subjects...and then hit on others anywhichwaytheycan for speaking against them. Funny. Are you trying to hurt others by trying to show that you're an expert IN amateur radio subjects. You seem to hit on others for speaking against you. It looks like they want to be the Biggest Rock in a field of pebbles. When it comes to amateur radio, you have yet to become a pebble. Dave K8MN |
#69
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article m, "Dee D. Flint" writes: You left out another block of time. For a large event, there needs to be a planning/coordination meeting in advance of the marathon that the communications staff would need to attend. Paid operators won't attend that for free either. Were the very first marathons, especially in the Olympic Games, run by professionals? The Los Angeles 2004 Marathon used LAPD and LAFD personnel who are paid all the time. Do they count in your analysis? Are marathon rules and regulations in Part 97, Title 47 C.F.R.? Do marathoners and marathon staff need to learn morse code in order to make the event a success? Skip the shuck and jive routine, Len. You seem to forget that you told us that amateur radio wasn't involved in the L.A. Marathon. Fact has never dissueded you from promoting your view as gospel. Dave K8MN |
#70
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , PAMNO (N2EY) writes: In article , (Len Over 21) writes: In article , writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , (N2EY) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , Alun writes: The very first marathons didn't need any ham radio to help them. No and the Greeks and Persians didn't use any short range bombers during their wars. Why do you keep implying that marathons MUST have ham radio help to be successful? I didn't see that implied. Don't waffle, Len. You introduced the topic of the Los Angeles Marathon and you claimed that amateur radio wasn't involved. It is a good thing you're typing your responses 'cuz you surely couldn't talk with that foot in your mouth. You haven't proved anything about ham radio being NECESSARY to stage and operate any marathon. That isn't the issue at all. You said that amateur radio WASN'T involved in a particular marathon. You were dead wrong. Road Races are run by sports cars on roads. On tires. Marathoners run on foot. On roads. Try not to be too much like the Schoolmaster who was once assigned to the far Amana Colonies... I'm not a schoolmaster and I've never heard of the Amana Colonies. You might want to make those the subject of one of your frequent lectures. Dave K8MN |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400  June 11, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400  June 11, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1389 – March 26, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | General |