| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
April 4th 04, 04:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: All that flappin'
From: (William) Date: 4/3/2004 9:05 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: All that flappin' From: (William) Date: 4/2/2004 7:19 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... EVERY nurse or paramedic is "selective (in) who he would treat in an emergency". It's called "triage". Back peddle. Tap dance. Cover up what you know you meant. And YOU "know" what I meant, Brain? I said that you know what you meant. And HOW did you KNOW what I "meant"...??? You don't even know what YOU mean... I'll leave it to the trial lawyers when they drag your posts thru a malpractice suit. Idiot. There's an idot here, Brian, but I am trying to not rub his nose in his business again. Carl says I am not playing nice. Lord knows I lose sleep at night worrying about Carl's assessment of newsgroup behaviour. You really should stop making stupid statements concerning who you would and would not treat in your profession. There's nothing "stupid" about it. Black, Red, Yellow or Green. You get treated accordingly. Sorry, Steve, but I'm neither black, red, nor yellow (who'se green???). I'm caucasian like almost all hams. Do you refuse to treat caucasians? If you're ever a victim at a disaster scene, you WILL be one of those colors, regardless of your pigmentation. 73 Steve, K4YZ BTW: You state that "almost all hams" are "caucasians". I suggest that you do a by-country census and figure out where the "most" of those "almost all" hams are, Brian. The figures don't support your assertion...Again... 73 Steve, K4YZ |
|
#2
April 4th 04, 11:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#3
April 5th 04, 03:04 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Subject: All that flappin'
From: (William) Date: 4/4/2004 4:53 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Steve, K4YZ BTW: You state that "almost all hams" are "caucasians". I suggest that you do a by-country census and figure out where the "most" of those "almost all" hams are, Brian. The figures don't support your assertion...Again... 73 Steve, K4YZ I want t hear the "pop" when you pull your head out. "Ham " is uniquely American. If NOTHING ELSE ever proved to me that you have almost ZERO, IF ANY experience operating from any foreign part of the world, THAT was it. Amateur Radio IS "ham" radio all over the world. Amateur Radio IS "ham" radio in ALL of Japan, Malaysia, the Phillipines, Europe and Africa. It is also in common literature of most South American Amateur Radio publications and newsletters. The term "ham" radio is part-and-parcel of the cover of the most popular Amateur Radio journal in Japan. I believe that other persons in this forum can verify for you that Japan's Amateur census is far in excess of the United States'. Brian, I have been trying to give you an "out" for the last 24 hours since everyone is making a lot of noise about "playing nice", but you keep making really stupid assertions that are so easily refuted that I have to wonder what your REAL problem is. If you have any doubts about any of what I have said about the use of the term "ham" being a "generic" and therefore worldwide reference to Amateur Radio, then just ask... Now...WHO can hear that "pop", Brian...?!?! 73 Steve, K4YZ |
|
#5
April 7th 04, 12:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Subject: All that flappin'
From: (William) Date: 4/6/2004 4:23 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... The term "ham" radio is part-and-parcel of the cover of the most popular Amateur Radio journal in Japan. I believe that other persons in this forum can verify for you that Japan's Amateur census is far in excess of the United States'. So you want to jump up and down and cite Japanese Amateur Radio when it suits your purpose, but when I told you 10 years ago that they have a no-code HF license, you didn't want to talk about it. It wasn't really an amateur license. It was like "CB Radio." Now we're all brother "Hams." How nice. I never said the Japanese low-power HF license was "like CB", Brian...Not once, not at all. Also, YOU said the term was "uniquely American". I proved you wrong so you make accusations that are false. Nice try. I'd ask you to provide a quote from a valid post, but since I know there's none, why waste the bandwidth...?!?! Steve, K4YZ |
|
#6
April 7th 04, 12:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: All that flappin' From: (William) Date: 4/6/2004 4:23 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... The term "ham" radio is part-and-parcel of the cover of the most popular Amateur Radio journal in Japan. I believe that other persons in this forum can verify for you that Japan's Amateur census is far in excess of the United States'. So you want to jump up and down and cite Japanese Amateur Radio when it suits your purpose, but when I told you 10 years ago that they have a no-code HF license, you didn't want to talk about it. It wasn't really an amateur license. It was like "CB Radio." Now we're all brother "Hams." How nice. I never said the Japanese low-power HF license was "like CB", Brian...Not once, not at all. Also, YOU said the term was "uniquely American". I proved you wrong so you make accusations that are false. Nice try. Just like the Japanese to copy something uniquely American. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
