Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old April 11th 04, 05:13 PM
WA8ULX
 
Posts: n/a
Default The solution to Dumbing Down

Subject: I have the solution to Dumbing Down
From: (WA8ULX)
Date: 4/10/04 11:13 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Well I was waiting till the time was right, its not right yet, but I might as
well tell you.
First the solution to Dumbing Down is easy, we can thank BPL for the solution.
I have been recording on Air QSO by Hams who have made comments in regards to
Jamming BPL. I have also been saving messages by Hams which have stated the
same. The recordings and messages are on CDs that I have and will continue to
collect.
Since the FCC and so called Ham Orgs have decided that the best thing for Ham
Radio is Dumbing Down, and I have decided that it is not the best thing.
Heres what Im going to do. As soon as the FCC converts Ham Radio into CBHAM
Radio.
I will wait for the first BPL complaint by the Utilities, at that point
the CDs will go to the Utility that is complaining, im sure there Lawyers will
know what to do with the info, also a copy will go to the
FCC. This should give the FCC and the BPL Company more than enought info to put
the blame on HAMS. At that point I will also make a suggestion on how to solve
the BPL problem. My comment to BPL and FCC will be to reduce power level of all
HF Ham XMITTERS to 50 WATTS ERP or less, if 50 Watts to much then it can always
be adjusted down, this should reduce BPL Problems.
What burden will that put on Hams, not much for the CW operators, now for SSB
CBplussers it may be a problem, but it shouldnt be, you guys are so tallented
you should be able to overcome that problem. Theres is more that I will
recomend to BPL but I will save that for latter.

  #3   Report Post  
Old April 11th 04, 06:06 PM
WA8ULX
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You can believe TROLL all you want, what I posted is FACTS
  #5   Report Post  
Old April 11th 04, 11:07 PM
JJ
 
Posts: n/a
Default

WA8ULX wrote:

Subject: I have the solution to Dumbing Down
From: (WA8ULX)
Date: 4/10/04 11:13 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Well I was waiting till the time was right, its not right yet, but I might as
well tell you.
First the solution to Dumbing Down is easy, we can thank BPL for the solution.
I have been recording on Air QSO by Hams who have made comments in regards to
Jamming BPL. I have also been saving messages by Hams which have stated the
same. The recordings and messages are on CDs that I have and will continue to
collect.
Since the FCC and so called Ham Orgs have decided that the best thing for Ham
Radio is Dumbing Down, and I have decided that it is not the best thing.
Heres what Im going to do. As soon as the FCC converts Ham Radio into CBHAM
Radio.
I will wait for the first BPL complaint by the Utilities, at that point
the CDs will go to the Utility that is complaining, im sure there Lawyers will
know what to do with the info, also a copy will go to the
FCC. This should give the FCC and the BPL Company more than enought info to put
the blame on HAMS. At that point I will also make a suggestion on how to solve
the BPL problem. My comment to BPL and FCC will be to reduce power level of all
HF Ham XMITTERS to 50 WATTS ERP or less, if 50 Watts to much then it can always
be adjusted down, this should reduce BPL Problems.
What burden will that put on Hams, not much for the CW operators, now for SSB
CBplussers it may be a problem, but it shouldnt be, you guys are so tallented
you should be able to overcome that problem. Theres is more that I will
recomend to BPL but I will save that for latter.


You must enjoy cutting off your nose in spite of your face, although
that might be an improvement.



  #6   Report Post  
Old April 12th 04, 12:58 AM
WA8ULX
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You must enjoy cutting off your nose in spite of your face, although
that might be an improvement.


Nope its just what needs to be done.
  #7   Report Post  
Old April 15th 04, 03:07 AM
Jim Hampton
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I assume that you will also suggest that low band VHF television stations
*also* reduce their power to 50 watts? They do not operate at the 100 or
1000 watt level, you know - and 56 to 60 MHz is channel two television in
the US. 60 to 64 is channel 3 ....

Actually, this could prove hilarious. I think there is a channel 3 in
Syracuse, NY, just 60 miles away or so ...
Oh, puleeeze do us that favor

73 from Rochester, NY
Jim AA2QA

"WA8ULX" wrote in message
...
Subject: I have the solution to Dumbing Down
From: (WA8ULX)
Date: 4/10/04 11:13 PM Central Daylight Time
Message-id:

Well I was waiting till the time was right, its not right yet, but I

might as
well tell you.
First the solution to Dumbing Down is easy, we can thank BPL for the

solution.
I have been recording on Air QSO by Hams who have made comments in

regards to
Jamming BPL. I have also been saving messages by Hams which have stated

the
same. The recordings and messages are on CDs that I have and will continue

to
collect.
Since the FCC and so called Ham Orgs have decided that the best thing for

Ham
Radio is Dumbing Down, and I have decided that it is not the best thing.
Heres what Im going to do. As soon as the FCC converts Ham Radio into

CBHAM
Radio.
I will wait for the first BPL complaint by the Utilities, at that point
the CDs will go to the Utility that is complaining, im sure there Lawyers

will
know what to do with the info, also a copy will go to the
FCC. This should give the FCC and the BPL Company more than enought info

to put
the blame on HAMS. At that point I will also make a suggestion on how to

solve
the BPL problem. My comment to BPL and FCC will be to reduce power level

of all
HF Ham XMITTERS to 50 WATTS ERP or less, if 50 Watts to much then it can

always
be adjusted down, this should reduce BPL Problems.
What burden will that put on Hams, not much for the CW operators, now for

SSB
CBplussers it may be a problem, but it shouldnt be, you guys are so

tallented
you should be able to overcome that problem. Theres is more that I will
recomend to BPL but I will save that for latter.



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (
http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.657 / Virus Database: 422 - Release Date: 4/13/04


  #8   Report Post  
Old April 16th 04, 02:47 AM
King Zulu
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"WA8ULX" wrote in message
...
...
FCC will be to reduce power level of all
HF Ham XMITTERS to 50 WATTS ERP or less, if 50 Watts to much then it can

always
be adjusted down, this should reduce BPL Problems.


Darn, I thought it would go the other way. The FCC would require all amateur
stations to run a KW minimum so that no one could complain about
interference from BPL due to weak ham signals. That would seem to be the
only right solution.

AK


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
DJ-V5T Programmer (RT Systems) - Install without floppy - solution Ed Elliott Equipment 0 June 10th 04 12:25 AM
DJ-V5T Programmer (RT Systems) - Install without floppy - solution Ed Elliott Equipment 0 June 10th 04 12:25 AM
Non-directional tracking solution? Washed Phenom Homebrew 32 May 29th 04 05:49 AM
KENWOOD 940 "NO MATCH" SOLUTION. Charles J. Shaw Equipment 0 December 30th 03 02:03 AM
Could This Be The Solution? N2EY Policy 40 September 17th 03 05:25 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017