Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . net, "KØHB"
writes: "Jason Hsu" wrote in message . com... | Until the ARRL proposal came out, I had never heard anyone propose | automatic upgrades of Technician licensees to the General class. Now | that this proposal has come out, many people are defending this part | of the proposal. People support the ARRL proposal because it gives about 65% of all existing hams a coupon for a free pass to General or Extra. That suggests that the proposal would gain 65% support right out of the box. Even NCI has decided to support it, but then the vast majority of NCI members are techs who would be eligible for the freebie. Thank you for that fair and equitable objective viewpoint, seasoned old sea salt. What's the percentage of the ARRL membership that are Techs compared to other classes? Remember that the no-code-test Tech license is over a third of ALL amateur licensees in the US. ARRL membership was down to 21% of all US ham licensees in December. Down from July and that down from December a year before. See any connections there? :-) LHA / WMD |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why the ARRL proposed upgrading Technicians to General | Policy | |||
Upgrading to from Tech Plus to General, help on a FCC Form 605 question please | General | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio in the 21st Century? | Policy | |||
Tech+ to General upgrade question | Policy |