"Alun" wrote

Not that I would want to work
Dan, who is on record as saying
that all phone ops are lids..

You must be mistaken. I just checked my log and I've worked W4NTI
dozens of times over the past few years. Nearly half of the Q's were on
SSB (I think that mode qualifies as "phone".) Certainly Dan wouldn't
work people he considers "lids".

Good luck on this one now!

73, de Hans, K0HB/4ID

"KØHB" wrote in news:GxBqc.1017$Tn6.35
@newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net:


"Alun" wrote

Not that I would want to work
Dan, who is on record as saying that all phone ops are lids..

You must be mistaken. I just checked my log and I've worked W4NTI
dozens of times over the past few years. Nearly half of the Q's were on
SSB (I think that mode qualifies as "phone".) Certainly Dan wouldn't
work people he considers "lids".

Good luck on this one now!

73, de Hans, K0HB/4ID





He said that phone ops are lids in the group. He tried to backtrack on
that, but google preserves his words indefinitely.

"Alun" wrote

He said that phone ops are lids in the group. He tried to backtrack on
that, but google preserves his words indefinitely.

I just did a google search on the phrase "phone ops are lids in the
group" and only your message came back. I don't believe Dan said "phone
ops are lids in the group".

73, de Hans, K0HB

On Thu, 20 May 2004 13:26:51 GMT, "KØHB"
wrote:

I just did a google search on the phrase "phone ops are lids in the
group" and only your message came back. I don't believe Dan said "phone
ops are lids in the group".

73, de Hans, K0HB


For the sake of getting things straight, guys, the statement Dan made
was as follows:

"I actually do consider ALUN a lid. Because he has stated he is a
phone operator ONLY. To me that is a lid."

73 DE John, KC2HMZ
Tonawanda, New York

"Radio Amateur KC2HMZ" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 20 May 2004 13:26:51 GMT, "KØHB"
wrote:

I just did a google search on the phrase "phone ops are lids in the
group" and only your message came back. I don't believe Dan said "phone
ops are lids in the group".

73, de Hans, K0HB


For the sake of getting things straight, guys, the statement Dan made
was as follows:

"I actually do consider ALUN a lid. Because he has stated he is a
phone operator ONLY. To me that is a lid."

73 DE John, KC2HMZ
Tonawanda, New York


And I still say that.

Dan/W4NTI

"KØHB" wrote in news:vm2rc.3350$be.3117
@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net:


"Alun" wrote

He said that phone ops are lids in the group. He tried to backtrack on
that, but google preserves his words indefinitely.

I just did a google search on the phrase "phone ops are lids in the
group" and only your message came back. I don't believe Dan said "phone
ops are lids in the group".

73, de Hans, K0HB





Hans, what I meant was he said "phone ops are lids" in the group, not that
he said "phone ops are lids in the group". Obviously I need to spell things
out for you to get it.

Here is his original post (in quotes below):-

From: Dan/W4NTI )
Subject: Morse and Contests

View this article only
Newsgroups: rec.radio.amateur.policy
Date: 2004-05-01 14:32:13 PST

"N2EY" wrote in message
m...


Perhaps someone can explain a certain operating habit I hear on Field
Day - but only one 'phone:

I hear most FD 'phone ops repeating the *received* exchange. That is,
you'll hear:

"November Two Echo Yankee from November Three Kilo Zed, roger your One
Bravo Eastern Pennsylvania, OK on your 1B EPA, please copy my three
alfa ...."

Why do so many deem it necessary to tell me what I just told them?
Heck, I know what class and section I'm in!

On CW, the single letter "R" does the job, and some ops don't even
bother with the R - they send their exchange as an indication that
they got yours. Or they send "TU" - (thank you) which does the job of
"roger" and "73" both.

--

One other point: Neither FD nor SS have the signal report as part of
the contact. FD is callsign, section and class, SS is serial number,
class, callsign, check and section, plus date and time which you don't
have to send but which are part of the required logging.

73 de Jim, N2EY

Well Jim, I think it means that phone ops are lids and real hams do it
with
continous wave.

Dan/W4NTI


So now you can all see, he said exactly what I said he did.

"KØHB" wrote in message nk.net...
"Alun" wrote

Not that I would want to work
Dan, who is on record as saying
that all phone ops are lids..

You must be mistaken. I just checked my log and I've worked W4NTI
dozens of times over the past few years. Nearly half of the Q's were on
SSB (I think that mode qualifies as "phone".) Certainly Dan wouldn't
work people he considers "lids".

Good luck on this one now!

73, de Hans, K0HB/4ID

That would make Dan a self-declared lid.

"William" wrote in message
om...
"KØHB" wrote in message
nk.net...
"Alun" wrote

Not that I would want to work
Dan, who is on record as saying
that all phone ops are lids..

You must be mistaken. I just checked my log and I've worked W4NTI
dozens of times over the past few years. Nearly half of the Q's were on
SSB (I think that mode qualifies as "phone".) Certainly Dan wouldn't
work people he considers "lids".

Good luck on this one now!

73, de Hans, K0HB/4ID

That would make Dan a self-declared lid.

Not really. I operate phone, have so for years. It's just that if that is
ALL you do in ham radio, I think your a LID.

LID = Poor Operator

Dan/W4NTI

"KØHB" wrote in message
k.net...

"Alun" wrote

Not that I would want to work
Dan, who is on record as saying
that all phone ops are lids..

You must be mistaken. I just checked my log and I've worked W4NTI
dozens of times over the past few years. Nearly half of the Q's were on
SSB (I think that mode qualifies as "phone".) Certainly Dan wouldn't
work people he considers "lids".

Good luck on this one now!

73, de Hans, K0HB/4ID



Thank you Hans,

I actually do consider ALUN a lid. Because he has stated he is a phone
operator ONLY. To me that is a lid.

Dan/W4NTI