Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#51
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Mike Coslo
writes: The exact process I used for getting my license was: First I took an online test. First couple times did just awful. In both General and Extra, I started out at about the 50 percent level. That's really pretty good for a start, with no preparation. Downloaded the question pool. Used it as reading material on the throne and around the house. But mostly as a post-test reference Did you highlight the right answers or black out the wrong ones? Continued taking the online tests. For every question I got wrong on the tests, I researched out the answer. Sources were reference books and the 'net. Yep. Continued until I scored 100 percent pretty consistently. And the actual test was a breeze, right? What you did was to 'study the test'. Which isn't "wrong" or illegal, despite what some may rant about it. You did what worked for you, within the rules. Which do you *really* think requires more understanding of the mateiral and the concepts behind it - a test where you don't know the exact Q&A beforehand, or one where you do? All the same to me. Really? And I think my method above says something more. Being smart is not necessarily knowing something - it is knowing what you know, knowing what you don't know, and knowing where to get the answer so you *do* know. Kinda like the difference between schooling and education. If you make questions up, you have to have a reference for them someplace. Is it in a book? fine, study the book then. Is it a question pool? Fine also. *If* you only care about right answers rather than understanding. Not really. I saw a electrician licensing test book with question pool recently. Lives depend on the electrician doing safe and proper work. and they are depending on the Electrician knowing. But someone cannot become a licensed electrician by written tests alone. There are extensive practical tests and experience requirements as well, and several levels of licensing. IIRC, here in PA it takes 9000 hours of documented work experience under the supervision of a licensed electrician to be licensed at the highest level. Rote memorization? Seriously if anyone rote memorizes the General and Extra tests, they are very intelligent and very stupid at the same time. Depends on the person and the subject. In some areas, the only way to know the material is rote memorization. (How long is a ham license term?) Of course, but that is diluting the issue. No other way to learn that stuff. The problem is that more and more of the test is becoming "that stuff". And they will have a few curves thrown at them at test time. How? The test questions are all in the pool. Read the pool and you have seen every possible question and answer. All my tests have been from the question pool, so it is something I have some advantage over many people here. Actual knowledge rather than opinion. I take a simulated test every so often just to maintain an even strain. The answers are not always in the same order as they are in the pool. I experienced this in my Extra test. And if the person knows the text of the answer, they almost certainly *know* the answer. That takes a level of understanding much greater than "This question's answer is "D" Nobody with any sense memorizes the answer letters! But being able to know which answer is right after having seen the exact Q&A several times before doesn't guarantee any level of understanding. For example, I could ask: - Which of the following are blunatrons? (Flufnagles, zinthorps, calinars, rhenotors) A) Fluffnagles and rhenotors only B) Zinthorps only C) Calinars and zinthorps only D) Calinars, zinthorps and fluffnagles (Of course the correct answer is C) Now, if you remember that calinars and zinthorps are blunatrons but fluffnagles and rhenotors aren't, you'll always get the question right. But do you really understand anything about blunatrons? Heck, download the pool as a Word or text document, edit out the wrong answers, print the questions up on 3x5 cards and just read the dern things while in the room of many doors. Remember the game "Trivial Pursuit"? When it was a big deal ~20 years ago, I used to carry a handful of the cards in my pocket and read them at odd times (on the subway, waiting for the elevator, etc.) Didn't consciously try to memorize them, just read them. I was soon nearly unbeatable - as long as the game used the Original edition cards. The question pools have far fewer questions than the Trivial Pursuit cards did. A thought: If a question pool is cheating, then a book with the answers in the test in the course of reading is cheating too Question pools don't equal cheating unless they are supposed to be secret. So... The only way that *some* Hams will be happy is if the test questions have answers in no book - that is to say that all testing will have to be in the form of basic research - the new ham will have to advance the state of the art in his/her admission test. bwaaahaahaa Otherwise the new ham is cheating and isn't as good as the old ham. 8^) (I just recently had to listen to an old timer in person on a tirade about the worthless new hams - again.) Why did you have to listen? I find turning on my heel and walking away does wonders. Or, looking the ranter straight in the eye and saying, "You're just wrong...." (lookit how the oldest ranter here on rrap reacts to being told he's wrong - which he often is....) Well, it wasn't a case where I could or should have turned away. I supposed I could have kicked the person out, but I also needed the help he was giving on a task. Real life has a habit of modifying our behavior. Plus ut wasn't a personal attack. Most hams I know think I'm a relative old timer. But its still irritating. Well, he was just plain wrong. The test is just one part of being qualified. Of course. But sometimes we have to work with people that are just plain wrong. Yep. Every once in a while, I'll mention something like "Hey, I resemble that remark!" There was an old song called "Patches" that you may recall from high school days. Man is remembering how tough he had it as a kid. Among the folks I grew up with, we still use the line "And then the rains came, and washed all the crops away" whenever somebody starts geezering. hehe, I used to do a good rendition of the line after that - "And at the age of thirteen, I felt I had the weight of the whooole world on my shoulders" 8^) "And Mama knew what I was going through..." That's the one! It's particularly effective when someone is going on and one about something like how tough it was to find a parking space, or how long the line at Starbucks was this morning, and three people do it, one taking each line... Besides, what it all comes down to is this: Hams - old and new - didn't change the exam procedures. Neither did ARRL, NCI, NCVEC or any other ham group. FCC did, because it saved them resources. We aren't going to a system other than multiple-choice published-Q&A-pool exams in the foreseeable future. Just not gonna happen. Just a thought here... If we were to say, go to a book oriented reference for the tests, I can assure you that it would be no better than the pool based system. Sure it would. But we're not going to go back to secret tests. Not gonna happen - at least not anytime soon. Why get in a lather over it? Thousands and thousands of college students prove this on a daily basis, pulling all-nighters, cramming to take their tests. All the crammed knowledge is placed in shirt term memory, to quickly fade after the test is over. That only works for some people. And recall that for most of those students, the cramming is not the only preparation done. Maybe the answer is to have on on one testing, where the test administrator comes to love with you for a week, to see if you *really* have knowledge of Ham radio....hehe. If the test administrator looks like Heidi Klum, or if I get to be *her* test administrator, I'll volunteer to put the system throuigh its paces. Heck, I'll sign up for two weeks...... Hey, maybe my dum typo was Karma! I've got dibs on Ms. Klum if she ever needs a ham radio instructor. This might be the way to increase the numbers of Hams! People would demand to be retested every year or so. And the YL's could pick their own instructors........ Yep. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#52
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#54
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , (Stevie
Stalker, Mighty Macho Morseman Ethnic Cleanser of Olde Tyme Hamme Raddio using a Fleet Kit) writes: Subject: FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM From: "Kelley James" Date: 7/15/2004 1:02 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: "Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote in message ... Indeed Amateur Radio is the ONLY pool of Morse capable radio operators remaining, the very small contingent of military and SIGINT operators not withstanding. Tell me more about military and SIGINT operators. What's to tell? The Army still trains AD personnel from all services in Morse Code in Arizona. This can be verified via independent sources so I will leave you to it. Fort Huachuca, Arizona. "Home of the Buffalo Soldiers." U.S. Army Military Intelligence Center, School, and also the Hq for Army MARS. :-) Huachuca has a nice website which includes an on-line "museum" of important Military Intelligence folks. Of course Lennie willl jump in and tell us "IT"S FOR RECEIVE ONLY ! ! ! !" Uh huh. Absolutely for RECEIVE ONLY! :-) Passive signal intelligence work is done that way. The other side has no idea they are being intercepted. Sunnuvagun! How about that? The curricula for all MOSs was on-line at Fort Huachuca. Haven't been there lately (on-line) so it might have been re-arranged. They had the names of the computer programs used in teaching morse code. All were commercial packages. Sunnuvagun! How about that! Been to Fort Huachuca in person. Hotness rules. Stalker Stevie will say "he's been there too" if his paranoic psychosis is working the same. :-) LHA / WMD |
#55
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Kelley James"
writes: "Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote in message ... Indeed Amateur Radio is the ONLY pool of Morse capable radio operators remaining, the very small contingent of military and SIGINT operators not withstanding. Tell me more about military and SIGINT operators. Don't ask too much. Stalker Stevie never did any Signals Intelligence work in the military. He was too busy doing his hamme raddio thing in between his "seven hostile actions." :-) He will tell you to "call the VA" to find out everything! Or, he will say stuff like "Sorry Hans, MARS IS ham radio!" Hi hi ho ho LHA / WMD |
#56
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , PAMNO
(N2EY) writes: In article , (Len Over 21) writes: In article , (N2EY) writes: In article , Robert Casey writes: Hams - old and new - didn't change the exam procedures. Neither did ARRL, NCI, NCVEC or any other ham group. FCC did, because it saved them resources. We aren't going to a system other than multiple-choice published-Q&A-pool exams in the foreseeable future. Just not gonna happen. ANd then there's the question of what knowledge should be expected from applicants anyway. Does it really require more knowledge and skill to operate on 14.167 vs 14.344? More spectrum is simply the reward system in use. It was chosen in large part because it's easy to enforce. Nonsense for the new millennium. That's what you're giving us, Len! Now, now Rev. Jim. You're off on an evangelical Sermon on the Antenna Mount again! You just didn't answer the question I posed about "enforcement ease." Tsk. tsk. tsk. Tell us how morse signals are "easier to enforce" than voice signals. Try a few details of how that is done. The separate, elite morsemen-only portions of the ham bands were put there by old morsemen who were able to influence League lobbying. Len, what are "morsemen"? An elite band of beepers stuck in a time warp of yesteryear. Amateurs, of course. The rest of the radio world has given up morse code modes for any primary communications. Most other radio services never even considered it! And if you're talking about how the bands got carved up into Extra-only, Advanced-and-Extra-only, and General-and-above subbands, that wasn't an ARRL idea at all. It came from elsewhere. What is this "easy to enforce" nonsense? It's not nonsense at all, Len. So...answer how it is "easy." The FCC reads morse easier than it can voice? [I don't think so] Can the FCC DF on OOK-CW signals "easier" than voice signals? [I don't think so] The easy to enforce *fact* is that it's simple to check the frequency of a signal against the license class. It's not nearly so easy to verify things like power level. Oh, yeah, the Magick of Morse! All morsemen are superbly honest and without fault...would not dream of falsifying anything, would they? Hello? Ever hear of audio recorders? Those have been around since WW2. Really. More modern stuff than wire recorders nowadays, old timer. Combine that with modern DF techniques (no rotating loop antennas required) and modern data recorders and ANY signal can be found out. All of the morsemen's propaganda is just spin to keep their little morse playground. No more, no less. What are you talking about, Len? YOUR spin on morse code. And the Belief System of the Church of St. Hiram. The only Morse-code-only segments of US amateur radio are the lowest 100 kHz of 6 and 2 meters. Open to all hams except Novices. WE weren't talking about "morse code only" stuff, Rev. Jim. [got some bad peyote again? tsk] You will be angry and disturbed at such direct language, but, like Ernestine's creator put it..."plbthththt...and that's the absolute truth." :-) And it's as true as what Ernestine says. IOW, what you wrote is absolute nonsense, Len, and the historical records prove it. Yah, yu be all hot and bothered! :-) SPIN doctoring you do, Rev. Jim, and you don't have the license to practice doctoring. Tsk, tsk. Besides, why do you want to live in the past so much? Moi? HAH! Who was talking up "T.O.M." olde tymer? YOU were. EIGHTY YEARS AGO. Tsk, tsk, tsk. Since 1990 it has been possible to get any class of US ham license with just a 5 wpm code test and a medical waiver. Since 2000, the only Morse code test left has been the 5 wpm test. So? The morse code test is STILL THERE, isn't it? All U.S. amateur radio licenses with below-30-MHz privileges require passing that morse code test. NOW. Not 14 years ago, not 80 years ago. NOW. WHY? Here's a challenge for ya, Len: Lissen up, peyote breath. Here's YOUR challenge: Try to go a whole 48 hours of NOT accessing the newsgroup and telling everyone a sermon or preaching that Code Is Good, the Best. Bet you can't do it. :-) You can't. You are fixated on Being Here, the Voice of "Truth" about olde-tyme hamme raddio, telling all heretics to your Belief System that they are "wrong," "incorrect," and other indelicate nasties when they don't like Mighty Macho Morse. Ho hum. LHA / WMD |
#57
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , (Stevie
Stalker, Ethnic Cleanser of Olde Tyme Hamme Raddio) writes: A nickle says Lennie the Lame found yet another anonymous server to hide behind. If not, it's someone he's slept with. Poor Stalker making LIES again. Tsk, tsk. Poor boy just doesn't know when to quit with that terrible hate psychosis. Can't realize that his fantastic thoughts just aren't liked by others. That's how it is with the mentally disturbed... No problem here on walking or leg useage, working fine. No "lameness." However, poor Stalker must have stepped in something long ago...probably his first set of LIES in here. No need to hide identities here. I'm still at the same address as given in those Ham Radio magazine articles. You can also send e-mail to the following very valid e-address: |
#58
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , (Stevie
Stalker, Hamme Raddio Ethnic Cleanser with his Fleet Kit) writes: Subject: FCC Morse testing at 16 and 20 WPM From: (Geoffrey S. Mendelson) Date: 7/15/2004 10:16 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: In article , Len Over 21 wrote: AMATEUR radio long ago CEASED to be a "pool of experienced morse operators" for any national need. The nation does NOT need morse operators, haven't for a long time. That's an intresting point. 9/11 showed the need still exists for experienced radio operators who can communicate under pressure. Morde code is no longer necessary, but a clear voice, understanding a phonetic alphabet, etc is. Geoffrey, you'll notice Lennie interjected "morse" operators, although he does take great liberties with trying to discredit Amatueur Radio at any opportunity. Poor Stalker, still deep in delusional psychosis thinking that all who disagree with Him are "discrediting amateur radio" (not "amatueur" radio, hi hi). No other radio service in the USA uses morse code for ANY emergency communications, nor do they do that for primary radio communications purposes. No Public Safety Radio group needs any morse qualifications to do their work. Additionally he was in error that stating that "Amateur radio long ago ceased to be a "pool of experienced morse operators" for any national need." No "error." REALITY. Stevie Stalker LIES again, but doesn't understand he does. Tsk. He confuses his fantasy with reality. Bad scene. He need mental help. Indeed Amateur Radio is the ONLY pool of Morse capable radio operators remaining, the very small contingent of military and SIGINT operators not withstanding. VERY small. The Military Intelligence Center at Fort Huachuca trains signal intercept operators. A few of the MOSs in that school learn International Morse Code from computer programs. Those same trainees also learn to operate a variety of recorders to record those intercepts for later analysis. Just one small facet of MI training. On-off keying morse code is falling in the rest of the world. Eventually even they (the U.S. military) will drop that training. They have the recorders and the recorded intercepts if some idiot foreign force wants to use morse...and thus be open to signals attack by just about anyone. And as much as being able to pull "the weak ones" out is a plus, ACCURACY is more important...That's why contests ding you if you miscopy an exchange. Those skills are collateral benefits to emergency communications...Lennie's uninformed opinion and ranting to the contrary. Poor delusional Stalker, still mixing up his hate-filled dystemper of a fantasyland continuum with reality. Tsk. He needs mental help. If what Lennie is is being "pro", then I dare say we should take some EXTRA pride in NOT being "pro" ! ! ! ! More delusional Stalker fantasyland hate. There are NO Public Safety Radio Services now using morse code in any form for public safety communications. None. Len Anderson has absolutely ZERO experience in emergency communications, save for what he cuts-and-pastes about CA's ACS system and MARS. Untrue, but trying to convince a delusional psychotic with a gigantic hate complex living in his fantasyland is a non-starter. Poor Stalker needs mental therapy. No experience as an Amateur operator, none in any capacity with any civil or federal program. Untrue. But Stalker will insist that I have none until the last psychotic delusion is ripped from his hate-filled little mind... He is not a licensed Amateur, nor is he in any other program affilitated with emergency communications, MARS included. "Sorry, Hans, MARS IS amateur radio!" Hi hi ho ho. Department of Defense Directive 4650.2, effective November 2003 says otherwise. Amateur licensee Stalker says MARS is amateur radio. Just who is the LIE spreader there? Hint. It isn't DoD. :-) I never thought I'd say that about myself, but unfortuntely it is true. I've tried to get my speed back up to something reasonable and expect that it would take an hour a day for at least a month. In regards to emergency uses, Geoffrey, it's irrelevent. It's nice to have, especially for health and welfare trafficing, but otherwise not necessary. RED ALERT! ALL HANDS TO BATTLE STATIONS! REALITY BROKE OUT! :-) People who work 9-5 5 days a week may actually be able to do it. I don't (more like noon (or eariler) to 3am). Sure you can! Just one or two QSO's a day will get your speed up in no time, regadless of when you work! I work 7P to 7A three to five days a week, and I am able to KEEP my speed above 20WPM with little effort. There ya go, Stalker. You just keep on beepin...and imagining yourself a big fat Hero of the Homeland for beeping fast. So long, Reality again. Hello fantasy! :-) LHA / WMD |
#59
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Dee D. Flint"
writes: Excellent. We can apply that similar logic to amateur radio requirements. The spectrum is a public resource. The prospective ham needs to demonstrate that he has the potential to be a contributor. Morsemanship left the "public resource" zone a long time ago for all the other radio services. You, and all other morsepersons, seem to think that amateur radio is all concerned with morse code skills. That's hardly in any "public interest" except to that tiny slice of the "public" that worships at the Church of St. Hiram. You and all the other morsepersons are Believers in that "church." This is accomplished by the testing process. The connection is then similar: demonstrating the potential for responsibility and being part of a larger group. Becoming a part of a slightly larger group of morse code users. ONLY in amateur radio. Hundreds of thousands of others have "demonstrated their 'potential' for responsibility...and DEMONSTRATED that very responsibility" in the military and/or commercial radio...WITHOUT having to do that testing for morse code cognition. As one of that group, I don't feel chastened by those spankaroony words from a self-styled "parent" who was into such responsibility beginning a half century ago. Notice that I tag it as potential since there will always be a few who are willing to put in the effort but then end up being problems. Notice: Mama Dee wants to play "parent" again, thinking that all others not thinking as she does are "children." Tsk, tsk. Poor Dee. Still on that self-elevated elitist pedestal again, trying to spank others for not thinking properly. :-) LHA / WMD |
#60
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , "Dee D. Flint"
writes: If the resulting "reward" isn't worth the effort, then the person doesn't really want it bad enough and won't be much of an asset anyway. Shear numbers really don't help in any activity. Dee, look at all the "assets" championing olde tyme hamme raddio in here. :-) An earthquake with high shear forces wouldn't convince them (or you) that morsemanship is not necessary. That's sheer supposition, of course. :-) LHA / WMD |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1366  October 17 2003 | Dx | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |