| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
July 17th 04, 10:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"William" wrote in message om... PAMNO (N2EY) wrote in message ... The important question is, who is the best judge of what the requirements should be? The newcomer or the experienced ham? 73 de Jim, N2EY Jim, many experienced amateurs have spoken agains the continued use of the Morse Code as a filter. You ignore them, or say they must be wrong. Luckily, hams don't decide, necomer or otherwise. The FCC does, and they see merit in the reasonable arguments put forth by those experienced hams. Best of Luck Please post the URLs of the surveys to back up your claim. How "many?" Is it a majority or is it just a vocal minority? So far the FCC has done nothing with the innumerable petitions nor have the acted unilaterally to implement the change now allowed by the international treaty. At this point it is premature to say that the FCC sees merit in either side of the question. Any intelligent person doesn't consider it a filter. It is simply a useful element of ham radio that should be maintained. Some of the people against using it as a filter are for keeping it as a part of the ham's required knowledge. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
| My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
| Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1366  October 17 2003 | Dx | |||
| Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
| NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||
Threaded Mode
