On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 10:45:38 -0400, "Democreep Party"
wrote:

FLUSH THE JOHNS IN 2004
VOTE FOR BUSH

The way things ought to be, both in the family unit and the White
House:

One Dick
One Bush

DJ

"IdaSpode" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 10:45:38 -0400, "Democreep Party"
wrote:

FLUSH THE JOHNS IN 2004
VOTE FOR BUSH

The way things ought to be, both in the family unit and the White
House:

One Dick - and in this case the name fits
One Bush - as in pussy as shown in his cowardly military record

DJ

So, in a time of constant terror alerts, record deficit, soldiers dying just
about every day for no real purpose, a crippled economy with the middle
class being crushed the reason you want to vote for the idiot is because of
the gay marriage issue??? How about all of the family units that lost there
homes and livelihoods? Are you really this ignorant? I'll ask you as well,
what good did Bush really do for this country and back up your answers.

--
If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving

I'll ask you as well,
what good did Bush really do for this country and back up your answers.

He won't because he can't

--Mike

"TBone" wrote in message
r.com...
"IdaSpode" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 10:45:38 -0400, "Democreep Party"
wrote:

FLUSH THE JOHNS IN 2004
VOTE FOR BUSH

The way things ought to be, both in the family unit and the White
House:

One Dick - and in this case the name fits
One Bush - as in pussy as shown in his cowardly military record

DJ

So, in a time of constant terror alerts, record deficit, soldiers dying
just
about every day for no real purpose, a crippled economy with the middle
class being crushed the reason you want to vote for the idiot is because
of
the gay marriage issue??? How about all of the family units that lost
there
homes and livelihoods? Are you really this ignorant? I'll ask you as
well,
what good did Bush really do for this country and back up your answers.

--
If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving

mgg wrote:
I'll ask you as well,

what good did Bush really do for this country and back up your answers.

He won't because he can't


It's a two way street. What has Kerry accomplished during his entire
time in the Senate and back up your answers.

Roy said it correctly when he once stated that debating politics is a
no win situation in a news group. Just like tbone you can't provide
anything to backup anything but still you demand everyone else should.

Bush, like it or not is running with his record. Kerry, like it or not
is running from his.

Jerry

TBone wrote:

How lame. As usual, instead of actually running on Bush's record, you need
to attack the other guy.

How dumb can you get.....every time you make a stupid comment like this
you are simple pointing a finger at yourself.


Perhaps that is because Bush doesn't have a record
worth looking at.

Better than Kerry who has none. I'm still waiting for the
accomplishments of Kerry that you keep avoiding. Can't you come up with
at least ONE thing he has done......lol.... of course not.


What accomplishments did Bush have prior to becoming
president?

and what hole have you been living in....


The fact is that it really doesn't matter.

To you it doesn't because you would simply spin and lie about it anyway
out of pure hatred of the man.


The only thing that
does matter is what he did while he is president and that equates to nothing
of value.

Only if value to everyone like yourself equates to taxing the hell out
of everyone and expanding government



Roy said it correctly when he once stated that debating politics is a
no win situation in a news group. Just like tbone you can't provide
anything to backup anything but still you demand everyone else should.


You said that you would vote for Lieberman, please list his great
accomplishments.

Now since you can't show one damn accomplishment of Kerry you want to
spin to Liberman ......... typical of your trolling bull****.


You are the one who keps saying that he is the best man
for the job, prove it.

More trolling bull**** from the expert. I said he was the best choice
between he and Kerry and he is, like it or not. Where is your proof
that Kerry is better. How long do we have to wait for you to put up or
shut up. Oh, I forgot you don't do that , you just demand everyone else
does.



Bush, like it or not is running with his record. Kerry, like it or not
is running from his.


Sorry pal, but you got that backwards as usual. If Bush were actually
running with his record, there would be no need to attack Kerry's but I'll
ask again,

Okay so asking Kerry to explain his record is attacking ....... how far
will you go to parrot the party line like a good little puppet. Stand
on you own two feet for a change and show us the great accomplishments
of Kerry. You can't and you never will.

what exactly did Bush do for this country. Answer - not a damn
thing in 3 1/2 years and that is a failure any way that you spin it.


No spin at all. Both men's records are there for the viewing but like
the good little puppet troll you are you refuse to explain Kerry's
record but instead attack with hate. Where is Kery's accomplishments?
Don't you have anything? Anything at all.......

Now if all you are going to do is continue with your typical bull****
troll spin instead of debate the records then this is a wasted topic.
However should you get the balls to actually attempt to post or cite
accomplishments of Kerry and like I said ANY accomplishment will be a
start them pleas do so. I like everyone else know you won't because he
has absolutely ZERO accomplishments but maybe you can imagine some which
you are very good at. Can't you find anything, anything at all
supportive of Kerry???????

Jerry

"Jerry" wrote in message
link.net...
TBone wrote:

How lame. As usual, instead of actually running on Bush's record, you
need
to attack the other guy.

How dumb can you get.....every time you make a stupid comment like this
you are simple pointing a finger at yourself.

Then how come that is all that you are doing. Every time I ask you to name
just one thing in 3 1/2 years of Bush, all you can do is make insults and
spin it back to Kerry.



Perhaps that is because Bush doesn't have a record
worth looking at.

Better than Kerry who has none. I'm still waiting for the
accomplishments of Kerry that you keep avoiding. Can't you come up with
at least ONE thing he has done......lol.... of course not.

This is exactly what I said above. No answer from you, just spin. Pretty
sad considering the man you love so much has been president for 3 1/2 years
and all you can do is yell and spin.


What accomplishments did Bush have prior to becoming
president?

and what hole have you been living in....

That doesn't answer the question and we are all still waiting.

The fact is that it really doesn't matter.

To you it doesn't because you would simply spin and lie about it anyway
out of pure hatred of the man.

Yet more spin. I don't hate the man. You just want to spin it that way so
that you can try to avoid answering the question without looking like a
fool.



The only thing that
does matter is what he did while he is president and that equates to
nothing
of value.

Only if value to everyone like yourself equates to taxing the hell out
of everyone and expanding government

Ah, so there it is,the lower taxes and small government BS again. The
problem is that it is pure crap. Except for the wealthy, just about all of
the money and many times more that was returned from his tax cuts get eaten
up by increased costs of living due to those very tax cuts. Then there is
the expanding government BS. If things like Enron didn't happen, there
would be no real need to expand the government but they do and so it does.
All shrinking it does is to make it easier to corrupt and easier for scum to
rip off the American citizen with little to no reduction in expenses. So
you are saying that Bush's accomplishments are a higher cost of living for
the average American and less protection from scumbags, yea, that pretty
much wraps it up.




Roy said it correctly when he once stated that debating politics is a
no win situation in a news group. Just like tbone you can't provide
anything to backup anything but still you demand everyone else should.


You said that you would vote for Lieberman, please list his great
accomplishments.

Now since you can't show one damn accomplishment of Kerry you want to
spin to Liberman ......... typical of your trolling bull****.

Hahahahahahahahaha, you really are funny Jerry. What I asked you for is
exactly what you say to me every time I asked you to list Bush's
accomplishments, LOL. I guess that you either think of yourself as a
trolling bull**** artist or your typical spin just backfiired on you, your
choice.



You are the one who keps saying that he is the best man
for the job, prove it.

More trolling bull**** from the expert.

More spinning from the spinmaster.

I said he was the best choice between he and Kerry and he is, like it or
not.

And since you cannot back that up....

Where is your proof that Kerry is better.

My proof is in 3 1/2 years of Bush and the sorry state of this country. I
don't recall Reagan having a stellar record prior to becoming president and
yet, he is regarded as being one of our great ones. Clinton also didn't
have much to brag about before becoming president and this country went
threw its greatest sustained economic times in its history during his two
terms. Bush Sr was the vice president prior to becoming president and
didn't do **** once he got into office. What qualifications did Bush Jr
have before he became president? We have elections every 4 years for a
reason. We pick who we hope will be the best man for the job (except this
time but we won't get into that) and after 4 years we reassess that decision
by the accomplishments made. If they did well, we re-elect them for 4 more
years and if not we elect someone else. Now you want to change that because
of YOUR hatred of Kerry and any liberal for that matter but too bad. He
didn't do a damn thing positive for the average citizen in his first term
and needs to go.

How long do we have to wait for you to put up or
shut up. Oh, I forgot you don't do that , you just demand everyone else
does.

Whether I demand it or not, you have yet to ever do it so in this case it is
Pot, Kettle, Black.





Bush, like it or not is running with his record. Kerry, like it or not
is running from his.


Sorry pal, but you got that backwards as usual. If Bush were actually
running with his record, there would be no need to attack Kerry's but
I'll
ask again,

Okay so asking Kerry to explain his record is attacking ....... how far
will you go to parrot the party line like a good little puppet.

Explain what, one wound????? What about the other two purple hearts, what
about his saving a shipmates life, what about his bravery in battle as said
by his ship mates. Funny how all of these things are pushed to the side. I
guess that's because Bush being an alcoholic loser at the time has nothing
to compare to it.


Stand on you own two feet for a change and show us the great
accomplishments
of Kerry. You can't and you never will.

The same goes for you and Bush with one critical exception, Bush is the
current president and with still having no accomplishments makes it MUCH
worse than Kerry who was the leader of nothing (yet).


what exactly did Bush do for this country. Answer - not a damn
thing in 3 1/2 years and that is a failure any way that you spin it.


No spin at all. Both men's records are there for the viewing but like
the good little puppet troll you are you refuse to explain Kerry's
record but instead attack with hate. Where is Kery's accomplishments?
Don't you have anything? Anything at all.......

Yawn, Pot, Kettle, Black. The same can be said of Bush and he is the
president for 3 1/2 years and has nothing positive to show for it at all.


Now if all you are going to do is continue with your typical bull****
troll spin instead of debate the records then this is a wasted topic.

LOL, in multiple posts you have yet to actually answer anything. Just the
typical right wing method of spin and dodge. Is that why you are in a Dodge
news group, LOL.

However should you get the balls to actually attempt to post or cite
accomplishments of Kerry and like I said ANY accomplishment will be a
start them pleas do so.

I asked you first and have yet to see anything and now you are running away
with your tail between your legs and trying to spin it as my failure, LOL.
When you can't even list a single accomplishment for a president that has
been in office for 3 1/2 years, that says it all. You can try to spin it
back to what did Kerry do but the same can be said for other great
presidents prior to taking office so your argument holds no water. But go
ahead, run away, we all know the truth.

I like everyone else know you won't because he
has absolutely ZERO accomplishments but maybe you can imagine some which
you are very good at. Can't you find anything, anything at all
supportive of Kerry???????

Yea, his war record despite your trying to trash it over one incident
created by a lying doctor. Funny after all these years he would remember
such a minor incident with all off the real horrors he had to deal with
every day over there. BTW, what political affiliation does this doctor
have, funny how nobody seems to mention that one. To bad by definition, our
current president has the military accomplishment of being a deserter.

--
If at first you don't succeed, you're not cut out for skydiving