Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , (Steve
Robeson K4CAP) writes: Subject: Back At Ya, Brian..... From: (Len Over 21) Date: 8/23/2004 3:51 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: In article , Other than being obnoxious and antagonistic, you have no commitment to ANYthing, and I think that's what twists your shorts most about Amateur Radio...everyday people doing things that you somehow think only YOU are qualified to do. NURSIE isn't an "everyday people." He a gunnery nurse, he a dill instructor marching the maggots, he a hero with "seven hostile actions" and he is da backbone of MARS regardless of what the DoD directs! NURSIE think I not "qualified!" I not qualified for morsemanship in amateur radio. I qualified for commercial radio, for military radio, in fact any radio...receivers or transmittes, any frequency range up to 24 GHz. Been there, done that, several times over. Not I. I'm just trying to influence the elimination of the morse code test for any U.S. radio license. No, you're not. You're doing your "best" to be antagonistic. Poor baby. I'm not even CLOSE to doing my wordsmithy "best" in here. :-) Ergo your actions here are meant to be nothing more than boil on Amateur Radio. Tsk, tsk. As the "medically certified healer" you should be able to cure that boil. You haven't. Poor baby. In that effort you are succeeding. Poor NURSIE. All bent out of shape for not being loved and respected like she so richly deserves?!? :-) Relax, have a bite to eat. BOIL a three-minute egg... The really great thing is that the "...kinds of pejorative personal comments" are just icing on the cake. It hasn't taken much to let the air out of most of your rantings, Lennie. What "air out of anything" other than your shouting mouth? :-) I haven't stopped. :-) Tsk, tsk, tsk. Let NURSIE chew on the following: NURSIE has NO EXPERIENCE in national politics to make any balanced, objective informed opinion on national politics, yet blithers on in here about that. Sure I do. I am a registered voter and have voted in every presidential and congressional election since I turned 18. I missed some Ohio state elections when overseas in 82 and 88. Oh well. National politics is NOT a subject for this newsgroup... NURSIE has NO EXPERIENCE in national economics to make any balanced, objective informed opinion on economics, yet blithers on in here about that. Sure I do. I pay taxes and have been involved in several state and local tax propositions. National economics is NOT a subject for this newsgroup... Lennie, you're slathering all over the keyboard again! You've got your short in such a twist you can't even keep your insults straight...! ! ! ! BBWWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! !! NURSIE understands NOT what this newsgroup is about... NURSIE nuts. NURSIE has NO EXPERIENCE in military communications to make any balanced, objective informed opinion on military radio, yet blithers on in here about that. Sorry. Wrong. NURSIE wrong. Not HF. Not big time comms. Tsk. NURSIE has NO EXPERIENCE in commercial communications to make any balanced, objective informed opinion on commercial radio, yet blithers on in here about that. I don't "blither on" in this forum about "commercial communications". NURSIE too busy with bad hyena imitations to understand this newsgroup concerns amateur RADIO. [that's all she knows...] NURSIE has NO EXPERIENCE in aerospace and spaceflight to make any balanced, objective informed opinion on space subjects, yet blithers on in here about that. And YOU do...?!?! Yes. By at least two corporations: EOS in Pasadena (a Xerox division) and Rocketdyne (then a division of Rockwell, later purchased by Boeing). I'm not counting sub-contracting there, don't have to...at a score of two to nothing agains the "team" of NURSIE and "Quitefine," it is time to work the "Murphy Rule." NURSIE has NO EXPERIENCE in magazine publishing on a national scale to make any balanced, objective informed opinion on anything in publishiing, yet blithers on in here about that. YOUR "experience" in "publishiing" was in a magazine that went toes-up with you as an "associate editor. Skip Tenney sold Ham Radio magazine after I quit them. HR had been in independent monthly publishing for 22 years. I'm not counting a few other non-radio-hobby related publications, except that two of them involve personal computing. Just an example of how much fun you can have with a radio in public, Lennie. Of course. You set the example. Act like an asshole and then play like CB. Of course. Lotsa fun. You showed everyone how... I've never said any such thing. You're lying again, Lennie. Tsk, tsk, TSK! When confronted with what all readers have seen, NURSIE claims he never said any such thing!!!! NURSIE nuts. I HAD respect for you at one time, but then you launched into the Nazi rants. Poor NURSIE. Family was in WW2 concentration camps? NURSIE stationed in Germany after WW2? Was victim of "NAZI oppression?" Must have been... NURSIE has directly insulted Brian Burke of that in here. He lent himself to it. Sorry. He should pay attention to what he writes, how he wrties it, and whom he writes it about. More transference. NURSIE doesn't pay much attention to his emotional outbursts in here...says he "never said such a thing" after he said it. Strange. You've just demonstrated beyond a shadow of a doubt that you are not a trustworthy person. More transference. NURSIE doesn't pay much attention to his emotional outbursts in here...says he "never said such a thing" after he said it. Strange. Continue with your "non-profane" comments about "having a head up the ass of another newsgroup enemy." I have never mad a comment about "having a head up the ass of another newsgroup enemy." Incorrect. You've insulted Brian Burke of doing just that. And so far, with your "rush to his rescue" rantings in this thread in the last 24 hours, you've proven me ABSOLUTELY CORRECT. More transference. NURSIE doesn't pay much attention to his emotional outbursts in here...says he "never said such a thing" after he said it. Strange. And this was not about you. It was about Brian P Burke misrepresenting his identity and not being man enough or having the conviction to stand behind his opinions. More transference. NURSIE doesn't pay much attention to his emotional outbursts in here...says he "never said such a thing" after he said it. Strange. Unfortunately for you, any person doing the same for "Leonard H. Anderson" will only get the now-expired license information for a now-expired person. Strange, twisted NURSIE. Wants all newsgroup opponents DEAD! NURSIE need some mental therapy, is in a good place to get it. She never avails herself of that. Tsk, tsk. not a legal signature |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , More than you. By a mile. You were nothing more than a radio mechanic. That's ALL the evidence you have ever provided this forum. YOU were NEVER a "military radio operator". NOT "mechanic," Diminutive Man. Fixed station operations and maintenance supervisor. But never a radio OPERATOR. HF transmitter with 1 KW or more, dozens of them. But never a radio OPERATOR. Microwave radio relay operations and maintenance supervisor. But never a radio OPERATOR. Twenty-four voice channel 1.8 GHz terminals made by GE. Who cares if they were made by The Hand of God? You were never a radio OPERATOR. I didn't work for a "set top box maker", Lennie. The "company" I worked for was a subsidiary. I was not an employee of ANTEC. You were told this before, but still try to use it as a diminuitive. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Antec makes "set-top boxes." They say so, show so. What, NURSIE do "volunteer work" for good of company? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I wasn't an ANTEC employeee, Lennie. I worked for a subsidiary. Sorry you have a problem with that, but have a good laugh...it IS at your own expense. NURSIE want to make "LIARS" out of Department of Defense, United States Army, National Archives and Records Administration, and the Pacific edition of Stars and Stripes military newspaper! NURSIE also want to make a "LIAR" out of the private Korean War website...and anyone else who can truthfully prove things. NURSIE need to talk to the Barkers and tell them, in no uncertain terms, that ANY honoring of Korean War dead is "dishonorable!" But you don't honor them, Lennie. You try to USE thier sacrifices in order to make yourself look better in THIS forum. It's got nothing to do with the Department of Defense. It's got nothing to do with the Pacific Stars and Stripes or any other veteran's organizations or websites. It's about Leonard H. Anderson trying to use the sacrifices of Soldiers who died in combat three years before he was even inducted in order to somehow glorify his otherwise lackluster Army service in an Amateur Radio newsgroup. That in and of itself makes you a creep of unfathomable depth. Psychological transference again. NURSIE look in mirror, try to call others what she see in mirror. Tsk. It's all on documents at NARA in St. Louis. Not the parts you tried to push off on us here. NARA has all my military experience documentation. It's not about what was documented 50 years ago Lennie. It's about your misdeeds in THIS forum. I am sure you are sorry you got caught doing it, but you did. "Sorry?" I'm rather sorry to encounter such a nutso as yourself...but life is like that. I am sure you ARE sorry to have encountered me. Really sucks to try and pull off the silly stuf you do in here only to have someone who KNOWS BETTER to derail it for ya... It's in the experiences of other hams such as Gene, N2JTV, who served WITH me at the same time. Too bad Gene didn't get a chance to read some of the cowardly crap you pulled in here. He still can if he bothers to look in from home in Long Island. :-) I don't know why he would. Although he's been a REAL extra for a long time, this forum's basic content is NURSIE shouting, hollering, and yell-yelling at everyone else! As well as talking NATIONAL POLITICS, THE ECONOMY, SPACE BUSINESS, and other wonderful subjects where the "qualifications" require high-rate morsemanship. A "real" Extra? Sheesh, Lennie, I've had mine for almost 24 years now. Doesn't get much more real than that. Your friend couldn't have had his any sooner than 1982 or 83, judging by the callsign. His is not a vanity callsign, so it was issued sequentially. The sequential system was introduced in 1978. I have no idea how quickly the 1x3 block in 2-land filled up, but I think its safe to say that N2JTV wasn't issued before 1983 or later. It's even in the Pacific edition of the military newspaper Stars and Stripes, in their 10 November 2002 edition...including six photos that I took. Whoopie doo. Two pictures I took wound up in Naval Air News and that has a far wider distribution that PacS&S. So give me a Pulitzer. You keep giving your opponents a "Putziler." You deserve it. You earned it. It fits. Rest of LennieRant snipped. SOS. Steve, K4YZ |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Subject: Back At Ya, Brian..... From: (Len Over 21) Date: 8/23/2004 3:51 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: NURSIE think I not "qualified!" I not qualified for morsemanship in amateur radio. I qualified for commercial radio, for military radio, in fact any radio...receivers or transmittes, any frequency range up to 24 GHz. Been there, done that, several times over. Great, Lennie. Then why don't you expend your verbose antagonisms in a military or commercial radio related newsgroup...?!?! This forum is about AMATEUR RADIO. It's very apparent that you are lost and refuse to look at a map or stop and ask directions. I bet that drives Mrs Lennie nuts. NURSIE need some mental therapy, is in a good place to get it. She never avails herself of that. Still waiting on your credentials to make such a determination. So far it's just an obvious shill to try and detract from the black eyes you keep collecting in here. Put some ice on it. not a legal signature No doubt. Steve, K4YZ (A real name and a real callsign) |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: And this was not about you. It was about Brian P Burke misrepresenting his identity and not being man enough or having the conviction to stand behind his opinions. More transference. NURSIE doesn't pay much attention to his emotional outbursts in here...says he "never said such a thing" after he said it. Strange. Of course; he lies. But since he's nuts he's not responsible for his actions. Because I do have convictions I receive a lot of flack from Yell DMC. For instance, when Part 97 says you cannot take compensation for amateur radio, then a repeater owner charges dues.... For instance, when Part 97 specifies only a Morse Code exam can satisfy element 1, and the VEC's administer Farnsworth exams.... For instance, when a poster states, "Sorry Hans, MARS IS Amateur Radio!" For instance, when a poster behaves insanely, I call him nuts. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "William" wrote in message m... (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: And this was not about you. It was about Brian P Burke misrepresenting his identity and not being man enough or having the conviction to stand behind his opinions. More transference. NURSIE doesn't pay much attention to his emotional outbursts in here...says he "never said such a thing" after he said it. Strange. Of course; he lies. But since he's nuts he's not responsible for his actions. Because I do have convictions I receive a lot of flack from Yell DMC. For instance, when Part 97 says you cannot take compensation for amateur radio, then a repeater owner charges dues.... Dues can hardly be considered compensation. It is perfectly legitimate to cover the costs of repeater setup, maintenance and operations by charging such dues. That does not violate the no compensation rule. For instance, when Part 97 specifies only a Morse Code exam can satisfy element 1, and the VEC's administer Farnsworth exams.... Part 97 does not define how the exam is to be administered. It simply requires a candidate to demonstrate a minimum level of proficiency but does not define the testing method. By the way Farnsworth is Morse code. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Back at Ya, NURSIE
From: "Dee D. Flint" Date: 8/24/2004 12:16 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: "William" wrote in message om... (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: And this was not about you. It was about Brian P Burke misrepresenting his identity and not being man enough or having the conviction to stand behind his opinions. More transference. NURSIE doesn't pay much attention to his emotional outbursts in here...says he "never said such a thing" after he said it. Strange. Of course; he lies. But since he's nuts he's not responsible for his actions. Because I do have convictions I receive a lot of flack from Yell DMC. For instance, when Part 97 says you cannot take compensation for amateur radio, then a repeater owner charges dues.... Dues can hardly be considered compensation. It is perfectly legitimate to cover the costs of repeater setup, maintenance and operations by charging such dues. That does not violate the no compensation rule. Dee, it's just more evidence that Brain (a) doesn't understand that the "dues" collected for the use of a repeater are for the use of the machine....NOT for operating a radio. The FCC has repeatedly stated that accepting funds to defray the cost of the upkeep of a resource such as a repeater is absolutely legitimate. Brain, like his mentor before him, convientiently dismiss or ignore FCC rulings or regulations when it suits them. For instance, when Part 97 specifies only a Morse Code exam can satisfy element 1, and the VEC's administer Farnsworth exams.... Part 97 does not define how the exam is to be administered. It simply requires a candidate to demonstrate a minimum level of proficiency but does not define the testing method. By the way Farnsworth is Morse code. There is no such thing as a "Farnsworth" exam. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
(William) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: And this was not about you. It was about Brian P Burke misrepresenting his identity and not being man enough or having the conviction to stand behind his opinions. More transference. NURSIE doesn't pay much attention to his emotional outbursts in here...says he "never said such a thing" after he said it. Strange. Of course; he lies. But since he's nuts he's not responsible for his actions. Yell-yell will rationalize anything... Maybe he was battered as a child? Because I do have convictions I receive a lot of flack from Yell DMC. Yell-yell be da dill sergeant still. He obsessed wid it. For instance, when Part 97 says you cannot take compensation for amateur radio, then a repeater owner charges dues.... Mama Dee say dat okay. Of course we gots da HRO stores making profit from ham radio... For instance, when Part 97 specifies only a Morse Code exam can satisfy element 1, and the VEC's administer Farnsworth exams.... Mama Dee say dat ok too. She say Part 97 doesn't describe hamexaminations. She wrongo. We spank Mama for boo-boo? For instance, when a poster states, "Sorry Hans, MARS IS Amateur Radio!" DoD ought to spank Yell-yell. :-) For instance, when a poster behaves insanely, I call him nuts. ...or irrational...or whacko...or crazy...or an extra? :-) LHA / WMD |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , (Steve Robeson K4CAP) writes: Subject: Back At Ya, Brian..... From: (Len Over 21) Date: 8/23/2004 3:51 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: NURSIE think I not "qualified!" I not qualified for morsemanship in amateur radio. I qualified for commercial radio, for military radio, in fact any radio...receivers or transmittes, any frequency range up to 24 GHz. Been there, done that, several times over. Great, Lennie. Then why don't you expend your verbose antagonisms in a military or commercial radio related newsgroup...?!?! This forum is about AMATEUR RADIO. Then why have you discussed the SPACE BUSINESS at length in here with another, neither one of you having ANY experience in the space business? It's very apparent that you are lost and refuse to look at a map or stop and ask directions. Tsk, tsk. I use maps all the time. MapQuest very handy for trips. Available free over the Internet! Maps from AAA also free, have an up-to-date collection (rather used) in the car. :-) I bet that drives Mrs Lennie nuts. Not at all. Why you mention wife? You like other guys' wives? I'll bet that drives Mrs. Nursie nuts! :-) NURSIE need some mental therapy, is in a good place to get it. She never avails herself of that. Still waiting on your credentials to make such a determination. Still waiting for those "authorities" to show up and take me away to be committed...that you said you could get with a simple phone call. Tsk, tsk. NURSIE not have authority...or guts to try it. So far it's just an obvious shill to try and detract from the black eyes you keep collecting in here. What "black eyes," Diminutive Man? My eyes are still blue, cute as ever. :-) Go get some mental therapy, NURSIE. You have "qualifications" to commit yourself. You got NO authority to commit anyone else. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , More than you. By a mile. You were nothing more than a radio mechanic. That's ALL the evidence you have ever provided this forum. YOU were NEVER a "military radio operator". NOT "mechanic," Diminutive Man. Fixed station operations and maintenance supervisor. But never a radio OPERATOR. Yes, I was. QSYing a transmitter and making sure it stays on frequency is OPERATING. HF comms across Pacific would routinely do about 3 QSYs per 24 hour period. With at least 30 transmitters on-circuit 24/7 that meant at least 10 QSYs per shift. QSYs had to be fast to minimize circuit out time, were done in under 3 minutes...more than half of which required frequency standards at receiver site to confirm mark and space frequencies for RTTY circuits. Down-time reduction was important when monthly throughput of messages averaged 220 thousand (1955). HF transmitter with 1 KW or more, dozens of them. But never a radio OPERATOR. Yell-yell WRONGO again. See above. Yell-yell not able to change final links on 15 KW Press Wireless transmitter in time required. :-) Microwave radio relay operations and maintenance supervisor. But never a radio OPERATOR. Not as AMATEUR operator, Yell-yell. Try to understand that 24/7 operations is NOT the same as AMATEUR fun and games. Serious business to maximize up-time on circuits. Twenty-four voice channel 1.8 GHz terminals made by GE. Who cares if they were made by The Hand of God? GE (General Electric Company) is NOT that religious...they just made good radio and electronics equipment. You were never a radio OPERATOR. WRONGO again. Using an AN/PRC-6 HT or the manpack (we called it "backpack" then) AN/PRC-8 most definitely involved OPERATING...as close to the amateur idea of OPERATING but without all the QSLs or the fish stories of DXCC awards. :-) I wasn't an ANTEC employeee, Lennie. I worked for a subsidiary. Sorry you have a problem with that, but have a good laugh...it IS at your own expense. Tsk, tsk, TSK! I never mentioned "ANTEC." Doesn't matter...all you were was a purchasing agent, and for less than half a year. NO work IN engineering, doing design or test. NURSIE need to talk to the Barkers and tell them, in no uncertain terms, that ANY honoring of Korean War dead is "dishonorable!" But you don't honor them, Lennie. Poor NURSIE, got the differences of HONOR and DISHONOR all mixed up. You try to USE thier sacrifices in order to make yourself look better in THIS forum. ? NURSIE MANUFACTURED "dishonor." It's got nothing to do with the Department of Defense. Yes it does. U.S. Army part of Department of Defense. 71st Signal Service Battalion was part of U.S. Army. I was in the 71st as well as all those other soldiers of the 71st. It's got nothing to do with the Pacific Stars and Stripes or any other veteran's organizations or websites. Tell that to all the military members and their dependents then. Stars & Stripes military newspaper is published worldwide FOR them. Tell that to Hal and Ted Barker of the Korean War Project. Tell them that they "dishonor" the Korean veterans by having that website. "Tell it to the Marines." :-) It's about Leonard H. Anderson trying to use the sacrifices of Soldiers who died in combat three years before he was even inducted in order to somehow glorify his otherwise lackluster Army service in an Amateur Radio newsgroup. WRONGO again. Tsk. I wasn't "inducted." I was a volunteer. That showed up on my Army Serial Number as the "RA" prefix. Inductees got a "US" prefix on that ASN. "Lackluster career?" I was assigned in a "rear area." Most battalions serving an area command ARE in rear areas. Very few got a chance to pick where they were going to be. I never intended to make a "career" in the military. I would be drafted soon anyway and took a personal step to volunteer. No problem. "Lackluster?" Tsk, tsk. It was the opportunity for the radio-interested to begin in BIG TIME communications. ACAN (Army Command and Administrative Network) was worldwide, thousands of circuits, all in operation 24/7. No hobby that, was military Big Business sort of operations. It's about your misdeeds in THIS forum. Tsk, tsk. In Stevieland of Fantasy, a "misdeed" is TALKING BACK to the gunnery nurse! :-) Poor NURSIE, still smarting about being talked-back to! Tsk. I am sure you ARE sorry to have encountered me. Nah. NURSIE just like all the other ego-boosting self-important ignoramuses waving credientials and claiming smarts and self- importance. Seen dozens just like her. Really sucks to try and pull off the silly stuf you do in here only to have someone who KNOWS BETTER to derail it for ya... Okay, when I find one of those, I'll tell everyone who it is... So far, I haven't found any that "knows better." Hi hi and a Ho ho! :-) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
trying to get back on packet using my old equipment | Digital | |||
BPL - UPLC ->Repeat the lie three times and claim it for truth | Policy | |||
The Game's Afoot! | Policy | |||
Do Hams get 11 Meters Back | General |