Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41   Report Post  
Old September 13th 04, 01:55 AM
William
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Dave Heil wrote in message ...
Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

William wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote in message


Heck your
fishing expeditions wouldn't be half as much fun without him here.


"Fishing expeditions?" I don't fish.

PCTA bait their hooks and offer me their lines. No problem at all
to reel them in. Easy thing.


You seem to have some confusion on the concept of fishing. Let's
see...."they" bait their hooks and offer you a line. Now then, *you*
have a reel? It doesn't sound like an easy thing at all.


Dave, if you're a big enough fish, the fisherman becomes the quary.
  #42   Report Post  
Old September 13th 04, 03:07 AM
Mike Coslo
 
Posts: n/a
Default



William wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote in message ...

There is a difference between civil anonymity and non-civil anonymity.
To not get that is to not get it.

- Mike KB3EIA -



Incorrect.

If there is no disagreement, then anonymity is just peachy.

But it is their anonymity that is -attacked- when there is a
disagreement, i.e., Steve calls them cowardly scum for hiding behind a
mask.


But I am not Steve!

What a broad paintbrush we paint with.

- Mike KB3EIA -

  #43   Report Post  
Old September 13th 04, 01:27 PM
William
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
William wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote in message ...

There is a difference between civil anonymity and non-civil anonymity.
To not get that is to not get it.

- Mike KB3EIA -



Incorrect.

If there is no disagreement, then anonymity is just peachy.

But it is their anonymity that is -attacked- when there is a
disagreement, i.e., Steve calls them cowardly scum for hiding behind a
mask.


But I am not Steve!

What a broad paintbrush we paint with.

- Mike KB3EIA -


You tolerate it, even condone it.

What a broad zone of tolerance you have for the PCTA, and how narrow it gets...
  #45   Report Post  
Old September 13th 04, 06:48 PM
Mike Coslo
 
Posts: n/a
Default

N2EY wrote:
In article , Mike Coslo
writes:


I have to ask...

Who is Moe, who is Larry, and who is Curly/Shemp?


hehe, well we all know who Moe is!



I don't. C'mon, spell it out.


Now figuring out the other two is more of a problem.



Let's do a poll!

73 de Jim, N2EY

(who actually met Moe Howard back in the 1970s)


Most incredibly Kewl!



Let's look at the personalities:

Moe - impatient, grumpy, and given to yelling, temper tantrums and name
calling.

Out of the three, Lenover21, William, and Steve, the person showing the
biggest tendency to do this is of course Lenover21. While Steve can
certainly throw out the insults with the best of them, he reserves it
for when he is provoked. Len apparently finds my middle of the road and
mild posts provoking.
Next is a problem. Larry is a relatively mild mannered straight man that
bears half or maybe more of Moe's angry outbursts, plus an unending
stream of name calling. I have to see Larry as more like myself or even
you, Jim!

Now to the others. William appears to feel kind of put-upon lately,
judging from his posts. I think that the stooge that most fits his
present situation is Joe Besser. I can still hear Joe' "Stopp iit" when
I think of him.

Now for the last of the trio. Remember how Curly Howard would get all
spun up and make noises when Moe would poke him in the eye or smack him
on the head with a hammer. He was good for a "hmmmm.. wise guy!",
barking at Moe, and even getting in pokes at Moe of his own.

Yes, Curly Howard in this poll is our own Steve.


Isn't it fascinating that the Stooges were lind of looked down upon in
their time, and now have truly achieved immortality? And all that, when
they apparently never read a script that they didn't like. That is a
talent they shared with Lucille Ball. Both could take garbage material,
and make us laugh with it. Genius.

- Mike KB3EIA -



  #46   Report Post  
Old September 13th 04, 09:58 PM
Dave Heil
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

Oh, and the anonymousies are anonymous because they can't
handle it under their own identity. Think of that. :-)


Dunno. I don't see anything either of them have posted that is
particularly "non-handlable".


Both are NOT INVOLVED!


We don't know if they are involved or not. We do know that *you* are
not involved.

No ID, nothing.


They may or may not have amateur radio callsigns. We do know that *you*
have none.

Follow der uber-oberst's commands given in here. He is PCTA extra.

:-)


I'm sure that the statement, "Len Anderson is not a radio amateur" will
be taken by you as a command. :-)

Dave K8MN
  #47   Report Post  
Old September 13th 04, 10:18 PM
Dave Heil
 
Posts: n/a
Default

William wrote:

Dave Heil wrote in message ...
Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

Len Over 21 wrote:

In article , Mike Coslo
writes:

William wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote in message


Heck your
fishing expeditions wouldn't be half as much fun without him here.

"Fishing expeditions?" I don't fish.

PCTA bait their hooks and offer me their lines. No problem at all
to reel them in. Easy thing.


You seem to have some confusion on the concept of fishing. Let's
see...."they" bait their hooks and offer you a line. Now then, *you*
have a reel? It doesn't sound like an easy thing at all.


Dave, if you're a big enough fish, the fisherman becomes the quary.


Yeah, and they have reels! Have it your way, "William".

Dave K8MN
  #48   Report Post  
Old September 13th 04, 10:20 PM
Dave Heil
 
Posts: n/a
Default

William wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
William wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote in message ...

There is a difference between civil anonymity and non-civil anonymity.
To not get that is to not get it.

- Mike KB3EIA -


Incorrect.

If there is no disagreement, then anonymity is just peachy.

But it is their anonymity that is -attacked- when there is a
disagreement, i.e., Steve calls them cowardly scum for hiding behind a
mask.


But I am not Steve!

What a broad paintbrush we paint with.

- Mike KB3EIA -


You tolerate it, even condone it.

What a broad zone of tolerance you have for the PCTA, and how narrow it gets...


If you'd added your Farnsworth testing boilerplate and the bit about
repeater owners enriching themselves, I'd think you were going mad.

Dave K8MN
  #50   Report Post  
Old September 14th 04, 01:20 AM
Mike Coslo
 
Posts: n/a
Default



William wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote in message ...

William wrote:

Mike Coslo wrote in message ...


There is a difference between civil anonymity and non-civil anonymity.
To not get that is to not get it.

- Mike KB3EIA -


Incorrect.

If there is no disagreement, then anonymity is just peachy.

But it is their anonymity that is -attacked- when there is a
disagreement, i.e., Steve calls them cowardly scum for hiding behind a
mask.


But I am not Steve!

What a broad paintbrush we paint with.

- Mike KB3EIA -



You tolerate it, even condone it.

What a broad zone of tolerance you have for the PCTA, and how narrow it gets...


I tolerate Leo too.

Tolerance isn't in fashion much these days. Too bad.

- Mike KB3EIA -

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ARS License Numbers N2EY Policy 833 February 3rd 06 02:27 AM
Ping Quitefine Blackguard Policy 26 September 9th 04 01:17 PM
Another D-H* NCVEC proposal Alun Policy 104 August 26th 04 01:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017