Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Heil wrote in message ...
Len Over 21 wrote: In article , Mike Coslo writes: Len Over 21 wrote: In article , Mike Coslo writes: William wrote: Mike Coslo wrote in message Heck your fishing expeditions wouldn't be half as much fun without him here. "Fishing expeditions?" I don't fish. PCTA bait their hooks and offer me their lines. No problem at all to reel them in. Easy thing. You seem to have some confusion on the concept of fishing. Let's see...."they" bait their hooks and offer you a line. Now then, *you* have a reel? It doesn't sound like an easy thing at all. Dave, if you're a big enough fish, the fisherman becomes the quary. |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() William wrote: Mike Coslo wrote in message ... There is a difference between civil anonymity and non-civil anonymity. To not get that is to not get it. - Mike KB3EIA - Incorrect. If there is no disagreement, then anonymity is just peachy. But it is their anonymity that is -attacked- when there is a disagreement, i.e., Steve calls them cowardly scum for hiding behind a mask. But I am not Steve! What a broad paintbrush we paint with. - Mike KB3EIA - |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
William wrote: Mike Coslo wrote in message ... There is a difference between civil anonymity and non-civil anonymity. To not get that is to not get it. - Mike KB3EIA - Incorrect. If there is no disagreement, then anonymity is just peachy. But it is their anonymity that is -attacked- when there is a disagreement, i.e., Steve calls them cowardly scum for hiding behind a mask. But I am not Steve! What a broad paintbrush we paint with. - Mike KB3EIA - You tolerate it, even condone it. What a broad zone of tolerance you have for the PCTA, and how narrow it gets... |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
N2EY wrote:
In article , Mike Coslo writes: I have to ask... Who is Moe, who is Larry, and who is Curly/Shemp? hehe, well we all know who Moe is! I don't. C'mon, spell it out. Now figuring out the other two is more of a problem. Let's do a poll! 73 de Jim, N2EY (who actually met Moe Howard back in the 1970s) Most incredibly Kewl! Let's look at the personalities: Moe - impatient, grumpy, and given to yelling, temper tantrums and name calling. Out of the three, Lenover21, William, and Steve, the person showing the biggest tendency to do this is of course Lenover21. While Steve can certainly throw out the insults with the best of them, he reserves it for when he is provoked. Len apparently finds my middle of the road and mild posts provoking. Next is a problem. Larry is a relatively mild mannered straight man that bears half or maybe more of Moe's angry outbursts, plus an unending stream of name calling. I have to see Larry as more like myself or even you, Jim! Now to the others. William appears to feel kind of put-upon lately, judging from his posts. I think that the stooge that most fits his present situation is Joe Besser. I can still hear Joe' "Stopp iit" when I think of him. Now for the last of the trio. Remember how Curly Howard would get all spun up and make noises when Moe would poke him in the eye or smack him on the head with a hammer. He was good for a "hmmmm.. wise guy!", barking at Moe, and even getting in pokes at Moe of his own. Yes, Curly Howard in this poll is our own Steve. Isn't it fascinating that the Stooges were lind of looked down upon in their time, and now have truly achieved immortality? And all that, when they apparently never read a script that they didn't like. That is a talent they shared with Lucille Ball. Both could take garbage material, and make us laugh with it. Genius. - Mike KB3EIA - |
#46
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , Mike Coslo writes: Oh, and the anonymousies are anonymous because they can't handle it under their own identity. Think of that. :-) Dunno. I don't see anything either of them have posted that is particularly "non-handlable". Both are NOT INVOLVED! We don't know if they are involved or not. We do know that *you* are not involved. No ID, nothing. They may or may not have amateur radio callsigns. We do know that *you* have none. Follow der uber-oberst's commands given in here. He is PCTA extra. :-) I'm sure that the statement, "Len Anderson is not a radio amateur" will be taken by you as a command. :-) Dave K8MN |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
William wrote:
Dave Heil wrote in message ... Len Over 21 wrote: In article , Mike Coslo writes: Len Over 21 wrote: In article , Mike Coslo writes: William wrote: Mike Coslo wrote in message Heck your fishing expeditions wouldn't be half as much fun without him here. "Fishing expeditions?" I don't fish. PCTA bait their hooks and offer me their lines. No problem at all to reel them in. Easy thing. You seem to have some confusion on the concept of fishing. Let's see...."they" bait their hooks and offer you a line. Now then, *you* have a reel? It doesn't sound like an easy thing at all. Dave, if you're a big enough fish, the fisherman becomes the quary. Yeah, and they have reels! Have it your way, "William". Dave K8MN |
#48
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
William wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote in message ... William wrote: Mike Coslo wrote in message ... There is a difference between civil anonymity and non-civil anonymity. To not get that is to not get it. - Mike KB3EIA - Incorrect. If there is no disagreement, then anonymity is just peachy. But it is their anonymity that is -attacked- when there is a disagreement, i.e., Steve calls them cowardly scum for hiding behind a mask. But I am not Steve! What a broad paintbrush we paint with. - Mike KB3EIA - You tolerate it, even condone it. What a broad zone of tolerance you have for the PCTA, and how narrow it gets... If you'd added your Farnsworth testing boilerplate and the bit about repeater owners enriching themselves, I'd think you were going mad. Dave K8MN |
#49
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() William wrote: PAMNO (N2EY) wrote in message ... In article , Mike Coslo writes: I have to ask... Who is Moe, who is Larry, and who is Curly/Shemp? hehe, well we all know who Moe is! I don't. C'mon, spell it out. Now figuring out the other two is more of a problem. Let's do a poll! 73 de Jim, N2EY More Extra Class civility? C'mon Brian! This is about as tame as it gets in Netnews. Are you *really* this sensitive, or just another excuse to bust our chops? - Mike KB3EIA - |
#50
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() William wrote: Mike Coslo wrote in message ... William wrote: Mike Coslo wrote in message ... There is a difference between civil anonymity and non-civil anonymity. To not get that is to not get it. - Mike KB3EIA - Incorrect. If there is no disagreement, then anonymity is just peachy. But it is their anonymity that is -attacked- when there is a disagreement, i.e., Steve calls them cowardly scum for hiding behind a mask. But I am not Steve! What a broad paintbrush we paint with. - Mike KB3EIA - You tolerate it, even condone it. What a broad zone of tolerance you have for the PCTA, and how narrow it gets... I tolerate Leo too. Tolerance isn't in fashion much these days. Too bad. - Mike KB3EIA - |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARS License Numbers | Policy | |||
Ping Quitefine | Policy | |||
Another D-H* NCVEC proposal | Policy |