Okay folks,

We have a few posters here that are anonymous.

I decided to look into the N2EY-Quitefine connection

What is your evidence for Jim being Quitefine?


Most of Jim's posts - interestingly enough with his callsign - are
posted from google, whereas Quitefine's are all posted from AOL. A small
number of Jim's are posted from AOL, although from the headers,
Quitefine could also be Steve too.

But I doubt it is either of them.

More importantly, it is of interest that some of the people that are so
concerned about these anonymii are more concerned about that anonymity.
not either one is engaging in name calling, although Blackguard seems a
bit coarser.

Can't you guys handle it?


I am -
at least
I think I am -

- Mike KB3EIA -

I think! ;^)

Subject: Jim = Quitefine?
From: Mike Coslo
Date: 9/10/2004 10:40 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

Okay folks,

We have a few posters here that are anonymous.

I decided to look into the N2EY-Quitefine connection

What is your evidence for Jim being Quitefine?


Most of Jim's posts - interestingly enough with his callsign - are
posted from google, whereas Quitefine's are all posted from AOL. A small
number of Jim's are posted from AOL, although from the headers,
Quitefine could also be Steve too.

Not I, kindly Sir!

But I do know who!

And I'm not telling!

73

Steve, K4YZ

"Mike Coslo" wrote

Quitefine could also be Steve too.

Only if you decide to suspend credulousness. Quitefine engages in
debates with manners, and does not try to win them by pure weight of
pejoratives and name calling. That easily distinguishes him(her?) from
Steve. If Quitefine is the space-shuttle of civility, then Steve is a
paper airplane.

With all kind wishes,

de Hans, K0HB

In article , Mike Coslo writes:

Okay folks,

We have a few posters here that are anonymous.

I decided to look into the N2EY-Quitefine connection

What is your evidence for Jim being Quitefine?


Most of Jim's posts - interestingly enough with his callsign - are
posted from google, whereas Quitefine's are all posted from AOL. A small
number of Jim's are posted from AOL, although from the headers,
Quitefine could also be Steve too.

But I doubt it is either of them.

More importantly, it is of interest that some of the people that are so
concerned about these anonymii are more concerned about that anonymity.
not either one is engaging in name calling, although Blackguard seems a
bit coarser.

Can't you guys handle it?


I am -
at least
I think I am -

- Mike KB3EIA -

I think! ;^)

You put Descarte before de horse... :-)

Oh, and the anonymousies are anonymous because they can't
handle it under their own identity. Think of that. :-)

Subject: Jim = Quitefine?
From: "KØHB"
Date: 9/10/2004 12:06 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id: .net


"Mike Coslo" wrote

Quitefine could also be Steve too.

Only if you decide to suspend credulousness. Quitefine engages in
debates with manners, and does not try to win them by pure weight of
pejoratives and name calling. That easily distinguishes him(her?) from
Steve. If Quitefine is the space-shuttle of civility, then Steve is a
paper airplane.

And of course THIS was NOT a "perjorative" on your part, Hans, and you are
eminently innocent of namecalling and flaming.

Do you have to spend twice as much money shaving BOTH of those faces,
Hans?


Steve, K4YZ

"Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote:


And of course THIS was NOT a "perjorative" on your part, Hans...


The word is pejorative, Steve, not "perjorative", so of course it was
not "perjorative" on my part.

Sunuvagun!

72.5,

de Hans, K0HB

PS: Unlike the rather civilized "Quitefine", I give as good as I get.
Sorry if you can't handle that, but try to get used to it.

Subject: Jim = Quitefine?
From: "KØHB"
Date: 9/10/2004 6:07 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id: et


"Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote:


And of course THIS was NOT a "perjorative" on your part, Hans...


The word is pejorative, Steve, not "perjorative", so of course it was
not "perjorative" on my part.

Excuse my typo.

Sunuvagun!

72.5,

Always just a bit shy.

de Hans, K0HB

PS: Unlike the rather civilized "Quitefine", I give as good as I get.
Sorry if you can't handle that, but try to get used to it.

I can handle you quite fine, Hans. (pun intended)

I've dealt with folks like you in AND out of the service, Hans. It's
challenging, but not really difficult at all.

It's just a matter of trying to determine which face you're presenting
with any given topic.

Steve, K4YZ

Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
Okay folks,

We have a few posters here that are anonymous.

I decided to look into the N2EY-Quitefine connection

What is your evidence for Jim being Quitefine?


Most of Jim's posts - interestingly enough with his callsign - are
posted from google, whereas Quitefine's are all posted from AOL. A small
number of Jim's are posted from AOL, although from the headers,
Quitefine could also be Steve too.

But I doubt it is either of them.

More importantly, it is of interest that some of the people that are so
concerned about these anonymii are more concerned about that anonymity.
not either one is engaging in name calling, although Blackguard seems a
bit coarser.

Can't you guys handle it?


I am -
at least
I think I am -

- Mike KB3EIA -

I think! ;^)

I'm merely amused by the lack of consistency with which Steve
approaches the anonymii.

Call it PCTA double standard if you will - all perfectly acceptable on
RRAP.

"Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote


It's just a matter of trying to determine which face you're presenting
with any given topic.


What you see is what you get, Steve. Just to clear up any confusion on
your part, here are my thoughts on the predominate topics regularly
discussed here on rrap.

1 -- I think that Morse (CW) is a fun operating mode, sort of like
restoring old-time automobiles.
2 -- I do not think that Morse testing ought to be required to obtain an
amateur radio license of any class.
3 -- I think that you, Len, and Brian are a modern-day reincarnation of
the Three Stooges. You guys ought to petition NBC or CBS to revive that
show on TV.

With all kind wishes,

de Hans, K0HB

Subject: Jim = Quitefine?
From: "KØHB"
Date: 9/10/2004 7:00 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id: . net


"Steve Robeson K4CAP" wrote


It's just a matter of trying to determine which face you're presenting
with any given topic.


What you see is what you get, Steve. Just to clear up any confusion on
your part, here are my thoughts on the predominate topics regularly
discussed here on rrap.

1 -- I think that Morse (CW) is a fun operating mode, sort of like
restoring old-time automobiles.
2 -- I do not think that Morse testing ought to be required to obtain an
amateur radio license of any class.
3 -- I think that you, Len, and Brian are a modern-day reincarnation of
the Three Stooges. You guys ought to petition NBC or CBS to revive that

When I was refering to your multiple faces, I was refering to the one
where in one breath you chastise others for name calling, flaming, personal
attacks and other such conduct, then turn right around and do it yourself.

And we can include you as the fourth Stooge.

There was no confusion, except perhaps in YOUR mind, as to what was being
said, about what and/or whom.

Steve, K4YZ