Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ever need one piece of graph paper at 10:00 at night?
Here is a link to a handy website with pdf's of various types of graph paper. http://www.mathematicshelpcentral.com/graph_paper.htm - Mike KB3EIA - |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Mike Coslo
writes: Ever need one piece of graph paper at 10:00 at night? Here is a link to a handy website with pdf's of various types of graph paper. http://www.mathematicshelpcentral.com/graph_paper.htm Thanks, Mike. The linked program for generating your own graph paper is also handy. If one has a good scanner, it should be able to repro exact dimensions...such as copying the (copyrighted) commercial graph papers (such as 3-, 4-, 5-log types or Smith charts) which are "non-standard" for anyone not in electronics. :-) I use a combination of PDFs, BMPs (via MS Paint) to get 1:1 drill guides for PCBs and small chassis structures. With either Corel or Adobe photo edit programs you will find that one can do quite-exact photo reductions of 2:1 or even 3:1 by the adjustment of pixels per inch in either Corel Photo House or Adobe PhotoDeluxe 3. Other photo programs should be able to do the same thing. Good for one-of-a-kind projects. I've regularly done 2:1 scale manual PCB resist traces on a pad of vellum (gridded 0.1"), scanned that into BMP format, cleaned it up in MS Paint (image attributes set to B&W), dropped the scale to 1:1, and done the etch masks on VueGraph transparent stock. Note: Paint allows adding lettering, numbers, etc. as you need. All without going out to any photo services. Again, good for quick one-of-a-kind projects. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
ubject: Graph paper
From: (Len Over 21) Date: 10/27/2004 12:38 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Good for one-of-a-kind projects. What "one-of-a-kind" project, Lennie? You can't put a 2N2222 on the air. Steve, K4YZ |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
(William) writes: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... ubject: Graph paper From: (Len Over 21) Date: 10/27/2004 12:38 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Good for one-of-a-kind projects. What "one-of-a-kind" project, Lennie? You can't put a 2N2222 on the air. Steve, K4YZ Oh, my! Len responds with something Quiteuseful in a Quitecivil tone, and he gets more Quiteuncivil Extra-class discourse. What is RRAP coming to? I think one MUST be federally tested in morse code and have a federal amateur merit badge callsign in order to post anything in here. :-) A 2N2222 is a legacy NPN transistor that dates back to the beginning of the 1970s as a MIL part (in the small metal can). Several variants survive today, including a TO-92 case plastic variety from ST (Germany). It's about 9 cents in quantity from Mouser or Allied. [price may vary slightly so check their on-line catalogs] I do believe that is the NPN bipolar used in one of the "Tuna-Tin Two" variants. :-) Not exactly a world-shaking full gallon output. bwahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah. Sorry about the snicker. I got like totatlly underwhelmed by the "qualified medical professional" venturing outside of his bedpan expertise into tuna can expertise. The scanner-printer-photo-edit process can be very useful to anyone doing one-of-a-kind PCB projects, regardless of the application. That includes preparing an etch resist mask for 1:1 scale using prepped photosensitive board stock. For some good buys on either "raw" PCB stock or the positive sensitized variety, I'd investigate Circuit-Specialists in AZ or Ocean State Electronics in RI or even Marlin P Jones in FL. All have both website and paper catalogs. For "prototype board" 3-hole-pad (one side) that can hold up to 30 DIPs, Circuit-Specialists' PC-407912 is quite good with 4 1/2" x 6 1/2" size, 44-pin edge connector on one end. Made by "Syntax" and similar to the Douglas Electronics 11-DE series. Wiring can be done with Kynar or Teflon insulated #24 or #26 solid at frequencies up to about 60 MHz digital. [I have a bulk buy quantity of MIL-E-16878 teflon wire that I use but heavy Kynar wire-wrap solid will work for that] Actually, I *can* get "on the air" with a legacy NPN such as a '2222 or even a 2N3904 but prefer a later design with a higher cutoff frequency and higher power dissipation. CAPman doesn't understand that his ham license would cause a beef if he tried to "get on the air" OFF the ham bands. Mine does and also enables a bit of extra income. Tsk. He would NOT be legal either way trying to use his ham license for that! :-) Back to GRAPH PAPER: A few years ago some website was offering "free" JPGs of K&E graph paper forms (they have many dozens of varieties). That site was unaware of (or flaunted) the Copyright laws and pulled the stuff to avoid LEGAL problems. :-) There's nothing to stop an individual from copying their own forms for their own private use...again, a good photo scanner is a must there but those cost under $150 at worst-buy electronics stores. Nobody is going to crawl through the computer and flash their shiny Raddio Kopp badges for doing so...although some try to do that. They have NO power of arrest. Most are products of some kind of arrested development. :-) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Graph paper
From: (Len Over 21) Date: 10/27/2004 8:15 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: In article , (William) writes: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... ubject: Graph paper From: (Len Over 21) Date: 10/27/2004 12:38 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: Good for one-of-a-kind projects. What "one-of-a-kind" project, Lennie? You can't put a 2N2222 on the air. Steve, K4YZ Oh, my! Len responds with something Quiteuseful in a Quitecivil tone, and he gets more Quiteuncivil Extra-class discourse. What is RRAP coming to? I think one MUST be federally tested in morse code and have a federal amateur merit badge callsign in order to post anything in here. :-) A 2N2222 is a legacy NPN transistor that dates back...SNIP We know that. Actually, I *can* get "on the air" with a legacy NPN such as a '2222 or even a 2N3904 but prefer a later design with a higher cutoff frequency and higher power dissipation. CAPman doesn't understand that his ham license would cause a beef if he tried to "get on the air" OFF the ham bands. Mine does and also enables a bit of extra income. Tsk. He would NOT be legal either way trying to use his ham license for that! YOUR license does not allow you to "get on the air", period, without a valid STATION license that SPECIFIES frequency, mode power, operating hours, etc. Mine doesn't say that. Sucks to be you, Lennie. Steve, K4YZ |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Coslo wrote in message ...
Ever need one piece of graph paper at 10:00 at night? Yeah, I fire up Mathcad, type in the data points, tell it to solve for the function if I need it and hit the "print" button . . or I can numerically solve indefinite integrals between specific limits and find the areas under the curve too then hit the print button. Here is a link to a handy website with pdf's of various types of graph paper. http://www.mathematicshelpcentral.com/graph_paper.htm - Mike KB3EIA - w3rv |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
Sweetums blurted out: I use a combination of PDFs, BMPs (via MS Paint) to get 1:1 drill guides for PCBs and small chassis structures. Welp, I knew there had to be somebody far enough behind the curve to still be using goofy old MS Paint. For *anything*. Congratulations Sweetums, you win the annual Kill Bill Society "Last of the Mohicans" award for 2004. With either Corel or Adobe photo edit programs you will find that one can do quite-exact photo reductions of 2:1 or even 3:1 by the adjustment of pixels per inch in either Corel Photo House or Adobe PhotoDeluxe 3. Other photo programs should be able to do the same thing. Good for one-of-a-kind projects. I've regularly done 2:1 scale manual PCB resist traces on a pad of vellum (gridded 0.1"), scanned that into BMP format, cleaned it up in MS Paint (image attributes set to B&W), dropped the scale to 1:1, and done the etch masks on VueGraph transparent stock. Note: Paint allows adding lettering, numbers, etc. as you need. All without going out to any photo services. Again, good for quick one-of-a-kind projects. *GROAN*! I don't believe it, whatta bass-ackward, contorted heap of nonsense. And you're an "engineering professional" eh? As if. Now let me explain the right way to do quickie one-off PCB and panel layouts Sweetums: In the first place you don't use frigging bit maps or any of the others of it's pixel-juggling junk for engineering work, those are for touching up photos of Aunt Minnie's birthday party. Real profesionals use vector-based graphics software which are designed for engineering purposes. They're called CAD programs you see. $100 at any decent computer store gets you 2-D TurboCAD which is accurate to a millionth of an inch if one cares to get that anal about locating holes in PCBs and it goes uphill from there. Or even better dig up Felixcad LT which is a general purpose full-featured freeware 2D CAD program and dump it in. I'll put it this way: By the time you've fiddled with your pencil, graph paper, scanner and collection of low-res dimensionally raunchy photo editing software just to get a drilling pattern I'll have a complete board layout including all the traces, lettering, donuts and the drilling pattern done 100% onscreen with a single program. All I have to do from there is load a sheet of vellum into the old LaserJet, specify the scale (100:1? No sweat.) and hit the "print" button. Or print just the hole pattern. Or just the traces and such for board burning purposes, etc. Just for the hell of it I checked a couple of my layouts for dimensional errors with a Pratt & Whitney optical comparator set to 10:1 magnification and the worst error I could find was 0.003 inches over a six inch span. Which is better than the advertised limit of the printer accuracy. Try that with Paint. w3rv |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
(Brian Kelly) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... Sweetums blurted out: Who is "sweetums?" :-) I use a combination of PDFs, BMPs (via MS Paint) to get 1:1 drill guides for PCBs and small chassis structures. Welp, I knew there had to be somebody far enough behind the curve to still be using goofy old MS Paint. For *anything*. tsk, tsk, tsk... 1. MS Paint is a freebie, came with Win95, transported through Win98 and onto XP. 2. I've used it to draw schematics, small to very big, using symbols also developed on Paint. 3. Resolution is at least 300 DPI which equates to +/- 0.003 inch. 4. The repeatable accuracy of dot-matrix printers such as either the HP 722c or HP PSC2110 is +/- 0.003 inch. 5. The accuracy of the printing process is greater than I can get using ordinary hobby-type hand tools. 6. You've got to remember this hobby radio work does NOT normally need Jo-block-checked accuracy. It is a HOBBY, not a working machine shop. Congratulations Sweetums, you win the annual Kill Bill Society "Last of the Mohicans" award for 2004. Don't mess with the Mohicans, white man. :-) Snarl at Microsoft all you want. Bill G. will chuckle in his mansion. :-) With either Corel or Adobe photo edit programs you will find that one can do quite-exact photo reductions of 2:1 or even 3:1 by the adjustment of pixels per inch in either Corel Photo House or Adobe PhotoDeluxe 3. Other photo programs should be able to do the same thing. Good for one-of-a-kind projects. I've regularly done 2:1 scale manual PCB resist traces on a pad of vellum (gridded 0.1"), scanned that into BMP format, cleaned it up in MS Paint (image attributes set to B&W), dropped the scale to 1:1, and done the etch masks on VueGraph transparent stock. Note: Paint allows adding lettering, numbers, etc. as you need. All without going out to any photo services. Again, good for quick one-of-a-kind projects. *GROAN*! I don't believe it, whatta bass-ackward, contorted heap of nonsense. Tsk. You should have been over at Miccolis' shack, making those state-of-the-art chassis into something looking "professional." And you're an "engineering professional" eh? As if. You betcha. Everything from thin-film/thick-film (the first of the SMD applications) to hand-painting lacquer resist for a very quick turn-around without leaving the lab (one afternoon, start to finish). I drew the line on compression-bonding of SAW filter wires and left that to the thin/thick film tech who had more experience with a micromanipulator and bonder. SAW filters were aluminum film on quartz, about the size of fundamental crystals in HF but were 56 to 63 MHz center frequency. Now let me explain the right way to do quickie one-off PCB and panel layouts Sweetums: In the first place you don't use frigging bit maps or any of the others of it's pixel-juggling junk for engineering work, those are for touching up photos of Aunt Minnie's birthday party. Tsk, tsk, tsk. Did you feed your kiddies Gerber plot foods? :-) In the first place, you argumentative old snit, ham radio is a HOBBY, not some profession. As such, one has to approach homebrew projects from the hobby standpoint...what tools are available, what processes can be safely done at home, the experience of the hobbyist, all those things. Tsk. I've done L-band stripline layouts at 4:1 on rubylith for a finished work about 10 inches long, had it photoreduced to full scale complete with the touchups to black out blank spots for spray etching on Duroid. Was needed to get the four directional couplers on that board accurate. It was. ["L-band" is 1 to 2 GHz for you long-wavers of HF] NO ONE NEEDS that kind of accuracy or QC for simple, loose tolerance one-of-a-kind PC boards, milliameter scale overlays, or small chassis drill guides. Try to stay focussed. Real profesionals use vector-based graphics software which are designed for engineering purposes. They're called CAD programs you see. Spoken like an UNREAL professional who does NOT do regular electronics engineering. :-) Real pros will use anything that WORKS and costs the company the least amount. Ham radio isn't involved in "company" business. Acronym-wise, you have to get them straight. "CAD" is computer-assisted-DRAFTING now. "CAE" is computer- assisted-ENGINEERING. "CAD" used to be general Design stuff but that changed about a decade ago. Got news for you, mechanical man. "Vectored" lines depend on the plotter being used. If you look deep into the guts that make them work you will find those are really DIGITAL with enough temporary storage to make the picture elements ("pixels") of high density. If you want REAL analog lines (which is what "vectoring" originally meant), then you cut Rubylith...something I did about 30 years ago. $100 at any decent computer store gets you 2-D TurboCAD which is accurate to a millionth of an inch if one cares to get that anal about locating holes in PCBs and it goes uphill from there. YOU are the one getting anal about accuracy. :-) For $100 anyone can download PCB software for FREE from Express PC's website and order a couple of finished PCBs with plated-thru vias or pads, foil both sides, if laid out with their software. Or even better dig up Felixcad LT which is a general purpose full-featured freeware 2D CAD program and dump it in. Why go to all that trouble for some simple one-of-a-kind PCBs which do NOT need exceptional tolerances...or meter scale replacements...or small drill guides? MS Paint was in the Win95 bundle, Corel Photoshop was bundled with WP8, and Adobe Photo House was bundled with Acrobat. I had an earlier Adobe photo program bundled with the HP 722C. One uses what one can. I'll put it this way: By the time you've fiddled with your pencil, graph paper, scanner and collection of low-res dimensionally raunchy photo editing software just to get a drilling pattern I'll have a complete board layout including all the traces, lettering, donuts and the drilling pattern done 100% onscreen with a single program. All I have to do from there is load a sheet of vellum into the old LaserJet, specify the scale (100:1? No sweat.) and hit the "print" button. Or print just the hole pattern. Or just the traces and such for board burning purposes, etc. "Raunchy photo editing software?" :-) Is that a clue on what YOU use YOUR photo editing software for? :-) Don't have a laserjet printer...or a Gerber plotter...or have any need for "100:1" scaling. I know of where I CAN get those services...for nothing. Don't need them for hobby projects. Hobby projects don't need esthetic perfection. Electrons don't care about human esthetics. Plated-through pads and vias are a convenience, not a necessity. Just enough pad for the solder to create a physical wedge (in addition to making a good solder joint) will do it. MG Chemicals has a good "green" overspray conformal coating; can be ordered through Allied Radio. No silkscreen reference designations for one-of-a-kinds needed if you have the original drawings. Manual PCB layouts are fine for not-dense boards. Autorouters are a help and programs for plotting with 20-thousandths wide traces and photo etch are a must. I don't try manual resist patterns at that kind of density...but I do try a manual layout BEFORE going either manual or programmed resist pattern. Some of us are good at that sort of thing and some are not; I am towards the good side. Having been an illustrator helps in that regard. Just for the hell of it I checked a couple of my layouts for dimensional errors with a Pratt & Whitney optical comparator set to 10:1 magnification and the worst error I could find was 0.003 inches over a six inch span. Which is better than the advertised limit of the printer accuracy. Try that with Paint. What I actually tried was to draw a couple of dimensions (two each of 5 inches) on a piece of vellum from a pad (Clearprint No. 1000H-10, each pad 50 sheets 8 1/2 x 11 inches, got a bunch of those from Staples long ago), run it through the Umax digital scanner, then print it out. Did the same with Paint for a second image, printed that out. Lacking a Pratt & Whitney optical comparator (not exactly in every ham shack or hobby workshop), I used an old single-piece steel alloy scale and got the SAME dimensions. To be honest, I didn't send the scale to NIST for precise calibration and I don't have a set of Jo-blocks at home and no laser interferometer to measure precise distances. Making simple punch marks by naked eyeball (being near-sighted helps) for drilling by a B&D variable-speed electric drill is what I normally do. :-) For PCBs I use an old Dremel Moto-Tool in the old-style Dremel mini- drill press holder (there's a new model Dremel that works more like the standard drill press). A Powerstat is used to slow down the Dremel's speed to suit the work material (Superior Electric, comparable to the GR Variac, does the same function). The trick for hobby purposes and ordinary workshops is to allow for sloppy location of holes with slightly over-size ones and manuevering room. Electrons, fields, and waves don't much give a snit what fancy instrument you use to make the supports or enclosures for their circuits. They don't care how much you make, how much you brag about income, job title, or ham class. You work by THEIR rules not by your shouting and snarling. Same for professional or amateur. Try to remember that. Len |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Brian Kelly) wrote in message om...
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ... Sweetums blurted out: I use a combination of PDFs, BMPs (via MS Paint) to get 1:1 drill guides for PCBs and small chassis structures. Welp, I knew there had to be somebody far enough behind the curve to still be using goofy old MS Paint. For *anything*. Congratulations Sweetums, you win the annual Kill Bill Society "Last of the Mohicans" award for 2004. Sheesh! Just when you thought you'd get slapped on the back for using something old and outdated... Wonder if I can still get Dr. Halo to boot up? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Old Paper Caps - Are they Always Bad? | Boatanchors | |||
high quality graph of nice 0-100 analog scale? | Homebrew | |||
"Press n' Peel Blue" PCB paper AND new laser printers. | Homebrew | |||
"Press n' Peel Blue" PCB paper AND new laser printers. | Homebrew |