Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not to be picking nits, Steve, but "information bulletin" is two words.
Information can be gathered through facts as well as opinions. I doubt that Todd is airing any informational bulletins/broadcasts/shows at all. If he is, and the material is outside that permitted by regulation, the FCC will nail his hide to the barn door. I would count on it....I am on. As for material is "consisting solely of subject matter of direct interest to the amateur service" Todd N9OGL |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "N9OGL" wrote in message oups.com... K1MAN has been on he air for a long time....So will I hehehehehe Really? I haven't heard your hero in several weeks, in fact the word has it he is gone. Dan/W4NTI |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
N9OGL wrote:
The FCC FROM N9OGL'S BLOG http://n9oglvoice.blogspot.com/ The Federal Communication Commission (FCC) are slime, no they are below slime. As most of aware I have been fighting a long battle against the FCC over the licensing system. This battle began in the 1997, 1998 when I applied six time for a Low Power TV license for a community which has no local television service. So because you can't write a proposal that shows you have an education above 6th grade, and there is a no need for your local television service, the FCC dismisses it and they are slime. Just because you request something isn't an automatic guarantee you will get it. The FCC doesn't exists just to grant your childish wishes. Grow up toddyboy. Now, I'm going to enlighten the ham community with my knowledge That shouldn't take more than 5 minutes. Grow up toddyboy. |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
N9OGL wrote:
At any rate the FCC may consider waivers at anytime and courts have gone farther to say "the FCC MUST consider waivers" regardless if they are in a filing window or not. But it doesn't say they must grant them. Grow up toddyboy. |
#25
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan/W4NTI wrote:
Hey Steve....ya think this guy is kin to K1MAN? Dan/W4NTI Maybe it MAN's son! They do act a somewhat alike. |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If he was removed by the FCC they would of announce it......someone
must of cut his coax. Todd N9OGL |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Aye, matey, toss off ye scurvy dogs and man the guns!! There's
piratin' ta do!! Arrrg!! |
#28
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() N9OGL wrote: (and once again violates nettiquette by not making attributions) K1MAN has been on he air for a long time....So will I hehehehehe Yes, he has... He also has a huge legal bill. He also has a history of federal fines and charges. So will you. Hope it's worth it, Toddie! Steve, K4YZ |
#29
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() N9OGL wrote (without attributing his quotes): Not to be picking nits, Steve, but "information bulletin" is two words. Hey...no kidding, Toddie. WHERE did I say OTHERWISE...?!?! Information can be gathered through facts as well as opinions. You can call it blue polka dotted hen feathers for all I care, Toddie. The results will be the same. I doubt that Todd is airing any informational bulletins/broadcasts/shows at all. If he is, and the material is outside that permitted by regulation, the FCC will nail his hide to the barn door. I would count on it....I am on. As for material is "consisting solely of subject matter of direct interest to the amateur service". If it's tainted with your opinion, it ceases to be "information" and is highly unlikely to be of any interest to "the amateur service". Steve, K4YZ |
#30
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dan/W4NTI wrote: Hey Steve....ya think this guy is kin to K1MAN? Hey Dan...I dunno...can any two "human beings" have that little supporting DNA and still maintain life? If he is, he comes from an already shallow gene pool! 73 Steve, K4YZ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|