K=D8HB wrote:
Lloyd wrote:

We are still waiting for you to post proof.
Well?

When it comes to proof, Steve is long on demanding, but short on
providing.

HANS!

I see it's thawed out enough up there for you to start oozing back
out from under the septic tank lid!

I see your first "comments" on your return are not to get into
some meaningful conversations, but to sling a bit of mud yourself!

I don't know what EVER possessed me to think that you would ever
actually live up to your own rhetoric about newsgroup conduct, "not
saying anything unless you ahve something constructive to say"...

But...there you are...Lennie Of The North. No More, No Less.

Steve, K4YZ

"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...
KØHB wrote:
Lloyd wrote:

We are still waiting for you to post proof.
Well?

When it comes to proof, Steve is long on demanding, but short on
providing.

HANS!

I see it's thawed out enough up there for you to start oozing back
out from under the septic tank lid!

I see your first "comments" on your return are not to get into
some meaningful conversations, but to sling a bit of mud yourself!

I don't know what EVER possessed me to think that you would ever
actually live up to your own rhetoric about newsgroup conduct, "not
saying anything unless you ahve something constructive to say"...

But...there you are...Lennie Of The North. No More, No Less.

Steve, K4YZ



I welcome the return of Hans and his rather unique views on various topics.
You might say Hans calls things like they are.
Welcome back Hans!

Randy Bradford
Dallas, TX

Randy Bradford wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...
K=D8HB wrote:
Lloyd wrote:

We are still waiting for you to post proof.
Well?

When it comes to proof, Steve is long on demanding, but short on
providing.

HANS!

I see it's thawed out enough up there for you to start oozing
back
out from under the septic tank lid!

I see your first "comments" on your return are not to get into
some meaningful conversations, but to sling a bit of mud yourself!

I don't know what EVER possessed me to think that you would ever
actually live up to your own rhetoric about newsgroup conduct, "not
saying anything unless you ahve something constructive to say"...

But...there you are...Lennie Of The North. No More, No Less.

Steve, K4YZ

I welcome the return of Hans and his rather unique views on various
topics.
You might say Hans calls things like they are.
Welcome back Hans!

Randy Bradford
Dallas, TX

Lots of people have their differences on rrap, but Hans doesn't resort
to dispicable veiled threats of bricks through windows, slashed tires,
or terrorized wives.

bb wrote:
Randy Bradford wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...
K=D8HB wrote:
Lloyd wrote:

We are still waiting for you to post proof.
Well?

When it comes to proof, Steve is long on demanding, but short on
providing.

HANS!

I see it's thawed out enough up there for you to start oozing
back
out from under the septic tank lid!

I see your first "comments" on your return are not to get into
some meaningful conversations, but to sling a bit of mud yourself!

I don't know what EVER possessed me to think that you would
ever
actually live up to your own rhetoric about newsgroup conduct, "not
saying anything unless you ahve something constructive to say"...

But...there you are...Lennie Of The North. No More, No Less.

Steve, K4YZ

I welcome the return of Hans and his rather unique views on various
topics.
You might say Hans calls things like they are.
Welcome back Hans!

Randy Bradford
Dallas, TX

Lots of people have their differences on rrap, but Hans doesn't
resort
to dispicable veiled threats of bricks through windows, slashed
tires,
or terrorized wives.

Neither do I.

Quote, please?

Steve,K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
Randy Bradford wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...
K=D8HB wrote:
Lloyd wrote:

We are still waiting for you to post proof.
Well?

When it comes to proof, Steve is long on demanding, but short
on
providing.

HANS!

I see it's thawed out enough up there for you to start
oozing
back
out from under the septic tank lid!

I see your first "comments" on your return are not to get
into
some meaningful conversations, but to sling a bit of mud
yourself!

I don't know what EVER possessed me to think that you would
ever
actually live up to your own rhetoric about newsgroup conduct,
"not
saying anything unless you ahve something constructive to say"...

But...there you are...Lennie Of The North. No More, No
Less.

Steve, K4YZ

I welcome the return of Hans and his rather unique views on
various
topics.
You might say Hans calls things like they are.
Welcome back Hans!

Randy Bradford
Dallas, TX

Lots of people have their differences on rrap, but Hans doesn't
resort
to dispicable veiled threats of bricks through windows, slashed
tires,
or terrorized wives.

Neither do I.

You do.

Quote, please?
=20
Steve,K4YZ

You know what you said. I know what you said.

"bb" wrote in message
oups.com...

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
Randy Bradford wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote in message
oups.com...
KØHB wrote:
Lloyd wrote:

We are still waiting for you to post proof.
Well?

When it comes to proof, Steve is long on demanding, but short
on
providing.

HANS!

I see it's thawed out enough up there for you to start
oozing
back
out from under the septic tank lid!

I see your first "comments" on your return are not to get
into
some meaningful conversations, but to sling a bit of mud
yourself!

I don't know what EVER possessed me to think that you would
ever
actually live up to your own rhetoric about newsgroup conduct,
"not
saying anything unless you ahve something constructive to say"...

But...there you are...Lennie Of The North. No More, No
Less.

Steve, K4YZ

I welcome the return of Hans and his rather unique views on
various
topics.
You might say Hans calls things like they are.
Welcome back Hans!

Randy Bradford
Dallas, TX

Lots of people have their differences on rrap, but Hans doesn't
resort
to dispicable veiled threats of bricks through windows, slashed
tires,
or terrorized wives.

Neither do I.

You do.

Quote, please?

Steve,K4YZ

You know what you said. I know what you said.



K4YZ is quick to demand proof and slow to produce proof.

An Anonymous Remailer wrote:

K4YZ is quick to demand proof and slow to produce proof.

And he lies.

bb wrote:
An Anonymous Remailer wrote:

K4YZ is quick to demand proof and slow to produce proof.

And he lies.

So far, other than refusing to tell you the nature of my military
duties, you have nothing to "back up" that assertion, Brain.

And the reason I don't discuss THOSE matters with you is that the
time I DID discuss with you (in private e-mail), YOU violated my trust
by bringing those private e-mails to the NG contrary to your agreement
to not do it.

Now...How's your kid gonna feel about Dad acting like that???

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
An Anonymous Remailer wrote:

K4YZ is quick to demand proof and slow to produce proof.

And he lies.

So far, other than refusing to tell you the nature of my military
duties, you have nothing to "back up" that assertion, Brain.

"Sorry Hans, MARS IS Amateur Radio."

Why did you tell Len about slashed tires, bricks through windows, and
terrorized wives???

And the reason I don't discuss THOSE matters with you is that
the
time I DID discuss with you (in private e-mail),

You used to send me all kinds of crap, even though I've asked you not
to. I prefer to keep everything public. You're not to be trusted.

YOU violated my trust
by bringing those private e-mails to the NG contrary to your
agreement
to not do it.

What agreement? What trust? You're a liar.

bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
bb wrote:
An Anonymous Remailer wrote:

K4YZ is quick to demand proof and slow to produce proof.

And he lies.

So far, other than refusing to tell you the nature of my
military
duties, you have nothing to "back up" that assertion, Brain.

"Sorry Hans, MARS IS Amateur Radio."

Why did you tell Len about slashed tires, bricks through windows, and
terrorized wives???

Becasue it was pertinent at the time. And factual, according to
the

And the reason I don't discuss THOSE matters with you is that
the
time I DID discuss with you (in private e-mail),

You used to send me all kinds of crap, even though I've asked you not
to. I prefer to keep everything public. You're not to be trusted.

And you've never asked me to "keep everything public."

I can understand your desire to do so, though...You're just one of
those folks who get's "stimulation" from being publically humiliated.
You certainly provide plenty of opportunities to do so!

YOU violated my trust
by bringing those private e-mails to the NG contrary to your
agreement
to not do it.

What agreement? What trust? You're a liar.

The agreement wherein you told me in an open post that you'd keep
anything exchanged in e mail confidential.

You didn't do it.

And no, I'm not. I'm INTOLERANT of liars and lies, which is why I
keep after you and yours...

But it's getting hard to keep up...You are nothing if not
prolific.

Steve, K4YZ