Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From Todd's "blog"....
QUOTE: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 UPDATE: 2 METERS INFORMATION BULLETIN N9OGL is planning this summer to run his information bulletin / amateur related programs on 2 meters. It will begin in June on 145.570 MHz between 5.00pm to midnight. UNQUOTE Someone needs to teach this idiot about the 2 meter band plans. 144.0-144.05 EME CW 144.05-144.10 CW and weak signal 144.10-144.20 EME and weak signal SSB 144.200 National calling frequency 144.20-144.275 SSB 144.275-144.30 Beacons 144.3-144.5 New OSCAR subband 144.5-144.6 Linear translator inputs 144.6-144.9 FM repeater inputs 144.9-145.10 Weak signal and FM simplex 145.01,03,05,07,09 widely used for packet 145.1-145.2 Linear translator outputs 145.2-145.5 FM repeater outputs 145.5-145.8 Misc. and experimental modes Why are you going to use 145.57 for "Information Bulletins" in a part of the spectrum used for experimenting and other non-traditional modes and techniques, Todd...?!?! Yes, you can "rationalize" that "miscellaneous" means you, but why put your sin=mplex 2 meter FM voice signal where people will not be typically looking for one? Also, the International Space Station has been operating varying spaceborne repeater activities in this region...Just think of how many people you'll REALLY PO if they get jammed by your "broadcasts" on one of the few clear passes the station makes over thier location. They'll be talking about N9OGL then, I can assure you. 145.8-146.0 OSCAR subband 146.01-146.37 Repeater inputs 146.4-146.58 Simplex 146.61-147.390 Repeater outputs 147.42-147.57 Simplex 147.60-147.99 Repeater inputs 147.555MHZ is the frequency traditionally used for local information broadcasts, Todd. No, there's no "regulation" demanding it's use for this purpose, but it's far more likely you wouldn't interfere with anyone this way and we'd be less prone to laugh at you as hard as we're doing. Steve, K4YZ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
OHHHHHHHHH poor Stevey he won't be able to listen to my information
bulletins on 2 meters booo hooo |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() N9OGL wrote (without attributes again): OHHHHHHHHH poor Stevey he won't be able to listen to my information bulletins on 2 meters booo hooo I have no use for them, Todd, on 2 meters or otherwise. Not only are you violating the "no broadcasting" rule of Part 97, it's now apparent that you have no repsect for established Band Plans. I cited the exact current plan for the 2 meter plan and this was your "response". I think that pretty much sums up what Amateur Radio can expect from you. And the reaction you are getting FROM Amateur Radio is pretty much a result of your lack of respect for the program, Todd. Steve, K4YZ |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I will point out that that is the ARRL National Band Plan....Band plans
do vary from state to state.....but I'm sure your aware of that. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() N9OGL wrote (again violating nettiquette by ignoring attributes): I will point out that that is the ARRL National Band Plan....Band plans do vary from state to state.....but I'm sure your aware of that. OK, Todd...enlighten us with the Illinois 2 meter Band Plan. Please provide us with the URL to the agency coordinating V/UHF allocations in Illinois. Steve, K4YZ |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I really know what Illinois Bandplan is.....but I do know it vary from
state to state.....because I believe Califorina does not recognize the "experimental part" of the 2 meter ham band. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() N9OGL wrote (more failure to observe nettiquette noted): I really know what Illinois Bandplan is.....but I do know it vary from state to state.....because I believe Califorina does not recognize the "experimental part" of the 2 meter ham band. Did you mean "I know what the Illinois Bandplan is"..?!?! Or did you mean "I really don't know what the bandplan is"..?!?! And you're not IN California, now are you? (Although I quite readily accept that you're "...in a different state...of mind...") So...busted AGAIN on yet another bit of INFORMATION that you have absolutely NO IDEA about but were quite willing to ACT like you did. Idiot. Steve, K4YZ |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
well I do know here in Illinois that they allow voice repeaters on the
Amateur Television frequencies on 440. I also know that here in Illinois 145.5 to 145.8 is used here in Illinois for everything from wireless Amateur radio LAN to echolink. if anything I run my information bulletin on 146.835 Mhz hehehe |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() N9OGL wrote: well I do know here in Illinois that they allow voice repeaters on the Amateur Television frequencies on 440. But that's not what we're talking about. The thread says "N9OGL to bust 2 meter band plan..." I also know that here in Illinois 145.5 to 145.8 is used here in Illinois for everything from wireless Amateur radio LAN to echolink. So you were ready to knowingly start using a relatively wideband mode in a part of the spectrum where low power data is being used... if anything I run my information bulletin on 146.835 Mhz hehehe At least you'd be on a repeater OUTPUT, and hence operating on a frequency planned for simplex and repeater outputs...THEN all you have to "worry" about will be causing interference to coordinated repeaters on 146.82 and .85. So what's your problem with picking an unused simplex frequency between 146.40-146.595 and 147.405 to 147.585 where simplex is supposed to be? Steve, K4YZ |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: N9OGL wrote: well I do know here in Illinois that they allow voice repeaters on the Amateur Television frequencies on 440. But that's not what we're talking about. The thread says "N9OGL to bust 2 meter band plan..." I also know that here in Illinois 145.5 to 145.8 is used here in Illinois for everything from wireless Amateur radio LAN to echolink. So you were ready to knowingly start using a relatively wideband mode in a part of the spectrum where low power data is being used... if anything I run my information bulletin on 146.835 Mhz hehehe At least you'd be on a repeater OUTPUT, and hence operating on a frequency planned for simplex and repeater outputs...THEN all you have to "worry" about will be causing interference to coordinated repeaters on 146.82 and .85. my signal isn't that wide So what's your problem with picking an unused simplex frequency between 146.40-146.595 and 147.405 to 147.585 where simplex is supposed to be? i'll probably stick with 146.835 - 600 Khz Todd n9ogl Steve, K4YZ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|