Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Everyone,
In the thread about " Selling 52 Simplex Radios", the following comments were made by Mike Coslo, "Rabbi Phil" and myself: QUOTE: Michael Coslo wrote: Rabbi Phil wrote: My friend Lennie Schwartz owns a radio store and was stuck with close to a hundred 52 simplex radios he could not sell. As his Rabbi & chief Sanhedrin, Lennie asked me for advice. Now Lennie has three gorgeous college-age daughters, so I had Lennie get them some cute little outfits, tight tops and tight short-shorts, similar to what the Hooters girls wear. We had the following message boldly printed on the butt end of the shorts and across the bust area of the tops: "I MONITOR 52 SIMPLEX" In less that 24 hours, Lennie sold all his 52 simplex radios at five times the original asking price and had to order more. Every male ham of any age swamped Lennie's radio store and demanded a 52 simplex radio. NOTE FOR HANS: It is not the message that is so important, as how you communicate the message. The only thing worse than being witty is not being witty. Come on, you can do better! 8^) Hey Mike...It's not THAT far fetched...Burghardt in NY has had that young lady in the tight fitting sweater for years...Musta beem selling SOMEthing! UNQUOTE: So...later this morning I received a private e-mail from one of RRAP'S regular posters. I have snipped the person's name, call sign and e mail headers since the letter was sent in private e-mail. However the e-mail made some very damning comments and a not-so-subtle threat. QUOTE: In rrap Steve Robeson wrote: Burghardt in NY has had that young lady in the tight fitting sweater for years...Musta beem selling SOMEthing! 73 Steve, K4YZ Burghardt Amateur Center is not in NY. It's a family business which was established by Stan Burghardt, W0IT (SK) 68 years ago in a small South Dakota town. A few years ago one of Stan's long-time employees, Jim Smith W0MJY, purchased the business from Stan and became the second owner. It remains a family owned business, and the lady you mention is Jim's daughter, Michele, KC0MYV, a wholesome midwesterner who is very active in running the "business side" of the store. Often she is pictured standing alongside her dad in their QST ads, never in my knowledge in a provocative sweater. The sleazy nudge-nudge insinuation in your "Musta beem seeling SOMEthing!" comment is one of the lowest forms of attack I've ever seen on rrap. I'll expect to see a sincere unconditional apology on rrap by the end of today, or I'll consider forwarding your trashy comments to Michele and Jim. UNQUOTE Here's my response to this "letter", made in a very public forum so that the correspondant can't make any other assinine insinuations or out-of-context editorializing: (1) I stand corrected on the South Dakota -vs- New York. My bust. (2) I am sure the young lady is very good at what she does, and is every bit the "wholesome" person you report. I NEVER said anything to the contrary. You are welcome to cite the part of the post wherein I said differently, but you and I both know it's not there. (3) The young lady's character and wholesomeness notwithstanding, THEY obviously had NO PROBLEM in posing her in a tight sweater, profile, in order to attract some male attention to thier ads. "Rabbi Phil" commented about someone else "selling radios" with pictures of pretty women. I pointed out that another Amateur dealer had been doing the same thing, and obviously it worked. Pictures of pretty women sell everything from soft drinks to firearms to high speed automobiles. Amateur Radio is no different. No problem. Now, Dear Anonymous Writer (anonymous HERE...since you and I both know who you are)...You can go RIGHT AHEAD and forward ANYthing you like to ANY one you like. Tell them about "how trashy" the item was, if you want, but it IS archived right ehre in Google. You took offense...Too bad for you. You know as well as I do that people can "take offense" at the most innocent of comments all-the-while letting morbid profanity and bold threats roll off thier backs. This is one of those moments. Have a nice day. Steve, K4YZ |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
When I asked the respondent where his/her self righteousness was
after the attacks on my daughet, this was the response I got and my reply: (QUOTE: HEADERS AGAIN SNIPPED FOR PRIVACY OF RESPONDENT) The shots against your daughter are low-life, as was the one you made about Jim Smith and his daughter. There were no "shots", (Name Deleted), ...The point was that a pretty face was able to sell radios. There are others in QST, CQ, etc. If you see anything more sinister than that, I submit that YOU have a very serious problem. But the difference is that you are present on rrap to defend your family while the Smith family is not represented on rrap against your "Musta beem selling SOMEthing!" insinuations. I reiterate the above. You are the one with a problem, (Anonymous Writer). You're looking for evil in everything you see. I could quote Genesis in RRAP and you'd portray me as the evil landlord. Having said that, I must credit you with having the nads not to hide your attack behind an anonymous email address. There was no attack. You are still challenged to cite an "attack". There was only (YOU) looking for a fight. At least you kept this one private. Bravo. UNQUOTE: I think there's some real significant mental issues with someone who finds some sinister evil in commenting that pretty faces sell radios (an "attack", as (s/he) called it), as opposed to those who defile the memory of a dead child. But...ya pays your money and you takes your choice. Steve, K4YZ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
K4YZ wrote:
I think there's some real significant mental issues with someone who finds some sinister evil in commenting that pretty faces sell radios (an "attack", as (s/he) called it), as opposed to those who defile the memory of a dead child. But...ya pays your money and you takes your choice. After asking the respondant to cite, publically and/or privately where the alleged "attack" was made, the party closed by telling me they wouldn't talk with me anymore and blocked e mail. Guess it didn't matter that they started the exchange. Some folks just don't like to have thier wisdom challenged. Or maybe they were too embarrassed when they realized they had jumped the gun on thier own accusations. Of course the issue wasn't addressed, nor were questions posed answered. I didn't really expect as much, but considering the respondant, I HAD hoped for better. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chubby Nursie,
I've been valiantly trying to follow this one-sided thread about threats made on you by some anonymous person (or maybe not) in some private(?) email exchange (how do you exchange emails with someone anonymous?). I've come to the conclusion that a) you're making it up, or b) you're corresponding with a phantom who is invisible to the rest of us here on rrap, or c) you've found a miraculous way of exchanging email with anonymous senders If the answer is a) then shame on you. If the answer is b) then seek mental counseling If the answer is c) then consult a patent attorney because you've a gold mine on your hands. 73, M.A.N. -- "I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it." - Voltaire |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Mel A. Nomah wrote: Chubby Nursie, I've been valiantly trying to follow this one-sided thread about threats made on you by some anonymous person (or maybe not) in some private(?) email exchange (how do you exchange emails with someone anonymous?). I've come to the conclusion that Ironic that YOU would say that, eh...?!?! Comeout from behind your veil, oh cowardly anonymous one. Putz. Steve, K4YZ |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mel A. Nomah wrote:
Chubby Nursie, I've been valiantly trying to follow this one-sided thread about threats made on you by some anonymous person (or maybe not) in some private(?) email exchange (how do you exchange emails with someone anonymous?). I've come to the conclusion that a) you're making it up, or b) you're corresponding with a phantom who is invisible to the rest of us here on rrap, or c) you've found a miraculous way of exchanging email with anonymous senders If the answer is a) then shame on you. If the answer is b) then seek mental counseling If the answer is c) then consult a patent attorney because you've a gold mine on your hands. 73, M.A.N. -- "I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it." - Voltaire The other poster is real, Mel. - Mike KB3EIA - |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message
... : : The other poster is real, Mel. : : - Mike KB3EIA - Hmmmmmm...... then my usenet link is broken, because all I see are posts from K4YZ directed at Anonymous, and nothing from "the other poster". Maybe my usenet link is screening out Anonymous. Guess that's probably a good thing! Thanks. M.A.N. -- "I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it." - Voltaire |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: Hello Everyone, In the thread about " Selling 52 Simplex Radios", the following comments were made by Mike Coslo, "Rabbi Phil" and myself: QUOTE: Michael Coslo wrote: Rabbi Phil wrote: My friend Lennie Schwartz owns a radio store and was stuck with close to a hundred 52 simplex radios he could not sell. As his Rabbi & chief Sanhedrin, Lennie asked me for advice. Now Lennie has three gorgeous college-age daughters, so I had Lennie get them some cute little outfits, tight tops and tight short-shorts, similar to what the Hooters girls wear. We had the following message boldly printed on the butt end of the shorts and across the bust area of the tops: "I MONITOR 52 SIMPLEX" In less that 24 hours, Lennie sold all his 52 simplex radios at five times the original asking price and had to order more. Every male ham of any age swamped Lennie's radio store and demanded a 52 simplex radio. NOTE FOR HANS: It is not the message that is so important, as how you communicate the message. The only thing worse than being witty is not being witty. Come on, you can do better! 8^) Hey Mike...It's not THAT far fetched...Burghardt in NY has had that young lady in the tight fitting sweater for years...Musta beem selling SOMEthing! But not radios, huh??? UNQUOTE: So...later this morning I received a private e-mail from one of RRAP'S regular posters. I have snipped the person's name, call sign and e mail headers since the letter was sent in private e-mail. However the e-mail made some very damning comments and a not-so-subtle threat. QUOTE: In rrap Steve Robeson wrote: Burghardt in NY has had that young lady in the tight fitting sweater for years...Musta beem selling SOMEthing! 73 Steve, K4YZ Burghardt Amateur Center is not in NY. It's a family business which was established by Stan Burghardt, W0IT (SK) 68 years ago in a small South Dakota town. A few years ago one of Stan's long-time employees, Jim Smith W0MJY, purchased the business from Stan and became the second owner. It remains a family owned business, and the lady you mention is Jim's daughter, Michele, KC0MYV, a wholesome midwesterner who is very active in running the "business side" of the store. Often she is pictured standing alongside her dad in their QST ads, never in my knowledge in a provocative sweater. The sleazy nudge-nudge insinuation in your "Musta beem seeling SOMEthing!" comment is one of the lowest forms of attack I've ever seen on rrap. Not really, but it is true to Steve's style. I'll expect to see a sincere unconditional apology on rrap by the end of today, or I'll consider forwarding your trashy comments to Michele and Jim. Unlikely. UNQUOTE Here's my response to this "letter", made in a very public forum so that the correspondant can't make any other assinine insinuations or out-of-context editorializing: (1) I stand corrected on the South Dakota -vs- New York. My bust. (2) I am sure the young lady is very good at what she does, and is every bit the "wholesome" person you report. I NEVER said anything to the contrary. You are welcome to cite the part of the post wherein I said differently, but you and I both know it's not there. (3) The young lady's character and wholesomeness notwithstanding, THEY obviously had NO PROBLEM in posing her in a tight sweater, profile, in order to attract some male attention to thier ads. "Rabbi Phil" commented about someone else "selling radios" with pictures of pretty women. I pointed out that another Amateur dealer had been doing the same thing, and obviously it worked. Pictures of pretty women sell everything from soft drinks to firearms to high speed automobiles. Amateur Radio is no different. No problem. Now, Dear Anonymous Writer (anonymous HERE...since you and I both know who you are)...You can go RIGHT AHEAD and forward ANYthing you like to ANY one you like. Tell them about "how trashy" the item was, if you want, but it IS archived right ehre in Google. You took offense...Too bad for you. You know as well as I do that people can "take offense" at the most innocent of comments all-the-while letting morbid profanity and bold threats roll off thier backs. This is one of those moments. Have a nice day. Steve, K4YZ Innocent comments - hi, hi! Robeson likes to make inuendo. If you call him on it, he'll try to turn you into the deviant. He's always the victim. Probably learned that tactic while rehearsing for his 100% disability hearing. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Mike Coslo wrote: Mel A. Nomah wrote: Chubby Nursie, I've been valiantly trying to follow this one-sided thread about threats made on you by some anonymous person (or maybe not) in some private(?) email exchange (how do you exchange emails with someone anonymous?). I've come to the conclusion that a) you're making it up, or b) you're corresponding with a phantom who is invisible to the rest of us here on rrap, or c) you've found a miraculous way of exchanging email with anonymous senders If the answer is a) then shame on you. If the answer is b) then seek mental counseling If the answer is c) then consult a patent attorney because you've a gold mine on your hands. 73, M.A.N. -- "I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it." - Voltaire The other poster is real, Mel. - Mike KB3EIA - Do you and Robeson share an e-mail account? |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
bb wrote:
Mike Coslo wrote: Mel A. Nomah wrote: Chubby Nursie, I've been valiantly trying to follow this one-sided thread about threats made on you by some anonymous person (or maybe not) in some private(?) email exchange (how do you exchange emails with someone anonymous?). I've come to the conclusion that a) you're making it up, or b) you're corresponding with a phantom who is invisible to the rest of us here on rrap, or c) you've found a miraculous way of exchanging email with anonymous senders If the answer is a) then shame on you. If the answer is b) then seek mental counseling If the answer is c) then consult a patent attorney because you've a gold mine on your hands. 73, M.A.N. -- "I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it." - Voltaire The other poster is real, Mel. - Mike KB3EIA - Do you and Robeson share an e-mail account? Nope. but the person involved emailed me also. And since it was private email, I won't divulge the name. As for the content of Steve's post, a person can either take it to mean that an attractive person used in an advertisement is a successful tactic ala "must be selling something", or that an attractive person in an advertisement is selling sex. I chose to read it as being a successful tactic, because most ads with attractive people are selling other things. Too bad, that. Otherwise I might have a career as a supermodel......... ;^) - Mike KB3EIA - |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #665 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #662 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #662 | Dx | |||
OPDX Special Bulletin #660.1 | Dx | |||
OPDX Special Bulletin #660.1 | Dx |