Ok, Mister Wizard, answer me this question, where in the FCC rules or a
FCC decision does it state that an information bulletin can not be
opinionated??? please quote it from rule or statement from the FCC.

You say I'm in violation of federal law so please enlighten me which
laws am I in violation of?

Todd N9OGL

N9OGL wrote:
Ok, Mister Wizard, answer me this question, where in the FCC rules or
a
FCC decision does it state that an information bulletin can not be
opinionated??? please quote it from rule or statement from the FCC.

You say I'm in violation of federal law so please enlighten me which
laws am I in violation of?

Once you have tainted "information" with individual opinion, it is
no longer information, but editorial.

FCC rules and regulations allow for the transmission of bulletins
of general interest to the Amateur service.

Your "bulletins", made up of YOUR "opinion", do not meet the test
of "general interest.

Read it yourself, Toiddie. You've requoted it over and over
enough.

Steve, K4YZ

Once you have tainted "information" with individual opinion, it is
no longer information, but editorial.

what rule states that???

Todd N9OGL

K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
Ok, Mister Wizard, answer me this question, where in the FCC rules
or
a
FCC decision does it state that an information bulletin can not be
opinionated??? please quote it from rule or statement from the FCC.

You say I'm in violation of federal law so please enlighten me
which
laws am I in violation of?

Once you have tainted "information" with individual opinion, it
is
no longer information, but editorial.

Tell it to Dan Rather.

FCC rules and regulations allow for the transmission of bulletins
of general interest to the Amateur service.

Your "bulletins", made up of YOUR "opinion", do not meet the test
of "general interest.

Explain, with citations.

bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
Ok, Mister Wizard, answer me this question, where in the FCC
rules
or
a
FCC decision does it state that an information bulletin can not
be
opinionated??? please quote it from rule or statement from the
FCC.

You say I'm in violation of federal law so please enlighten me
which
laws am I in violation of?

Once you have tainted "information" with individual opinion, it
is
no longer information, but editorial.

Tell it to Dan Rather.

Oh...You mean the SMAE Dan Rather that's humuiated himself lately
by "going live" with "stories" that were unsubstantiated and patently
false on the face of it?

FCC rules and regulations allow for the transmission of
bulletins
of general interest to the Amateur service.

Your "bulletins", made up of YOUR "opinion", do not meet the
test
of "general interest.

Explain, with citations.

No citation needed. Just spend a semester in a Freshman
journalism class.

Todd can broadcast his "shows" if he cares to, but just like
K1MAN, he gonna have to eventually face the federal music, Brian..
Don't take my word for it...A former FCC communications lawyer said so
himself in this forum.

There ya go.

Steve, K4YZ

Steve,

you have to show me where me and Phil discussed information bulletins
because I saw was me and his discussion on low power FM.

Todd n9ogl

N9OGL wrote:
Steve,

you have to show me where me and Phil discussed information bulletins
because I saw was me and his discussion on low power FM.

Oh NO, Todd....

You mean you WEREN'T PAYING ATTENTION...?!?!

Not, YOU..!!! I am so SHOCKED....(not!)

"...me and Phil..." Didn't discuss anything.

I asked Phil some very specific questions regarding your
alleged "bulletins", and he responded that indeed your actions were not
in compliance with Part 97. He further stated your statements
vis-a-vis made you ineligible for a broadcast license and could casue
your Amateur license to be reviewed before being routinely renewed next
time around...

Assuming, of course, you still HAVE an Amateur license TO
renew....

Steve, K4YZ

Steve, if that's the case and I find out I'm on some ****ing list I'm
not only going to sue your ****ing ass but I'm going to sue that fat
asshole Phil. Believe me you ****ing piece of **** I ****ing will. So
you go tell that LYING fat **** what I told you.

N9OGL wrote:
Steve, if that's the case and I find out I'm on some ####ing list I'm
not only going to sue your ####ing ### but I'm going to sue that fat
###hole Phil. Believe me you ####ing piece of #### I ####ing will. So
you go tell that LYING fat #### what I told you.

(1) Nothing Todd Daugherty, under ANY of his made up names, could
scare or impress me.

(2) Sue me for what? Reporting to the FCC that YOU have
acknowledged in a public forum that YOU have violated Federal
law...?!?! Sue me for reporting your profanities and threats in a
public forum...?!?! Have fun trying!

(3) Your profanity doesn't make you any bigger or badder. It
only makes you more profane and more idiotic.

(4) You're ALREADY on a list.

Have fun THINKING you can "sue" everyone, Todd. It only makes you
look more impotent (if that were possible) and more pathetic than you
already are. You've been watching too many re-runs of Perry Mason and
"L.A. Law".

Steve, K4YZ

"N9OGL" wrote in message
oups.com...
Steve, if that's the case and I find out I'm on some ****ing list I'm
not only going to sue your ****ing ass but I'm going to sue that fat
asshole Phil. Believe me you ****ing piece of **** I ****ing will. So
you go tell that LYING fat **** what I told you.


.................................................. ...........................
..................

Todd.
Step back three paces, take a deep breath and compose yourself.

First, no attorney you can afford to hire is going to "sue that fat asshole"
as you threaten.

Secondly, Todd...there is no "Believe me you ****ing piece of **** I ****ing
will".

You are blowing smoke and acting like the obtuse baby you are.

Please, Toddie, excuse me while I yawn, but make an effort to at least get
past your juvenile rants.

You are rather boring, Toddie.

Oh, Todd. The only "list" you are on so far?
That would be a **** List, Todd.
You put yourself there with your own rants....

You have only yourself to blame.