Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's an update on the "when will FCC drop Element 1?" pool.
Note how almost everyone's date, including mine, has already passed: WA2SI: September 13, 2003 KF6TPT: September 29, 2003 KC8EPO: December 31, 2003 K2UNK: January 1, 2004 (first prediction) K2ASP: March 15, 2004 AA2QA: April 1, 2004 N2EY: April 15, 2004 N3KIP: May 1, 2004 (first prediction) KC8PMX: July 1, 2004 WA2ISE: August 1, 2004 K3LT: September 15, 2004 WK3C: December 30, 2004 N4PGW: May 22, 2005 N8UZE: July 1, 2005 N3KIP: December 31, 2005 (second prediction) K2UNK: July 1, 2006 (second prediction) AB2RC: July 1, 2007 KB3EIA: July 5, 2007 W5TIT: June 1, 2008 Anybody want to add a prediction? If so, the "rolling rule" (thanks Dee, N8UZE) applies: If your prediction on this list is a year or more in the past, you can add a new one. At this point everyone before N3KIP can add a new prediction. All predictions stay on the list. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K=D8HB wrote: "K4YZ" wrote It was one of your many unsubstantiated assertions. Rrap is like the bible .... it's all unsubstantiated .... just take it "on faith". Steve takes nothing on faith. I don't even want to think what he would call those who penned the Bible. |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() bb wrote: K=D8HB wrote: "K4YZ" wrote It was one of your many unsubstantiated assertions. Rrap is like the bible .... it's all unsubstantiated .... just take it = "on faith". Steve takes nothing on faith. Not from you and Lennie. You're proven liars. Why would I take anything on "faith" from a proven liar, Brain? What have YOU done to disprove my allegations of your dishonesty? I don't even want to think what he would call those who penned the Bible. I call them "men". Why? What do YOU call them? Steve, K4YZ |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
sorryJim but failing to back up an opinion doesn't mean they can't, may
mean they simply choose not to bother |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Bert Craig wrote: I will go on the record with the prediction that Element 1 will NOT go away completely as first thought. It will be dropped for Tech "+" and General privies, but retained for the Extra. I am willing to bet that you've got the right combination, at least for now, Bert. I see a two class license structure on the next "restructuring" round. That's not to say I like it or support it, but I bet that's where we end up. I think enough folks have written to the FCC, as well as their elected officials, (Some of whom have a say in the FCC's budget.) and expressed their wishes that we not follow suit with the nations that have completely dropped the code from their licensing process. A-yup. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: Bert Craig wrote: I will go on the record with the prediction that Element 1 will NOT go away completely as first thought. It will be dropped for Tech "+" and General privies, but retained for the Extra. I am willing to bet that you've got the right combination, at least for now, Bert. I see a two class license structure on the next "restructuring" round. That's not to say I like it or support it, but I bet that's where we end up. Ayup. Sounds reasonbable to me. |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's an update on the "when will FCC drop Element 1?" pool.
Note how almost everyone's date, including mine, has already passed: WA2SI: September 13, 2003 (first prediction) KF6TPT: September 29, 2003 KC8EPO: December 31, 2003 K2UNK: January 1, 2004 (first prediction) K2ASP: March 15, 2004 AA2QA: April 1, 2004 N2EY: April 15, 2004 N3KIP: May 1, 2004 (first prediction) KC8PMX: July 1, 2004 WA2ISE: August 1, 2004 K3LT: September 15, 2004 WK3C: December 30, 2004 N4PGW: May 22, 2005 N8UZE: July 1, 2005 N3KIP: December 31, 2005 (second prediction) K2UNK: July 1, 2006 (second prediction) AB2RC: July 1, 2007 KB3EIA: July 5, 2007 W5TIT: June 1, 2008 WA2SI: Complete elimination not within the foreseeable future (second prediction) Anybody want to add a prediction? If so, the "rolling rule" (thanks Dee, N8UZE) applies: If your prediction on this list is a year or more in the past, you can add a new one. At this point everyone before and including N4PGW can add a new prediction. All predictions stay on the list. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill where do come up with that date
(july 1 06) in case google edits all down Just curious |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
K4YZ wrote:
Bert Craig wrote: I will go on the record with the prediction that Element 1 will NOT go away completely as first thought. It will be dropped for Tech "+" and General privies, but retained for the Extra. I am willing to bet that you've got the right combination, at least for now, Bert. I see a two class license structure on the next "restructuring" round. That's not to say I like it or support it, but I bet that's where we end up. I'd vote for all of it myself. Problem is though that crystal-balling what the FCC actually comes up with is like playing Russian roulette with three rounds in the cylinder. Maybe four rounds . . . Like Shultz would say "I doan bet on NOTTING!". In this game. Which is why I haven't. And won't. I think enough folks have written to the FCC, as well as their elected officials, (Some of whom have a say in the FCC's budget.) and expressed their wishes that we not follow suit with the nations that have completely dropped the code from their licensing process. A-yup. 73 Steve, K4YZ w3rv |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question Pool vs Book Larnin' | Policy | |||
The Pool | Policy | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | General | |||
REQ:latest Ham University with curent tech pool willing to share?/sell cheep | Equipment |