Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41   Report Post  
Old June 24th 05, 09:00 AM
an_old_friend
 
Posts: n/a
Default

ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on
the result

K4YZ wrote:
Bert Craig wrote:

I will go on the record with the prediction that Element 1 will NOT go
away completely as first thought. It will be dropped for Tech "+" and
General privies, but retained for the Extra.


I am willing to bet that you've got the right combination, at
least for now, Bert.

I see a two class license structure on the next "restructuring"
round. That's not to say I like it or support it, but I bet that's
where we end up.

I think enough folks have
written to the FCC, as well as their elected officials, (Some of whom
have a say in the FCC's budget.) and expressed their wishes that we not
follow suit with the nations that have completely dropped the code from
their licensing process.


OTH I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the FCC
that will carry the day

A-yup.

73

Steve, K4YZ


  #42   Report Post  
Old June 24th 05, 10:51 AM
K4YZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default



an_old_friend wrote:
ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on
the result


Top posting, Markie?

Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top post
too?

OTH...(SNIP)


You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The
Horizon".

I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the FCC
that will carry the day


What? Huh?

Steve, K4YZ

  #43   Report Post  
Old June 24th 05, 04:53 PM
an_old_friend
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Usenet Nazi

K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on
the result


Top posting, Markie?

Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top post
too?

OTH...(SNIP)


You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The
Horizon".


again you understand

I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the FCC
that will carry the day


What? Huh?


Gee I can't even largely agree with you and have be civil or not hack
my posts apart

Steve, K4YZ


As I said before at least you have drop the Flaso polite 73's from your
posts

  #44   Report Post  
Old June 24th 05, 06:57 PM
K4YZ
 
Posts: n/a
Default



an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on
the result


Top posting, Markie?

Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top post
too?

OTH...(SNIP)


You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The
Horizon".


again you understand


No, I didn't...hence the request to clarify your intent.

You've not done that yet.

I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the FCC
that will carry the day


What? Huh?


Gee I can't even largely agree with you and have be civil or not hack
my posts apart


How can I tell you're agreeing with me or disagreeing when your
replies are a rape of the English language, Markie?

And if you were agreeing with me, why "Stevie"..?!?!

On those few occassions where it appeared as though you might act
reasonable, I refer to you as Mark, address you by your callsign and
add a "73" to the post.

You seem to not do that.

As I said before at least you have drop the Flaso polite 73's from your
posts


"Flaso"...?!?! Sounds like an Italian or Baltic name. Who's
Flaso?

I had dropped "73" from you a loooooooooooooooooooooong time ago.
Not so with others who are civil and mature in their responses.

Steve, K4YZ

  #45   Report Post  
Old June 24th 05, 08:11 PM
an_old_friend
 
Posts: n/a
Default



K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on
the result

Top posting, Markie?

Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top post
too?

OTH...(SNIP)

You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The
Horizon".


again you understand


No, I didn't...hence the request to clarify your intent.


It was quite clear till you hack out the context and you can go back
yourself and do it lazy bumm


You've not done that yet.


Nope and I am NOT carring your freight.


I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the FCC
that will carry the day

What? Huh?


Gee I can't even largely agree with you and have be civil or not hack
my posts apart


How can I tell you're agreeing with me or disagreeing when your
replies are a rape of the English language, Markie?


Then you should if you are a christian turn the other cheek.


And if you were agreeing with me, why "Stevie"..?!?!


becuase I felt like it. You never use my name politely

On those few occassions where it appeared as though you might act
reasonable, I refer to you as Mark, address you by your callsign and
add a "73" to the post.


I am gald you stoped the false coutesy

You seem to not do that.


No I don't. What was your first clue?

I'll go one a bit here

Why on earth would I use a morse deserved term when I dislike Morse?


As I said before at least you have drop the Flaso polite 73's from your
posts


"Flaso"...?!?! Sounds like an Italian or Baltic name. Who's
Flaso?

I had dropped "73" from you a loooooooooooooooooooooong time ago.
Not so with others who are civil and mature in their responses.


and I am thanking you for it


Steve, K4YZ




  #46   Report Post  
Old June 24th 05, 08:13 PM
an_old_friend
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I like that ty Hans

K=D8HB wrote:
"K4YZ" wrote


It was one of your many unsubstantiated assertions.


Rrap is like the bible .... it's all unsubstantiated .... just take it "on
faith".


  #47   Report Post  
Old June 25th 05, 01:05 AM
Kim
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com...


K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on

on
the result

Top posting, Markie?

Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top

post
too?

OTH...(SNIP)

You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The
Horizon".

again you understand


No, I didn't...hence the request to clarify your intent.


It was quite clear till you hack out the context and you can go back
yourself and do it lazy bumm


You've not done that yet.


Nope and I am NOT carring your freight.


I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the

FCC
that will carry the day

What? Huh?

Gee I can't even largely agree with you and have be civil or not hack
my posts apart


How can I tell you're agreeing with me or disagreeing when your
replies are a rape of the English language, Markie?


Then you should if you are a christian turn the other cheek.


And if you were agreeing with me, why "Stevie"..?!?!


becuase I felt like it. You never use my name politely

On those few occassions where it appeared as though you might act
reasonable, I refer to you as Mark, address you by your callsign and
add a "73" to the post.


I am gald you stoped the false coutesy

You seem to not do that.


No I don't. What was your first clue?

I'll go one a bit here

Why on earth would I use a morse deserved term when I dislike Morse?


As I said before at least you have drop the Flaso polite 73's from

your
posts


"Flaso"...?!?! Sounds like an Italian or Baltic name. Who's
Flaso?

I had dropped "73" from you a loooooooooooooooooooooong time ago.
Not so with others who are civil and mature in their responses.


and I am thanking you for it


Steve, K4YZ



Do you guys just HAVE to foul every damned thread with this crap?

Kim W5TIT


  #48   Report Post  
Old June 25th 05, 01:12 AM
bb
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Kim wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com...


K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on

on
the result

Top posting, Markie?

Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top

post
too?

OTH...(SNIP)

You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The
Horizon".

again you understand

No, I didn't...hence the request to clarify your intent.


It was quite clear till you hack out the context and you can go back
yourself and do it lazy bumm


You've not done that yet.


Nope and I am NOT carring your freight.


I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the

FCC
that will carry the day

What? Huh?

Gee I can't even largely agree with you and have be civil or not hack
my posts apart

How can I tell you're agreeing with me or disagreeing when your
replies are a rape of the English language, Markie?


Then you should if you are a christian turn the other cheek.


And if you were agreeing with me, why "Stevie"..?!?!


becuase I felt like it. You never use my name politely

On those few occassions where it appeared as though you might act
reasonable, I refer to you as Mark, address you by your callsign and
add a "73" to the post.


I am gald you stoped the false coutesy

You seem to not do that.


No I don't. What was your first clue?

I'll go one a bit here

Why on earth would I use a morse deserved term when I dislike Morse?


As I said before at least you have drop the Flaso polite 73's from

your
posts

"Flaso"...?!?! Sounds like an Italian or Baltic name. Who's
Flaso?

I had dropped "73" from you a loooooooooooooooooooooong time ago.
Not so with others who are civil and mature in their responses.


and I am thanking you for it


Steve, K4YZ



Do you guys just HAVE to foul every damned thread with this crap?

Kim W5TIT


"With K4YZe, All Things Are Impossible."

  #49   Report Post  
Old June 25th 05, 01:12 AM
bb
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Kim wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com...


K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on

on
the result

Top posting, Markie?

Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top

post
too?

OTH...(SNIP)

You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The
Horizon".

again you understand

No, I didn't...hence the request to clarify your intent.


It was quite clear till you hack out the context and you can go back
yourself and do it lazy bumm


You've not done that yet.


Nope and I am NOT carring your freight.


I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the

FCC
that will carry the day

What? Huh?

Gee I can't even largely agree with you and have be civil or not hack
my posts apart

How can I tell you're agreeing with me or disagreeing when your
replies are a rape of the English language, Markie?


Then you should if you are a christian turn the other cheek.


And if you were agreeing with me, why "Stevie"..?!?!


becuase I felt like it. You never use my name politely

On those few occassions where it appeared as though you might act
reasonable, I refer to you as Mark, address you by your callsign and
add a "73" to the post.


I am gald you stoped the false coutesy

You seem to not do that.


No I don't. What was your first clue?

I'll go one a bit here

Why on earth would I use a morse deserved term when I dislike Morse?


As I said before at least you have drop the Flaso polite 73's from

your
posts

"Flaso"...?!?! Sounds like an Italian or Baltic name. Who's
Flaso?

I had dropped "73" from you a loooooooooooooooooooooong time ago.
Not so with others who are civil and mature in their responses.


and I am thanking you for it


Steve, K4YZ



Do you guys just HAVE to foul every damned thread with this crap?

Kim W5TIT


"With K4YZ, All Things Are Impossible."

  #50   Report Post  
Old June 25th 05, 01:53 AM
Cmd Buzz Corey
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Kim wrote:


Do you guys just HAVE to foul every damned thread with this crap?

Kim W5TIT


From one with TIT in her call.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Question Pool vs Book Larnin' Mike Coslo Policy 24 July 22nd 04 05:50 AM
The Pool N2EY Policy 515 February 22nd 04 03:14 AM
From the Extra question pool: The dipole David Robbins General 1 January 23rd 04 05:32 PM
REQ:latest Ham University with curent tech pool willing to share?/sell cheep Equipment 0 November 27th 03 07:15 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017