Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on
the result K4YZ wrote: Bert Craig wrote: I will go on the record with the prediction that Element 1 will NOT go away completely as first thought. It will be dropped for Tech "+" and General privies, but retained for the Extra. I am willing to bet that you've got the right combination, at least for now, Bert. I see a two class license structure on the next "restructuring" round. That's not to say I like it or support it, but I bet that's where we end up. I think enough folks have written to the FCC, as well as their elected officials, (Some of whom have a say in the FCC's budget.) and expressed their wishes that we not follow suit with the nations that have completely dropped the code from their licensing process. OTH I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the FCC that will carry the day A-yup. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an_old_friend wrote: ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on the result Top posting, Markie? Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top post too? OTH...(SNIP) You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The Horizon". I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the FCC that will carry the day What? Huh? Steve, K4YZ |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Usenet Nazi
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on the result Top posting, Markie? Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top post too? OTH...(SNIP) You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The Horizon". again you understand I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the FCC that will carry the day What? Huh? Gee I can't even largely agree with you and have be civil or not hack my posts apart Steve, K4YZ As I said before at least you have drop the Flaso polite 73's from your posts |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on the result Top posting, Markie? Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top post too? OTH...(SNIP) You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The Horizon". again you understand No, I didn't...hence the request to clarify your intent. You've not done that yet. I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the FCC that will carry the day What? Huh? Gee I can't even largely agree with you and have be civil or not hack my posts apart How can I tell you're agreeing with me or disagreeing when your replies are a rape of the English language, Markie? And if you were agreeing with me, why "Stevie"..?!?! On those few occassions where it appeared as though you might act reasonable, I refer to you as Mark, address you by your callsign and add a "73" to the post. You seem to not do that. As I said before at least you have drop the Flaso polite 73's from your posts "Flaso"...?!?! Sounds like an Italian or Baltic name. Who's Flaso? I had dropped "73" from you a loooooooooooooooooooooong time ago. Not so with others who are civil and mature in their responses. Steve, K4YZ |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on the result Top posting, Markie? Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top post too? OTH...(SNIP) You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The Horizon". again you understand No, I didn't...hence the request to clarify your intent. It was quite clear till you hack out the context and you can go back yourself and do it lazy bumm You've not done that yet. Nope and I am NOT carring your freight. I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the FCC that will carry the day What? Huh? Gee I can't even largely agree with you and have be civil or not hack my posts apart How can I tell you're agreeing with me or disagreeing when your replies are a rape of the English language, Markie? Then you should if you are a christian turn the other cheek. And if you were agreeing with me, why "Stevie"..?!?! becuase I felt like it. You never use my name politely On those few occassions where it appeared as though you might act reasonable, I refer to you as Mark, address you by your callsign and add a "73" to the post. I am gald you stoped the false coutesy You seem to not do that. No I don't. What was your first clue? I'll go one a bit here Why on earth would I use a morse deserved term when I dislike Morse? As I said before at least you have drop the Flaso polite 73's from your posts "Flaso"...?!?! Sounds like an Italian or Baltic name. Who's Flaso? I had dropped "73" from you a loooooooooooooooooooooong time ago. Not so with others who are civil and mature in their responses. and I am thanking you for it Steve, K4YZ |
#46
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I like that ty Hans
K=D8HB wrote: "K4YZ" wrote It was one of your many unsubstantiated assertions. Rrap is like the bible .... it's all unsubstantiated .... just take it "on faith". |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"an_old_friend" wrote in message
oups.com... K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on the result Top posting, Markie? Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top post too? OTH...(SNIP) You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The Horizon". again you understand No, I didn't...hence the request to clarify your intent. It was quite clear till you hack out the context and you can go back yourself and do it lazy bumm You've not done that yet. Nope and I am NOT carring your freight. I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the FCC that will carry the day What? Huh? Gee I can't even largely agree with you and have be civil or not hack my posts apart How can I tell you're agreeing with me or disagreeing when your replies are a rape of the English language, Markie? Then you should if you are a christian turn the other cheek. And if you were agreeing with me, why "Stevie"..?!?! becuase I felt like it. You never use my name politely On those few occassions where it appeared as though you might act reasonable, I refer to you as Mark, address you by your callsign and add a "73" to the post. I am gald you stoped the false coutesy You seem to not do that. No I don't. What was your first clue? I'll go one a bit here Why on earth would I use a morse deserved term when I dislike Morse? As I said before at least you have drop the Flaso polite 73's from your posts "Flaso"...?!?! Sounds like an Italian or Baltic name. Who's Flaso? I had dropped "73" from you a loooooooooooooooooooooong time ago. Not so with others who are civil and mature in their responses. and I am thanking you for it Steve, K4YZ Do you guys just HAVE to foul every damned thread with this crap? Kim W5TIT |
#48
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Kim wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on the result Top posting, Markie? Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top post too? OTH...(SNIP) You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The Horizon". again you understand No, I didn't...hence the request to clarify your intent. It was quite clear till you hack out the context and you can go back yourself and do it lazy bumm You've not done that yet. Nope and I am NOT carring your freight. I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the FCC that will carry the day What? Huh? Gee I can't even largely agree with you and have be civil or not hack my posts apart How can I tell you're agreeing with me or disagreeing when your replies are a rape of the English language, Markie? Then you should if you are a christian turn the other cheek. And if you were agreeing with me, why "Stevie"..?!?! becuase I felt like it. You never use my name politely On those few occassions where it appeared as though you might act reasonable, I refer to you as Mark, address you by your callsign and add a "73" to the post. I am gald you stoped the false coutesy You seem to not do that. No I don't. What was your first clue? I'll go one a bit here Why on earth would I use a morse deserved term when I dislike Morse? As I said before at least you have drop the Flaso polite 73's from your posts "Flaso"...?!?! Sounds like an Italian or Baltic name. Who's Flaso? I had dropped "73" from you a loooooooooooooooooooooong time ago. Not so with others who are civil and mature in their responses. and I am thanking you for it Steve, K4YZ Do you guys just HAVE to foul every damned thread with this crap? Kim W5TIT "With K4YZe, All Things Are Impossible." |
#49
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Kim wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: ammussingly enough I expect for once Stevie that you are right on on the result Top posting, Markie? Your written gulash is ahrd enough to follow, but now you top post too? OTH...(SNIP) You meant "OTOH", perhaps? OTH in radio terms is "Over The Horizon". again you understand No, I didn't...hence the request to clarify your intent. It was quite clear till you hack out the context and you can go back yourself and do it lazy bumm You've not done that yet. Nope and I am NOT carring your freight. I suspect it more some of the last influence of the ARRL at the FCC that will carry the day What? Huh? Gee I can't even largely agree with you and have be civil or not hack my posts apart How can I tell you're agreeing with me or disagreeing when your replies are a rape of the English language, Markie? Then you should if you are a christian turn the other cheek. And if you were agreeing with me, why "Stevie"..?!?! becuase I felt like it. You never use my name politely On those few occassions where it appeared as though you might act reasonable, I refer to you as Mark, address you by your callsign and add a "73" to the post. I am gald you stoped the false coutesy You seem to not do that. No I don't. What was your first clue? I'll go one a bit here Why on earth would I use a morse deserved term when I dislike Morse? As I said before at least you have drop the Flaso polite 73's from your posts "Flaso"...?!?! Sounds like an Italian or Baltic name. Who's Flaso? I had dropped "73" from you a loooooooooooooooooooooong time ago. Not so with others who are civil and mature in their responses. and I am thanking you for it Steve, K4YZ Do you guys just HAVE to foul every damned thread with this crap? Kim W5TIT "With K4YZ, All Things Are Impossible." |
#50
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kim wrote:
Do you guys just HAVE to foul every damned thread with this crap? Kim W5TIT From one with TIT in her call. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question Pool vs Book Larnin' | Policy | |||
The Pool | Policy | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | General | |||
REQ:latest Ham University with curent tech pool willing to share?/sell cheep | Equipment |