Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#231
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Leo wrote:
On 26 Jun 2005 18:08:19 -0700, wrote: Leo wrote: On 26 Jun 2005 11:19:31 -0700, wrote: What would you suggest? Isn't that rather obvious? What do you suggest? Isn't that rather obvious? What do you suggest? Isn't that rather obvious? What do you suggest I do instead? Isn't that rather obvious? What do you suggest I do instead? Isn't that rather obvious? Then what do you suggest I do? Isn't that rather obvious? What do you suggest I do instead? Isn't that rather obvious? What do you suggest I do? Isn't that rather obvious? What would you suggest? Isn't that rather obvious? What do you suggest I do, Leo? Isn't that rather obvious? What do you suggest? Isn't that rather obvious? What do you suggest I do differently, Leo? Isn't that rather obvious? And your suggestion is? Isn't that rather obvious? What do you suggest I do differently, Leo? Isn't that rather obvious? In a word: No. It's not rather obvious, Leo. Sorry to hear that, Jim. How simplified do you need things to be? It's not about simplification, Leo. It's about clarity. Why can't you just clearly and plainly state what you suggest that I do? What *do* you suggest? Just speak plainly rather than answering a question with another question, or a zinger. What's your suggestion? The way I see it, you have two options: 1. Continue to be suckered in to foolish arguments. 2. Do not continue to be suckered in to foolish arguments. OK so far. Option 1 is expensive - you become a possession of those who goad you in to responding. A puppet, as it were, dancing at the end of someone's strings.... That's your spin on it - does not address what actions you suggest *I* take. Option 2 is much more difficult than Option 1 - it requires the intelligence to recognize a legitimate argument from bait, and considerable inner strength to resist the drive to respond, even when you know you are in the right. So what do you suggest *I* do? Owned or free. That's your spin. The path you choose will be entirely up to you. So there *is* a choice! Choose wisely! Wise by whose standards? How would such a choice be demonstrated in concrete, practical terms? What actions do you suggest? 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#233
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Leo wrote: On 26 Jun 2005 18:08:19 -0700, wrote: What's your suggestion? The way I see it, you have two options: 1. Continue to be suckered in to foolish arguments. 2. Do not continue to be suckered in to foolish arguments. Option 1 is expensive - you become a possession of those who goad you in to responding. A puppet, as it were, dancing at the end of someone's strings.... Option 2 is much more difficult than Option 1 - it requires the intelligence to recognize a legitimate argument from bait, and considerable inner strength to resist the drive to respond, even when you know you are in the right. Owned or free. The path you choose will be entirely up to you. Choose wisely! 73 de Jim, N2EY 73, Leo Grasshopper, snatch this pebble from my hand. |
#234
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote: Leo wrote: On 26 Jun 2005 18:08:19 -0700, wrote: What's your suggestion? The way I see it, you have two options: 1. Continue to be suckered in to foolish arguments. 2. Do not continue to be suckered in to foolish arguments. OK so far. Option 1 is expensive - you become a possession of those who goad you in to responding. A puppet, as it were, dancing at the end of someone's strings.... That's your spin on it - does not address what actions you suggest *I* take. Option 2 is much more difficult than Option 1 - it requires the intelligence to recognize a legitimate argument from bait, and considerable inner strength to resist the drive to respond, even when you know you are in the right. So what do you suggest *I* do? Owned or free. That's your spin. The path you choose will be entirely up to you. So there *is* a choice! Choose wisely! Wise by whose standards? How would such a choice be demonstrated in concrete, practical terms? What actions do you suggest? 73 de Jim, N2EY And so Grasshopper hesitates. Asks many questions. Must be told what he is to do, rather than just do what he is told. The pebble is withdrawn and Grasshopper is none the richer and none the wiser. |
#235
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: Leo on Mon 27 Jun 2005 07:19
On 26 Jun 2005 18:08:19 -0700, wrote: Leo wrote: On 26 Jun 2005 11:19:31 -0700, wrote: The following cantu-respondu is repeated 14 times, more or less the same What would you suggest? Isn't that rather obvious? In a word: No. It's not rather obvious, Leo. Sorry to hear that, Jim. How simplified do you need things to be? Based on years of trying to play the Olde Guru of Amateur Radio in here, he simply wants things HIS WAY. He was that way on an AOL amateur radio group, too. What *do* you suggest? Just speak plainly rather than answering a question with another question, or a zinger. What's your suggestion? The way I see it, you have two options: 1. Continue to be suckered in to foolish arguments. 2. Do not continue to be suckered in to foolish arguments. Option 1 is expensive - you become a possession of those who goad you in to responding. A puppet, as it were, dancing at the end of someone's strings.... He will do it again (and did) following. Predictable. :-) Option 2 is much more difficult than Option 1 - it requires the intelligence to recognize a legitimate argument from bait, and considerable inner strength to resist the drive to respond, even when you know you are in the right. Owned or free. The path you choose will be entirely up to you. Choose wisely! He hasn't, but then HE MUST BE *RIGHT* in whatever he sayeth. All who speak contrary to His wisdom are WRRRONNNNGGGG. The bells have been ringing in here with the above for years. Watch the replies to his "Riley" encyclical. :-) |
#236
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Jun 2005 09:59:04 -0700, wrote:
Leo wrote: On 26 Jun 2005 18:08:19 -0700, wrote: Leo wrote: On 26 Jun 2005 11:19:31 -0700, wrote: What would you suggest? Isn't that rather obvious? What do you suggest? Isn't that rather obvious? What do you suggest? Isn't that rather obvious? What do you suggest I do instead? Isn't that rather obvious? What do you suggest I do instead? Isn't that rather obvious? Then what do you suggest I do? Isn't that rather obvious? What do you suggest I do instead? Isn't that rather obvious? What do you suggest I do? Isn't that rather obvious? What would you suggest? Isn't that rather obvious? What do you suggest I do, Leo? Isn't that rather obvious? What do you suggest? Isn't that rather obvious? What do you suggest I do differently, Leo? Isn't that rather obvious? And your suggestion is? Isn't that rather obvious? What do you suggest I do differently, Leo? Isn't that rather obvious? In a word: No. It's not rather obvious, Leo. Sorry to hear that, Jim. How simplified do you need things to be? It's not about simplification, Leo. It's about clarity. Why can't you just clearly and plainly state what you suggest that I do? I have - many, many times. You must decide. What *do* you suggest? Just speak plainly rather than answering a question with another question, or a zinger. What's your suggestion? The way I see it, you have two options: 1. Continue to be suckered in to foolish arguments. 2. Do not continue to be suckered in to foolish arguments. OK so far. Glad to hear it! So far, so good. Option 1 is expensive - you become a possession of those who goad you in to responding. A puppet, as it were, dancing at the end of someone's strings.... That's your spin on it - does not address what actions you suggest *I* take. That is your current reality. Option 2 is much more difficult than Option 1 - it requires the intelligence to recognize a legitimate argument from bait, and considerable inner strength to resist the drive to respond, even when you know you are in the right. This is your potential future reality. So what do you suggest *I* do? Decide! Owned or free. That's your spin. That's your opinion. Owned - or free. You must decide. The path you choose will be entirely up to you. So there *is* a choice! There is always a choice. Yours to make if your are able to do so, You must decide! Choose wisely! Wise by whose standards? We'll all see the answer to that one soon enough - when you decide! How would such a choice be demonstrated in concrete, practical terms? Hmmm - you read the two options, right? ![]() What actions do you suggest? Decide! Only you can make this decision - you're on your own now. Good luck! 73 de Jim, N2EY 73, Leo |
#237
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Jun 2005 15:37:43 -0700, "bb" wrote:
Leo wrote: On 26 Jun 2005 18:08:19 -0700, wrote: What's your suggestion? The way I see it, you have two options: 1. Continue to be suckered in to foolish arguments. 2. Do not continue to be suckered in to foolish arguments. Option 1 is expensive - you become a possession of those who goad you in to responding. A puppet, as it were, dancing at the end of someone's strings.... Option 2 is much more difficult than Option 1 - it requires the intelligence to recognize a legitimate argument from bait, and considerable inner strength to resist the drive to respond, even when you know you are in the right. Owned or free. The path you choose will be entirely up to you. Choose wisely! 73 de Jim, N2EY 73, Leo Grasshopper, snatch this pebble from my hand. Ah - the journey of 1,000 miles begins with but a single step. He must decide. 73, Leo |
#238
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Jun 2005 16:02:31 -0700, wrote:
From: Leo on Mon 27 Jun 2005 07:19 On 26 Jun 2005 18:08:19 -0700, wrote: Leo wrote: On 26 Jun 2005 11:19:31 -0700, wrote: The following cantu-respondu is repeated 14 times, more or less the same Thank God for copy-and-paste - I'd never have made it! ![]() What would you suggest? Isn't that rather obvious? In a word: No. It's not rather obvious, Leo. Sorry to hear that, Jim. How simplified do you need things to be? Based on years of trying to play the Olde Guru of Amateur Radio in here, he simply wants things HIS WAY. He was that way on an AOL amateur radio group, too. BTW - are there archives of those discussions on the Net anywhere? Might make interesting reading..... ![]() What *do* you suggest? Just speak plainly rather than answering a question with another question, or a zinger. What's your suggestion? The way I see it, you have two options: 1. Continue to be suckered in to foolish arguments. 2. Do not continue to be suckered in to foolish arguments. Option 1 is expensive - you become a possession of those who goad you in to responding. A puppet, as it were, dancing at the end of someone's strings.... He will do it again (and did) following. Predictable. :-) We'll soon see - he might surprise us! Option 2 is much more difficult than Option 1 - it requires the intelligence to recognize a legitimate argument from bait, and considerable inner strength to resist the drive to respond, even when you know you are in the right. Owned or free. The path you choose will be entirely up to you. Choose wisely! He hasn't, but then HE MUST BE *RIGHT* in whatever he sayeth. He might! We'll all know soon enough...... All who speak contrary to His wisdom are WRRRONNNNGGGG. The bells have been ringing in here with the above for years. Watch the replies to his "Riley" encyclical. :-) Heh. I'm watching 'er grow day by day......... 73, Leo |
#239
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 27 Jun 2005 15:41:23 -0700, "bb" wrote:
wrote: Leo wrote: On 26 Jun 2005 18:08:19 -0700, wrote: What's your suggestion? The way I see it, you have two options: 1. Continue to be suckered in to foolish arguments. 2. Do not continue to be suckered in to foolish arguments. OK so far. Option 1 is expensive - you become a possession of those who goad you in to responding. A puppet, as it were, dancing at the end of someone's strings.... That's your spin on it - does not address what actions you suggest *I* take. Option 2 is much more difficult than Option 1 - it requires the intelligence to recognize a legitimate argument from bait, and considerable inner strength to resist the drive to respond, even when you know you are in the right. So what do you suggest *I* do? Owned or free. That's your spin. The path you choose will be entirely up to you. So there *is* a choice! Choose wisely! Wise by whose standards? How would such a choice be demonstrated in concrete, practical terms? What actions do you suggest? 73 de Jim, N2EY And so Grasshopper hesitates. Asks many questions. Must be told what he is to do, rather than just do what he is told. The pebble is withdrawn and Grasshopper is none the richer and none the wiser. Ah - it is true, he has missed the pebble. Again. (sigh) But take heart - perhaps there is a greater treasure to be attained. Perhaps, by missing the little pebble he is but one step closer to the final destination. He must decide. 73, Leo ![]() |
#240
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Utillity freq List; | Shortwave | |||
Navy launches second Kerry medal probe | Shortwave | |||
U.S. Navy IG Says Kerry's Medals Proper | Shortwave | |||
Navy Radiomen | General | |||
Base Closures | Shortwave |