an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
What it proves is that you aren't able to follow instructions.

What do you mean??

What I mean is: "I t p r o v e s t h a t y o u a r e n '
t

a b l e t o f o l l o w i n s t r u c t i o n s.



Waivers don't have filing window, waivers can filed
at anytime....the point are a bunch of lying scumbags just like
yourself.

No one's lied to you, Todd.

and you are lieng about Todds point or at best you missed it although I
don't can ahrdly see howthat is possible

I didn't miss anything.

Todd's the one missing the point.

He didn't meet licensing requirements. The FCC said NO. Todd
thinks that "just because" he filed a "waiver" he has a right to an
LPFM license. He doesn't.

You just haven't got what it takes to step up to the plate and
take responsibility for your own actions or failings.

Even if true it is a failing you personaly should be able to understand
since you suffer from it

Wrong again, Mark. There have been occassions in this forum where
I have made an error, and when shown that error, acknowledged it and
issued an apolgy where due. Ask Cecil, Hans, Kim, etc...

Steve, K4YZ

He didn't meet licensing requirements. The FCC said NO. Todd
thinks that "just because" he filed a "waiver" he has a right to an
LPFM license. He doesn't.

Hey moron, it was LOW POWER TV not LOW POWER FM

dumbass

He didn't meet licensing requirements. The FCC said NO. Todd
thinks that "just because" he filed a "waiver" he has a right to an
LPFM license. He doesn't.

No dickhead, the FCC didn't even consider my waiver, if they deny my
waiver then I can appeal to the US court of appeal, they did even do
that, Before you open your mouth steve you better know what the hell
you are talking about.

The FCC DOES NOT SERVE THE PUBLIC INTREST...(SNIP)

That's your opinion.

it's my opinion steve along with a LOT of other people that feel that
way.

However they did, in their best judgement, keep YOU off the public
airwaves, and as far as I am concerned that was worth almost all the
other grief they could possibly promulgate for any radio service.

Steve you don't know what the hell your talking about

Gee, Todd...there's a couple of LPFM stations near me, and none of
them seem to have any problems with "big companies" OR the FCC.

Yeah steve and there would be more LPFM stations on the air if the Big
radio stations lobby group the NAB wouldn't of lied to congress about
LPFM interfering. Like I said steve you don't know what the hell you
are talking about.

Let's see...why am I NOT impressed...?!?!
You're a foul-mouthed bigot...
You're a radio scofflaw...
You're borderline functionally illiterate...
You're a deadbeat parasite, almost 40 and still mooching off
mumsie and popsie...
I could go on, but anything else would just be icing on the
cake...
And your a Crybaby little bitchwhore who doesn't know what the hell he
is talking about...and FYI I don't mooch of my parents I've done pretty
well for myself in the stock market.

K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
Some Moron said
What I mean is: "I t p r o v e s t h a t y o u a r e n 't a b l e t o f o l l o w i n s t r u c t i o n s.

No steve what you don't understand is the FCC area bunch of scumbags
who go to the federal courts claiming that all a person has to do is
apply for a license and a waiver, and when some one does it (and by the
way I'm NOT the only one that has done it) the FCC wouldn't time the
####ing time to even look at the application or waiver.

"...wouldn't time the ####ing time..."

Angry, aren't you?

Perhaps he is so what, Now people need your premission to get angery?


The FCC DOES NOT SERVE THE PUBLIC INTREST...(SNIP)

That's your opinion.

However they did, in their best judgement, keep YOU off the public
airwaves, and as far as I am concerned that was worth almost all the
other grief they could possibly promulgate for any radio service.

Well they did not keep him off the public airwaves, they kept him off
Comercail ones, but he on the public airwaves, as are you.


(UNSNIP)...the only interest the FCC serves is the BIG companies.

Gee, Todd...there's a couple of LPFM stations near me, and none of
them seem to have any problems with "big companies" OR the FCC.

That's all I really have to say because in my opinion
your nothing but a waste of space, a sadist control freak, with a god
complex.

Let's see...why am I NOT impressed...?!?!

Most likely becuase you are an unsuccesfull control freak ....


You're a foul-mouthed bigot...

And You Steve are Bigot.


You're a radio scofflaw...

You are a stalker


You're borderline functionally illiterate...

you are a Hatemonger


You're a deadbeat parasite, almost 40 and still mooching off
mumsie and popsie...

A Lazy bum that wants others to do HIS work

I could go on, but anything else would just be icing on the
cake...

As Could I but you put it well

Steve, K4YZ

Dave Heil wrote:
N9OGL wrote:

...and FYI I don't mooch of my parents I've done pretty

well for myself in the stock market.


I'll bet that living in their home past your mid-thirties has allowed
you to set aside a tidy sum for investing in the market, eh Todd?

Dave K8MN




One would think that if he has done so well in the stock market as he
claims, he could buy a place of his own or at least get an appartment,
move out and stop sponging off mommy and daddy. 30+ and still being
supported by his parents...pretty pathetic.

N9OGL wrote:
Hey, interfernce is interfernce...

Simply classic.

[14. Section 97.113(a)(3) of the Rules prohibits an Amateur
station from transmitting any communications in which the
station licensee or control operator has a pecuniary
interest. On November 25, 2004 and March 30, 2005, Mr.
Baxter's station repeatedly transmitted references to his
website, which offers various products for sale, including a
monthly newsletter published by Glenn Baxter and offered for
sale for forty-five dollars per year. In addition, on
December 1, 2004, Station K1MAN transmitted a seventy-minute
interview with a person who was considering whether to
retain Baxter Associates, an employment-search firm owned by
Mr. Baxter. During the transmission, Mr. Baxter discussed
fees, investments, and franchising opportunities. We find
that Mr. Baxter apparently willfully and repeatedly violated
Section 97.113(a)(3) of the Rules on each of these occasions
by transmitting communications regarding matters in which he
has a pecuniary interest.]


Oh, the ARRL doesn't do that??? the rule states that pecuniary interest
applies to direct and indirect. K1MAN is doing direct, while the ARRL
doesn't indirect.

No, the ARRL doesn't do that.

[16. Section 97.113(b) of the Rules prohibits, with limited
exceptions not applicable here, an Amateur station from
engaging in any form of broadcasting or transmitting one-way
transmissions. Section 97.3(a)(10) of the Rules defines
broadcasting as ``transmissions intended for reception by
the general public.'' 14 We find that the pre-recorded
seventy-minute interview with a person interested in
retaining Baxter Associates, during which there was no
station identification, constitutes a ``broadcast'' and an
impermissible one-way transmission. Therefore, Mr. Baxter
apparently willfully violated Section 97.113(b) of the
Rules.]

and the question I have for the FCC is where does this and how does it
apply to section 326 of the communication act. after all isn't it up to
the station to deiced what is of intrest to amateur radio??

Apparently it isn't up the "the station" to "deiced". You didn't
understand it before. You don't understand it now.

finally I would like to tell all my fans that this sick joke of a NAL
does not effect my station or the N9OGL SHOW

Your fans? You have fans?


Dave K8MN

Apparently it isn't up the "the station" to "deiced". You didn't
understand it before. You don't understand it now.

I suggest Dave that you go to the FCC site and read for yourself

http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/ama...nications.html


Todd N9OGL
THE N9OGL SHOW

Apparently it isn't up the "the station" to "deiced". You didn't
understand it before. You don't understand it now.

Here's a a part of the webpage at the FCC website:

http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/ama...nications.html

About Amateur Communications & Operations

The following are answers to frequently asked questions about
communications appropriate for the amateur service. See Part 97 of the
Commission's Rules, 47 C.F.R. Part 97, ("rules") for the complete
regulations.

One-Way Transmissions

Q. What types of one-way communications are amateur stations authorized
to transmit?

A. Section 97.111(b) provides for one-way communications. In summary,
auxiliary, beacon, space and stations in distress are specifically
authorized to make certain one-way transmissions. Additionally, an
amateur station may transmit the following types of one-way
communications:


1. Brief transmissions necessary to make adjustments to the station;

2. Brief transmissions necessary for establishing two-way
communications with other stations;

3. Telecommand;

4. Transmissions necessary to providing emergency communications;

5. Transmissions necessary to assisting persons learning, or improving
proficiency in, the international Morse code;

6. Transmissions necessary to disseminate an information bulletin; and

7. Telemetry.

Q. What is an "information bulletin"?

A. The term is defined in Section 97.3. It is a message directed only
to amateur operators and consists solely of subject matter of direct
interest to the amateur service. The control operator of the station
transmitting an information bulletin is responsible for determining
that the subject matter is of direct interest to the amateur service.

Q. Does an amateur station transmitting information bulletins have to
share the channel?

A. Yes. Section 97.101 provides that each station licensee and each
control operator must cooperate in selecting transmitting channels and
in making the most effective use of the amateur service frequencies. A
specific transmitting channel is not assigned for the exclusive use of
any amateur station. Section 97.101 also provides that no amateur
operator shall cause interference to any radio communication or signal.
There is no exemption for amateur stations transmitting for information
bulletins.

Q. Is broadcasting prohibited?

A. Yes. Section 97.113 prohibits amateur stations from engaging in any
form of broadcasting or in any activity related to program production
or news gathering for broadcasting purposes.

Q. Is there an exception to this prohibition?

A. Yes, there is one exception: Communications directly related to the
immediate safety of human life or the protection of property may be
provided by amateur stations to broadcasters for dissemination to the
public where no other means of communication is reasonably available
before or at the time of the event.

Q. What is "broadcasting"?

A. Section 97.3 defines the term "broadcasting," in the context of the
amateur service, as a transmission intended for reception by the
general public, either direct or delayed.


Todd N9OGL