Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
I used to have novice call WD6BDK back in the mid to late 70s (76-79 I think?). I'm hoping to upgrade from a tech to an extra on Saturday, and I was just told I could use my old expired novice call to skip element 1 (the 5wpm test). I'd rather not stress over element 1 (I can pass, but...). If you or someone you know has an old callbook and could look me up and scan or fax me a copy of the page, I would be eternally in your debt. Much thanks, Paul |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The W5YI-VEC will perform exhaustive hand lookups into their massive
collection of old callbooks for a $5 fee. Contact them at 1-800-669-9594. Good Luck , Ace - WH2T "Paul Traina" wrote in message oups.com... Hi, I used to have novice call WD6BDK back in the mid to late 70s (76-79 I think?). I'm hoping to upgrade from a tech to an extra on Saturday, and I was just told I could use my old expired novice call to skip element 1 (the 5wpm test). I'd rather not stress over element 1 (I can pass, but...). If you or someone you know has an old callbook and could look me up and scan or fax me a copy of the page, I would be eternally in your debt. Much thanks, Paul |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Paul Traina wrote: Hi, I used to have novice call WD6BDK back in the mid to late 70s (76-79 I think?). I'm hoping to upgrade from a tech to an extra on Saturday, and I was just told I could use my old expired novice call to skip element 1 (the 5wpm test). I'd rather not stress over element 1 (I can pass, but...). If you or someone you know has an old callbook and could look me up and scan or fax me a copy of the page, I would be eternally in your debt. Much thanks, Paul Paul, I would guess that the hams most likely to have yellowing copies of the flying horse are the ones least interested in seeing anyone bypass another Morse Code exam. Good luck to you. bb |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks, unfortunately W5YI doesn't have a complete set, they're missing
1975-1983 apparently. I a friend of a friend claims he's got a 1979 callbook with my callsign in it, but he's neither fax nor scanner enabled, so I'm still looking. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You could be right, sigh. I feel a little guilty for doing it this
way, but if the FCC says it's good, then who am I to argue. Besides, I bet a few of them couldn't pass the new element 3. I took it in 1978-9 timeframe, and it's a new ballgame. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Paul, I would guess that the hams most likely to have yellowing copies of the flying horse are the ones least interested in seeing anyone bypass another Morse Code exam. There's ebay. Someone may be looking to unload stuff like this. Then you could bring the entire callbook with you and that would be plenty of evidence. But this will take time. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Traina" wrote in message ups.com... Thanks, unfortunately W5YI doesn't have a complete set, they're missing 1975-1983 apparently. I a friend of a friend claims he's got a 1979 callbook with my callsign in it, but he's neither fax nor scanner enabled, so I'm still looking. If there is an Office Max or Kinko's in his area, he can go there and get it scanned and faxed. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Traina" wrote in message ups.com... Thanks, unfortunately W5YI doesn't have a complete set, they're missing 1975-1983 apparently. I a friend of a friend claims he's got a 1979 callbook with my callsign in it, but he's neither fax nor scanner enabled, so I'm still looking. Also if you don't mind paying the fee, the FCC can provide a cofirmation. But it takes a while to get confirmations of old paper records. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul Traina" wrote in message oups.com... You could be right, sigh. I feel a little guilty for doing it this way, but if the FCC says it's good, then who am I to argue. Besides, I bet a few of them couldn't pass the new element 3. I took it in 1978-9 timeframe, and it's a new ballgame. No need to feel guilty. Besides if look at the history of licensing the earliest requirements were only 5wpm on code. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dee Flint wrote: "Paul Traina" wrote in message oups.com... You could be right, sigh. I feel a little guilty for doing it this way, but if the FCC says it's good, then who am I to argue. Besides, I bet a few of them couldn't pass the new element 3. I took it in 1978-9 timeframe, and it's a new ballgame. No need to feel guilty. Besides if look at the history of licensing the earliest requirements were only 5wpm on code. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE I've been pointing that out for years, but the PCTA tend to ignore that aspect of testing. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Who Can Have A US License? Sequential Calls? | Policy | |||
FCC resumes issuing calls. | Policy | |||
The Pool | Policy | |||
If Ham radio were invented today........ | Policy | |||
FCC Vanity Call Sign Dispute | Policy |