| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
July 27th 05, 10:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
an_old_friend wrote: BTw not saying Stevie is gay but just turning his back on him Please DO turn your back, Markie. I've seen your face, so the other side can only be an improvement. K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: cut Gee NOW you insist I to read your #### in order In order to "WHAT"...?!?! (Why don't you complete sentences?) was complete is complete No, it wasn't. yes it was No, it wasn't. was and remains a complete sentence No, it wasn't. you are demnding I wait till the next post or the next post beofre calling you on something Bull#### "juvi" comment, Markie. And not true. you are demanding I read your post in the order they were written some thing i can't even tell Bull#### I see....Markie Logic suggests that one can make logical, rational replies if one reads a post, jumps two or three posts, comes back to another, etc etc. cuting unrelated #### You're cutting your own throat? About time! you go on blaming me for your misdeeds Nope. I made the initial transposition of letters. I acknowledged it in the very next post. There was no misdeed. not in this thread maybe somewhere else in the ether Nope. In the very next post. not the next post I read and not any post I can find till you were called on it twice Uh huh...suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuure. Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight. more stve lying to evade his respoinilty for his own words More Markie lying to avoid being made to look more foolish than he already is... Ooooooooooooooooooops! Too late! Steve, K4YZ |
|
#2
July 27th 05, 07:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: BTw not saying Stevie is gay but just turning his back on him Please DO turn your back, Markie. I've seen your face, so the other side can only be an improvement. K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: cut Gee NOW you insist I to read your #### in order In order to "WHAT"...?!?! (Why don't you complete sentences?) was complete is complete No, it wasn't. yes it was No, it wasn't. was and remains a complete sentence No, it wasn't. learn english you are demnding I wait till the next post or the next post beofre calling you on something Bull#### non response you are demanding I read your post in the order they were written some thing i can't even tell Bull#### I see....Markie Logic suggests that one can make logical, rational replies if one reads a post, jumps two or three posts, comes back to another, etc etc. of course one reads posts and responds to them cuting unrelated #### more juvi stif you go on blaming me for your misdeeds Nope. I made the initial transposition of letters. I acknowledged it in the very next post. There was no misdeed. not in this thread maybe somewhere else in the ether Nope. In the very next post. not the next post I read and not any post I can find till you were called on it twice more evasion more stve lying to evade his respoinilty for his own words more evasion Steve, K4YZ |
|
#3
July 28th 05, 06:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Gee NOW you insist I to read your #### in order In order to "WHAT"...?!?! (Why don't you complete sentences?) was complete is complete No, it wasn't. yes it was No, it wasn't. was and remains a complete sentence No, it wasn't. learn english I know English. What you're writing is "English" only by loose association. you are demnding I wait till the next post or the next post beofre calling you on something Bull#### non response For once you got something right, but I bet you didn't even know why... you are demanding I read your post in the order they were written some thing i can't even tell Bull#### I see....Markie Logic suggests that one can make logical, rational replies if one reads a post, jumps two or three posts, comes back to another, etc etc. of course one reads posts and responds to them You ignored what I said, Markie...But ignoring it does not make it any less true. cuting unrelated #### more juvi stif What's "juvi" is your silly abbreviations and second grade grammar. you go on blaming me for your misdeeds Nope. I made the initial transposition of letters. I acknowledged it in the very next post. There was no misdeed. not in this thread maybe somewhere else in the ether Nope. In the very next post. not the next post I read and not any post I can find till you were called on it twice more evasion Nope. Nothing to evade. more stve lying to evade his respoinilty for his own words more evasion What's "responinilty"...?!?! You insist what you're writing is "English", but few of your words are in Websters. What's up with that? Steve, K4YZ |
|
#4
July 28th 05, 07:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Gee NOW you insist I to read your #### in order In order to "WHAT"...?!?! (Why don't you complete sentences?) was complete is complete No, it wasn't. yes it was No, it wasn't. was and remains a complete sentence No, it wasn't. learn english I know English. What you're writing is "English" only by loose association. you are demnding I wait till the next post or the next post beofre calling you on something Bull#### non response For once you got something right, but I bet you didn't even know why... you are demanding I read your post in the order they were written some thing i can't even tell Bull#### I see....Markie Logic suggests that one can make logical, rational replies if one reads a post, jumps two or three posts, comes back to another, etc etc. of course one reads posts and responds to them You ignored what I said, Markie...But ignoring it does not make it any less true. cuting unrelated #### more juvi stif What's "juvi" is your silly abbreviations and second grade grammar. you go on blaming me for your misdeeds Nope. I made the initial transposition of letters. I acknowledged it in the very next post. There was no misdeed. not in this thread maybe somewhere else in the ether Nope. In the very next post. not the next post I read and not any post I can find till you were called on it twice more evasion Nope. Nothing to evade. more stve lying to evade his respoinilty for his own words more evasion What's "responinilty"...?!?! You insist what you're writing is "English", but few of your words are in Websters. What's up with that? Steve, K4YZ I am beginning to think that toddieboy, an_old_whateverheis, john smithy, and lennieboy are all related. |
|
#5
July 28th 05, 09:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Gee NOW you insist I to read your #### in order In order to "WHAT"...?!?! (Why don't you complete sentences?) was complete is complete No, it wasn't. yes it was No, it wasn't. was and remains a complete sentence No, it wasn't. learn english I know English. then use english you are still unable to understand that you are demnding I read and respond to your post in order, and then claiming you don't understand what in order means What you're writing is "English" only by loose association. you are demnding I wait till the next post or the next post beofre calling you on something Bull#### non response For once you got something right, but I bet you didn't even know why... you are demanding I read your post in the order they were written some thing i can't even tell Bull#### I see....Markie Logic suggests that one can make logical, rational replies if one reads a post, jumps two or three posts, comes back to another, etc etc. of course one reads posts and responds to them You ignored what I said, Markie...But ignoring it does not make it any less true. nO I did not ignore it I dismissed it since as yuo should know on USEnet if you post message A then B then C I may se them as C then A then B Therefore there is no logical sense in expecting that I will read and respond to your posts in the order you wrote them more juvi stuff you go on blaming me for your misdeeds Nope. I made the initial transposition of letters. I acknowledged it in the very next post. There was no misdeed. not in this thread maybe somewhere else in the ether Nope. In the very next post. not the next post I read and not any post I can find till you were called on it twice more evasion Nope. Nothing to evade. only your misdeeds more stve lying to evade his respoinilty for his own words more evasion another stevie evasion cut Steve, K4YZ |
|
#6
July 28th 05, 10:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Gee NOW you insist I to read your #### in order In order to "WHAT"...?!?! (Why don't you complete sentences?) was complete is complete No, it wasn't. yes it was No, it wasn't. was and remains a complete sentence No, it wasn't. learn english I know English. then use english I do. You're the one with a problem, markie. you are still unable to understand that you are demnding I read and respond to your post in order, and then claiming you don't understand what in order means In order to WHAT...?!?! USE CAPITALIZATION! USE PUNCTUATION! What you're writing is "English" only by loose association. you are demnding I wait till the next post or the next post beofre calling you on something Bull#### non response For once you got something right, but I bet you didn't even know why... you are demanding I read your post in the order they were written some thing i can't even tell Bull#### I see....Markie Logic suggests that one can make logical, rational replies if one reads a post, jumps two or three posts, comes back to another, etc etc. of course one reads posts and responds to them You ignored what I said, Markie...But ignoring it does not make it any less true. nO I did not ignore it I dismissed it since as yuo should know on USEnet if you post message A then B then C I may se them as C then A then B So what you're telling me is that you're aware you have a problem, and that despite being aware of that problem, you have neither the capacity nor incentive to fix the problem. You see, I buy the "I can't read clearly due to dyslexia" issue...What I DON'T buy is your using it as a crutch to further facilitate your laziness and incompetent mind. Therefore there is no logical sense in expecting that I will read and respond to your posts in the order you wrote them You don't seem to have that probelm with other posters, Markie...Which only further leads me to believe that you're simply lying to cover up your incompetence. more juvi stuff you go on blaming me for your misdeeds Nope. I made the initial transposition of letters. I acknowledged it in the very next post. There was no misdeed. not in this thread maybe somewhere else in the ether Nope. In the very next post. not the next post I read and not any post I can find till you were called on it twice more evasion Nope. Nothing to evade. only your misdeeds No misdeeds on my part to evade, Markie. more stve lying to evade his respoinilty for his own words more evasion another stevie evasion cut Nope. No more than you doing the same thing. Stop lying. Act like a man. Get help for your problems. (I'll hit the lottery before any of THAT happens......) Steve, K4YZ |
|
#7
July 28th 05, 10:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Gee NOW you insist I to read your #### in order In order to "WHAT"...?!?! (Why don't you complete sentences?) was complete is complete No, it wasn't. yes it was No, it wasn't. was and remains a complete sentence No, it wasn't. learn english I know English. then use english I do. nope You're the one with a problem, markie. i admit to mine grow up and do the same you are still unable to understand that you are demnding I read and respond to your post in order, and then claiming you don't understand what in order means In order to WHAT...?!?! in order period how stupid are you? USE CAPITALIZATION! doesn't help with you USE PUNCTUATION! does not help with you you don't understand english What you're writing is "English" only by loose association. you are demnding I wait till the next post or the next post beofre calling you on something Bull#### non response For once you got something right, but I bet you didn't even know why... you are demanding I read your post in the order they were written some thing i can't even tell Bull#### I see....Markie Logic suggests that one can make logical, rational replies if one reads a post, jumps two or three posts, comes back to another, etc etc. of course one reads posts and responds to them You ignored what I said, Markie...But ignoring it does not make it any less true. nO I did not ignore it I dismissed it since as yuo should know on USEnet if you post message A then B then C I may se them as C then A then B cuting out stevie changing the subject, and making remarks with zero relanance to the issue at hand Therefore there is no logical sense in expecting that I will read and respond to your posts in the order you wrote them You don't seem to have that probelm with other posters, most don't post as much as yourself stevie nd no one but you expects me to look in another thread for a correction before I coment on the one in fornt of me more evding the subject more juvi stuff you go on blaming me for your misdeeds Nope. I made the initial transposition of letters. I acknowledged it in the very next post. There was no misdeed. not in this thread maybe somewhere else in the ether Nope. In the very next post. not the next post I read and not any post I can find till you were called on it twice more evasion Nope. Nothing to evade. only your misdeeds No misdeeds on my part to evade, Markie. your misdeeds are almost beyond counting You lie you cheat you comit public fraud you stalk you harrass you threaten you libel you forge more steve lying to evade his respoinilty for his own words |
|
#8
July 28th 05, 03:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: Gee NOW you insist I to read your #### in order In order to "WHAT"...?!?! (Why don't you complete sentences?) was complete is complete No, it wasn't. yes it was No, it wasn't. was and remains a complete sentence No, it wasn't. learn english I know English. then use english I do. nope Yep. Care to take some of YOUR postings and MY postings to an English teacher and see who get's the "A" and who flunks? I'll put $500 on it. What say? You're the one with a problem, markie. i admit to mine grow up and do the same You only "admit" to your problems after getting your nose rubbed in them, and even then you don't do anything to fix them. you are still unable to understand that you are demnding I read and respond to your post in order, and then claiming you don't understand what in order means In order to WHAT...?!?! in order period how stupid are you? Not as stupid as you. USE a period. Use capitalization. Use punctuation. USE CAPITALIZATION! doesn't help with you It's not about helping me, Blockhead...It's about helping YOU! USE PUNCTUATION! does not help with you It's not about helping me, Blockhead...It's about helping YOU! you don't understand english Sure I do, starting with the fact that it's proper to start a sentence with a capital letter and end it with a period. It's also proper to capitalize "English". You insist you know it so well but you never demonstrate it. What you're writing is "English" only by loose association. you are demnding I wait till the next post or the next post beofre calling you on something Bull#### non response For once you got something right, but I bet you didn't even know why... you are demanding I read your post in the order they were written some thing i can't even tell Bull#### I see....Markie Logic suggests that one can make logical, rational replies if one reads a post, jumps two or three posts, comes back to another, etc etc. of course one reads posts and responds to them You ignored what I said, Markie...But ignoring it does not make it any less true. nO I did not ignore it I dismissed it since as yuo should know on USEnet if you post message A then B then C I may se them as C then A then B cuting out stevie changing the subject, and making remarks with zero relanance to the issue at hand Markie to Englsih translation: "He's got me by throat and I can't come up with an adequate answer." And what's "relanance"...?!?! Therefore there is no logical sense in expecting that I will read and respond to your posts in the order you wrote them You don't seem to have that probelm with other posters, most don't post as much as yourself stevie nd no one but you expects me to look in another thread for a correction before I coment on the one in fornt of me I expect you to have already read the preceeding post in order for the one in front of you to make sense. more evding the subject Then stop evading. more juvi stuff you go on blaming me for your misdeeds Nope. I made the initial transposition of letters. I acknowledged it in the very next post. There was no misdeed. not in this thread maybe somewhere else in the ether Nope. In the very next post. not the next post I read and not any post I can find till you were called on it twice more evasion Nope. Nothing to evade. only your misdeeds No misdeeds on my part to evade, Markie. your misdeeds are almost beyond counting You lie Nope. you cheat Nope. you comit public fraud Nope. you stalk Nope. you harrass Nope. you threaten Nope. you libel Nope. you forge Nope. more steve lying to evade his respoinilty for his own words You just uttered eight libellous statements, Markie. And then followed it up with yet another of your jibberish statements. Each one made as a statement of fact when there is in deed no basis of fact to any of them. Unlike your earlier post where you had the momentary lucidity to say "in my opinion, However even such a caveat does not protect you from civil suit. Even in Michigan. Steve, K4YZ |
|
#9
July 29th 05, 09:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: you don't understand english Priceless! You lie you cheat you comit public fraud you stalk you harrass you threaten you libel you forge You need to get a grip on yourself, Mark. more steve lying to evade his respoinilty for his own words I think more of us should take respoinilty for our actions. Dave K8MN |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
