K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:


I opose hazing ritual frat boy rituals for access to the public
airwaves


Translation: "I don't want to learn anything technical, or anything
about regulations, or take a test to determine if I am half-way capable
of operating a transmitter responsibably on the ham bands".

guess you failed english

Better to "fail" it than bend it over and rape it in broad
daylight.

break

And let's face it, Mark...That IS what you suggest.

no it is not that is another Stevie lie

Morse code test proves nothing about anything technical or any way
determine my ability to operate a tranmitter

Morse Code testing is simply a hazing ritual a frat house game, and you
support becuase it is that.


For the past week you've been refusing to apologize to Hans because
he had the temerity to use proper emission designators in response to
an inquiry BY you...

right I refuse, and you like junkyard dog think you can bully me into
doing so

He provided you specific information, but you've since made a
"federal case" out of having been "forced" to learn something.

"Auf Anglish bitte" is making a "federal case" of it.

You lying sack of ****, you are the one making a 'federal case' of it


Steve, K4YZ

an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:


I opose hazing ritual frat boy rituals for access to the public
airwaves


Translation: "I don't want to learn anything technical, or anything
about regulations, or take a test to determine if I am half-way capable
of operating a transmitter responsibably on the ham bands".

guess you failed english

Better to "fail" it than bend it over and rape it in broad
daylight.

break

And let's face it, Mark...That IS what you suggest.

no it is not that is another Stevie lie

No, it's not.

Everything you post about Amateur Radio licensing is about "how can
I get more without doing anything"...

Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics!

Morse code test proves nothing about anything technical or any way
determine my ability to operate a tranmitter

Sure it does.

It shows you know how to operate an Amateur Radio transmitter in
the CW mode.

Morse Code testing is simply a hazing ritual a frat house game, and you
support becuase it is that.

Nope.

I support it becasue it's the simplest mode to get on the air and
acts as a "level playing field" for Amateurs of all nations and all
tongues.

For the past week you've been refusing to apologize to Hans because
he had the temerity to use proper emission designators in response to
an inquiry BY you...

right I refuse, and you like junkyard dog think you can bully me into
doing so

You refuse because you're an immoral, selfish, self-centered punk.

He provided you specific information, but you've since made a
"federal case" out of having been "forced" to learn something.

"Auf Anglish bitte" is making a "federal case" of it.

Your whinings about how he was "condescending" to you by using the
very same language the FCC uses was...

You lying sack of ####, you are the one making a 'federal case' of it

Profanity is the adjective of choce of the weak mind.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:

Manure! Nothing in amateur radio takes away any of the "liberites"
granted by the Constitution.


the code test does indeed do so

As with any number of things of late, you're simply wrong.

IYO opinion

doesn't make it so

But in this case he's right.

nope

Neither you or any other person has been denied their
Constitutional rights due to ANY Amateur examination.

Nothing in the U.S. Constitution prevents the FCC from administering a
morse code test for amateur radio licensing. You have no right to an
amateur radio license.

Nothing gives it he power to impose an uneeded test

Uneeded in YOUR opinion.

then defend it as needed


I have a right to a fair test

It IS fair.

nope no fairer than a buggy whip test



The FCC will allow almost ANY accomodation for the test other than
just paying someone to tkae it for you.

I opose hazing ritual frat boy rituals for access to the public
airwaves

I opossum your view.


and the Constitution of the US

Okay, I opossum the Constitution.

You support frat boy #### and don't bother to use language as you
demand I do

He was using YOUR style, Mark.

not realy


What's a matter?

Having trouble understanding it?

no


Everything you needed for an answer was right before you--spelled out.
That, of course, might have been the problem. Next time, ask Hans for
the aural version.


not it wasn't

Yes, Mark, it was. Your repeated denials of reality are just making you
look stupid.

He did not answer the question of wether CW was premitted

Yes he did.

nope


Why do you continue to blatantly lie when Hans' post is archived
for all to see?

why do you lie about my reply


do understand what I am saying when I type 60m Band or not?

Yes, you mean the spot frequencies which are not a band at all.

then stop your whining becuase that is all it is whining

No, it's correcting your misconceptions.

no misconceptions


I don't know Steve's views on the NBA or NFL draft. I do know what
you've written previously about being drafted. Now we're to understand
that you didn't actually mean "drafted".

never said that either as I then a year later , and a few days ago I
using the word in other senses. That you and Stevie are hung out on one
meaning is not my fault. I have also admitted the use was unforunate
but you are just in attacking

It's not "one meaning".

It's that you lied.

Ask any American citizen what "drafted" means in military terms,
and they will tell you it means involuntary conscription, or words to
that effect.

as an american citzen myself your staement falls down


no one has yet to come up with a term other than band to describe 60 m
doesn't stop setvie and hans from going on and on about how wrong it is

Hans gave you a term to use. There is no 60m band by definition.


and yet you, steve and Hans know better than the ARRL and W5YI

Yeah, it surely looks that way. It certainly won't be the first time.

such humility

Facts are facts.

but only if they are facts


If I (or any person, for that matter...) is "right" but not part
of some "organization", does it make it any LESS "true"...?!?!

your point?

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:


I opose hazing ritual frat boy rituals for access to the public
airwaves


Translation: "I don't want to learn anything technical, or anything
about regulations, or take a test to determine if I am half-way capable
of operating a transmitter responsibably on the ham bands".

guess you failed english

Better to "fail" it than bend it over and rape it in broad
daylight.

break

And let's face it, Mark...That IS what you suggest.


break
no it is not that is another Stevie lie

No, it's not.

Everything you post about Amateur Radio licensing is about "how can
I get more without doing anything"...

nope


Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics!

i may well yet take part in such a suit


Morse code test proves nothing about anything technical or any way
determine my ability to operate a tranmitter

Sure it does.

nope


It shows you know how to operate an Amateur Radio transmitter in
the CW mode.

no it does not

I can do that right now, and have done so for providing code pratice, I
use comptuer to encode and decode


Morse Code testing is simply a hazing ritual a frat house game, and you
support becuase it is that.

Nope.

yes it is


I support it becasue it's the simplest mode to get on the air and
acts as a "level playing field" for Amateurs of all nations and all
tongues.

so?

and withdrwaing your remarks about needing work to earn the license?


For the past week you've been refusing to apologize to Hans because
he had the temerity to use proper emission designators in response to
an inquiry BY you...

right I refuse, and you like junkyard dog think you can bully me into
doing so

You refuse because you're an immoral, selfish, self-centered punk.

no I refuse becuase I don't owe one, and I will not be bullied into one

even if you had gotten the reason right, doesn't alter the facts you
have beentrying to harass and bully me into making it


He provided you specific information, but you've since made a
"federal case" out of having been "forced" to learn something.

"Auf Anglish bitte" is making a "federal case" of it.

Your whinings about how he was "condescending" to you by using the
very same language the FCC uses was...

that was after you made the federal case, he was condsending (as is the
FCC and almost the entire govt)


You lying sack of ####, you are the one making a 'federal case' of it

Profanity is the adjective of choce of the weak mind.

IYO



Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:


I opose hazing ritual frat boy rituals for access to the public
airwaves


Translation: "I don't want to learn anything technical, or anything
about regulations, or take a test to determine if I am half-way capable
of operating a transmitter responsibably on the ham bands".

guess you failed english

Better to "fail" it than bend it over and rape it in broad
daylight.

break

And let's face it, Mark...That IS what you suggest.


break
no it is not that is another Stevie lie

No, it's not.

Everything you post about Amateur Radio licensing is about "how can
I get more without doing anything"...

nope


Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics!

i may well yet take part in such a suit


Morse code test proves nothing about anything technical or any way
determine my ability to operate a tranmitter

Sure it does.

nope


It shows you know how to operate an Amateur Radio transmitter in
the CW mode.

no it does not

I can do that right now, and have done so for providing code pratice, I
use comptuer to encode and decode


Morse Code testing is simply a hazing ritual a frat house game, and you
support becuase it is that.

Nope.

yes it is


I support it becasue it's the simplest mode to get on the air and
acts as a "level playing field" for Amateurs of all nations and all
tongues.

so?

and withdrwaing your remarks about needing work to earn the license?


For the past week you've been refusing to apologize to Hans because
he had the temerity to use proper emission designators in response to
an inquiry BY you...

right I refuse, and you like junkyard dog think you can bully me into
doing so

You refuse because you're an immoral, selfish, self-centered punk.

no I refuse becuase I don't owe one, and I will not be bullied into one

even if you had gotten the reason right, doesn't alter the facts you
have beentrying to harass and bully me into making it


He provided you specific information, but you've since made a
"federal case" out of having been "forced" to learn something.

"Auf Anglish bitte" is making a "federal case" of it.

Your whinings about how he was "condescending" to you by using the
very same language the FCC uses was...

that was after you made the federal case, he was condsending (as is the
FCC and almost the entire govt)


You lying sack of ####, you are the one making a 'federal case' of it

Profanity is the adjective of choce of the weak mind.

IYO



Steve, K4YZ

Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:
Steveo wrote:
Cmd Buzz Corey wrote:

You failed English and spelling. Like I say, you would fit perfectly
on

the Chicken Band, they are all on just about your level.


You're no netter than him jj, your drivel is worse than what's on CB.

hth

Stick to the Childrens Band with the rest of the scum of radio land, you
are way out classed here steveio.

I certainly am...but not by you, commander buzz-boi. You used to be ok to
converse with a year or two ago, 'jj the buzz'. Dunno wtf crawled up your
ass enough for you to reference cb'ers so much. (penis envy?)

an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics!

i may well yet take part in such a suit

You'll do no such thing.

You're a pathological liar and a coward to boot.

When your "lawyer" gets a load of your posts here and sees that
your credibility is zilch-point-squat, you won't be able to get him to
litigate a case for you even if the Pope swears on CNN Live that you're
the "wronged" party.

Huge snip.

Profanity is the adjective of choce of the weak mind.

IYO

In the opinions of civilized people.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics!

i may well yet take part in such a suit

You'll do no such thing.

I might not but then I might


You're a pathological liar and a coward to boot.

not true


When your "lawyer" gets a load of your posts here and sees that
your credibility is zilch-point-squat, you won't be able to get him to
litigate a case for you even if the Pope swears on CNN Live that you're
the "wronged" party.

stevie it your posts that will be at evidence not mine

it is you that have comitted libel


Huge snip.

Profanity is the adjective of choce of the weak mind.

IYO

In the opinions of civilized people.

if you are civilized then I don't want to be civilized


Steve, K4YZ

an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics!

i may well yet take part in such a suit

You'll do no such thing.

I might not but then I might

No...you won't.

You're a pathological liar and a coward to boot.

not true

A B S O L U T E L Y true!

When your "lawyer" gets a load of your posts here and sees that
your credibility is zilch-point-squat, you won't be able to get him to
litigate a case for you even if the Pope swears on CNN Live that you're
the "wronged" party.

stevie it your posts that will be at evidence not mine

Nope. Sorry. I get to bring "evidence" too.

And "boyo", have YOU stacked it up!

it is you that have comitted libel

Nope.

Huge snip.

Profanity is the adjective of choce of the weak mind.

IYO

In the opinions of civilized people.

if you are civilized then I don't want to be civilized

No problem. You've already missed the bus.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Your "I'll sue using ADA!" rants were classics!

i may well yet take part in such a suit

You'll do no such thing.

I might not but then I might

No...you won't.

I hope I don't have to

but depending on event never sure what I will do and I avoid making
such decisons till I need to


You're a pathological liar and a coward to boot.

not true

A B S O L U T E L Y true!

not at all


When your "lawyer" gets a load of your posts here and sees that
your credibility is zilch-point-squat, you won't be able to get him to
litigate a case for you even if the Pope swears on CNN Live that you're
the "wronged" party.

stevie it your posts that will be at evidence not mine

Nope. Sorry. I get to bring "evidence" too.

sure do but only relavant stuff gets into the record

and I would not need even to win in order to harm you the cost of
defending a suit can run quite high

You threatened to kill me you therten everyone here that you disagree
with.

My own do/would make the case harder but not impossible


And "boyo", have YOU stacked it up!

you have been stacking it deeper

and it is all ****


it is you that have comitted libel

Nope.

yep


Huge snip.

Profanity is the adjective of choce of the weak mind.

IYO

In the opinions of civilized people.

if you are civilized then I don't want to be civilized

No problem. You've already missed the bus.

in all truth I think it is you that is uncivliized but suit yourself


Steve, K4YZ