"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Kim:

I expected as much, a women libber who isn't a libber at all.


And you are showing your real ignorance. I am far, far from being a
Pansy-ass women's libber. I disagree with most Women's Liberation Theology,
I disagree with the tenent of being a Women's Liberation victim (yes, I said
victim); and I think most of the Women's Libbers I've met are about as
misrepresentative of everyday life as they can possibly be.

I think women should be as capable as anyone else. I try not to see this as
a male/female world, because I think that is very devisive and
nonproductive. I will get into the ring of life along with anyone else, and
I don't look to anyone else to live it for me. If you call that "bad," it's
my opinion that you are threatened by that. I don't need any man's
permission for thing, nor would I ever allow a man to think I did.


Rather a spoiled female brat which wants all the perks of being female
and none of the responsibility.


Hardly. I can't think of a perk that I'm interested in.


And, you are right, gays marrying makes a mockery out of marriage. Two
butt buddies (or two lesbian lick masters) are ridiculous and should
be give mental health to repair their suffering mental conditions...


Nope. That isn't right at all--at least not from my perspective. I was
cutting into the tragic philosophy that you have. I notice you didn't say
much about any of the shortcomings we have as people who aren't gay or
lesbian. I believe you are quite mistaken about your beliefs. But, you are
entitled to your thoughts on the matter.


You wouldn't know a real female if she ran up and bit ya on yer bum.
Already you are whinning because your tricks ain't going to work here.


Mmm. Your perverted thoughts of women's body parts is noted. And, what
tricks are you speaking of? You just can't handle a woman who is quite
capable of holding her own. Like I said, that thing your packin' is pretty
worthless.


Screw off, you are just a new age wacko and they are a dime a dozen!
You are too used to people kissing yer bum to be politically correct,
ain't gonna happen here--I have too much respect for myself.


I am not the slightest bit interested in anyone kissing my ass...right now
in particular: you. And, I doubt you have "too much" respect for yourself.
Your actions say otherwise. I'd pretty much come to the decision that you
are a man in peril with himself.


If you want to stay focused on ham issues good. If you want to argue
being politically correct or I have to suffer your opinions and
views--chuck it girl!

John


Oh, yeah. I see the "ham issues" you're discussing. ROFLMAO... What a
friggin' weanie... When you get to be HALF the irritant that Larry Roll is,
come back and see me.

Kim W5TIT



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

look, what you think, what you expect, what you want--don't waste your
time or mine telling me--get it or don't, I am here neither to stop
you nor assist you...

.... next, if you have to go though quoting each and ever line and/or
paragraph you are responding to, and you cannot organize your thought
and create your own text without intermingling it with mine--don't
expect me to read it, I don't have the time to be wading though a
bunch of text I have written myself--create a work of your own which
can stand on its own two feet! I know you have seen others incapable
of free thought and an attention span shorter than their thumb do
it--but dependence on another to weed through that mess you create is
way too much to ask for!

So, you proclaim yourself neither a libber nor to follow what was a
conventional woman's behavior from before--ok, big deal, free world,
you waste my time, don't tell me about it do it!!! I find such
proclamation neither new, original or threatening... perhaps boring, I
have been doing it since I was born!

I note you wish to argue, can you stay focused, what is it you are
saying here, use your own text... don't cut and paste mine or others,
if you can't write--take a class!

If you have anything real to say, I'll be here...

John

"Kim" wrote in message
...
"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Kim:

I expected as much, a women libber who isn't a libber at all.


And you are showing your real ignorance. I am far, far from being a
Pansy-ass women's libber. I disagree with most Women's Liberation
Theology,
I disagree with the tenent of being a Women's Liberation victim
(yes, I said
victim); and I think most of the Women's Libbers I've met are about
as
misrepresentative of everyday life as they can possibly be.

I think women should be as capable as anyone else. I try not to see
this as
a male/female world, because I think that is very devisive and
nonproductive. I will get into the ring of life along with anyone
else, and
I don't look to anyone else to live it for me. If you call that
"bad," it's
my opinion that you are threatened by that. I don't need any man's
permission for thing, nor would I ever allow a man to think I did.


Rather a spoiled female brat which wants all the perks of being
female
and none of the responsibility.


Hardly. I can't think of a perk that I'm interested in.


And, you are right, gays marrying makes a mockery out of marriage.
Two
butt buddies (or two lesbian lick masters) are ridiculous and
should
be give mental health to repair their suffering mental
conditions...


Nope. That isn't right at all--at least not from my perspective. I
was
cutting into the tragic philosophy that you have. I notice you
didn't say
much about any of the shortcomings we have as people who aren't gay
or
lesbian. I believe you are quite mistaken about your beliefs. But,
you are
entitled to your thoughts on the matter.


You wouldn't know a real female if she ran up and bit ya on yer
bum.
Already you are whinning because your tricks ain't going to work
here.


Mmm. Your perverted thoughts of women's body parts is noted. And,
what
tricks are you speaking of? You just can't handle a woman who is
quite
capable of holding her own. Like I said, that thing your packin' is
pretty
worthless.


Screw off, you are just a new age wacko and they are a dime a
dozen!
You are too used to people kissing yer bum to be politically
correct,
ain't gonna happen here--I have too much respect for myself.


I am not the slightest bit interested in anyone kissing my
ass...right now
in particular: you. And, I doubt you have "too much" respect for
yourself.
Your actions say otherwise. I'd pretty much come to the decision
that you
are a man in peril with himself.


If you want to stay focused on ham issues good. If you want to
argue
being politically correct or I have to suffer your opinions and
views--chuck it girl!

John


Oh, yeah. I see the "ham issues" you're discussing. ROFLMAO...
What a
friggin' weanie... When you get to be HALF the irritant that Larry
Roll is,
come back and see me.

Kim W5TIT



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via
Encryption =----

Are you drunk? Or, is it drugs?

Kim W5TIT



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Geesh...

Kim, I don't have time... neither for drugs, alcohol or you...

John

"Kim" wrote in message
...
Are you drunk? Or, is it drugs?

Kim W5TIT



----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet
News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via
Encryption =----

.... next, if you have to go though quoting each and ever line and/or
paragraph you are responding to, and you cannot organize your thought
and create your own text without intermingling it with mine--don't
expect me to read it, I don't have the time...


Good and valid point. Many respondees have decided that it is necessary to
repost an entire thread, ad nauseum, as they "make their point".
It appears to me to be a waste of time and space and regurgitating the
entire thread serves little, if any purpose.

I suppose that it may be well beyond some of their capabilities to be
concise and to the point.

John Smith, forgive them, for they know not what they do.

Opie:

Ohhh, isn't that nice of you, worried about the bandwidth of sending
all the text... how thoughtful!!!!
yawn

Hey, if you have a minute, would you mind clipping off all the junk
following this text here?

John

"Opie" Anon@noremailers wrote in message
...


... next, if you have to go though quoting each and ever line and/or
paragraph you are responding to, and you cannot organize your
thought
and create your own text without intermingling it with mine--don't
expect me to read it, I don't have the time...


Good and valid point. Many respondees have decided that it is
necessary to
repost an entire thread, ad nauseum, as they "make their point".
It appears to me to be a waste of time and space and regurgitating
the
entire thread serves little, if any purpose.

I suppose that it may be well beyond some of their capabilities to
be
concise and to the point.

John Smith, forgive them, for they know not what they do.

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Opie:

Ohhh, isn't that nice of you, worried about the bandwidth of sending
all the text... how thoughtful!!!!
yawn

Hey, if you have a minute, would you mind clipping off all the junk...
snip

Consider it done, Good Buddy. It was, after all, YOUR complaint.

10-4?

Dopie:

Thanks bud!!!!

John

"Opie" Anon@noremailers wrote in message
...

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Opie:

Ohhh, isn't that nice of you, worried about the bandwidth of sending
all the text... how thoughtful!!!!
yawn

Hey, if you have a minute, would you mind clipping off all the
junk...
snip

Consider it done, Good Buddy. It was, after all, YOUR complaint.

10-4?