K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
From: "K4YZ" on Sun 24 Jul 2005 23:45

"...not surrendering your obligations to technology."
Geeee-susss! Think about what a dumbfork thing you wrote!
You sound like you've mounted a lecturn but forgot to
light your mental lantern. The light ain't come on yet.

The light IS on, Lennie.

I guess it was MY fault for assuming you'd take the whole context
of the message and reply in kind, but then that would ruin your rant.

One does NOT ensure that one's station is operating properly
simply by virture of the digital display of the device in question.

The FCC requires routine diagnostics of the station to ensure it's
compliance.

where in the rules does it make that requirement?


Staying WITHIN the band edges IS "proper operation."
The ONLY way you CAN stay within (and be LEGAL) is to
USE TECHNOLOGY!

Yep.

With diagnostic devices EXTERNAL to the device in
question...Signal generators, Spectrum Analyzers, etc etc etc.

still don't know what tools you need even after being told


giving up trying to explain radio to dumbfork stebie

NOT giving up pointing out how Lennie Anderson tries to misdirect
and deceive on issues pertaining to Amateur Radio...

then get your facts straight




Putz.

probeing another of lennies points for him


Steve, K4YZ

an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
From: "K4YZ" on Sun 24 Jul 2005 23:45

"...not surrendering your obligations to technology."
Geeee-susss! Think about what a dumbfork thing you wrote!
You sound like you've mounted a lecturn but forgot to
light your mental lantern. The light ain't come on yet.

The light IS on, Lennie.

I guess it was MY fault for assuming you'd take the whole context
of the message and reply in kind, but then that would ruin your rant.

One does NOT ensure that one's station is operating properly
simply by virture of the digital display of the device in question.

The FCC requires routine diagnostics of the station to ensure it's
compliance.

where in the rules does it make that requirement?

You've GOT to be kidding...

Staying WITHIN the band edges IS "proper operation."
The ONLY way you CAN stay within (and be LEGAL) is to
USE TECHNOLOGY!

Yep.

With diagnostic devices EXTERNAL to the device in
question...Signal generators, Spectrum Analyzers, etc etc etc.

still don't know what tools you need even after being told

Sure I do. And those do just fine.

giving up trying to explain radio to dumbfork stebie

NOT giving up pointing out how Lennie Anderson tries to misdirect
and deceive on issues pertaining to Amateur Radio...

then get your facts straight

I do.

It's you and Lennie who have some situation awareness issues to
fix.



Putz.

probeing another of lennies points for him

I'll never be probing ANYthing of Lennie's, Markie!

That's YOUR fetish!

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
From: "K4YZ" on Sun 24 Jul 2005 23:45

"...not surrendering your obligations to technology."
Geeee-susss! Think about what a dumbfork thing you wrote!
You sound like you've mounted a lecturn but forgot to
light your mental lantern. The light ain't come on yet.

The light IS on, Lennie.

I guess it was MY fault for assuming you'd take the whole context
of the message and reply in kind, but then that would ruin your rant.

One does NOT ensure that one's station is operating properly
simply by virture of the digital display of the device in question.

The FCC requires routine diagnostics of the station to ensure it's
compliance.


break

where in the rules does it make that requirement?

You've GOT to be kidding...

not at all been asking that for months you never answer


Staying WITHIN the band edges IS "proper operation."
The ONLY way you CAN stay within (and be LEGAL) is to
USE TECHNOLOGY!

Yep.

With diagnostic devices EXTERNAL to the device in
question...Signal generators, Spectrum Analyzers, etc etc etc.

still don't know what tools you need even after being told

Sure I do. And those do just fine.

giving up trying to explain radio to dumbfork stebie

NOT giving up pointing out how Lennie Anderson tries to misdirect
and deceive on issues pertaining to Amateur Radio...

then get your facts straight

I do.

then try telling the turth if you know it


It's you and Lennie who have some situation awareness issues to
fix.

not realy




Putz.

probeing another of lennies points for him

ctuuing stevie sexual stuff again

but just typed adjacent keys on the keyboard


Steve, K4YZ

an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

where in the rules does it make that requirement?

You've GOT to be kidding...

not at all been asking that for months you never answer

Glad to prove you wrong again, Markie.

97.103 and 97.307, among others, require specification tolerances
be maintained.

There are others.

NOT giving up pointing out how Lennie Anderson tries to misdirect
and deceive on issues pertaining to Amateur Radio...

then get your facts straight

I do.

then try telling the turth if you know it

"the "turth"...?!?!

It's you and Lennie who have some situation awareness issues to
fix.

not realy

Absolutely "realy"



Putz.

probeing another of lennies points for him

ctuuing stevie sexual stuff again

You're doing what? "ctuuing"...?!?!

but just typed adjacent keys on the keyboard

Which adjacent keys? You haven't corrected whatever error you
made.

There's any number of idiotic mistakes you could have made.
Please show your work.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

where in the rules does it make that requirement?

You've GOT to be kidding...

not at all been asking that for months you never answer

Glad to prove you wrong again, Markie.

not at all

97.103 and 97.307, among others, require specification tolerances
be maintained.

BUZZ you still are not quoting any rule requiring such

The operator is respaoniblie if the sation does not comply but nothing
requiring any particular method of ensuring it

same ole **** steve

There are others.

then cite one of them finaly


NOT giving up pointing out how Lennie Anderson tries to misdirect
and deceive on issues pertaining to Amateur Radio...

then get your facts straight

I do.

then try telling the turth if you know it

"the "turth"...?!?!

yep the turth


It's you and Lennie who have some situation awareness issues to
fix.

not realy

Absolutely "realy"

not at all

you are the one that reads something, adds to it and then makes claims




Putz.

probeing another of lennies points for him

ctuuing stevie sexual stuff again

You're doing what? "ctuuing"...?!?!

sure


but just typed adjacent keys on the keyboard

Which adjacent keys? You haven't corrected whatever error you
made.

sure did

There's any number of idiotic mistakes you could have made.
Please show your work.

BYS i already have


Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
wrote:
From: "K4YZ" on Sun 24 Jul 2005 23:45

"...not surrendering your obligations to technology."
Geeee-susss! Think about what a dumbfork thing you wrote!
You sound like you've mounted a lecturn but forgot to
light your mental lantern. The light ain't come on yet.

The light IS on, Lennie.

I guess it was MY fault for assuming you'd take the whole context
of the message and reply in kind, but then that would ruin your rant.

One does NOT ensure that one's station is operating properly
simply by virture of the digital display of the device in question.

The FCC requires routine diagnostics of the station to ensure it's
compliance.

where in the rules does it make that requirement?

You've GOT to be kidding...

I'd like to see the schedule that Riley has Steve's station undergoing
such "routine" diagnostics. Must be some kind of license modification
or compliance agreement for out of band operation.

Staying WITHIN the band edges IS "proper operation."
The ONLY way you CAN stay within (and be LEGAL) is to
USE TECHNOLOGY!

Yep.

With diagnostic devices EXTERNAL to the device in
question...Signal generators, Spectrum Analyzers, etc etc etc.

still don't know what tools you need even after being told

Sure I do. And those do just fine.

Yup: "etc etc etc" finally got you to the right arena, if you have a
good imagination (and you do). Hi!

giving up trying to explain radio to dumbfork stebie

NOT giving up pointing out how Lennie Anderson tries to misdirect
and deceive on issues pertaining to Amateur Radio...

then get your facts straight

I do.

It's you and Lennie who have some situation awareness issues to
fix.

You appear to have issues with everything that Len may say.



Putz.

probeing another of lennies points for him

I'll never be probing ANYthing of Lennie's, Markie!

That's YOUR fetish!

You're the one who claims to wear the rubber glove.

an_old_friend wrote:

K4YZ wrote:

97.103 and 97.307, among others, require specification tolerances
be maintained.

BUZZ you still are not quoting any rule requiring such

The operator is respaoniblie if the sation does not comply but nothing
requiring any particular method of ensuring it

BUZZ indeed. Steve reads much into the rule, but does not read the
rule.

an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

where in the rules does it make that requirement?

You've GOT to be kidding...

not at all been asking that for months you never answer

Glad to prove you wrong again, Markie.

not at all

97.103 and 97.307, among others, require specification tolerances
be maintained.

BUZZ you still are not quoting any rule requiring such

Sure it was.

Ask Phil Kane.

The operator is respaoniblie if the sation does not comply but nothing
requiring any particular method of ensuring it

No "particular method". But requires it all the same.

same ole #### steve

Nope. You asked. I provided. You responded with profanity.

THAT is the "S.O.S", Markie.

There are others.

then cite one of them finaly

So, you want ME to "carry your freight", eh...?!?!

Rest deleted. Beyond Markie's IQ.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

where in the rules does it make that requirement?

You've GOT to be kidding...

not at all been asking that for months you never answer

Glad to prove you wrong again, Markie.

not at all

97.103 and 97.307, among others, require specification tolerances
be maintained.

BUZZ you still are not quoting any rule requiring such

Sure it was.

Ask Phil Kane.

The operator is respaoniblie if the sation does not comply but nothing
requiring any particular method of ensuring it

No "particular method". But requires it all the same.

only regulates the result


same ole #### steve

cut out stevie improper use of distress call

There are others.

then cite one of them finaly

So, you want ME to "carry your freight", eh...?!?!

lying again stevie

you made the claim you prove it

It is your freight not mine

cuting more stevie ****

Steve, K4YZ