Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#111
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: I repeat MY question....What makes you think I'd hazard my freedom for a putz like you..?!?! the fact you act like you are nuts enough to do it Stop and think about this for a second, Markie... On the one hand you claim I am "nuts enough to do it" , suggesting that I'd actually perpetrate an act of violence against you... sure are if I were closer If I wanted to do you violence, Markie, it wouldn't matter if you were across the street or across the country. Yet here you are stirring the pot. showing what you were trying was blackmail I never tried to "blackmail" you. You need to whip out a legal dictionary and read what constitutes "blackmail", Markie. If I thought someone was a potential threat to myself or my family, the LAST thing I'd do is get in their face! I choose to balcane the risks verus not alowing a terroist such as yourself to silence me You choose to WHAT the risks...?!?! And WHAT is a "terroist"...?!?! The sum of it is that your own suggestion that you're in any danger from me is ludicrous, as I have been saying for years. Not when you keep making threats I haven't made any threats. you are a low level danger So NOW you're saying you HAVE been lying about any danger to you and your "family". terorists and balckmailer need to be resited when possible "terorists" "balckmailer" "resited" There's no terrorists or blackmailers here, Markie. In your IMAGINATION maybe...but not in reality. It is you being stupid to even type that And it's even more idiotic for a putz like to you keep repeating it when it was so obviously NOT a threat then OR now! bull#### it was a threat...(SNIP) cuting a lie Then you cut nothing. (UNSNIP)....foruately one you have havne't carried out, but one you keep repeating, such as your threat to come to the UP I don't "keep repeating" any threat. YOU keep repeating it. you keep making threats of various sorts Nope. threats to call a prosecuter for my lying online, threats to came to the UP where I live, threats against Todd, and Len and Brain What threats? cuting stevie evasion What evasion? You keep making accusations that I ask you to substantiate. You "substantiate" your claims by your OWN "evasion" in the form of "cuting" the releveant questions. yes I would rather take a threat more seriously than t deserves than have my family and friends end up dead, any real man would see that Any real man would stop perpetuating a story that was a lie when he stated it and is a lie 7 years later. then stop Stevie Stop what? stop making new threats WHAT new threats? stop harassing people I'm not harrassing people. You post, I respond. Period. Sorry you don't like the comments, but then the comments I was responding to were pretty stupid to start with, so what did you expect? "First Ammendment", Markie... You're the one with the honesty issues...said so yourslef on numerous occassions. stop making threats stopp harassing folks I'm doing neither. you keep doing it you lying SoS Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...here's the anger...Can't get your way so let's go back to insinuating profanites.... been doing it for years Yes, you have. Time for you to stop it, isn't it? threats harrasment trying to intimadate people Your "threats" to "sue" were never deemed even remotely plausible. Your semi-literate dreck can be considered "harrassing" in it's own way. And people like you never "intimadate" anyone. Humor them, sure... You've rendered more than your fair share of laughs here! Steve, K4YZ |
#112
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: I repeat MY question....What makes you think I'd hazard my freedom for a putz like you..?!?! the fact you act like you are nuts enough to do it Stop and think about this for a second, Markie... On the one hand you claim I am "nuts enough to do it" , suggesting that I'd actually perpetrate an act of violence against you... sure are if I were closer If I wanted to do you violence, Markie, it wouldn't matter if you were across the street or across the country. sure sure more stavie bluster Yet here you are stirring the pot. showing what you were trying was blackmail I never tried to "blackmail" you. You need to whip out a legal dictionary and read what constitutes "blackmail", Markie. it is mading a demand for gain for a target under threat your actions quailify you continue to black mail me If I thought someone was a potential threat to myself or my family, the LAST thing I'd do is get in their face! I choose to balcane the risks verus not alowing a terroist such as yourself to silence me speling cop cut The sum of it is that your own suggestion that you're in any danger from me is ludicrous, as I have been saying for years. Not when you keep making threats I haven't made any threats. liar "one shot one kill..." Is a threat Threating to speak to Todds folks is a threat you are a low level danger So NOW you're saying you HAVE been lying about any danger to you and your "family". nope I am saying you have prooven you mostly make threats without backing em up\ Wether od not you ever had any intention on caring out your threats has nothing to do your making them You simply make Idles(so far) threats, but you make threats often terorists and balckmailer need to be resited when possible There's no terrorists or blackmailers here, Markie. spelling cop cut yep there is his name is Steve Robeson In your IMAGINATION maybe...but not in reality. It is you being stupid to even type that And it's even more idiotic for a putz like to you keep repeating it when it was so obviously NOT a threat then OR now! bull#### it was a threat...(SNIP) cuting a lie cuting another lie (UNSNIP)....foruately one you have havne't carried out, but one you keep repeating, such as your threat to come to the UP I don't "keep repeating" any threat. YOU keep repeating it. you keep making threats of various sorts Nope. yes you do you threatened Tood I saw that, you conitue to threaten me, idly it seems but you continue and you lie about it threats to call a prosecuter for my lying online, threats to came to the UP where I live, threats against Todd, and Len and Brain What threats? your threats cuting stevie evasion What evasion? your evasion You keep making accusations that I ask you to substantiate. yes you do, overlooking the fact it has been done in many case Years ago, and repaeted again and again cuting another stevie evasion distrotion yes I would rather take a threat more seriously than t deserves than have my family and friends end up dead, any real man would see that Any real man would stop perpetuating a story that was a lie when he stated it and is a lie 7 years later. then stop Stevie Stop what? stop making new threats WHAT new threats? threaten you come to the UP threatening action with various parties stop harassing people I'm not harrassing people. liar You post, I respond. Period. Sorry you don't like the comments, but then the comments I was responding to were pretty stupid to start with, so what did you expect? liar you are not a bit sorry why do you tell such obvious lies "First Ammendment", Markie... you don't have any right to threaten peoplethe 1st amendment does cover that You're the one with the honesty issues...said so yourslef on numerous occassions. stop making threats stopp harassing folks I'm doing neither. you keep doing it you lying SoS Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...here's the anger...Can't get your way so let's go back to insinuating profanites.... not realy you are a lying sack of ****, just calling you on it been doing it for years cuting stvie distoring context threats harrasment trying to intimadate people Your "threats" to "sue" were never deemed even remotely plausible. never made one I have pointed that you are vulernable to one, never threatened to do it you have got anything worth talking and of plausible to whom? You well that is more than likely right, a real crout that is another matter Your semi-literate dreck can be considered "harrassing" in it's own way. really someone is making you read it? And people like you never "intimadate" anyone. Humor them, sure... not trying to intimadateI would not horn on your territory steve, not that you arre any good at it You've rendered more than your fair share of laughs here! Steve, K4YZ |
#113
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: I repeat MY question....What makes you think I'd hazard my freedom for a putz like you..?!?! the fact you act like you are nuts enough to do it Stop and think about this for a second, Markie... On the one hand you claim I am "nuts enough to do it" , suggesting that I'd actually perpetrate an act of violence against you... sure are if I were closer If I wanted to do you violence, Markie, it wouldn't matter if you were across the street or across the country. more bluster and with your pattern threatening behavoir as well Yet here you are stirring the pot. showing what you were trying was blackmail I never tried to "blackmail" you. liar You need to whip out a legal dictionary and read what constitutes "blackmail", Markie. perhaps you should try it but then you lie even to yourself about what you are doing so you can't understand If I thought someone was a potential threat to myself or my family, the LAST thing I'd do is get in their face! I choose to balcane the risks verus not alowing a terroist such as yourself to silence me cuting speling cop The sum of it is that your own suggestion that you're in any danger from me is ludicrous, as I have been saying for years. Not when you keep making threats I haven't made any threats. "one shot one kill.. is a threat you made it so by the aove statement you are a liar you are a low level danger So NOW you're saying you HAVE been lying about any danger to you and your "family". no merely adknowing that you porven yourself a maker of idle threats, just a school yard bully, moderately dangerous but I can handle that that you take a state saying "you are a low level danger" and twist it into So NOW you're saying you HAVE been lying about any danger to you and your "family"." is truely amazing but for the beifit of people you may bedazzled with your bull****, (truely bull**** is the politest term for what you do Stevie) I took you for a major threat then, now I see you a minor bully wether you ever intended harm to me or were just Bluffing doesn't matter you threatened I took such measures then as I saw fit and i take such measures NOW as I see , that my threat assess ment of you has changed not with standing you nonsense that you had no intention of carring out your threats does not alter the fact that ANY ressonable person may consider the phrase "one shot, One kill, even in ILLIOPOLIS" a threat when directed at a person living in that town that I don't see you as much danger today and therefore It is safe enough today to simply volley back at you does not alter the facts you fraidten me and my family is action those years ago you are a terrorist pruning the thread back |
#114
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: I repeat MY question....What makes you think I'd hazard my freedom for a putz like you..?!?! the fact you act like you are nuts enough to do it Stop and think about this for a second, Markie... On the one hand you claim I am "nuts enough to do it" , suggesting that I'd actually perpetrate an act of violence against you... sure are if I were closer If I wanted to do you violence, Markie, it wouldn't matter if you were across the street or across the country. sure sure more stavie bluster Nope. It's far more effective to rub an idiots nose in their foolishness than it is to commit an act of violence against them. Peer pressure does the rest. And you continue to avoid answering my question..."What makes you think that I'd hazard my freedom for a putz like you...?!?!" Yet here you are stirring the pot. showing what you were trying was blackmail I never tried to "blackmail" you. You need to whip out a legal dictionary and read what constitutes "blackmail", Markie. it is mading a demand for gain for a target under threat Oh, you're MAD alright! And what target? What threat? your actions quailify Not in an AMERICAN court of law they wouldn't. you continue to black mail me You continue to utter unfounded and hillarious lies in a public forum. If I thought someone was a potential threat to myself or my family, the LAST thing I'd do is get in their face! I choose to balcane the risks verus not alowing a terroist such as yourself to silence me speling cop cut "balance" "allowing" "terrorist" The sum of it is that your own suggestion that you're in any danger from me is ludicrous, as I have been saying for years. Not when you keep making threats I haven't made any threats. liar "one shot one kill..." Is a threat Nope. Put it back in context, Markie, because that's where it would be taken from in court. In other words... MARK C. MORGAN IS LYING AGAIN! Threating to speak to Todds folks is a threat Nope. you are a low level danger So NOW you're saying you HAVE been lying about any danger to you and your "family". nope I am saying you have prooven you mostly make threats without backing em up There's nothing to be "back(ed) up", Markie. The "threat" was a mixture of YOUR paranoia and your need to be a victim in order to get what you want. Wether od not you ever had any intention on caring out your threats has nothing to do your making them I didn't make any, Markie. You simply make Idles(so far) threats, but you make threats often Nope. terorists and balckmailer need to be resited when possible There's no terrorists or blackmailers here, Markie. spelling cop cut "terrorists" "blackmailer" "resisted" yep there is his name is Steve Robeson Nope. Just Markie Morgan lying in public again. In your IMAGINATION maybe...but not in reality. It is you being stupid to even type that And it's even more idiotic for a putz like to you keep repeating it when it was so obviously NOT a threat then OR now! bull#### it was a threat...(SNIP) cuting a lie cuting another lie We could do YOUR trick, Markie... "cuting another lie...nothing left!" But since you can't even get "cutting" right, it's apparent that you've cut nothing but things you're too cowardly to address. (UNSNIP)....foruately one you have havne't carried out, but one you keep repeating, such as your threat to come to the UP I don't "keep repeating" any threat. YOU keep repeating it. you keep making threats of various sorts Nope. yes you do you threatened Tood I saw that, you conitue to threaten me, idly it seems but you continue "continue" I didn't threaten Todd. and you lie about it Nope. threats to call a prosecuter for my lying online, threats to came to the UP where I live, threats against Todd, and Len and Brain What threats? your threats What threats? cuting stevie evasion What evasion? your evasion WHAT evasion...?!?! You keep making accusations that I ask you to substantiate. yes you do, overlooking the fact it has been done in many case Years ago, and repaeted again and again Nope. All we have are your stories of threats. I am surprised we haven't been treated to any black helo or unmarked vans stories, too. cuting another stevie evasion distrotion "Cutting" "distortion" You couldn't have cut a distortion because there wasn't one there. yes I would rather take a threat more seriously than t deserves than have my family and friends end up dead, any real man would see that Any real man would stop perpetuating a story that was a lie when he stated it and is a lie 7 years later. then stop Stevie Stop what? stop making new threats WHAT new threats? threaten you come to the UP Oh? Exercising my rights to travel freely within the United States is now a "threat"...?!?! threatening action with various parties What threats? stop harassing people I'm not harrassing people. liar Nope. You post, I respond. Period. Sorry you don't like the comments, but then the comments I was responding to were pretty stupid to start with, so what did you expect? liar you are not a bit sorry Not a liar and sure I'm sorry. why do you tell such obvious lies Why do you put words in others mouths and try to pass them off as truthful? "First Amendment", Markie... you don't have any right to threaten people I haven't threatened anyone. the 1st amendment does cover that No, it does not. QUOTE: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. UNQUOTE: What IS the The GOVERNMENT is prohibited from establishing laws IRT the establishment of religion. The GOVERNMENT is prohibited from abrdging one's freedom to exercise religion of choice. The GOVERNMENT is prohibited from abridging freedom of speech. The GOVERNMENT is prohibited from impeding the press. The GOVERNMENT is prohibited from restricting peaceful assembly. The GOVERNMENT is prohibited from making laws that impede the people's right to seek relief of their grievances. What's NOT the Any wording that says that, if I WANTED to, I couldn't threaten you or anyone else. Yes, there ARE laws that provide penalties for it...But the Constitution, as you suggest, is NOT source of those laws. You're the one with the honesty issues...said so yourself on numerous occassions. stop making threats stopp harassing folks I'm doing neither. you keep doing it you lying SoS Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...here's the anger...Can't get your way so let's go back to insinuating profanites.... not realy you are a lying sack of ####, just calling you on it More anger. Even spelled it out this time. been doing it for years cuting stvie distoring context "Cutting" "Stevie" "distorting" What was cut was more "hitting the nail on the head" comments that Markie doesn't want to see again due to coward issues. threats harrasment trying to intimadate people Your "threats" to "sue" were never deemed even remotely plausible. never made one Sure you did. Said you were going to use the ADA to force the FCC's hand to give you a free ride on the code test. I have pointed that you are vulernable to one, never threatened to do it you have got anything worth talking I am not "vunerable" to any suit brought by you! You sure do like flattering yourself! and of plausible to whom? You well that is more than likely right, a real crout that is another matter What? Huh? What's a "real crout"...?!?! Your semi-literate dreck can be considered "harrassing" in it's own way. really someone is making you read it? If I want to try an understand what you're saying. I think learning Serbo-Croation by braille might be easier. And people like you never "intimadate" anyone. Humor them, sure... not trying to intimadate I would not horn on your territory steve, not that you arre any good at it "intimidate" "are" I'm not trying to intimidate anyone, Markie. You've rendered more than your fair share of laughs here! But you HAVE left us laughing! Steve, K4YZ |
#115
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: I repeat MY question....What makes you think I'd hazard my freedom for a putz like you..?!?! the fact you act like you are nuts enough to do it Stop and think about this for a second, Markie... On the one hand you claim I am "nuts enough to do it" , suggesting that I'd actually perpetrate an act of violence against you... sure are if I were closer If I wanted to do you violence, Markie, it wouldn't matter if you were across the street or across the country. sure sure more stavie bluster Nope. It's far more effective to rub an idiots nose in their foolishness than it is to commit an act of violence against them. Peer pressure does the rest. which is of course essencaily a confession that you threaten and harrass folks And you continue to avoid answering my question..."What makes you think that I'd hazard my freedom for a putz like you...?!?!" and I have answered it becuase you are nuts Yet here you are stirring the pot. showing what you were trying was blackmail I never tried to "blackmail" you. You need to whip out a legal dictionary and read what constitutes "blackmail", Markie. it is mading a demand for gain for a target under threat cuting libel And what target? What threat? me the htreat s are violence, (one shot one kill..) outing Your demands I comply or youd tell everyone I was gay, your conitued harrasment unless I do as YOU say It is all blackmail your actions quailify Not in an AMERICAN court of law they wouldn't. sure do you continue to black mail me You continue to utter unfounded and hillarious lies in a public forum. nope you are simply an ignorant stalker, and blackmailer. If I thought someone was a potential threat to myself or my family, the LAST thing I'd do is get in their face! I choose to balcane the risks verus not alowing a terroist such as yourself to silence me speling cop cut The sum of it is that your own suggestion that you're in any danger from me is ludicrous, as I have been saying for years. Not when you keep making threats I haven't made any threats. liar "one shot one kill..." Is a threat Nope. Put it back in context, Markie, because that's where it would be taken from in court. it is in context Killing was never the subject discsion of murder has nothing to do Radio or Morse Code cut Threating to speak to Todds folks is a threat Nope. sure is you are a low level danger So NOW you're saying you HAVE been lying about any danger to you and your "family". nope I am saying you have prooven you mostly make threats without backing em up There's nothing to be "back(ed) up", Markie. yes there is and you keep making threats cuting another lies Wether od not you ever had any intention on caring out your threats has nothing to do your making them I didn't make any, Markie. One shot on kill .. is a threat, you are lying in saying otherwise that it was idle matters not You simply make Idles(so far) threats, but you make threats often Nope. abolsutely true terorists and balckmailer need to be resited when possible There's no terrorists or blackmailers here, Markie. spelling cop cut yep there is his name is Steve Robeson Nope. Just Markie Morgan lying in public again. just Stevie unable to be a man an accept respoiblity for his own actions, and his own words Just Stevie squirming to evade the turth of his bulling personality In your IMAGINATION maybe...but not in reality. It is you being stupid to even type that And it's even more idiotic for a putz like to you keep repeating it when it was so obviously NOT a threat then OR now! bull#### it was a threat...(SNIP) cuting a lie cuting another lie cuting speling cop (UNSNIP)....foruately one you have havne't carried out, but one you keep repeating, such as your threat to come to the UP I don't "keep repeating" any threat. YOU keep repeating it. you keep making threats of various sorts Nope. yes you do you threatened Tood I saw that, you conitue to threaten me, idly it seems but you continue cuting spelling cop I didn't threaten Todd. you sure did you threatened to call his perants you threatened to contact his ISP (you carried out that threat but it was still a threat you are a bully and so juvi you can't even take responiblity for YOUR actions you will now proceed to blame Todd for these threats Nothing you do is YOUR responiblity and you lie about it Nope. threats to call a prosecuter for my lying online, threats to came to the UP where I live, threats against Todd, and Len and Brain What threats? your threats What threats? the threats typed above cuting stevie evasion What evasion? your evasion WHAT evasion...?!?! your eveasion I have typed it often typed a few examples in this post and will not repeat just becuase Stevie the BULLY demands I do so You keep making accusations that I ask you to substantiate. yes you do, overlooking the fact it has been done in many case Years ago, and repaeted again and again Nope. All we have are your stories of threats. I am surprised we haven't been treated to any black helo or unmarked vans stories, too. well if that suprises then yuare of stupid, but we all know that, everyone but you of course cuting another stevie evasion distrotion cuting speling cop You couldn't have cut a distortion because there wasn't one there. sure was yes I would rather take a threat more seriously than t deserves than have my family and friends end up dead, any real man would see that Any real man would stop perpetuating a story that was a lie when he stated it and is a lie 7 years later. then stop Stevie Stop what? stop making new threats WHAT new threats? threaten you come to the UP Oh? Exercising my rights to travel freely within the United States is now a "threat"...?!?! when cuopled with your other behavoir certainly is threatening action with various parties What threats? asked and answered stop harassing people I'm not harrassing people. liar Nope. you harrass everyone here that you disgaree with, You harrass folks on the Air, by what I hear from other hams You post, I respond. Period. Sorry you don't like the comments, but then the comments I was responding to were pretty stupid to start with, so what did you expect? liar you are not a bit sorry Not a liar and sure I'm sorry. 2 lies with one sentence why do you tell such obvious lies Why do you put words in others mouths and try to pass them off as truthful? that is your gig stevie "First Amendment", Markie... you don't have any right to threaten people I haven't threatened anyone. lying again I have seen you threaten Todd and BB and you have threatened me when 4 people tell you are doing something an inteligent man would start to wonder if there wasn't something to it, but of course that lets you out the 1st amendment does cover that No, it does not. QUOTE: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. UNQUOTE: What IS the so what? a key word in the ruling of the court is peaceably that is why threatening people ois ilegal that it why the hate speech have a legs to stand on you are guilty of threats and hate speech cuting stevie off target rant You're the one with the honesty issues...said so yourself on numerous occassions. stop making threats stopp harassing folks I'm doing neither. you keep doing it you lying SoS Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...here's the anger...Can't get your way so let's go back to insinuating profanites.... not realy you are a lying sack of ####, just calling you on it More anger. Even spelled it out this time. nope you would have to be angery to use the word ****. I use when I deem it proper, very calmly so another lie I am not angery with I am disguted by you been doing it for years cuting stvie distoring context cuting speling cop threats harrasment trying to intimadate people Your "threats" to "sue" were never deemed even remotely plausible. never made one Sure you did. Said you were going to use the ADA to force the FCC's hand to give you a free ride on the code test. Lie I said a case could be made I said it was a hard case at that time with the treaty lang in place I also said It could be VERY expensive and more than I cared to venture you don't understand the difference between saying something could be done and it will be done , or that it will be attepted that you confuse tense and moods is part of the process where you so often distrot and twist a true stament someone has made, into lie of YOUR making I have pointed that you are vulernable to one, never threatened to do it you have got anything worth talking I am not "vunerable" to any suit brought by you! sure are If Just filed it id would cost a fair amount of money that applies to you or anyone for that matter You sure do like flattering yourself! more evidence that stevie does not have metal contact with the real world and of plausible to whom? You well that is more than likely right, a real crout that is another matter cuting spelling cop Your semi-literate dreck can be considered "harrassing" in it's own way. really someone is making you read it? If I want to try an understand what you're saying. you don't want to understand you are just hunting for things you can twist I think learning Serbo-Croation by braille might be easier. more bashing of the Disabled, the blind in this case with your clear lack of human compassion why did you become a nurse? was it another power play? And people like you never "intimadate" anyone. Humor them, sure... not trying to intimadate I would not horn on your territory steve, not that you arre any good at it cutin spelling cop I'm not trying to intimidate anyone, Markie. liar you admited to it in the post I am responding to You've rendered more than your fair share of laughs here! But you HAVE left us laughing! comenting on your words Haven't you haerd about what it means when you talk to yourself Steve, K4YZ |
#116
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: It's far more effective to rub an idiots nose in their foolishness than it is to commit an act of violence against them. Peer pressure does the rest. which is of course essencaily a confession that you threaten and harrass folks "essentially" No, it's not. And you continue to avoid answering my question..."What makes you think that I'd hazard my freedom for a putz like you...?!?!" and I have answered it becuase you are nuts That's an answer? Where are YOUR credentials to determine the stabilty of anyone else's mental health, Mark? The fact that YOU are a mental health patient? Yet here you are stirring the pot. showing what you were trying was blackmail I never tried to "blackmail" you. You need to whip out a legal dictionary and read what constitutes "blackmail", Markie. it is mading a demand for gain for a target under threat cuting libel And what target? What threat? me the htreat s are violence, (one shot one kill..) outing Your demands I comply or youd tell everyone I was gay, your conitued harrasment unless I do as YOU say What threats? What 'outing (my) demands'...?!?! You ARE gay, Markie. You stated so yourself in this forum. It is all blackmail What blackmail? In order to "prove" blackmail, you have to prove that I stood to gain from some act or threat of violence against you. No such "blackmail" was caused since no such threat was made nor did any potential gain exist. your actions quailify Not in an AMERICAN court of law they wouldn't. sure do Nope. We will now await your presentation of credentials in jurisprudence. you continue to black mail me You continue to utter unfounded and hillarious lies in a public forum. nope you are simply an ignorant stalker, and blackmailer. Nope, nope and nope. "one shot one kill..." Is a threat Nope. Put it back in context, Markie, because that's where it would be taken from in court. it is in context Killing was never the subject I never suggested to kill you. That's your rampant paranoia. discsion of murder has nothing to do Radio or Morse Code You're suggesting the "murder" of Morse Code usage in Amateur Radio. Threating to speak to Todds folks is a threat Nope. sure is How? you are a low level danger So NOW you're saying you HAVE been lying about any danger to you and your "family". nope I am saying you have prooven you mostly make threats without backing em up There's nothing to be "back(ed) up", Markie. yes there is and you keep making threats Why do you continue to make and remake this assertion in the face of evidence to the contrary? cuting another lies Avoiding other issues you don't want to get your nose rubbed in any more. Wether od not you ever had any intention on caring out your threats has nothing to do your making them I didn't make any, Markie. One shot on kill .. is a threat Nope. It MEANS, as it meant in the ORIGINAL CONTEXT, was that my comments "squarely hit" what I "aim" for. you are lying in saying otherwise You are lying in tryng to make it anything more than it was. that it was idle matters not It wasn't a threat..."idle" or otherwise. You simply make Idles(so far) threats, but you make threats often Nope. abolsutely true Absolutely UNtrue... But don't let that slow you down... terorists and balckmailer need to be resited when possible There's no terrorists or blackmailers here, Markie. spelling cop cut yep there is his name is Steve Robeson Nope. Just Markie Morgan lying in public again. just Stevie unable to be a man an accept respoiblity for his own actions, and his own words Nope. Just Markie Morgan lying in public again. Just Stevie squirming to evade the turth of his bulling personality Nope. Just Markie Morgan lying in public again...and again...and again... cuting a lie cuting another lie cuting speling cop You just can't stand it, can you...cut, cut cut... yes you do you threatened Tood I saw that, you conitue to threaten me, idly it seems but you continue cuting spelling cop I didn't threaten Todd. you sure did you threatened to call his perants you threatened to contact his ISP (you carried out that threat but it was still a threat It wasn't a threat. Toddie violated the terms of his TOS. He refused to stop. He got what he asked for. you are a bully and so juvi you can't even take responiblity for YOUR actions Sure I do. you will now proceed to blame Todd for these threats Nope. Toiddie is responsible for his own actions...And he had to pay a price for them. If YOU think that I have made all of these threats against you and am the "stalker" you accuse me of, please, file a civil or criminal charge against me, Markie.. It will be quite satisfying to have you served with the countersuit and then see who's side holds up better in court. Nothing you do is YOUR responiblity Sure it is. And I've put my "hand out" with apologies or corrections where appropriate. Ask around. and you lie about it Nope. threats to call a prosecuter for my lying online, threats to came to the UP where I live, threats against Todd, and Len and Brain What threats? your threats What threats? the threats typed above What threats? You keep saying "those threats" and I keep saying "cite them". All YOU do is say "those threats". There are NO threats. cuting stevie evasion What evasion? your evasion WHAT evasion...?!?! your eveasion What "eveasion"...?!?! I have typed it often typed a few examples in this post and will not repeat just becuase Stevie the BULLY demands I do so You've retyped nothing except "your threats" and "your evasion", Markie. You've not SUBSTANTIATED either... You keep making accusations that I ask you to substantiate. yes you do, overlooking the fact it has been done in many case Years ago, and repaeted again and again Nope. All we have are your stories of threats. I am surprised we haven't been treated to any black helo or unmarked vans stories, too. well if that suprises then yuare of stupid, but we all know that, everyone but you of course I love being called "stupid" in a sentence that is so fractured that it takes several re-readings to figure out that I was "insulted". cuting another stevie evasion distrotion cuting speling cop "cuting" "distrotion" You couldn't have cut a distortion because there wasn't one there. sure was Nope. Oh? Exercising my rights to travel freely within the United States is now a "threat"...?!?! when cuopled with your other behavoir certainly is "cuopled" "behavoir" What "behaviour" do you refer to? threatening action with various parties What threats? asked and answered Avoided and evaded by you. stop harassing people I'm not harrassing people. liar Nope. you harrass everyone here that you disgaree with, You harrass folks on the Air, by what I hear from other hams Oh? Then you've proven that you're "hearing voices", Markie. You post, I respond. Period. Sorry you don't like the comments, but then the comments I was responding to were pretty stupid to start with, so what did you expect? liar you are not a bit sorry Not a liar and sure I'm sorry. 2 lies with one sentence Nope. why do you tell such obvious lies Why do you put words in others mouths and try to pass them off as truthful? that is your gig stevie Nope. As usual, you're welcome to TRY and "prove" that, however you'll not be successful. "First Amendment", Markie... you don't have any right to threaten people I haven't threatened anyone. lying again Nope. I have seen you threaten Todd and BB and you have threatened me Nope, nope and nope. when 4 people tell you are doing something an inteligent man would start to wonder if there wasn't something to it, but of course that lets you out Any discussion group wherein YOU profess to be an "inteligent" (intelligent) man is a conversation mispent. the 1st amendment does cover that No, it does not. QUOTE: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. UNQUOTE: What IS the so what? The assertions YOU cut from the quote were NOT covered by a single word of the First Amendment. Let's put this BACK into context since you snipped all of that out... QUOTE you don't have any right to threaten people I haven't threatened anyone. the 1st amendment does cover that No, it does not. QUOTE: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. UNQUOTE: What IS the The GOVERNMENT is prohibited from establishing laws IRT the establishment of religion. The GOVERNMENT is prohibited from abrdging one's freedom to exercise religion of choice. The GOVERNMENT is prohibited from abridging freedom of speech. The GOVERNMENT is prohibited from impeding the press. The GOVERNMENT is prohibited from restricting peaceful assembly. The GOVERNMENT is prohibited from making laws that impede the people's right to seek relief of their grievances. What's NOT the Any wording that says that, if I WANTED to, I couldn't threaten you or anyone else. Yes, there ARE laws that provide penalties for it...But the Constitution, as you suggest, is NOT source of those laws. UNQUOTE Now, I'd appreciate it if you'd acknowldge your "respoinblty" to TAKE "respoinblty" for your mistake. a key word in the ruling of the court is peaceably The fact remains that the First Amendment does NOT say what you alleged it to say. that is why threatening people ois ilegal that it why the hate speech have a legs to stand on "ois ilegal" What were you trying to say? What "hate speech"...?!?! you are guilty of threats and hate speech Nope. Not even close. cuting stevie off target rant Proving that YOUR assertions were "off target"...?!?! You're the one with the honesty issues...said so yourself on numerous occassions. stop making threats stopp harassing folks I'm doing neither. you keep doing it you lying SoS Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...here's the anger...Can't get your way so let's go back to insinuating profanites.... not realy you are a lying sack of ####, just calling you on it More anger. Even spelled it out this time. nope you would have to be angery to use the word ####. I use when I deem it proper, very calmly Profanity is the tool of a violent mind, Markie. so another lie Nope. I am not angery with I am disguted by you You are disgusted by getting your nose rubbed in your mistruths and deceit? Then stop doing it. been doing it for years cuting stvie distoring context cuting speling cop "cuting" "speling" Nice going, Markie...66 2/3 % error rate in one sentence...If one can accurately call that a "sentence". threats harrasment trying to intimadate people Your "threats" to "sue" were never deemed even remotely plausible. never made one Sure you did. Said you were going to use the ADA to force the FCC's hand to give you a free ride on the code test. Lie I said a case could be made A case CAN be made for your deceitfulness and dishonesty. So as I said earlier, if you think a case can be made against me, file it. I said it was a hard case at that time with the treaty lang in place So what? A M E R I C A N law allowed for alterations to the treaty as did caveats IN the treaty that gave administrations some leeway. I also said It could be VERY expensive and more than I cared to venture Then obviously not enough dedication. you don't understand the difference between saying something could be done and it will be done , or that it will be attepted Sure I do. that you confuse tense and moods is part of the process where you so often distrot and twist a true stament someone has made, into lie of YOUR making No lie made here. You made threats of lawsuits under ADA. I have pointed that you are vulernable to one, never threatened to do it you have got anything worth talking I am not "vunerable" to any suit brought by you! sure are If Just filed it id would cost a fair amount of money The cost would be yours twice over, Markie. Your initial filing against me, then your defense expenses for the countersuit. that applies to you or anyone for that matter Yep...And they can countersue too. You sure do like flattering yourself! more evidence that stevie does not have metal contact with the real world There's no metal in my body, Markie. How would I have metal contact withn the world? and of plausible to whom? You well that is more than likely right, a real crout that is another matter cuting spelling cop Congratulations. Only 33 1/3% error rate that time. Your semi-literate dreck can be considered "harrassing" in it's own way. really someone is making you read it? If I want to try an understand what you're saying. you don't want to understand you are just hunting for things you can twist There's nothing to "twist". Your comments are twisted right out of the box, Markie...I jsut ahve fun with them! I think learning Serbo-Croation by braille might be easier. more bashing of the Disabled, the blind in this case Nope. Are you NOW alleging that only the blind can use Braille? with your clear lack of human compassion why did you become a nurse? What "clear lack of human compassion"...?!?! You mean not being a soft touch for every self-appreciating, self-victimizing jerk that tries to take advantge of others compassion, Markie? If I were that, every hospital in every community would be filed to the rafters 24/7 with no hope for ever seeing an empty bed again. was it another power play? By saying "another" powert play, you're suggesting an ORIGINAL "power play". What would have been the first. And people like you never "intimadate" anyone. Humor them, sure... not trying to intimadate I would not horn on your territory steve, not that you arre any good at it cutin spelling cop Still 33 1/3%, however this time you ever mispelled your mispelled word! I'm not trying to intimidate anyone, Markie. liar you admited to it in the post I am responding to No I didn't. Quote the line where you alledge I say "I am trying to intimidate you", Markie... You've rendered more than your fair share of laughs here! But you HAVE left us laughing! comenting on your words "Commenting" Haven't you haerd about what it means when you talk to yourself "heard" I am not "talking to (my)self"... I am talking ABOUT you. Steve, K4YZ |
#117
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: It's far more effective to rub an idiots nose in their foolishness than it is to commit an act of violence against them. Peer pressure does the rest. which is of course essencaily a confession that you threaten and harrass folks "essentially" No, it's not. yes of course it is And you continue to avoid answering my question..."What makes you think that I'd hazard my freedom for a putz like you...?!?!" and I have answered it becuase you are nuts That's an answer? yes it is cuting stevie rants Yet here you are stirring the pot. showing what you were trying was blackmail I never tried to "blackmail" you. You need to whip out a legal dictionary and read what constitutes "blackmail", Markie. it is mading a demand for gain for a target under threat cuting libel And what target? What threat? me the htreat s are violence, (one shot one kill..) outing Your demands I comply or youd tell everyone I was gay, your conitued harrasment unless I do as YOU say What threats? you threats One Shot one kill... your threats to contact UP officals and (do something)\ your threat to expose me as Gay in the newsgrup those many years ago why do you need everything repeated and again and agian What 'outing (my) demands'...?!?! You ARE gay, Markie. You stated so yourself in this forum. but not until after you outed me, you preceeded that action by threatening to do so unless I complied with your demands that your blackmail was unsucessfull has no bearing on whether or not your prefromed it It is all blackmail What blackmail? In order to "prove" blackmail, you have to prove that I stood to gain from some act or threat of violence against you. no I don't, however in this case you did stand to gain you demanded I stop posting in RRAP obviously you valued that No such "blackmail" was caused since no such threat was made nor did any potential gain exist. wrong you made the threat and stood to gain your actions quailify Not in an AMERICAN court of law they wouldn't. sure do Nope. We will now await your presentation of credentials in jurisprudence. you continue to black mail me You continue to utter unfounded and hillarious lies in a public forum. nope you are simply an ignorant stalker, and blackmailer. Nope, nope and nope. "one shot one kill..." Is a threat Nope. Put it back in context, Markie, because that's where it would be taken from in court. it is in context Killing was never the subject I never suggested to kill you. liar it is a plain and clear threat That's your rampant paranoia. one shot one kill is a threat discsion of murder has nothing to do Radio or Morse Code You're suggesting the "murder" of Morse Code usage in Amateur Radio. another Stevie lie I am making no such sugestion after all Morse code is not a person, only people can be murdered Threating to speak to Todds folks is a threat Nope. sure is How? by being one you are a low level danger So NOW you're saying you HAVE been lying about any danger to you and your "family". nope I am saying you have prooven you mostly make threats without backing em up There's nothing to be "back(ed) up", Markie. yes there is and you keep making threats Why do you continue to make and remake this assertion in the face of evidence to the contrary? what eveidence? cuting another lies Wether od not you ever had any intention on caring out your threats has nothing to do your making them I didn't make any, Markie. One shot on kill .. is a threat Nope. It MEANS, as it meant in the ORIGINAL CONTEXT, was that my comments "squarely hit" what I "aim" for. Killing is killing it was and remains a threat you are lying in saying otherwise You are lying in tryng to make it anything more than it was. nope if you were manere when it was brought you would have adknowledged the words to have been illchoosen or something like that instead when I did not react as you wish you added various threats of legal action, repated the thret in various manner and generaly behaved in a threatening manner that it was idle matters not It wasn't a threat..."idle" or otherwise. sure was You simply make Idles(so far) threats, but you make threats often Nope. abolsutely true Absolutely UNtrue... But don't let that slow you down... terorists and balckmailer need to be resited when possible There's no terrorists or blackmailers here, Markie. spelling cop cut yep there is his name is Steve Robeson Nope. Just Markie Morgan lying in public again. just Stevie unable to be a man an accept respoiblity for his own actions, and his own words Nope. Just Markie Morgan lying in public again. just Stevie unable to be a man an accept respoiblity for his own actions, and his own words nothing is Stevies fault Just Stevie squirming to evade the turth of his bulling personality Nope. Just Markie Morgan lying in public again...and again...and again... cuting a lie cuting another lie cuting speling cop You just can't stand it, can you...cut, cut cut... yes you do you threatened Tood I saw that, you conitue to threaten me, idly it seems but you continue cuting spelling cop I didn't threaten Todd. you sure did you threatened to call his perants you threatened to contact his ISP (you carried out that threat but it was still a threat It wasn't a threat. it sure is apeartnly it seems an idle one Toddie violated the terms of his TOS. He refused to stop. He got what he asked for. but you threatened to do , and apealently did it have a reason to make a threat doesn't mean you are not threatening him you realy don't know english do you you are a bully and so juvi you can't even take responiblity for YOUR actions Sure I do. you will now proceed to blame Todd for these threats Nope. Toiddie is responsible for his own actions...And he had to pay a price for them. yep as expected and predicted If YOU think that I have made all of these threats against you and am the "stalker" you accuse me of, please, file a civil or criminal charge against me, Markie.. I have sought to do so, and there is realy very little I can do short of traveling to Tenn. and doing so that is one of the problems with the internet It will be quite satisfying to have you served with the countersuit and then see who's side holds up better in court. more threats Nothing you do is YOUR responiblity Sure it is. And I've put my "hand out" with apologies or corrections where appropriate. still haven't adknowledged your mistakes about the Brothers Grim Ask around. No one answers yes you have and you lie about it Nope. threats to call a prosecuter for my lying online, threats to came to the UP where I live, threats against Todd, and Len and Brain What threats? your threats What threats? the threats typed above What threats? You keep saying "those threats" and I keep saying "cite them". All YOU do is say "those threats". There are NO threats. sure are not going to retype them and retype em threats to call a prosecuter for my lying online, threats to come to the UP where I live, threats against Todd, and Len and Brain cuting stevie evasion What evasion? your evasion WHAT evasion...?!?! your eveasion What "eveasion"...?!?! yours I have typed it often typed a few examples in this post and will not repeat just becuase Stevie the BULLY demands I do so You've retyped nothing except "your threats" and "your evasion", Markie. lying agian You've not SUBSTANTIATED either... you have admited to typing "One shot on kill" that does it right there, the rest just piles on You keep making accusations that I ask you to substantiate. yes you do, overlooking the fact it has been done in many case Years ago, and repaeted again and again Nope. All we have are your stories of threats. I am surprised we haven't been treated to any black helo or unmarked vans stories, too. well if that suprises then yuare of stupid, but we all know that, everyone but you of course I love being called "stupid" in a sentence that is so fractured that it takes several re-readings to figure out that I was "insulted". then where is your thank you cuting another stevie evasion distrotion cuting speling cop You couldn't have cut a distortion because there wasn't one there. sure was Nope. Oh? Exercising my rights to travel freely within the United States is now a "threat"...?!?! when cuopled with your other behavoir certainly is "cuopled" "behavoir" What "behaviour" do you refer to? your make threats by the way It is infact ilegal for you to came HERE since you have been informed your are unwelcome threatening action with various parties What threats? asked and answered Avoided and evaded by you. asked and answered stop harassing people I'm not harrassing people. liar Nope. you harrass everyone here that you disgaree with, You harrass folks on the Air, by what I hear from other hams Oh? Then you've proven that you're "hearing voices", Markie. nope I have hear Hams call you a Papa Oscar serria on the air You post, I respond. Period. Sorry you don't like the comments, but then the comments I was responding to were pretty stupid to start with, so what did you expect? liar you are not a bit sorry Not a liar and sure I'm sorry. 2 lies with one sentence Nope. why do you tell such obvious lies Why do you put words in others mouths and try to pass them off as truthful? that is your gig stevie Nope. As usual, you're welcome to TRY and "prove" that, however you'll not be successful. already have many times "First Amendment", Markie... you don't have any right to threaten people I haven't threatened anyone. lying again Nope. yes One shot one kill is a threat I have seen you threaten Todd and BB and you have threatened me Nope, nope and nope. yep yep and yep when 4 people tell you are doing something an inteligent man would start to wonder if there wasn't something to it, but of course that lets you out Any discussion group wherein YOU profess to be an "inteligent" (intelligent) man is a conversation mispent. more evasion the 1st amendment does cover that No, it does not. QUOTE: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. UNQUOTE: What IS the so what? The assertions YOU cut from the quote were NOT covered by a single word of the First Amendment. Let's put this BACK into context since you snipped all of that out... cuting out your evasive waste of bandwidth Now, I'd appreciate it if you'd acknowldge your "respoinblty" to TAKE "respoinblty" for your mistake. no mistake you keep trying to divert the issue you have NO right to threaten people you have NO right to harrass people you have NO right to stalk people The first amendent does not give the right to do ilgeal things nor does any other part of the Constitution a key word in the ruling of the court is peaceably The fact remains that the First Amendment does NOT say what you alleged it to say. i was simply using your quoting of the text that is why threatening people ois ilegal that it why the hate speech have a legs to stand on "ois ilegal" What were you trying to say? What "hate speech"...?!?! your bashing of people for being gay or pagan or just different you are guilty of threats and hate speech Nope. Not even close. sure are I posted awhile back some example form just your titles cuting stevie off target rant You're the one with the honesty issues...said so yourself on numerous occassions. stop making threats stopp harassing folks I'm doing neither. you keep doing it you lying SoS Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...here's the anger...Can't get your way so let's go back to insinuating profanites.... not realy you are a lying sack of ####, just calling you on it More anger. Even spelled it out this time. nope you would have to be angery to use the word ####. I use when I deem it proper, very calmly Profanity is the tool of a violent mind, Markie. IYO I do assert my free right to use such words as I choose as long I as I don't violate the rights of others so another lie Nope. I am not angery with I am disguted by you You are disgusted by getting your nose rubbed in your mistruths and deceit? No I am disgusted by your manner your hypocrazy, your stupidity Then stop doing it. more off tager Bull**** been doing it for years cuting stvie distoring context cuting speling cop cutng spelling cop threats harrasment trying to intimadate people Your "threats" to "sue" were never deemed even remotely plausible. never made one Sure you did. Said you were going to use the ADA to force the FCC's hand to give you a free ride on the code test. Lie I said a case could be made A case CAN be made for your deceitfulness and dishonesty. So as I said earlier, if you think a case can be made against me, file it. If Thought It would yeild anything I would do so but I don't think you have to money to pay the judgement so it is not worth doing I said it was a hard case at that time with the treaty lang in place So what? A M E R I C A N law allowed for alterations to the treaty as did caveats IN the treaty that gave administrations some leeway. Indeed but the treaty lang made the ADA case much harder, I also said It could be VERY expensive and more than I cared to venture Then obviously not enough dedication. if you like you don't understand the difference between saying something could be done and it will be done , or that it will be attepted Sure I do. then you must be willfully lying when you make these claims that you confuse tense and moods is part of the process where you so often distrot and twist a true stament someone has made, into lie of YOUR making No lie made here. You made threats of lawsuits under ADA. nope I discussed the posiblity I discussed the pros and cons I decided against it you lie whan you make the staement "You made threats of lawsuits under ADA." I have pointed that you are vulernable to one, never threatened to do it you have got anything worth talking I am not "vunerable" to any suit brought by you! sure are If Just filed it id would cost a fair amount of money The cost would be yours twice over, Markie. prehaps which does not alter the factual statement I just made going to court is such a crap shoot Your initial filing against me, then your defense expenses for the countersuit. nope no doubling there I'd be handle one level on contingincy youd be paying out of pocket the whole way mostlikely, or at least in your defense that applies to you or anyone for that matter Yep...And they can countersue too. yea never said otherwise It is easy to sue in America not so easy to collect You sure do like flattering yourself! more evidence that stevie does not have metal contact with the real world There's no metal in my body, Markie. How would I have metal contact withn the world? and of plausible to whom? You well that is more than likely right, a real crout that is another matter cuting spelling cop Congratulations. Only 33 1/3% error rate that time. Your semi-literate dreck can be considered "harrassing" in it's own way. really someone is making you read it? If I want to try an understand what you're saying. you don't want to understand you are just hunting for things you can twist There's nothing to "twist". Your comments are twisted right out of the box, Markie...I jsut ahve fun with them! I think learning Serbo-Croation by braille might be easier. more bashing of the Disabled, the blind in this case Nope. Are you NOW alleging that only the blind can use Braille? nope but you are of course bashing the disabled with your clear lack of human compassion why did you become a nurse? What "clear lack of human compassion"...?!?! your clear lack You mean not being a soft touch for every self-appreciating, self-victimizing jerk that tries to take advantge of others compassion, Markie? Nope I mean your mean sprited obcessive bulling If I were that, every hospital in every community would be filed to the rafters 24/7 with no hope for ever seeing an empty bed again. more lies this time about the number of hospital you could affect was it another power play? By saying "another" powert play, you're suggesting an ORIGINAL "power play". yea What would have been the first. not sure what power play was the first you go on about so many And people like you never "intimadate" anyone. Humor them, sure... not trying to intimadate I would not horn on your territory steve, not that you arre any good at it cutin spelling cop Still 33 1/3%, however this time you ever mispelled your mispelled word! I'm not trying to intimidate anyone, Markie. liar you admited to it in the post I am responding to No I didn't. sure did Quote the line where you alledge I say "I am trying to intimidate you", Markie... no claim of such a an exact was ever made You've rendered more than your fair share of laughs here! But you HAVE left us laughing! comenting on your words "Commenting" Haven't you haerd about what it means when you talk to yourself "heard" I am not "talking to (my)self"... I am talking ABOUT you. Steve, K4YZ |
#118
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: It's far more effective to rub an idiots nose in their foolishness than it is to commit an act of violence against them. Peer pressure does the rest. which is of course essencaily a confession that you threaten and harrass folks "essentially" No, it's not. yes of course it is Of course it's not. And you continue to avoid answering my question..."What makes you think that I'd hazard my freedom for a putz like you...?!?!" and I have answered it becuase you are nuts That's an answer? yes it is cuting stevie rants More "cuting". But here it is re-installed: Where are YOUR credentials to determine the stabilty of anyone else's mental health, Mark? The fact that YOU are a mental health patient? That weasn't a rant. That was a question. Why were you so embarrassed to address it? Yet here you are stirring the pot. showing what you were trying was blackmail I never tried to "blackmail" you. You need to whip out a legal dictionary and read what constitutes "blackmail", Markie. it is mading a demand for gain for a target under threat cuting libel And what target? What threat? me the htreat s are violence, (one shot one kill..) outing Your demands I comply or youd tell everyone I was gay, your conitued harrasment unless I do as YOU say What threats? you threats One Shot one kill... Wasn't a threat seven years ago. It's not a threat today, no matter how many times you repeat it out of context. your threats to contact UP officals and (do something) Why does it concern you that you might be brought to the attention of your threat to expose me as Gay in the newsgrup those many years ago I didn't threaten yoy with exposing your deviancy, Mark. Pardon the choice of words, but you "exposed" yourslf all on your own. why do you need everything repeated and again and agian Why can't you type the same word the same way in one sentence? And I keep hoping that sooner or later you'll come up with a viable reason for your unviable assertions. So far, you haven't done it, so expect to keep getting that same question asked until you pony-up something that sounds remotely life-like. What 'outing (my) demands'...?!?! You ARE gay, Markie. You stated so yourself in this forum. but not until after you outed me, you preceeded that action by threatening to do so unless I complied with your demands Markie...I DIDN'T OUT YOU! Whoever you THINK was under your saddle about your deviancy, it wasn't me...You did that alllllllllllllllllllllll by your self! that your blackmail was unsucessfull has no bearing on whether or not your prefromed it I didn't blackmail you or attempt to blackmail you, ergo it's irrelevent WHAT was "successful" or not. It is all blackmail What blackmail? In order to "prove" blackmail, you have to prove that I stood to gain from some act or threat of violence against you. no I don't, however in this case you did stand to gain you demanded I stop posting in RRAP obviously you valued that Nope. And still no proof, Mark. No such "blackmail" was caused since no such threat was made nor did any potential gain exist. wrong you made the threat and stood to gain Nope. The ONLY person here who stands to gain anything by you not posting here is YOU, Mark. Because as long as you post here, you'll be known as the illiterate lying gay pagan draftee... your actions quailify Not in an AMERICAN court of law they wouldn't. sure do Nope. We will now await your presentation of credentials in jurisprudence. Guess you forgot about "cuting" that one.... you continue to black mail me You continue to utter unfounded and hillarious lies in a public forum. nope you are simply an ignorant stalker, and blackmailer. Nope, nope and nope. "one shot one kill..." Is a threat Nope. Put it back in context, Markie, because that's where it would be taken from in court. it is in context Killing was never the subject I never suggested to kill you. liar Nope. it is a plain and clear threat To a delusional paranoid personality, perhaps... That's your rampant paranoia. one shot one kill is a threat To a delusional paranoid persoanlity, perhaps... discsion of murder has nothing to do Radio or Morse Code You're suggesting the "murder" of Morse Code usage in Amateur Radio. another Stevie lie I am making no such sugestion Sure you have. You've deliberately stated that you'd make all Morse Code usage stop if you could, after all Morse code is not a person, only people can be murdered Then why are you accusing me of trying to murder you? Threating to speak to Todds folks is a threat Nope. sure is How? by being one "by being one" what? Re-read what you wrote, in response to what I wrote, Mark... It doesn't make sense. you are a low level danger So NOW you're saying you HAVE been lying about any danger to you and your "family". nope I am saying you have prooven you mostly make threats without backing em up There's nothing to be "back(ed) up", Markie. yes there is and you keep making threats Why do you continue to make and remake this assertion in the face of evidence to the contrary? what eveidence? E X A C T L Y ! ! ! ! N O E V I D E N C E ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! YOU have NO EVIDENCE of ANY threat! cuting another lies Wether od not you ever had any intention on caring out your threats has nothing to do your making them I didn't make any, Markie. One shot on kill .. is a threat Nope. It MEANS, as it meant in the ORIGINAL CONTEXT, was that my comments "squarely hit" what I "aim" for. Killing is killing Not int he context of the comment I made, Mark. It meant then, as it does now, taht I "hit" what I aim at...In the FULL CONTEXT of the statement I amde in response to YOUR comments... it was and remains a threat Nope. Why do you continue to "force" this lie when it's apparent you're not telling the truth, Mark? you are lying in saying otherwise You are lying in tryng to make it anything more than it was. nope Absolutely. if you were manere when it was brought you would have adknowledged the words to have been illchoosen or something like that If I was "marere"...?!?! As for "illchoosen", perhaps YOU should have thought about the response YOUR instead when I did not react as you wish you added various threats of legal action, repated the thret in various manner and generaly behaved in a threatening manner that it was idle matters not It wasn't a threat..."idle" or otherwise. sure was To a delusional paranoid persoanlity, perhaps... You simply make Idles(so far) threats, but you make threats often Nope. abolsutely true Absolutely UNtrue... But don't let that slow you down... terorists and balckmailer need to be resited when possible There's no terrorists or blackmailers here, Markie. spelling cop cut yep there is his name is Steve Robeson Nope. Just Markie Morgan lying in public again. just Stevie unable to be a man an accept respoiblity for his own actions, and his own words Nope. Just Markie Morgan lying in public again. just Stevie unable to be a man an accept respoiblity for his own actions, and his own words nothing is Stevies fault It's only "Stevies fault" when Stevie does it wrong. So far you've not presented any "evidence" to the contrary except your childish sandlot "ya-HUH!" arguments. Just Stevie squirming to evade the turth of his bulling personality Nope. Just Markie Morgan lying in public again...and again...and again... cuting a lie cuting another lie cuting speling cop You just can't stand it, can you...cut, cut cut... yes you do you threatened Tood I saw that, you conitue to threaten me, idly it seems but you continue cuting spelling cop I didn't threaten Todd. you sure did you threatened to call his perants you threatened to contact his ISP (you carried out that threat but it was still a threat It wasn't a threat. it sure is apeartnly it seems an idle one To a delusional paranoid personality, perhaps... Toddie violated the terms of his TOS. He refused to stop. He got what he asked for. but you threatened to do , and apealently did it "apealently"...?!?! I told him I wouldn't tolerate his violent, profane and threatening behaviour towards me. He thought rules didn't apply to him. He found out different. have a reason to make a threat doesn't mean you are not threatening him you realy don't know english do you I know it better than you. I employ it more accurately, too. I know that English is capitalized. I know that "realy" is actually spelled "really", but you keep screwing that up too. I know that a sentence is started with a capital letter and ended with a period, except where a question is asked. You seem to have a problem with that. you are a bully and so juvi you can't even take responiblity for YOUR actions Sure I do. you will now proceed to blame Todd for these threats Nope. Toiddie is responsible for his own actions...And he had to pay a price for them. yep as expected and predicted I am sure there was a point there. Care to make it? If YOU think that I have made all of these threats against you and am the "stalker" you accuse me of, please, file a civil or criminal charge against me, Markie.. I have sought to do so, and there is realy very little I can do short of traveling to Tenn. and doing so that is one of the problems with the internet But...but...but...MARK! All this past week you were telling us what great financial shape you're allegedly in...two cars..house...investments...allegedly turned down a $240K/yr job... Guess that's yet ANOTHER lie we've caught you in. It will be quite satisfying to have you served with the countersuit and then see who's side holds up better in court. more threats Nope. A promise. You file any "charges" or "suit" against me, and your ears will whistle for a week with the paper landing in your lap from summons servers! Nothing you do is YOUR responiblity Sure it is. And I've put my "hand out" with apologies or corrections where appropriate. still haven't adknowledged your mistakes about the Brothers Grim It's "Grimm", Markie. Ask around. No one answers yes you have You've not asked the question. And I bet most everyone is ignoring these posts...so ask them directly. and you lie about it Nope. threats to call a prosecuter for my lying online, threats to came to the UP where I live, threats against Todd, and Len and Brain What threats? your threats What threats? the threats typed above What threats? You keep saying "those threats" and I keep saying "cite them". All YOU do is say "those threats". There are NO threats. sure are Nope. not going to retype them and retype em You can retype the Magna Carta and it won't prove anything. You'll still have no threats. threats to call a prosecuter for my lying online, threats to come to the UP where I live, threats against Todd, and Len and Brain What threats? cuting stevie evasion What evasion? your evasion WHAT evasion...?!?! your eveasion What "eveasion"...?!?! yours WHAT EVASION...?!?!? I have typed it often typed a few examples in this post and will not repeat just becuase Stevie the BULLY demands I do so You've retyped nothing except "your threats" and "your evasion", Markie. lying agian I am not lying and I am not an agian. You've not SUBSTANTIATED either... you have admited to typing "One shot on kill" that does it right there, the rest just piles on That wasn't a threat. Wasn't then...isn't now...won't be 100 years from now... You keep making accusations that I ask you to substantiate. yes you do, overlooking the fact it has been done in many case Years ago, and repaeted again and again Nope. All we have are your stories of threats. I am surprised we haven't been treated to any black helo or unmarked vans stories, too. well if that suprises then yuare of stupid, but we all know that, everyone but you of course I love being called "stupid" in a sentence that is so fractured that it takes several re-readings to figure out that I was "insulted". then where is your thank you You flushed it after your last bowel movement, Markie. cuting another stevie evasion distrotion cuting speling cop You couldn't have cut a distortion because there wasn't one there. sure was Nope. Oh? Exercising my rights to travel freely within the United States is now a "threat"...?!?! when cuopled with your other behavoir certainly is "cuopled" "behavoir" What "behaviour" do you refer to? your make threats What threats? by the way It is infact ilegal for you to came HERE since you have been informed your are unwelcome It would be illegal for me to knock on your front door or violate your privacy. It would NOT be illegal for me to come to Michigan...ANYwhere in Michigan. Nor would it be illegal for me to speak with local law enforcement or mental health case workers about you, being careful to express my concerns as just that...concerns. threatening action with various parties What threats? asked and answered Avoided and evaded by you. asked and answered Avoided and evaded by you. stop harassing people I'm not harrassing people. liar Nope. you harrass everyone here that you disgaree with, You harrass folks on the Air, by what I hear from other hams Oh? Then you've proven that you're "hearing voices", Markie. nope I have hear Hams call you a Papa Oscar serria on the air "heard" "Sierra" I am sure you hear a LOT of voices doing that, Markie... All part of your delusional mindset, Markie. You post, I respond. Period. Sorry you don't like the comments, but then the comments I was responding to were pretty stupid to start with, so what did you expect? liar you are not a bit sorry Not a liar and sure I'm sorry. 2 lies with one sentence Nope. why do you tell such obvious lies Why do you put words in others mouths and try to pass them off as truthful? that is your gig stevie Nope. As usual, you're welcome to TRY and "prove" that, however you'll not be successful. already have many times No...you've CLAIMED that you have tried... All you do is make sandlot taunts. None of them effective or accurate. "First Amendment", Markie... you don't have any right to threaten people I haven't threatened anyone. lying again Nope. yes One shot one kill is a threat Nope. A prosecuter won't touch your "claim" based upon the original context and in response to your own words, Markie. I have seen you threaten Todd and BB and you have threatened me Nope, nope and nope. yep yep and yep Nope, nope and nope. And no matter how many times you wish to carry that one out, it still won't be true. when 4 people tell you are doing something an inteligent man would start to wonder if there wasn't something to it, but of course that lets you out Any discussion group wherein YOU profess to be an "inteligent" (intelligent) man is a conversation mispent. more evasion Nope. You accused me of not being "inteligent". I corrected your error and answerd the claim. No evasion. the 1st amendment does cover that No, it does not. QUOTE: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. UNQUOTE: What IS the so what? The assertions YOU cut from the quote were NOT covered by a single word of the First Amendment. Let's put this BACK into context since you snipped all of that out... cuting out your evasive waste of bandwidth Now, I'd appreciate it if you'd acknowldge your "respoinblty" to TAKE "respoinblty" for your mistake. no mistake A bit mistake...on your part. The one wherein you think you can keep blustering your way through your inappropriate claims. you keep trying to divert the issue No I don't. you have NO right to threaten people I don't. you have NO right to harrass people I don't. you have NO right to stalk people I don't. The first amendent does not give the right to do ilgeal things You again express your obvious misunderstanding of what is said in the First Amendment to the Constitution, Markie. nor does any other part of the Constitution And there is nothing in ANY part of the Constitution that is "violated" by our exchanges here, Mark.... a key word in the ruling of the court is peaceably The fact remains that the First Amendment does NOT say what you alleged it to say. i was simply using your quoting of the text You simply did not. You tried to take ONE word from it and apply it contrary to it's use in THAT Amendement. You failed. that is why threatening people ois ilegal that it why the hate speech have a legs to stand on "ois ilegal" What were you trying to say? What "hate speech"...?!?! your bashing of people for being gay or pagan or just different I don't "bash" you, Mark, and certainly NOT for any of those reasons. You keep getting your nose tweeked because you keep getting caught lying. And in fact you've LIED about all of those things. You claimed you WEREN'T gay, but it's since been proven with your own words that you are. You claimed you weren't pagan, but it's since been proven with your own words that you are. And you've claimed that you're not "dffrent" when it's CLEARLY evident that you are! you are guilty of threats and hate speech Nope. Not even close. sure are I posted awhile back some example form just your titles And none of them were "hate speech" as defined by the Civil Rights Act. Try again. cuting stevie off target rant You're the one with the honesty issues...said so yourself on numerous occassions. stop making threats stopp harassing folks I'm doing neither. you keep doing it you lying SoS Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...here's the anger...Can't get your way so let's go back to insinuating profanites.... not realy you are a lying sack of ####, just calling you on it More anger. Even spelled it out this time. nope you would have to be angery to use the word ####. I use when I deem it proper, very calmly Profanity is the tool of a violent mind, Markie. IYO Nope. In the opinion of those "pros" you always refer to. I do assert my free right to use such words as I choose as long I as I don't violate the rights of others By re-titling these posts "stvie ####" you violate MY right to not be called a profane word or to have my "intellectual property" defiled... Hence the "Markie Mularkie" posts in kind. so another lie Nope. I am not angery with I am disguted by you You are disgusted by getting your nose rubbed in your mistruths and deceit? No I am disgusted by your manner your hypocrazy, your stupidity Then you're focusing on the wrong things. You should be disgusted by the fact that you are a decietful liar who can't post a word without errors being laid bare. Then stop doing it. more off tager Bull#### What a "tager"...?!?! been doing it for years cuting stvie distoring context cuting speling cop cutng spelling cop "cuting" It's "CUTTING", Markie. And at the beginning of a sentence, if that's what that was, the "C" should be capitalized. threats harrasment trying to intimadate people Your "threats" to "sue" were never deemed even remotely plausible. never made one Sure you did. Said you were going to use the ADA to force the FCC's hand to give you a free ride on the code test. Lie I said a case could be made A case CAN be made for your deceitfulness and dishonesty. So as I said earlier, if you think a case can be made against me, file it. If Thought It would yeild anything I would do so but I don't think you have to money to pay the judgement so it is not worth doing Uh huh. What you DON'T have are (1) sufficent grounds and (2) what it would take to pay your OWN "judgement" for the false suit charge that would be appended. I said it was a hard case at that time with the treaty lang in place So what? A M E R I C A N law allowed for alterations to the treaty as did caveats IN the treaty that gave administrations some leeway. Indeed but the treaty lang made the ADA case much harder No it didn't. If anything, the ADA made it EASIER to make your argument viable. I also said It could be VERY expensive and more than I cared to venture Then obviously not enough dedication. if you like Nope...If YOU like...Obviously you don't have the heart for it. you don't understand the difference between saying something could be done and it will be done , or that it will be attepted Sure I do. then you must be willfully lying when you make these claims Nope. that you confuse tense and moods is part of the process where you so often distrot and twist a true stament someone has made, into lie of YOUR making No lie made here. You made threats of lawsuits under ADA. nope Yep. I discussed the posiblity You said your "laywr" was preparing your brief". I discussed the pros and cons I decided against it One of the very few wise things you ever did...or should I say DIDN'T do...?!?! you lie whan you make the staement "You made threats of lawsuits under ADA." Nope. I have pointed that you are vulernable to one, never threatened to do it you have got anything worth talking I am not "vunerable" to any suit brought by you! sure are If Just filed it id would cost a fair amount of money The cost would be yours twice over, Markie. prehaps which does not alter the factual statement I just made going to court is such a crap shoot In YOUR case it would be... Your initial filing against me, then your defense expenses for the countersuit. nope no doubling there I'd be handle one level on contingincy youd be paying out of pocket the whole way mostlikely, or at least in your defense First of all, no lawyer is going to take a "he said/she said" case "on contingency" unless it's against Wal-Mart, one of the Big Three in Detroit, etc. In those cases they at least hope to win "shut up" money and probably will. Secondly, as I told you before, I have the resources to overcome any legal case YOU could hopre to mount from Michigan. At the most, I'd have to pony-up filing fees...No big deal... that applies to you or anyone for that matter Yep...And they can countersue too. yea never said otherwise But you, like Toiddie, throw "I'LL SUE! I'LL SUE" around as if in doing so you are the only one who can use legal resourse. As I have clearly demonstrated here, however, you'll quickly find out that you are NOT the only person who can bring a suit. It is easy to sue in America Finally you get the idea... not so easy to collect Bravo. You sure do like flattering yourself! more evidence that stevie does not have metal contact with the real world There's no metal in my body, Markie. How would I have metal contact withn the world? and of plausible to whom? You well that is more than likely right, a real crout that is another matter cuting spelling cop Congratulations. Only 33 1/3% error rate that time. Your semi-literate dreck can be considered "harrassing" in it's own way. really someone is making you read it? If I want to try an understand what you're saying. you don't want to understand you are just hunting for things you can twist There's nothing to "twist". Your comments are twisted right out of the box, Markie...I jsut ahve fun with them! I think learning Serbo-Croation by braille might be easier. more bashing of the Disabled, the blind in this case Nope. Are you NOW alleging that only the blind can use Braille? nope but you are of course bashing the disabled Nope. Serbo-Croation is a difficult language. I tried. Gave up. And I can't differentiate the characters in Braille adequately to use it. No bashing occured. with your clear lack of human compassion why did you become a nurse? What "clear lack of human compassion"...?!?! your clear lack Clear lack of what? You mean not being a soft touch for every self-appreciating, self-victimizing jerk that tries to take advantge of others compassion, Markie? Nope I mean your mean sprited obcessive bulling "sprited" "obcessive" "bulling" The only one "bulling" anyone here, Mark, is you trying to bull everyone else! If I were that, every hospital in every community would be filed to the rafters 24/7 with no hope for ever seeing an empty bed again. more lies this time about the number of hospital you could affect It's got nothing to do with me. It's got to do with Nurses not being a "soft touch" as I stated above. And trust me when I say that every ER I ahve worked in, East, West, North and South has it's share of "frequent flyers"...system abusers just like you, Markie. was it another power play? By saying "another" powert play, you're suggesting an ORIGINAL "power play". yea And it was...?!?!? What would have been the first. not sure what power play was the first you go on about so many You've not named one so far. And people like you never "intimadate" anyone. Humor them, sure... not trying to intimadate I would not horn on your territory steve, not that you arre any good at it cutin spelling cop Still 33 1/3%, however this time you ever mispelled your mispelled word! I'm not trying to intimidate anyone, Markie. liar you admited to it in the post I am responding to No I didn't. sure did Sheesh. Where, Markie. WHERE did I say "I am trying to intimidate you", Markie? Quote the line where you alledge I say "I am trying to intimidate you", Markie... no claim of such a an exact was ever made Oh, but it was! QUOTE I'm not trying to intimidate anyone, Markie. liar you admited to it in the post I am responding to UNQUOTE So...where's this alleged admission, Markie? No quote = Markie Lying. You've rendered more than your fair share of laughs here! But you HAVE left us laughing! comenting on your words "Commenting" Haven't you haerd about what it means when you talk to yourself "heard" I am not "talking to (my)self"... I am talking ABOUT you. Still. Steve, K4YZ |
#119
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: It's far more effective to rub an idiots nose in their foolishness than it is to commit an act of violence against them. Peer pressure does the rest. which is of course essencaily a confession that you threaten and harrass folks "essentially" No, it's not. yes of course it is Of course it's not. "It's far more effective to rub an idiots nose in their foolishness than it is to commit an act of violence against them. Peer pressure does the rest." your words and they are a confession to harrasment And you continue to avoid answering my question..."What makes you think that I'd hazard my freedom for a putz like you...?!?!" and I have answered it becuase you are nuts That's an answer? yes it is cuting stevie rants more cuting of ranting and raving Yet here you are stirring the pot. showing what you were trying was blackmail I never tried to "blackmail" you. You need to whip out a legal dictionary and read what constitutes "blackmail", Markie. it is mading a demand for gain for a target under threat cuting libel And what target? What threat? me the htreat s are violence, (one shot one kill..) outing Your demands I comply or youd tell everyone I was gay, your conitued harrasment unless I do as YOU say What threats? you threats One Shot one kill... Wasn't a threat seven years ago. it sure was It's not a threat today, no matter how many times you repeat it out of context. it still is just an idle one thankfuly your threats to contact UP officals and (do something) Why does it concern you that you might be brought to the attention of It does not realy concern me other than it could prove anoying but that of course has nothing to do with wether it is a threat on your part your threat to expose me as Gay in the newsgrup those many years ago I didn't threaten yoy with exposing your deviancy, Mark. Pardon the choice of words, but you "exposed" yourslf all on your own. liar Steve you emailed me your proof and threatened to expose me if I did not stop posting in the newsgroup then you revealed it and found to your shock I never denied it why do you need everything repeated and again and agian Why can't you type the same word the same way in one sentence? becuase And I keep hoping that sooner or later you'll come up with a viable reason for your unviable assertions. liar what you realy want is for me to go away again So far, you haven't done it, so expect to keep getting that same question asked until you pony-up something that sounds remotely life-like. not into horse's stevie What 'outing (my) demands'...?!?! You ARE gay, Markie. You stated so yourself in this forum. but not until after you outed me, you preceeded that action by threatening to do so unless I complied with your demands Markie...I DIDN'T OUT YOU! Whoever you THINK was under your saddle about your deviancy, it wasn't me...You did that alllllllllllllllllllllll by your self! lying stevie nothing but lies on your part You did the stalking looking for something you found it you tired blackmail with it and I did not go along then you did it you outed me that your blackmail was unsucessfull has no bearing on whether or not your prefromed it I didn't blackmail you or attempt to blackmail you, ergo it's irrelevent WHAT was "successful" or not. lying agian It is all blackmail What blackmail? In order to "prove" blackmail, you have to prove that I stood to gain from some act or threat of violence against you. no I don't, however in this case you did stand to gain you demanded I stop posting in RRAP obviously you valued that Nope. yep And still no proof, Mark. I have the proof and carefully in a file No such "blackmail" was caused since no such threat was made nor did any potential gain exist. wrong you made the threat and stood to gain Nope. The ONLY person here who stands to gain anything by you not posting here is YOU, Mark. Because as long as you post here, you'll be known as the illiterate lying gay pagan draftee... another lie You want me out of here, very badly I gain nothing by leaving, not even the end of your harassment your actions quailify Not in an AMERICAN court of law they wouldn't. sure do Nope. We will now await your presentation of credentials in jurisprudence. Guess you forgot about "cuting" that one.... nope but it isn't my credentcail that are important you continue to black mail me You continue to utter unfounded and hillarious lies in a public forum. nope you are simply an ignorant stalker, and blackmailer. Nope, nope and nope. "one shot one kill..." Is a threat Nope. Put it back in context, Markie, because that's where it would be taken from in court. it is in context Killing was never the subject I never suggested to kill you. liar Nope. yes you have you sent the threat out in the gruops more threats in the NG and more still by email someone, possibly you called the Cops In illiopolas with some cock and bull story you have boasted of finding a picture of my home in those days here recently it is a plain and clear threat To a delusional paranoid personality, perhaps... no to any reasonable person, which of course lets you out That's your rampant paranoia. one shot one kill is a threat To a delusional paranoid persoanlity, perhaps... no to any reasonable person, which of course lets you out you are the delsuional paraniod any questioning of the PR of the ARS is a personal attack on you that is paranois and delusional, it is also a sign of other mental problems discsion of murder has nothing to do Radio or Morse Code You're suggesting the "murder" of Morse Code usage in Amateur Radio. another Stevie lie I am making no such sugestion Sure you have. You've deliberately stated that you'd make all Morse Code usage stop if you could, after all Morse code is not a person, only people can be murdered Then why are you accusing me of trying to murder you? not even accusing you of that, but of threatening too can't you keep anything straight? Threating to speak to Todds folks is a threat Nope. sure is How? by being one "by being one" what? by being a threat Re-read what you wrote, in response to what I wrote, Mark... It doesn't make sense. sure does you are a low level danger So NOW you're saying you HAVE been lying about any danger to you and your "family". nope I am saying you have prooven you mostly make threats without backing em up There's nothing to be "back(ed) up", Markie. yes there is and you keep making threats Why do you continue to make and remake this assertion in the face of evidence to the contrary? what eveidence? E X A C T L Y ! ! ! ! N O E V I D E N C E ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! right you have presented no eveidence that you are not making threats I have posted various bit of evidence therefore you are lying when you say"Why do you continue to make and remake this assertion in the face of evidence to the contrary?", becuase you have present no evidence to contrary YOU have NO EVIDENCE of ANY threat! I have your admission of sending the first threat, and then ore besides what more do I need beyond an admission? cuting another lies Wether od not you ever had any intention on caring out your threats has nothing to do your making them I didn't make any, Markie. One shot on kill .. is a threat Nope. It MEANS, as it meant in the ORIGINAL CONTEXT, was that my comments "squarely hit" what I "aim" for. Killing is killing Not int he context of the comment I made, Mark. It meant then, as it does now, taht I "hit" what I aim at...In the FULL CONTEXT of the statement I amde in response to YOUR comments... Nothing in the context had anything to do with killing, the threat was out of the blue. The is never a reason to threaten to kill anyone over the ARS Indeed what you intended isn't relavant. The standard is would a reasonable person think they were being threatened it was and remains a threat Nope. sure is Why do you continue to "force" this lie when it's apparent you're not telling the truth, Mark? becuase I am telling the truth The only reason you don't see it is that you are pretty sick you are lying in saying otherwise You are lying in tryng to make it anything more than it was. nope Absolutely. not at all if it were nothing you would have appologized for the misunderstanding You might try that now, but I doubt it if you were manere when it was brought you would have adknowledged the words to have been illchoosen or something like that If I was "marere"...?!?! As for "illchoosen", perhaps YOU should have thought about the response YOUR unfinished thought here? My response was to put you off guard with a simple and harmless lie to deflect you from your threat, based on your nestfew posts it diverted you for several days, till I returned home and could take other actions instead when I did not react as you wish you added various threats of legal action, repated the thret in various manner and generaly behaved in a threatening manner that it was idle matters not It wasn't a threat..."idle" or otherwise. sure was To a delusional paranoid persoanlity, perhaps... to any reasonable person You simply make Idles(so far) threats, but you make threats often Nope. abolsutely true Absolutely UNtrue... But don't let that slow you down... terorists and balckmailer need to be resited when possible There's no terrorists or blackmailers here, Markie. spelling cop cut yep there is his name is Steve Robeson Nope. Just Markie Morgan lying in public again. just Stevie unable to be a man an accept respoiblity for his own actions, and his own words Nope. Just Markie Morgan lying in public again. just Stevie unable to be a man an accept respoiblity for his own actions, and his own words nothing is Stevies fault It's only "Stevies fault" when Stevie does it wrong. but Stevie never admts to making mistake so accordoing to Stevie nothing is Stevie fault So far you've not presented any "evidence" to the contrary except your childish sandlot "ya-HUH!" arguments. I have your admissions I guess a confession to all the elements of the crime isn't good enough for you Just Stevie squirming to evade the turth of his bulling personality Nope. Just Markie Morgan lying in public again...and again...and again... cuting a lie cuting another lie cuting speling cop You just can't stand it, can you...cut, cut cut... yes you do you threatened Tood I saw that, you conitue to threaten me, idly it seems but you continue cuting spelling cop I didn't threaten Todd. you sure did you threatened to call his perants you threatened to contact his ISP (you carried out that threat but it was still a threat It wasn't a threat. it sure is apeartnly it seems an idle one To a delusional paranoid personality, perhaps... to any reasonable person Toddie violated the terms of his TOS. He refused to stop. He got what he asked for. but you threatened to do , and apealently did it "apealently"...?!?! I told him I wouldn't tolerate his violent, profane and threatening behaviour towards me. and thereby threatened him He thought rules didn't apply to him. you don't think they apply to you He found out different. really? you were claiming that you had nothing to do with what happened to todd with his ISp awhile back now you admit it? have a reason to make a threat doesn't mean you are not threatening him you realy don't know english do you cuting speling cop **** you are a bully and so juvi you can't even take responiblity for YOUR actions Sure I do. you will now proceed to blame Todd for these threats Nope. Toiddie is responsible for his own actions...And he had to pay a price for them. yep as expected and predicted I am sure there was a point there. indeed and you made it for me thank you Care to make it? I can't you did the job for me If YOU think that I have made all of these threats against you and am the "stalker" you accuse me of, please, file a civil or criminal charge against me, Markie.. I have sought to do so, and there is realy very little I can do short of traveling to Tenn. and doing so that is one of the problems with the internet But...but...but...MARK! All this past week you were telling us what great financial shape you're allegedly in...two cars..house...investments...allegedly turned down a $240K/yr job... good shape, yes, your point? Guess that's yet ANOTHER lie we've caught you in. nope you really don't read do you. I have to travel to tennesse at some point to deal with you, spend a lot of money that you are not worth , to obtain a judgement that you would not likely be able to pay I am in good shape because I choose my fights carefully Unlike you I don't go in full bore without thinking things through It will be quite satisfying to have you served with the countersuit and then see who's side holds up better in court. more threats Nope. A promise. You file any "charges" or "suit" against me, and your ears will whistle for a week with the paper landing in your lap from summons servers! that is certainly a lie my ears would not wistle at all at one point you were going to make a phone call and have me arrested like that You realy don't know much about how the world works Nothing you do is YOUR responiblity Sure it is. And I've put my "hand out" with apologies or corrections where appropriate. still haven't adknowledged your mistakes about the Brothers Grim It's "Grimm", Markie. and still stevie you fail to fess up Ask around. No one answers yes you have You've not asked the question. And I bet most everyone is ignoring these posts...so ask them directly. not most everyone other coment on them, Again your claim you make it lazy bum and you lie about it Nope. threats to call a prosecuter for my lying online, threats to came to the UP where I live, threats against Todd, and Len and Brain What threats? your threats What threats? the threats typed above What threats? You keep saying "those threats" and I keep saying "cite them". All YOU do is say "those threats". There are NO threats. sure are Nope. yep you have admtted to making them, just denieng that they are threats not going to retype them and retype em You can retype the Magna Carta and it won't prove anything. you even blew that one Stevie it would indeed prove something but of course Magna Carta has nothing to do with this matter so again you evade the issue You'll still have no threats. I have your admissions threats to call a prosecuter for my lying online, threats to come to the UP where I live, threats against Todd, and Len and Brain What threats? the one you typed and admitted to typing cuting stevie evasion What evasion? your evasion WHAT evasion...?!?! your eveasion What "eveasion"...?!?! yours WHAT EVASION...?!?!? yours I have typed it often typed a few examples in this post and will not repeat just becuase Stevie the BULLY demands I do so You've retyped nothing except "your threats" and "your evasion", Markie. lying agian I am not lying and I am not an agian. You are lying, and I never said you are an "again" so 2 lies one sentence You've not SUBSTANTIATED either... you have admited to typing "One shot on kill" that does it right there, the rest just piles on That wasn't a threat. sure was Wasn't then...isn't now...won't be 100 years from now... will always be a threat You keep making accusations that I ask you to substantiate. yes you do, overlooking the fact it has been done in many case Years ago, and repaeted again and again Nope. All we have are your stories of threats. I am surprised we haven't been treated to any black helo or unmarked vans stories, too. well if that suprises then yuare of stupid, but we all know that, everyone but you of course I love being called "stupid" in a sentence that is so fractured that it takes several re-readings to figure out that I was "insulted". then where is your thank you You flushed it after your last bowel movement, Markie. more **** form you stevie cuting another stevie evasion distrotion cuting speling cop You couldn't have cut a distortion because there wasn't one there. sure was Nope. Oh? Exercising my rights to travel freely within the United States is now a "threat"...?!?! when cuopled with your other behavoir certainly is "cuopled" "behavoir" What "behaviour" do you refer to? your make threats What threats? yours admitted to and documented more than once by the way It is infact ilegal for you to came HERE since you have been informed your are unwelcome It would be illegal for me to knock on your front door or violate your privacy. it is ilegal for you to enter my land It would NOT be illegal for me to come to Michigan...ANYwhere in Michigan. wrong It is ilegal for you to come to my Land and would allow me to use deadly force if I choose Nor would it be illegal for me to speak with local law enforcement or mental health case workers about you, being careful to express my concerns as just that...concerns. HMM seem you were threatening me if I contacted Tennesse about my concerns those laws do work both ways threatening action with various parties What threats? asked and answered Avoided and evaded by you. asked and answered Avoided and evaded by you. asked and answered stop harassing people I'm not harrassing people. liar Nope. you harrass everyone here that you disgaree with, You harrass folks on the Air, by what I hear from other hams Oh? Then you've proven that you're "hearing voices", Markie. nope I have hear Hams call you a Papa Oscar serria on the air "heard" "Sierra" I am sure you hear a LOT of voices doing that, Markie... Only during a good opening to tennesse is it so hard to admit there are other hams that don't like you? All part of your delusional mindset, Markie. nope it is part of yours I fear You post, I respond. Period. Sorry you don't like the comments, but then the comments I was responding to were pretty stupid to start with, so what did you expect? liar you are not a bit sorry Not a liar and sure I'm sorry. 2 lies with one sentence Nope. why do you tell such obvious lies Why do you put words in others mouths and try to pass them off as truthful? that is your gig stevie Nope. As usual, you're welcome to TRY and "prove" that, however you'll not be successful. already have many times No...you've CLAIMED that you have tried... that too of course but I have your repeated confessions that is about all I really need All you do is make sandlot taunts. None of them effective or accurate. confessions are quite effective "First Amendment", Markie... you don't have any right to threaten people I haven't threatened anyone. lying again Nope. yes One shot one kill is a threat Nope. sure is A prosecuter won't touch your "claim" based upon the original context and in response to your own words, Markie. there is no context in which it isn't a threat I have seen you threaten Todd and BB and you have threatened me Nope, nope and nope. yep yep and yep Nope, nope and nope. sure have and I have posted and reported And no matter how many times you wish to carry that one out, it still won't be true. Huh? It is ture that you have threatened me, both publicaly and in private it is ture that you have harrased me publicaly and privately You have threatened Todd Her I have seen that. You ahve harrassed Todd I have seen that myself You have admitng to conducting what Len discribes as harrassing IMing of him on AOL You harrass and Threaten BB in this forum when 4 people tell you are doing something an inteligent man would start to wonder if there wasn't something to it, but of course that lets you out Any discussion group wherein YOU profess to be an "inteligent" (intelligent) man is a conversation mispent. more evasion Nope. You accused me of not being "inteligent". I corrected your error and answerd the claim. not at all I questioned it I still do, since you do not ACT like an inteligent human being let alone an adult one you also did not address the point No evasion. Not addressing the point is an evasion stevie the 1st amendment does cover that No, it does not. QUOTE: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. UNQUOTE: What IS the so what? The assertions YOU cut from the quote were NOT covered by a single word of the First Amendment. Let's put this BACK into context since you snipped all of that out... cuting out your evasive waste of bandwidth Now, I'd appreciate it if you'd acknowldge your "respoinblty" to TAKE "respoinblty" for your mistake. no mistake A bit mistake...on your part. The one wherein you think you can keep blustering your way through your inappropriate claims. not at all you keep trying to divert the issue No I don't. sure do you have NO right to threaten people I don't. agreed you don't have the right so stop doing it you have NO right to harrass people I don't. agreed you don't have the right so stop doing it you have NO right to stalk people I don't. agreed you don't have the right so stop doing it The first amendent does not give the right to do ilgeal things You again express your obvious misunderstanding of what is said in the First Amendment to the Constitution, Markie. I understand it clearly your mind is fogged on that subject and many others nor does any other part of the Constitution And there is nothing in ANY part of the Constitution that is "violated" by our exchanges here, Mark.... never said that it was What I said is that constitution does not give the right to threaten or harrass people a key word in the ruling of the court is peaceably The fact remains that the First Amendment does NOT say what you alleged it to say. i was simply using your quoting of the text You simply did not. sure did You tried to take ONE word from it and apply it contrary to it's use in THAT Amendement. nope not at all You failed. Not realy but then I wasn't doing what said I was doing and faling at it, this rambling on and on is part of your SOP here, wander all over the place that is why threatening people ois ilegal that it why the hate speech have a legs to stand on "ois ilegal" What were you trying to say? What "hate speech"...?!?! your bashing of people for being gay or pagan or just different I don't "bash" you, Mark, and certainly NOT for any of those reasons. lying again Stevie You keep getting your nose tweeked because you keep getting caught lying. And in fact you've LIED about all of those things. nope You claimed you WEREN'T gay, but it's since been proven with your own words that you are. well i ambisexual you are not up on the facts You claimed you weren't pagan, but it's since been proven with your own words that you are. nope And you've claimed that you're not "dffrent" when it's CLEARLY evident that you are! another lie stevie you are guilty of threats and hate speech Nope. Not even close. sure are I posted awhile back some example form just your titles And none of them were "hate speech" as defined by the Civil Rights Act. sure are Try again. cuting stevie off target rant You're the one with the honesty issues...said so yourself on numerous occassions. stop making threats stopp harassing folks I'm doing neither. you keep doing it you lying SoS Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh...here's the anger...Can't get your way so let's go back to insinuating profanites.... not realy you are a lying sack of ####, just calling you on it More anger. Even spelled it out this time. nope you would have to be angery to use the word ####. I use when I deem it proper, very calmly Profanity is the tool of a violent mind, Markie. IYO Nope. In the opinion of those "pros" you always refer to. now you are just lying agian I do assert my free right to use such words as I choose as long I as I don't violate the rights of others By re-titling these posts "stvie ####" you violate MY right to not be called a profane word or to have my "intellectual property" defiled... you have no such right Hence the "Markie Mularkie" posts in kind. so another lie Nope. I am not angery with I am disguted by you You are disgusted by getting your nose rubbed in your mistruths and deceit? No I am disgusted by your manner your hypocrazy, your stupidity Then you're focusing on the wrong things. You should be disgusted by the fact that you are a decietful liar who can't post a word without errors being laid bare. more lies from stevie Then stop doing it. more off tager Bull#### What a "tager"...?!?! been doing it for years cuting stvie distoring context cuting speling cop cutng spelling cop cuting spelling cop threats harrasment trying to intimadate people Your "threats" to "sue" were never deemed even remotely plausible. never made one Sure you did. Said you were going to use the ADA to force the FCC's hand to give you a free ride on the code test. Lie I said a case could be made A case CAN be made for your deceitfulness and dishonesty. So as I said earlier, if you think a case can be made against me, file it. If Thought It would yeild anything I would do so but I don't think you have to money to pay the judgement so it is not worth doing Uh huh. What you DON'T have are (1) sufficent grounds and (2) what it would take to pay your OWN "judgement" for the false suit charge that would be appended. I said it was a hard case at that time with the treaty lang in place So what? A M E R I C A N law allowed for alterations to the treaty as did caveats IN the treaty that gave administrations some leeway. Indeed but the treaty lang made the ADA case much harder No it didn't. sure did If anything, the ADA made it EASIER to make your argument viable. Stvie you have lost it ADA made the case possible, the treaty made the case harder what your last stament has to do with the matter I don't know I also said It could be VERY expensive and more than I cared to venture Then obviously not enough dedication. if you like Nope...If YOU like...Obviously you don't have the heart for it. If it is what I like well I did not care to spend the money or time at what I was sure would be won otherwise indeed it apears that My discussing the possible case, may have influneced NCI to include the ADA case arguement in there threat to the FCC one they seem to caved on So It seems other used the case as another wedge you don't understand the difference between saying something could be done and it will be done , or that it will be attepted Sure I do. then you must be willfully lying when you make these claims Nope. sure do since you lie about what was said that you confuse tense and moods is part of the process where you so often distrot and twist a true stament someone has made, into lie of YOUR making No lie made here. You made threats of lawsuits under ADA. nope Yep. nope I discussed the posiblity You said your "laywr" was preparing your brief". no never said said anything about "laywr" I discussed the pros and cons I decided against it One of the very few wise things you ever did...or should I say DIDN'T do...?!?! you lie whan you make the staement "You made threats of lawsuits under ADA." Nope. yes have have lied and contiue to do so I have pointed that you are vulernable to one, never threatened to do it you have got anything worth talking I am not "vunerable" to any suit brought by you! sure are If Just filed it id would cost a fair amount of money The cost would be yours twice over, Markie. prehaps which does not alter the factual statement I just made going to court is such a crap shoot In YOUR case it would be... in all cases it is Your initial filing against me, then your defense expenses for the countersuit. nope no doubling there I'd be handle one level on contingincy youd be paying out of pocket the whole way mostlikely, or at least in your defense First of all, no lawyer is going to take a "he said/she said" case "on contingency" unless it's against Wal-Mart, one of the Big Three in Detroit, etc. In those cases they at least hope to win "shut up" money and probably will. again you are misinformed Secondly, as I told you before, I have the resources to overcome any legal case YOU could hopre to mount from Michigan. At the most, I'd have to pony-up filing fees...No big deal... that applies to you or anyone for that matter Yep...And they can countersue too. yea never said otherwise But you, like Toiddie, throw "I'LL SUE! I'LL SUE" around as if in doing so you are the only one who can use legal resourse. no another lie on your part, or is it delusions again As I have clearly demonstrated here, however, you'll quickly find out that you are NOT the only person who can bring a suit. more threats It is easy to sue in America Finally you get the idea... no it has taken you several years to get that not so easy to collect Bravo. which is why sueing you is not worth while You sure do like flattering yourself! more evidence that stevie does not have metal contact with the real world There's no metal in my body, Markie. How would I have metal contact withn the world? and of plausible to whom? You well that is more than likely right, a real crout that is another matter cuting spelling cop Congratulations. Only 33 1/3% error rate that time. Your semi-literate dreck can be considered "harrassing" in it's own way. really someone is making you read it? If I want to try an understand what you're saying. you don't want to understand you are just hunting for things you can twist There's nothing to "twist". Your comments are twisted right out of the box, Markie...I jsut ahve fun with them! I think learning Serbo-Croation by braille might be easier. more bashing of the Disabled, the blind in this case Nope. Are you NOW alleging that only the blind can use Braille? nope but you are of course bashing the disabled Nope. sure are Serbo-Croation is a difficult language. I tried. Gave up. not really Russian now that is one is bad And I can't differentiate the characters in Braille adequately to use it. you just didn't want to bad enough No bashing occured. sure did with your clear lack of human compassion why did you become a nurse? What "clear lack of human compassion"...?!?! your clear lack Clear lack of what? human compassion You mean not being a soft touch for every self-appreciating, self-victimizing jerk that tries to take advantge of others compassion, Markie? Nope I mean your mean sprited obcessive bulling cutting more spelling cop If I were that, every hospital in every community would be filed to the rafters 24/7 with no hope for ever seeing an empty bed again. more lies this time about the number of hospital you could affect It's got nothing to do with me. then you lied when you typed " If I were that, every hospital in every community would be filed to the rafters 24/7 with no hope for ever seeing an empty bed again." You typed the I not me It's got to do with Nurses not being a "soft touch" as I stated above. no you stated something else And trust me when I say that every ER I ahve worked in, East, West, North and South has it's share of "frequent flyers"...system abusers just like you, Markie. more libel was it another power play? By saying "another" powert play, you're suggesting an ORIGINAL "power play". yea And it was...?!?!? What would have been the first. not sure what power play was the first you go on about so many You've not named one so far. sure have Your actions as VE in denieing a properly issued code waiver for one your efforts to control the posting of Todd, BB, Len and Me And people like you never "intimadate" anyone. Humor them, sure... not trying to intimadate I would not horn on your territory steve, not that you arre any good at it cutin spelling cop Still 33 1/3%, however this time you ever mispelled your mispelled word! I'm not trying to intimidate anyone, Markie. liar you admited to it in the post I am responding to No I didn't. sure did Sheesh. Where, Markie. WHERE did I say "I am trying to intimidate you", Markie? never said you stated that I siad you were doing it Quote the line where you alledge I say "I am trying to intimidate you", Markie... no claim of such a an exact was ever made Oh, but it was! nope QUOTE I'm not trying to intimidate anyone, Markie. liar you admited to it in the post I am responding to UNQUOTE So...where's this alleged admission, Markie? in the post I was repsoning to as stated No quote = Markie Lying. nope You've rendered more than your fair share of laughs here! But you HAVE left us laughing! comenting on your words "Commenting" Haven't you haerd about what it means when you talk to yourself "heard" I am not "talking to (my)self"... I am talking ABOUT you. Still. now you are talking to yourself look at the lines Steve, K4YZ |
#120
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote: yes of course it is Of course it's not. "It's far more effective to rub an idiots nose in their foolishness than it is to commit an act of violence against them. Peer pressure does the rest." your words and they are a confession to harrasment No, they are not. They are proof that it's far more effective to rub an idiots nose in his own foolishness than it is to commit an act of violence against him. You're an idiot and you keep acting like a fool. That I respond in such a way as to show you both is NOT "harrassment". If you don't like what you see, Markie, correct your idiotic and foolish behaviour. And you continue to avoid answering my question..."What makes you think that I'd hazard my freedom for a putz like you...?!?!" and I have answered it becuase you are nuts That's an answer? yes it is cuting stevie rants more cuting of ranting and raving Your "cuting" is nothing more than self preservation, Markie. QUOTE: cuting stevie rants More "cuting". But here it is re-installed: Where are YOUR credentials to determine the stabilty of anyone else's mental health, Mark? The fact that YOU are a mental health patient? That wasn't a rant. That was a question. Why were you so embarrassed to address it? me the htreat s are violence, (one shot one kill..) outing Your demands I comply or youd tell everyone I was gay, your conitued harrasment unless I do as YOU say What threats? you threats One Shot one kill... Wasn't a threat seven years ago. It's not a threat today, no matter how many times you repeat it out of context. your threats to contact UP officals and (do something) Why does it concern you that you might be brought to the attention of mental health case workers or law enforcement if you're "OK", Markie? It does not realy concern me other than it could prove anoying I am sure that it would be. Most deviants and liars find having to face thier problems head-long to be "annoying". but that of course has nothing to do with wether it is a threat on your part It's not a threat. your threat to expose me as Gay in the newsgrup those many years ago I didn't threaten yoy with exposing your deviancy, Mark. Pardon the choice of words, but you "exposed" yourslf all on your own. liar Steve Nope. you emailed me your proof and threatened to expose me if I did not stop posting in the newsgroup then you revealed it and found to your shock I never denied it It's no "shock" on my part that you're a deviant, Markie. And still no "proof" of ANY wrongdoing, Markie. why do you need everything repeated and again and agian Why can't you type the same word the same way in one sentence? becuase "becuase".....BBWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!! And I keep hoping that sooner or later you'll come up with a viable reason for your unviable assertions. liar what you realy want is for me to go away again No...that would be more like winning the lottery. So far, you haven't done it, so expect to keep getting that same question asked until you pony-up something that sounds remotely life-like. not into horse's stevie But you're SOMETHING like a horse's, Markie... What 'outing (my) demands'...?!?! You ARE gay, Markie. You stated so yourself in this forum. but not until after you outed me, you preceeded that action by threatening to do so unless I complied with your demands Markie...I DIDN'T OUT YOU! Whoever you THINK was under your saddle about your deviancy, it wasn't me...You did that alllllllllllllllllllllll by your self! lying stevie nothing but lies on your part You did the stalking looking for something you found it you tired blackmail with it and I did not go along then you did it you outed me Uh huh... Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight......... ....... that your blackmail was unsucessfull has no bearing on whether or not your prefromed it I didn't blackmail you or attempt to blackmail you, ergo it's irrelevent WHAT was "successful" or not. lying agian I'm not lying and I'm not an agian, whatever that is... It is all blackmail What blackmail? In order to "prove" blackmail, you have to prove that I stood to gain from some act or threat of violence against you. no I don't, however in this case you did stand to gain you demanded I stop posting in RRAP obviously you valued that Nope. yep Nope. And still no proof, Mark. I have the proof and carefully in a file Uh huh...Along with pictures of the Pope fondling goats, no doubt... No such "blackmail" was caused since no such threat was made nor did any potential gain exist. wrong you made the threat and stood to gain Nope. The ONLY person here who stands to gain anything by you not posting here is YOU, Mark. Because as long as you post here, you'll be known as the illiterate lying gay pagan draftee... another lie You want me out of here, very badly I gain nothing by leaving, not even the end of your harassment You gain everything...including the self-delusion that you're right, that you're an "OK" person the way you are, that it's OK to lie, and WHAT harrassment...??? your actions quailify Not in an AMERICAN court of law they wouldn't. sure do Nope. We will now await your presentation of credentials in jurisprudence. Guess you forgot about "cuting" that one.... nope but it isn't my credentcail that are important Sure it is. Put it back in context, Markie, because that's where it would be taken from in court. it is in context Killing was never the subject I never suggested to kill you. liar Nope. yes you have you sent the threat out in the gruops more threats in the NG and more still by email And you're still lying. Why do you lie in public when it's already known that you're an admtted liar, Markie? How do you think all those admissions of lying are going to go over in court...!?! someone, possibly you called the Cops In illiopolas with some cock and bull story If it was a cock and bull story, it wasn't about you. you have boasted of finding a picture of my home in those days here recently YOU posted it, Markie. It was on your GeoCities site, along with your picture... it is a plain and clear threat To a delusional paranoid personality, perhaps... no to any reasonable person, which of course lets you out Let's me in, Markie, and YOU out. That's your rampant paranoia. one shot one kill is a threat To a delusional paranoid persoanlity, perhaps... no to any reasonable person, which of course lets you out you are the delsuional paraniod Nope. I'm not the one who thinks that someone is stalking him, trying to kill him over flaming in a newsgroup, and who thinks sexual and societal devaiance is OK. any questioning of the PR of the ARS is a personal attack on you that is paranois and delusional No...LYING about Amateur Radio is an attack on licensed Amateurs. it is also a sign of other mental problems Here we go with Dr Markie's diagnosis again... after all Morse code is not a person, only people can be murdered Then why are you accusing me of trying to murder you? not even accusing you of that, but of threatening too can't you keep anything straight? Sure I can. You've allegeded I threatened to kill (murder) you. And yes, you've accused me of it. Threating to speak to Todds folks is a threat Nope. sure is How? by being one "by being one" what? by being a threat How is talking to Todd's parents a threat unless he's doing something wrong? Re-read what you wrote, in response to what I wrote, Mark... It doesn't make sense. sure does To YOU, perhaps...But English is my native tongue. Why do you continue to make and remake this assertion in the face of evidence to the contrary? what eveidence? E X A C T L Y ! ! ! ! N O E V I D E N C E ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! right you have presented no eveidence that you are not making threats I have posted various bit of evidence You've posted nothing but your paranoid delusions. therefore you are lying when you say"Why do you continue to make and remake this assertion in the face of evidence to the contrary?", becuase you have present no evidence to contrary Upside down as usual, Mark! Nice try, though! YOU have NO EVIDENCE of ANY threat! I have your admission of sending the first threat, and then ore besides You have NO "admission". what more do I need beyond an admission? Facts, Boyo, because you have no admission of ANYthing... cuting another lies Wether od not you ever had any intention on caring out your threats has nothing to do your making them I didn't make any, Markie. One shot on kill .. is a threat Nope. It MEANS, as it meant in the ORIGINAL CONTEXT, was that my comments "squarely hit" what I "aim" for. Killing is killing Not int he context of the comment I made, Mark. It meant then, as it does now, taht I "hit" what I aim at...In the FULL CONTEXT of the statement I made in response to YOUR comments... Nothing in the context had anything to do with killing, the threat was out of the blue. The is never a reason to threaten to kill anyone over the ARS You continue this unhealthy rant about threats, Mark. No threat was made. Indeed what you intended isn't relavant. Sure it is. Ask a lawyer. The standard is would a reasonable person think they were being threatened And as you said..."that leaves you out".... it was and remains a threat Nope. sure is More evidence of self-delusional acts, Markie... Why do you continue to "force" this lie when it's apparent you're not telling the truth, Mark? becuase I am telling the truth No, you're not. The only reason you don't see it is that you are pretty sick No, actually I am in very good health. you are lying in saying otherwise You are lying in tryng to make it anything more than it was. nope Absolutely. not at all if it were nothing you would have appologized for the misunderstanding You might try that now, but I doubt it You're the one with the misunderstanding, Mark. Why should I apologize for YOUR misunderstanding? if you were manere when it was brought you would have adknowledged the words to have been illchoosen or something like that If I was "marere"...?!?! As for "illchoosen", perhaps YOU should have thought about the response YOUR unfinished thought here? Nope. Computer hiccup. Oh well. But here it is in it's entirety: "As for "illchoosen", perhaps YOU should have thought about the response YOUR words might elicit". My response was to put you off guard with a simple and harmless lie to deflect you from your threat, based on your nestfew posts it diverted you for several days, till I returned home and could take other actions Again with this story about "putting me off" and "other actions". Fiction, Markie...Nothing but fiction... instead when I did not react as you wish you added various threats of legal action, repated the thret in various manner and generaly behaved in a threatening manner that it was idle matters not It wasn't a threat..."idle" or otherwise. sure was To a delusional paranoid persoanlity, perhaps... to any reasonable person But you're not that. nothing is Stevies fault It's only "Stevies fault" when Stevie does it wrong. but Stevie never admts to making mistake so accordoing to Stevie nothing is Stevie fault You keep saying that but it's not true. I keep suggesting you ask around but you refuse to do it. So far you've not presented any "evidence" to the contrary except your childish sandlot "ya-HUH!" arguments. I have your admissions I guess a confession to all the elements of the crime isn't good enough for you No admissions. No confessions. No crime...at least one commited by me. apeartnly it seems an idle one To a delusional paranoid personality, perhaps... to any reasonable person Then that leaves you out. Toddie violated the terms of his TOS. He refused to stop. He got what he asked for. but you threatened to do , and apealently did it "apealently"...?!?! I told him I wouldn't tolerate his violent, profane and threatening behaviour towards me. and thereby threatened him Nope. He thought rules didn't apply to him. you don't think they apply to you Sure they do. You just haven't proven where I've "violated" some "rules". He found out different. really? Yep. you were claiming that you had nothing to do with what happened to todd with his ISp awhile back now you admit it? What happened to Todd was a direct result of Todd's violation of his TOS with Consolidated Communications. Todd had it in his control to NOT violate them. have a reason to make a threat doesn't mean you are not threatening him you realy don't know english do you cuting speling cop #### Let me put it back for you: QUOTE: you realy don't know english do you I know it better than you. I employ it more accurately, too. I know that English is capitalized. I know that "realy" is actually spelled "really", but you keep screwing that up too. I know that a sentence is started with a capital letter and ended with a period, except where a question is asked. You seem to have a problem with that. UNQUOTE See...it's still as true today aas it was yesterday. you are a bully and so juvi you can't even take responiblity for YOUR actions Sure I do. you will now proceed to blame Todd for these threats Nope. Toiddie is responsible for his own actions...And he had to pay a price for them. yep as expected and predicted I am sure there was a point there. indeed and you made it for me thank you What point? That Toiddie was responsible for his own actions...?!?! Then you'd be correct. Care to make it? I can't you did the job for me What point? If YOU think that I have made all of these threats against you and am the "stalker" you accuse me of, please, file a civil or criminal charge against me, Markie.. I have sought to do so, and there is realy very little I can do short of traveling to Tenn. and doing so that is one of the problems with the internet But...but...but...MARK! All this past week you were telling us what great financial shape you're allegedly in...two cars..house...investments...allegedly turned down a $240K/yr job... good shape, yes, your point? The point is you're lying about THIS, too... You claim you can't afford to come to Tennessee. Guess that's yet ANOTHER lie we've caught you in. nope Yep. you really don't read do you. Congratualtions on getting "really" right for a change. Now if we can work on the capitalization and proper punctuation, you'll be well on your way... I have to travel to tennesse at some point to deal with you, spend a lot of money that you are not worth , to obtain a judgement that you would not likely be able to pay I am in good shape because I choose my fights carefully You're in good shape because the countersuit would leave you with the clothes on your back, a pup-tent and a bicycle to get around on. Unlike you I don't go in full bore without thinking things through Sure you do. You're making ludicrous charges in a public forum EVERY day. You've admitted to being a prolific liar and that's been archived. Seems pretty "full bore" to me... It will be quite satisfying to have you served with the countersuit and then see who's side holds up better in court. more threats Nope. A promise. You file any "charges" or "suit" against me, and your ears will whistle for a week with the paper landing in your lap from summons servers! that is certainly a lie my ears would not wistle at all Sure they would. at one point you were going to make a phone call and have me arrested like that Nope. Have you INVESTIGATED. There IS a difference. You realy don't know much about how the world works Seems you're the one with the perception deficits, Markie. Nothing you do is YOUR responiblity Sure it is. And I've put my "hand out" with apologies or corrections where appropriate. still haven't adknowledged your mistakes about the Brothers Grim It's "Grimm", Markie. and still stevie you fail to fess up On what? Ask around. No one answers yes you have You've not asked the question. And I bet most everyone is ignoring these posts...so ask them directly. not most everyone other coment on them, Again your claim you make it Nope. YOU claimed I never apologize or admit mistakes. I've given you references to verify. You refuse to do it. lazy bum Coward. There are NO threats. sure are Nope. yep you have admtted to making them, just denieng that they are threats I can't "admit to making them" and then deny them, Markie. I've stated all along, and correctly so, that I never made a threat. not going to retype them and retype em You can retype the Magna Carta and it won't prove anything. you even blew that one Stevie it would indeed prove something but of course Magna Carta has nothing to do with this matter so again you evade the issue Nope. You'll still have no threats. I have your admissions I didn't admit to any wrongdoing, Markie. You have nothing. threats to call a prosecuter for my lying online, threats to come to the UP where I live, threats against Todd, and Len and Brain What threats? the one you typed and admitted to typing I never typed a threat. Why do you keep lying about this? (And then snipping my questions about WHY you lie about it...?!?!) cuting stevie evasion What evasion? your evasion WHAT evasion...?!?! your eveasion What "eveasion"...?!?! yours WHAT EVASION...?!?!? yours Still no evasion, Markie... Just your tit-for-tat accusations that are patently false. I have typed it often typed a few examples in this post and will not repeat just becuase Stevie the BULLY demands I do so You've retyped nothing except "your threats" and "your evasion", Markie. lying agian I am not lying and I am not an agian. You are lying, and I never said you are an "again" Re-read the sentence above, IdiotBoy. so 2 lies one sentence Nope...but we have YOU looking stupid over one of YOUR typos again! You've not SUBSTANTIATED either... you have admited to typing "One shot on kill" that does it right there, the rest just piles on That wasn't a threat. sure was Why does Mark Morgan continue to lie? Wasn't then...isn't now...won't be 100 years from now... will always be a threat Only to a paranoid delusional mind, Markie... I love being called "stupid" in a sentence that is so fractured that it takes several re-readings to figure out that I was "insulted". then where is your thank you You flushed it after your last bowel movement, Markie. more #### form you stevie capitalize "from" No punctuation. Looks like the #### was coming from you. your make threats What threats? yours admitted to and documented more than once I've not admitted to ANY threats. Not a one. by the way It is infact ilegal for you to came HERE since you have been informed your are unwelcome It would be illegal for me to knock on your front door or violate your privacy. it is ilegal for you to enter my land That's what I said, IdiotBoy. Now where's YOUR basis for stating that it would be illegal for me to travel to Michigan...the UP or otherwise...?!?! It would NOT be illegal for me to come to Michigan...ANYwhere in Michigan. wrong It is ilegal for you to come to my Land As I said above... and would allow me to use deadly force if I choose Now THERE'S a THREAT ! ! ! ! ! ! Better read the law on what constitutes the VALID use of deadly force, Markie. Hint: Cutting across your front yard isn't it.... Nor would it be illegal for me to speak with local law enforcement or mental health case workers about you, being careful to express my concerns as just that...concerns. HMM seem you were threatening me if I contacted Tennesse about my concerns Nope. I just said if YOU file a suit, be prepared for the result. those laws do work both ways As I have been telling YOU, IdiotBoy. threatening action with various parties What threats? asked and answered Avoided and evaded by you. asked and answered Avoided and evaded by you. asked and answered Escaped and evaded. stop harassing people I'm not harrassing people. liar Nope. you harrass everyone here that you disgaree with, You harrass folks on the Air, by what I hear from other hams Oh? Then you've proven that you're "hearing voices", Markie. nope I have hear Hams call you a Papa Oscar serria on the air "heard" "Sierra" I am sure you hear a LOT of voices doing that, Markie... Only during a good opening to tennesse is it so hard to admit there are other hams that don't like you? I am sure there are. But unless YOU get on the air and say something, I doubt you'll hear them... All part of your delusional mindset, Markie. nope it is part of yours I fear You have good reason to fear, Markie. You're sick and need help. No...you've CLAIMED that you have tried... that too of course but I have your repeated confessions that is about all I really need You keep claiming THAT too, but you have no confession from me on ANYthing. All you do is make sandlot taunts. None of them effective or accurate. confessions are quite effective They would be if you had one. "First Amendment", Markie... you don't have any right to threaten people I haven't threatened anyone. lying again Nope. yes One shot one kill is a threat Nope. sure is Nope. A prosecuter won't touch your "claim" based upon the original context and in response to your own words, Markie. there is no context in which it isn't a threat Sure there is...The original context in which it was stated and the comments to which it was responding...YOUR comments by the way... I have seen you threaten Todd and BB and you have threatened me Nope, nope and nope. yep yep and yep Nope, nope and nope. sure have and I have posted and reported Nope, nope and nope. And no matter how many times you wish to carry that one out, it still won't be true. Huh? N o m a t t e r h o w m a n y t i m e s y o u w i s h t o c a r r y t h a t o n e o u t, i t s t i l l w o n ' t b e t r u e. Was that better since I slowed down when I wrote it...?!?! It is ture that you have threatened me, both publicaly and in private No, it's not. it is ture that you have harrased me publicaly and privately Nope. You have threatened Todd Her I have seen that. Why are you calling Todd a "Her"...?!?! And I didn't threaten Todd. You ahve harrassed Todd I have seen that myself Gee, Markie...got "have" spelled wrong...'magine that. And you're deluding yourself again. You have admitng to conducting what Len discribes as harrassing IMing of him on AOL Lennie's another liar. Documented. He lied then, he's lied since. You harrass and Threaten BB in this forum S T I L L more mistruths, Markie! When will it stop? when 4 people tell you are doing something an inteligent man would start to wonder if there wasn't something to it, but of course that lets you out Any discussion group wherein YOU profess to be an "inteligent" (intelligent) man is a conversation mispent. more evasion Nope. You accused me of not being "inteligent". I corrected your error and answerd the claim. not at all I questioned it I still do, since you do not ACT like an inteligent human being You're reading your own stuff, Markie. let alone an adult one You're reading your own stuff, Markie. you also did not address the point Several times over, but that hasn't stopped you! No evasion. Not addressing the point is an evasion stevie Then you're guiltyn of THAT "rule" over and over... the 1st amendment does cover that No, it does not. QUOTE: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. UNQUOTE: What IS the so what? The assertions YOU cut from the quote were NOT covered by a single word of the First Amendment. Let's put this BACK into context since you snipped all of that out... cuting out your evasive waste of bandwidth Now, I'd appreciate it if you'd acknowldge your "respoinblty" to TAKE "respoinblty" for your mistake. no mistake A big mistake...on your part. The one wherein you think you can keep blustering your way through your inappropriate claims. not at all Sure. you keep trying to divert the issue No I don't. sure do Nope. you have NO right to threaten people I don't. agreed you don't have the right so stop doing it No...I said I don't threaten people. you have NO right to harrass people I don't. agreed you don't have the right so stop doing it No...I said I don't harrass people. you have NO right to stalk people I don't. agreed you don't have the right so stop doing it No...I said I don't stalk people. The first amendent does not give the right to do ilgeal things You again express your obvious misunderstanding of what is said in the First Amendment to the Constitution, Markie. I understand it clearly your mind is fogged on that subject and many others Your mind is the fogged one, IdiotBoy. You're the one who said the First Amendment said things it didn't say. nor does any other part of the Constitution And there is nothing in ANY part of the Constitution that is "violated" by our exchanges here, Mark.... never said that it was Sure you did! What I said is that constitution does not give the right to threaten or harrass people You said the First Amendment said that. You were wrong. I re-posted the same thing three times over proving you were wrong. Are you going to admit your error, or do we just throw this one on the pile with the rest? a key word in the ruling of the court is peaceably The fact remains that the First Amendment does NOT say what you alleged it to say. i was simply using your quoting of the text You simply did not. sure did You're NOW lying about the content of the First Amendment. Is there ANY topic that you won't lie about, Markie...?!?! You tried to take ONE word from it and apply it contrary to it's use in THAT Amendement. nope not at all Yep. Absolutely. You failed. Not realy but then I wasn't doing what said I was doing and faling at it, this rambling on and on is part of your SOP here, wander all over the place Nope...YOU are the one making FALSE references to the First Amendment of the Constitution. I proved you wrong. Are you going to admit your error? that is why threatening people ois ilegal that it why the hate speech have a legs to stand on "ois ilegal" What were you trying to say? What "hate speech"...?!?! your bashing of people for being gay or pagan or just different I don't "bash" you, Mark, and certainly NOT for any of those reasons. lying again Stevie Nope. You keep getting your nose tweeked because you keep getting caught lying. And in fact you've LIED about all of those things. nope Yep. You claimed you WEREN'T gay, but it's since been proven with your own words that you are. well i ambisexual you are not up on the facts Sure I am. You're having sex with men. You're doing it right now. Why lie MORE about it? You claimed you weren't pagan, but it's since been proven with your own words that you are. nope Yep. And you've claimed that you're not "dffrent" when it's CLEARLY evident that you are! another lie stevie Not in the least. You're a proven liar, sexual deviate and untrustworthy. All of it proven by your own word. you are guilty of threats and hate speech Nope. Not even close. sure are I posted awhile back some example form just your titles And none of them were "hate speech" as defined by the Civil Rights Act. sure are Nope. Profanity is the tool of a violent mind, Markie. IYO Nope. In the opinion of those "pros" you always refer to. now you are just lying agian Nope. Not lying, and not lying "agian". I do assert my free right to use such words as I choose as long I as I don't violate the rights of others By re-titling these posts "stvie ####" you violate MY right to not be called a profane word or to have my "intellectual property" defiled... you have no such right Sure I do. No I am disgusted by your manner your hypocrazy, your stupidity Then you're focusing on the wrong things. You should be disgusted by the fact that you are a decietful liar who can't post a word without errors being laid bare. more lies from stevie Nope. Then stop doing it. more off tager Bull#### What a "tager"...?!?! been doing it for years cuting stvie distoring context cuting speling cop cutng spelling cop cuting spelling cop It's "CUTTING", Markie. And at the beginning of a sentence, if that's what that was, the "C" should be capitalized. And some punctuation at the end would be appropriate, too. A M E R I C A N law allowed for alterations to the treaty as did caveats IN the treaty that gave administrations some leeway. Indeed but the treaty lang made the ADA case much harder No it didn't. sure did Sure it did...that was the whole urpose of the ADA...to provide a "one stop shopping" law that, in essence, said not matter what may be written in any other law, the disabled have certain rights. If anything, the ADA made it EASIER to make your argument viable. Stvie you have lost it ADA made the case possible, the treaty made the case harder what your last stament has to do with the matter I don't know You "don't know" because you have a hard time comprehending English and paying attention to the flow of the conversation. I also said It could be VERY expensive and more than I cared to venture Then obviously not enough dedication. if you like Nope...If YOU like...Obviously you don't have the heart for it. If it is what I like well I did not care to spend the money or time at what I was sure would be won otherwise Not likely. Not with blind and deaf people passing Element 1 within the liberal guidelines that the FCC had already established. Makes it pretty hard to establish a need for a change of federal rules when one can point to people with the same disabilites you suggest need the help who have already passed the exam you claim they can't pass WITHOUT the help..... indeed it apears that My discussing the possible case, may have influneced NCI to include the ADA case arguement in there threat to the FCC one they seem to caved on So It seems other used the case as another wedge Uh huh.......... Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight................ ...... you don't understand the difference between saying something could be done and it will be done , or that it will be attepted Sure I do. then you must be willfully lying when you make these claims Nope. sure do since you lie about what was said I've quoted what YOU have said, Markie. Are you now claiming that YOU were lying? that you confuse tense and moods is part of the process where you so often distrot and twist a true stament someone has made, into lie of YOUR making No lie made here. You made threats of lawsuits under ADA. nope Yep. nope Yep. I discussed the posiblity You said your "laywr" was preparing your brief". no never said said anything about "laywr" Sheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesh.... I discussed the pros and cons I decided against it One of the very few wise things you ever did...or should I say DIDN'T do...?!?! you lie whan you make the staement "You made threats of lawsuits under ADA." Nope. yes have have lied and contiue to do so I KNOW you have lied and continue to do so. Why won't you stop it? It does NOTHING to help your point! I have pointed that you are vulernable to one, never threatened to do it you have got anything worth talking I am not "vunerable" to any suit brought by you! sure are If Just filed it id would cost a fair amount of money The cost would be yours twice over, Markie. prehaps which does not alter the factual statement I just made going to court is such a crap shoot In YOUR case it would be... in all cases it is Nope. Your initial filing against me, then your defense expenses for the countersuit. nope no doubling there I'd be handle one level on contingincy youd be paying out of pocket the whole way mostlikely, or at least in your defense First of all, no lawyer is going to take a "he said/she said" case "on contingency" unless it's against Wal-Mart, one of the Big Three in Detroit, etc. In those cases they at least hope to win "shut up" money and probably will. again you are misinformed Nope. You forget what "contingency" means... It means the lawyer get's paid CONTINGENT upon winning ang getting a settlement. NO lawyer, unless he's "family", is going to take that he said/she said case, Markie... Secondly, as I told you before, I have the resources to overcome any legal case YOU could hopre to mount from Michigan. At the most, I'd have to pony-up filing fees...No big deal... that applies to you or anyone for that matter Yep...And they can countersue too. yea never said otherwise But you, like Toiddie, throw "I'LL SUE! I'LL SUE" around as if in doing so you are the only one who can use legal resourse. no another lie on your part, or is it delusions again Nope. No delusions. As I have clearly demonstrated here, however, you'll quickly find out that you are NOT the only person who can bring a suit. more threats Nope. A promise. "Sue" me and see what happens. It is easy to sue in America Finally you get the idea... no it has taken you several years to get that I have no doubt that it takes you "several years" to get a lot, Markie. not so easy to collect Bravo. which is why sueing you is not worth while It's not worth "suing" me because the results to you would be catastrophic financially. but you are of course bashing the disabled Nope. sure are Nope. Serbo-Croation is a difficult language. I tried. Gave up. not really Russian now that is one is bad Obviously English is pretty hard, too, judging by that last sentence of yours... And I can't differentiate the characters in Braille adequately to use it. you just didn't want to bad enough Nope. Didn't need to. No bashing occured. sure did Nope. with your clear lack of human compassion why did you become a nurse? What "clear lack of human compassion"...?!?! your clear lack Clear lack of what? human compassion Where do you get that? Just because I don't buy your self-victimizing routine? You mean not being a soft touch for every self-appreciating, self-victimizing jerk that tries to take advantge of others compassion, Markie? Nope I mean your mean sprited obcessive bulling cutting more spelling cop Then let me help you again: "spirited" "obsessive" "bullying" And there was none of it. If I were that, every hospital in every community would be filed to the rafters 24/7 with no hope for ever seeing an empty bed again. more lies this time about the number of hospital you could affect It's got nothing to do with me. then you lied when you typed " If I were that, every hospital in every community would be filed to the rafters 24/7 with no hope for ever seeing an empty bed again." You typed the I not me It's got to do with Nurses being soft touches for system abusers such as yourself. It's got to do with Nurses not being a "soft touch" as I stated above. no you stated something else Nope. I meant what I said. Anything else is YOU putting words in other people's mouths. And trust me when I say that every ER I ahve worked in, East, West, North and South has it's share of "frequent flyers"...system abusers just like you, Markie. more libel Nope. Fact. was it another power play? By saying "another" powert play, you're suggesting an ORIGINAL "power play". yea And it was...?!?!? What would have been the first. not sure what power play was the first you go on about so many You've not named one so far. sure have Your actions as VE in denieing a properly issued code waiver for one I am under NO responsibility to sign an application if I feel that the applicaiton would represent the submission of a falsified application. your efforts to control the posting of Todd, BB, Len and Me Oh make no doubts, Markie...I don't "control" them... I just have fun pointing out the patent lies, deceit and mistruths you four generate. And lord knows you four generate a lot! And people like you never "intimadate" anyone. Humor them, sure... not trying to intimadate I would not horn on your territory steve, not that you arre any good at it cutin spelling cop Still 33 1/3%, however this time you ever mispelled your mispelled word! I'm not trying to intimidate anyone, Markie. liar you admited to it in the post I am responding to No I didn't. sure did Sheesh. Where, Markie. WHERE did I say "I am trying to intimidate you", Markie? never said you stated that I siad you were doing it Sure you said I said it, Markie! QUOTE: I'm not trying to intimidate anyone, Markie. liar you admited to it in the post I am responding to UNQUOTE To "admit" to anything, I'd have to say or write it. Quote the line where you alledge I say "I am trying to intimidate you", Markie... no claim of such a an exact was ever made Oh, but it was! nope Sure it was! QUOTE I'm not trying to intimidate anyone, Markie. liar you admited to it in the post I am responding to UNQUOTE So...where's this alleged admission, Markie? in the post I was repsoning to as stated Nope. No quote = Markie Lying. nope Absolutely. No quote means you were making it up all along. You've rendered more than your fair share of laughs here! But you HAVE left us laughing! comenting on your words "Commenting" Haven't you haerd about what it means when you talk to yourself "heard" I am not "talking to (my)self"... I am talking ABOUT you. Still. now you are talking to yourself look at the lines It's not "talking to (my)self", Markie. It was pointing out that you're STILL a laughing stock! Steve, K4YZ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lennie Anderson...Self Destructive Or Just Doesn't Get It...?!?! | Policy | |||
Mode/Band Use in 1961 | Policy | |||
Lennie Steps In His Own Excrement Once Again | Policy | |||
Lennie Makes "Idiot" An Olympic Event | Policy | |||
Lennie's Double Standard Once Again Revealed...BY Lennie! | Policy |