Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
commander:
Still reading tea leaves and consulting with oracles I see... Gawd man, you are wasting your money! Actually, I am a super-spy for the CIA--like the hams here. grin John "Cmdr Buzz Corey" wrote in message ... John Smith wrote: N2EY: I was going to mention, the "commander" assisting you would do MUCH more harm than good... A "Thanks! But, NO thanks!" is probably the logical move... Says the no-license cber. |
#42
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#43
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
an_old_friend wrote:
wrote: Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: I live in the US was born Prague which was few conutieis ago over there Few what? few countiries ago as I said That's incorrect. What you said was "conutieis". Now, you've written "countiries". Want to go for "countries"? I could have reasonably deduced "countries" from your "countiries", but I would never have gotten it from "conutieis". It's still not clear that the word is "countries". not my problem Yes, Mark, it *is* your problem. You are unable to communicate your thoughts to others. If the word "countries" is correct, then we still have some problems with the meaning: "I live in the US was born Prague which was few [countries?] ago over there." Were you born *in* Prague? Did you really mean that Prague was a few countries ago? Prague still exists. Did you mean that Prague is in a different country than it used to be in? That would be correct, but it was only one country ago. It was in Czechoslovakia; now it is in the Czech Republic. How much chaff are we to go through to arrive at what you meant to convey? Mark's philosophy is that if you can't understand what he wrote, no matter how bolluxed up, it's *your* fault and *your* problem, not his. That's obviously illogical. not at all. you use exactly the same line of reasoning yourself I think I see one of your difficulties, Mark. You post gibberish which others cannot understand and others post in properly (for the most part) English which you are not able to understand. doesn't matter to you if I don't see your logic you just drive on and you have made a logical post in year on the subject code testing for example you don't care just drive on Your semi-sentence is incomprehensible. Dave K8MN |
#44
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: masive cut none if you like none was making you read anything None if I like none? What the hell is that supposed to mean? You mispell; you don't capitalize; you leave out all punctuation. yea so Not "yea" but "yeah". The "so" is that you often post material that is beyond comprehension. beyond yours find i would not be making that admission if I were you but suit yourself Your attempt at a sentence is gibberish, Mark. it means as I have said over and over don't read my stuff if you like *Nobody* can read much of the material you post. It is gibberish. gee stevie can when he wants and others as well There are times when you write a nearly-comprehensible thought. Those times are rare. as to that being one country ago I disagree but I can always count on you to beat dead horses I note that none of my questions was answered and that the matter hasn't been cleared up at all by you. nah your problem is you didn't like the answers you and stevie have that in comon, you don't get the answer you wnat you get insulting and abusive it gets boring Mark, let us be clear. There were *no* answers. You didn't answer questions about the words or what meaning they were supposed to have. You clear about what that you are as controling as stevie I answered your questions you just don'tlike the answers You still have not answered the questions about what you meant to convey. Perhaps you thought you did so. You were wrong. that is your problem not mine No, Mark, it is still *your* problem. You aren't able to communicate with others by use of the written word. If you write gibberish and then refuse to explain it, you can't claim abuse (though I get the idea that a fellow such as yourself, a guy with masochistic leanings, might enjoy that). wrong I certianly can and do as you note so I guess we can chalk that one up in the Lie catagory 1. You write gibberish. That is not a lie. 2. You were questioned about what you wrote and what it was supposed to mean. That is not a lie. 3. You write crap which others can't understand and you've claimed "abuse" when someone tells you so. That is not a lie. Dave K8MN |
#45
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Heil wrote:
I think I see one of your difficulties, Mark. You post gibberish which others cannot understand and others post in properly (for the most part) English which you are not able to understand. And mark the idiot, thinks it is everyone else's' fault. |
#46
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: Dave Heil on Jul 29, 12:36 pm
an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: Your attempt at a sentence is gibberish, Mark. No problem...Gruppenfuhrer Heil's attempts at "discussion" turn into personal insults against all who reply to him (with the exception of PCTA extras, that is). There are times when you write a nearly-comprehensible thought. Those times are rare. There are very few times when Herr Gruppenfuhrer Heil's "replies" are anything other than personal insults. You still have not answered the questions about what you meant to convey. Perhaps you thought you did so. You were wrong. Oh, oh...self-promotion to a JUDGE of ALL. "Heah come de judge, heah come de judge!" No, Mark, it is still *your* problem. You aren't able to communicate with others by use of the written word. Tsk. Fearless Leader speaks! Can we understand, your holiness, that all MUST make fun of those with dyslexia? Apparantly that is the RULE in here. [or is it RILE instead?] 1. You write gibberish. That is not a lie. You've written personal insults to people who disagree with you. That is not a lie. 2. You were questioned about what you wrote and what it was supposed to mean. That is not a lie. You've been questioned about what you wrote and what it was supposed to mean...you've only responded with personal insults to those who have disagreed with you. That is not a lie. 3. You write crap which others can't understand and you've claimed "abuse" when someone tells you so. That is not a lie. So? You write CRAP (merde, ****, whatever) which only PCTA extras can understand and claimed that NCTAs "abuse" you, therefore "justifying" your personal insults against them. That is not a lie. Have fun making fun at others' expense, Herr Gruppenfuhrer. That is your nature, apparently. You are a God of Radio and JUDGE over all others who don't agree with you. Charming behavior. Not. bit bit |
#47
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
commander:
Let us, just for the sake of argument, that mark was in line for an "Idiot Award" (proving he has a high dislike for politics), you would be runner up--indeed, that race for a winner could easily end up in a tie! John "Cmdr Buzz Corey" wrote in message ... Dave Heil wrote: I think I see one of your difficulties, Mark. You post gibberish which others cannot understand and others post in properly (for the most part) English which you are not able to understand. And mark the idiot, thinks it is everyone else's' fault. |
#48
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: large cut If you write gibberish and then refuse to explain it, you can't claim abuse (though I get the idea that a fellow such as yourself, a guy with masochistic leanings, might enjoy that). wrong I certianly can and do as you note so I guess we can chalk that one up in the Lie catagory 1. You write gibberish. That is not a lie. which has no relationship to my reply 2. You were questioned about what you wrote and what it was supposed to mean. That is not a lie. and none their either 3. You write crap which others can't understand and you've claimed "abuse" when someone tells you so. That is not a lie. I did not say that either I said I could claim abuse if I liked, I did not in fact make any such claim You lied when you siad I could not claim abuse. I can certainly claim abuse anytime I wish, any statement by you or anyone else is a lie I count 4-6 replies (today) where you go on and on about your inabilty to read my stuff, then do yourself a kindness and don't try If it is realy beyond your ken then don't bother. I'll not be offended in the least OTOH just becuase you ask me something doesn't mean I have to answer at all or in the manner you choose Your effort to try and "make" me are clearly abusive Dave K8MN |
#49
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() John Smith wrote: commander: Let us, just for the sake of argument, that mark was in line for an "Idiot Award" (proving he has a high dislike for politics), you would be runner up--indeed, that race for a winner could easily end up in a tie! I don't I qualify your idiot award having worked a state politcal office of the Log Cabin Republicans I think I am barred from any "award" involving a dislike of politics John "Cmdr Buzz Corey" wrote in message ... Dave Heil wrote: I think I see one of your difficulties, Mark. You post gibberish which others cannot understand and others post in properly (for the most part) English which you are not able to understand. And mark the idiot, thinks it is everyone else's' fault. |
#50
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Use a Pool Cage As An Antenna? | Antenna | |||
Question Pool vs Book Larnin' | Policy | |||
The Pool | Policy | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | General | |||
REQ:latest Ham University with curent tech pool willing to share?/sell cheep | Equipment |