an_old_friend wrote:

Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

wrote:


Dave Heil wrote:


an_old_friend wrote:


Dave Heil wrote:


an_old_friend wrote:

I live in the US was born Prague which was few conutieis ago over there

Few what?

few countiries ago as I said

That's incorrect. What you said was "conutieis". Now, you've written
"countiries". Want to go for "countries"?

How about a spell checker? Or maybe just some proofreading?


already answered a dozen or so times



I could have reasonably deduced "countries" from your "countiries", but
I would never have gotten it from "conutieis".

It's still not clear that the word is "countries".


not my problem

Wrong, your stupidity is your problem. As said before, you can't even
put together a clear sentence that can be understood, and then you blame
everyone else because they can't understand you gibbrish. Again, dumber
than a bowl of dirt.


then don't read it buzz nobody is making you

You miss the point, Mark. Nobody can read some of the stuff you post.
If you dispense with spelling, capitalization and punctuation, why post
at all? Who wants to read the ramblings of an illiterate?

Dave K8MN

"Dave Heil" wrote

Who wants to read the ramblings of an illiterate?

The ILA ("Illiterate Legion of America") is insulted that you'd call Mark an
illiterate.

K=D8HB wrote:
"Dave Heil" wrote

Who wants to read the ramblings of an illiterate?

The ILA ("Illiterate Legion of America") is insulted that you'd call Mark=
an
illiterate.

Must be in the water...

I just got a phone call from the "Idiot's Defense League" and they
say they'll sue if I keep associating Markie with idiots...I asked them
what they suggested, and they said that whatever adjective I would
choose to use, "idiot" was just too good for him.

Just goes to show ya...

73

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ:

The original greek meaning of "idiot" was a person not interested in
politics... that is my intent when I use that word--hate those damn
"non-political freaks!" grin

John

"K4YZ" wrote in message
ups.com...


KØHB wrote:
"Dave Heil" wrote

Who wants to read the ramblings of an illiterate?

The ILA ("Illiterate Legion of America") is insulted that you'd call Mark an
illiterate.

Must be in the water...

I just got a phone call from the "Idiot's Defense League" and they
say they'll sue if I keep associating Markie with idiots...I asked them
what they suggested, and they said that whatever adjective I would
choose to use, "idiot" was just too good for him.

Just goes to show ya...

73

Steve, K4YZ

From: "John Smith" on Wed 27 Jul 2005 17:51

N2EY:

I predict, because of this new threat which will disclose the sheer simplicity
of amateur radio, the old hams will rally-up with a burst of new energy and
surprise us all....

I think a new (re-discovered really) technology will be developed by the hams,
in a joint effort of all classes, to develop and perfect the arcane lost
knowledge of reincarnation.

Dead hams will arise from their graves, grab keys and re-new old expired sk
licenses.

Element 1 shall never pass from this earth!

RADIO HAM MORSE CODE ZOMBIES LORDS OF THE WIND! [working title]

Soon to be a Major Motion Picture, produced by Dreamworks SKG!

Hollywood finally beat the New Zealanders at something!

Read all about it in Hollywood Reporter and Daily Variety!

bip bap

K4YZ wrote:

KØHB wrote:

"Dave Heil" wrote


Who wants to read the ramblings of an illiterate?

The ILA ("Illiterate Legion of America") is insulted that you'd call Mark an
illiterate.


Must be in the water...

I just got a phone call from the "Idiot's Defense League" and they
say they'll sue if I keep associating Markie with idiots...I asked them
what they suggested, and they said that whatever adjective I would
choose to use, "idiot" was just too good for him.

Just goes to show ya...

It must have slipped your mind that Mark is not an idiot. He is an idoit.

Dave K8MN

I just got a phone call from the "Idiot's Defense League" and they
say they'll sue if I keep associating Markie with idiots...I asked them
what they suggested, and they said that whatever adjective I would
choose to use, "idiot" was just too good for him.


There's "moron" but I don't know if that's a step up
or a step down.... ;-)

Dave Heil wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:

Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

wrote:


Dave Heil wrote:


an_old_friend wrote:


Dave Heil wrote:


an_old_friend wrote:

I live in the US was born Prague which was few conutieis ago over there

Few what?

few countiries ago as I said

That's incorrect. What you said was "conutieis". Now, you've written
"countiries". Want to go for "countries"?

How about a spell checker? Or maybe just some proofreading?


already answered a dozen or so times



I could have reasonably deduced "countries" from your "countiries", but
I would never have gotten it from "conutieis".

It's still not clear that the word is "countries".


not my problem

Wrong, your stupidity is your problem. As said before, you can't even
put together a clear sentence that can be understood, and then you blame
everyone else because they can't understand you gibbrish. Again, dumber
than a bowl of dirt.


then don't read it buzz nobody is making you

You miss the point, Mark. Nobody can read some of the stuff
you post.

Any literate person can read it. Making sense out of it is
another matter.

If you dispense with spelling, capitalization and punctuation, why post at all?

Here's a theory, Dave: It's done to antagonize the reader. As a
way for the writer to insult the reader, by saying the reader
is unworthy of the effort required to write understandably.

Who wants to read the ramblings of an illiterate?

The point is that you and others bother to read the gibberish
and comment on it at length.

73 de Jim, N2EY

wrote in message
ups.com...
Dave Heil wrote:

If you dispense with spelling, capitalization and punctuation, why
post at all?

Here's a theory, Dave: It's done to antagonize the reader. As a
way for the writer to insult the reader, by saying the reader
is unworthy of the effort required to write understandably.

Who wants to read the ramblings of an illiterate?

The point is that you and others bother to read the gibberish
and comment on it at length.

73 de Jim, N2EY


Uh, yep. Dave writes the questions "who wants to read..." and yet, it's
apparent he's done so--at length--and responded to it as well. Although,
I've never seen Dave participate in any kind of post other than to be
contentious or attempt to flare some kind of superior attitude. Maybe I've
not taken notice, but I don't remember ever seeing a post from Dave that is
remotely technical in nature, or that isn't a cheap route to taking pot
shots at those he has issues with.

That's OK, though, maybe the newsgroup is sport for him... I like the
contention myself. I'd much rather debate with some spunk, but arguing and
slinging mud suits me well when I'm in the mood...

Kim W5TIT

wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:

Cmdr Buzz Corey wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:


cut
You miss the point, Mark. Nobody can read some of the stuff
you post.

Any literate person can read it. Making sense out of it is
another matter.

Jim I have been coutesous to on this but you are straining my ability
to do so

How can you use CW a medium completely without error correction and be
unable to work the meaning of simple text with the leasure of time and
the abilty to look at the context

People can follow my typing the first draft with no polishing turned
into CW on air and yet you claim you can't follow it in text

How is that possible?

Do you have an exaplintion why The level of difficulties for people in
reading my stuff here in this newsgroup declines as support for code
testing increases, indeedanywhere I post it seem that the abilty to
read and understands declines with the degree of their agreement

I frankly suspect that what the problem is, is simply that people like
Dave and it seems you don't want to understand and therefore seize on
any excuse not to do so


If you dispense with spelling, capitalization and punctuation, why post at all?

Here's a theory, Dave: It's done to antagonize the reader. As a
way for the writer to insult the reader, by saying the reader
is unworthy of the effort required to write understandably.

close Jim it is a reflection of the author opinion of the value of the
medium, usenet is unworthy of the effort, but I have said that before


Who wants to read the ramblings of an illiterate?

The point is that you and others bother to read the gibberish
and comment on it at length.

and that is an intersting point

73 de Jim, N2EY