an_old_friend wrote:

wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

I live in the US was born Prague which was few conutieis ago over there

Few what?

few countiries ago as I said

That's incorrect. What you said was "conutieis". Now, you've written
"countiries". Want to go for "countries"?

I could have reasonably deduced "countries" from your "countiries", but
I would never have gotten it from "conutieis".

It's still not clear that the word is "countries".


not my problem

Yes, Mark, it *is* your problem. You are unable to communicate your
thoughts to others.

If the word "countries" is correct, then we still have some problems
with the meaning:

"I live in the US was born Prague which was few [countries?] ago over
there."

Were you born *in* Prague? Did you really mean that Prague was a few
countries ago? Prague still exists. Did you mean that Prague is in a
different country than it used to be in? That would be correct, but it
was only one country ago. It was in Czechoslovakia; now it is in the
Czech Republic. How much chaff are we to go through to arrive at what
you meant to convey?

Mark's philosophy is that if you can't understand what he wrote,
no matter how bolluxed up, it's *your* fault and *your* problem,
not his. That's obviously illogical.


not at all. you use exactly the same line of reasoning yourself

I think I see one of your difficulties, Mark. You post gibberish which
others cannot understand and others post in properly (for the most part)
English which you are not able to understand.

doesn't matter to you if I don't see your logic you just drive on

and you have made a logical post in year on the subject code testing
for example you don't care just drive on

Your semi-sentence is incomprehensible.

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:


I think I see one of your difficulties, Mark. You post gibberish which
others cannot understand and others post in properly (for the most part)
English which you are not able to understand.


And mark the idiot, thinks it is everyone else's' fault.

commander:

Let us, just for the sake of argument, that mark was in line for an "Idiot
Award" (proving he has a high dislike for politics), you would be runner
up--indeed, that race for a winner could easily end up in a tie!

John

"Cmdr Buzz Corey" wrote in message
...
Dave Heil wrote:


I think I see one of your difficulties, Mark. You post gibberish which
others cannot understand and others post in properly (for the most part)
English which you are not able to understand.


And mark the idiot, thinks it is everyone else's' fault.

John Smith wrote:
commander:

Let us, just for the sake of argument, that mark was in line for an "Idiot
Award" (proving he has a high dislike for politics), you would be runner
up--indeed, that race for a winner could easily end up in a tie!

I don't I qualify your idiot award having worked a state politcal
office of the Log Cabin Republicans I think I am barred from any
"award" involving a dislike of politics

John

"Cmdr Buzz Corey" wrote in message
...
Dave Heil wrote:


I think I see one of your difficulties, Mark. You post gibberish which
others cannot understand and others post in properly (for the most part)
English which you are not able to understand.


And mark the idiot, thinks it is everyone else's' fault.

From: Dave Heil on Jul 29, 12:36 pm

an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:


Your attempt at a sentence is gibberish, Mark.

No problem...Gruppenfuhrer Heil's attempts at "discussion"
turn into personal insults against all who reply to him
(with the exception of PCTA extras, that is).


There are times when you write a nearly-comprehensible thought. Those
times are rare.

There are very few times when Herr Gruppenfuhrer Heil's
"replies" are anything other than personal insults.


You still have not answered the questions about what you meant to
convey. Perhaps you thought you did so. You were wrong.

Oh, oh...self-promotion to a JUDGE of ALL.

"Heah come de judge, heah come de judge!"

No, Mark, it is still *your* problem. You aren't able to communicate
with others by use of the written word.

Tsk. Fearless Leader speaks!

Can we understand, your holiness, that all MUST make fun of
those with dyslexia? Apparantly that is the RULE in here.
[or is it RILE instead?]


1. You write gibberish. That is not a lie.

You've written personal insults to people who disagree with
you. That is not a lie.

2. You were questioned about what you wrote and what it was supposed to
mean. That is not a lie.

You've been questioned about what you wrote and what it was
supposed to mean...you've only responded with personal insults
to those who have disagreed with you. That is not a lie.

3. You write crap which others can't understand and you've claimed
"abuse" when someone tells you so. That is not a lie.

So? You write CRAP (merde, ****, whatever) which only PCTA
extras can understand and claimed that NCTAs "abuse" you,
therefore "justifying" your personal insults against them.
That is not a lie.

Have fun making fun at others' expense, Herr Gruppenfuhrer.
That is your nature, apparently.

You are a God of Radio and JUDGE over all others who don't
agree with you. Charming behavior. Not.

bit bit

wrote:
From: Dave Heil on Jul 29, 12:36 pm


an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:



Your attempt at a sentence is gibberish, Mark.


No problem...

Sure it is a problem. It was gibberish before you came along with your
bag o' snot post and it is still gibberish.

Gruppenfuhrer Heil's attempts at "discussion"
turn into personal insults against all who reply to him
(with the exception of PCTA extras, that is).

Why do you suppose that Bill Sohl is able to disagree with PCTA Extra
Class licensees and still not be insulted? Do you think it might be
that his manner is different than yours?



There are times when you write a nearly-comprehensible thought. Those
times are rare.


There are very few times when Herr Gruppenfuhrer Heil's
"replies" are anything other than personal insults.

Spoken like an expert on the subject, Mr. Carbon Obnoxide.



You still have not answered the questions about what you meant to
convey. Perhaps you thought you did so. You were wrong.


Oh, oh...self-promotion to a JUDGE of ALL.

"Heah come de judge, heah come de judge!"


No, Mark, it is still *your* problem. You aren't able to communicate
with others by use of the written word.


Tsk. Fearless Leader speaks!

Can we understand, your holiness, that all MUST make fun of
those with dyslexia? Apparantly that is the RULE in here.
[or is it RILE instead?]

Why, absolutely not, Leonid! I'm only dealing with a dyslexic who
refuses to use available tools to enable him to better communicate using
the written word. You know--the guy who claims that his gibberish is
everyone else's problem.



1. You write gibberish. That is not a lie.


You've written personal insults to people who disagree with
you. That is not a lie.

Your insulting posts to those who disagree with you outnumber any I've
written by five or six to one.

2. You were questioned about what you wrote and what it was supposed to
mean. That is not a lie.


You've been questioned about what you wrote and what it was
supposed to mean...you've only responded with personal insults
to those who have disagreed with you. That is not a lie.

See my response above.

3. You write crap which others can't understand and you've claimed
"abuse" when someone tells you so. That is not a lie.


So? You write CRAP (merde, ****, whatever) which only PCTA
extras can understand and claimed that NCTAs "abuse" you,
therefore "justifying" your personal insults against them.
That is not a lie.

Bzzzzz! Sorry, that *is* a lie.

Have fun making fun at others' expense, Herr Gruppenfuhrer.
That is your nature, apparently.

Swell, Mr. Carbon Obnoxide.

You are a God of Radio and JUDGE over all others who don't
agree with you. Charming behavior. Not.

Oh? Those personalities inhabiting the body of Leonard H. Anderson have
reached a consenus on whether I am or am not a Radio God? They've been
divided for several years now.

You are a licensed radio amateur. Not.

Dave K8MN