an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:


an_old_friend wrote:


Dave Heil wrote:

masive cut



none if you like none was making you read anything

None if I like none? What the hell is that supposed to mean? You
mispell; you don't capitalize; you leave out all punctuation.


yea so

Not "yea" but "yeah". The "so" is that you often post material that is
beyond comprehension.


beyond yours find i would not be making that admission if I were you
but suit yourself

Your attempt at a sentence is gibberish, Mark.


it means as I have said over and over
don't read my stuff if you like

*Nobody* can read much of the material you post. It is gibberish.


gee stevie can when he wants and others as well

There are times when you write a nearly-comprehensible thought. Those
times are rare.


as to that being one country ago I disagree but I can always count on
you to beat dead horses

I note that none of my questions was answered and that the matter hasn't
been cleared up at all by you.


nah your problem is you didn't like the answers you and stevie have
that in comon, you don't get the answer you wnat you get insulting and
abusive it gets boring

Mark, let us be clear. There were *no* answers. You didn't answer
questions about the words or what meaning they were supposed to have.


You clear about what that you are as controling as stevie I answered
your questions you just don'tlike the answers

You still have not answered the questions about what you meant to
convey. Perhaps you thought you did so. You were wrong.

that is your problem not mine

No, Mark, it is still *your* problem. You aren't able to communicate
with others by use of the written word.

If you write gibberish and then refuse to explain it, you can't claim
abuse (though I get the idea that a fellow such as yourself, a guy with
masochistic leanings, might enjoy that).


wrong I certianly can and do as you note so I guess we can chalk that
one up in the Lie catagory

1. You write gibberish. That is not a lie.
2. You were questioned about what you wrote and what it was supposed to

mean. That is not a lie.
3. You write crap which others can't understand and you've claimed

"abuse" when someone tells you so. That is not a lie.


Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:

Dave Heil wrote:

an_old_friend wrote:


large cut

If you write gibberish and then refuse to explain it, you can't claim
abuse (though I get the idea that a fellow such as yourself, a guy with
masochistic leanings, might enjoy that).


wrong I certianly can and do as you note so I guess we can chalk that
one up in the Lie catagory

1. You write gibberish. That is not a lie.

which has no relationship to my reply

2. You were questioned about what you wrote and what it was supposed to

mean. That is not a lie.

and none their either

3. You write crap which others can't understand and you've claimed

"abuse" when someone tells you so. That is not a lie.

I did not say that either

I said I could claim abuse if I liked, I did not in fact make any such
claim

You lied when you siad I could not claim abuse. I can certainly claim
abuse anytime I wish, any statement by you or anyone else is a lie

I count 4-6 replies (today) where you go on and on about your inabilty
to read my stuff,

then do yourself a kindness and don't try

If it is realy beyond your ken then don't bother. I'll not be offended
in the least

OTOH just becuase you ask me something doesn't mean I have to answer at
all or in the manner you choose

Your effort to try and "make" me are clearly abusive


Dave K8MN