Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ham Radio has a well-regarded position in society as the
nest from which the engineers of the country fledge; but what is its position today; and, do we wish to do anything about that tradition? 1. We have a privileged position in that we are authorised both to make and also to operate our own transmitters. No-one else has the privileges of both and hence we are in a unique position. Do we wish to preserve this status quo, or, are we happy that our numbers are increasingly over-run by CB types, by which category I mean those who buy their rigs ready-made off-the-shelf and even send them back when minor repairs are needed? 2. Ham Radio has traditions of international gentlemanliness, but you might think otherwise from reading these NG. The foul-mouthed infantile temper tantrum is an increasing problem, and, as such, it reflects badly upon us. Do we wish this to continue, or should we set ourselves firmly apart from such people AND REFUSE EVEN TO DISCOURSE WITH THEM, THESE CHILDISH BROADCASTERS (CBERS), IN THESE NG? 3. The self-styled "national" society, in Britland at least, is going through a financial crisis as the _REAL_ Radio Hams leave in their droves when faced with an influx of what can only be described as CBers. (How else can you describe a 6-year-old licensee who does not have the mathematical skill set to deal with decimals, let alone the elementary transpositions that are necessary to deal with Ohm's Law?). Do we wish to have a society that represents the technical aficionado that is the _REAL_ Radio Ham? In short, do we simply stand by whilst the Mongolian Hordes of Ne'er-Do-Wells destroy what we and out predecessors have setup? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What's all this childish, long running fuss about?
There's nothing whatever to prevent radio hams from carrying on in their traditional, relatively well-ordered, self-disciplined ways. There's plenty of room on the bands to share with a little more QRM. And CB-ers cannot possibly interfere with use of soldering irons on the kitchen table. There always has been obstruction by the XYL. Just give it time and the more unruly band users will either fall into line or change hobby to tropical fish. ---- Reg, G4FGQ |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You mean the intellectual MINNOWS who dare to
appROACH our high PERCHES and have the auDACE-ity to CARP that they are our equals despite that they are PIKEys? Perhaps you meant freshwater fish? "Reg Edwards" wrote in message ... Just give it time and the more unruly band users will either fall into line or change hobby to tropical fish. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Reg Edwards" wrote in message ... What's all this childish, long running fuss about? There's nothing whatever to prevent radio hams from carrying on in their traditional, relatively well-ordered, self-disciplined ways. There's plenty of room on the bands to share with a little more QRM. And CB-ers cannot possibly interfere with use of soldering irons on the kitchen table. There always has been obstruction by the XYL. Just give it time and the more unruly band users will either fall into line or change hobby to tropical fish. ---- Reg, G4FGQ Can anyone tell me what the length my Koi Carp has to be to be resonant across 40 metres? Andy MW0GUV |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Polymath wrote: Ham Radio has a well-regarded position in society as the nest from which the engineers of the country fledge; but what is its position today; and, do we wish to do anything about that tradition? 1. We have a privileged position in that we are authorised both to make and also to operate our own transmitters. No-one else has the privileges of both and hence we are in a unique position. Do we wish to preserve this status quo, or, are we happy that our numbers are increasingly over-run by CB types, by which category I mean those who buy their rigs ready-made off-the-shelf and even send them back when minor repairs are needed? No one is required to build to their sets (at least no license that I aware there are some odd byways in theworld) and the we do get tired of the whining about how you used to have to blow the galls for your own tubes over a hot fire 2. Ham Radio has traditions of international gentlemanliness, but you might think otherwise from reading these NG. The foul-mouthed infantile temper tantrum is an increasing problem, and, as such, it reflects badly upon us. Do the foul mouths and most infantile tempers are amoug those Old time hams whoose passing your seem too lament we wish this to continue, or should we set ourselves firmly apart from such people AND REFUSE EVEN TO DISCOURSE WITH THEM, THESE CHILDISH BROADCASTERS (CBERS), IN THESE NG? 3. The self-styled "national" society, in Britland at least, is going through a financial crisis as the _REAL_ Radio Hams leave in their droves when faced and you know these hams are leaving for these reason how? Maybe like myself leaving the ARRL they are simply fed up with the entrenched interests there trying to kill the ARS with an influx of what can only be described as CBers. (How else can you describe a 6-year-old licensee who does not have the mathematical skill set to as a Ham radio operator of course deal with decimals, let alone the elementary transpositions that are necessary to deal with Ohm's Law?). Do we wish to have a society that represents the technical aficionado that is the _REAL_ Radio Ham? In short, do we simply stand by whilst the Mongolian Hordes of Ne'er-Do-Wells destroy what we and out predecessors have setup? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "an old friend" wrote in message oups.com... Please don't include poly wallys crap in your posts, I have him tucked nicely away in my killfile and have no wish to read his twaddle. Thanks Andy MW0GUV |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Nedlar " Nedlar wrote in message ... On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 13:45:28 +0100, "MW0GUV" wrote: Can anyone tell me what the length my Koi Carp has to be to be resonant across 40 metres? Andy MW0GUV Twice the width of your mouth. You are an idiot and a coward Andy MW0GUV |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "MW0GUV" wrote in message ... Can anyone tell me what the length my Koi Carp has to be to be resonant across 40 metres? I think you will find that resonance ACROSS the 40 mt. band is relative to the "girth" of the fish rather than length. Yours piscatorially KW. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Polymath:
You don't need CW to build a transmitter, calm down, take the meds, it will be ok... John "Polymath" wrote in message ... Ham Radio has a well-regarded position in society as the nest from which the engineers of the country fledge; but what is its position today; and, do we wish to do anything about that tradition? 1. We have a privileged position in that we are authorised both to make and also to operate our own transmitters. No-one else has the privileges of both and hence we are in a unique position. Do we wish to preserve this status quo, or, are we happy that our numbers are increasingly over-run by CB types, by which category I mean those who buy their rigs ready-made off-the-shelf and even send them back when minor repairs are needed? 2. Ham Radio has traditions of international gentlemanliness, but you might think otherwise from reading these NG. The foul-mouthed infantile temper tantrum is an increasing problem, and, as such, it reflects badly upon us. Do we wish this to continue, or should we set ourselves firmly apart from such people AND REFUSE EVEN TO DISCOURSE WITH THEM, THESE CHILDISH BROADCASTERS (CBERS), IN THESE NG? 3. The self-styled "national" society, in Britland at least, is going through a financial crisis as the _REAL_ Radio Hams leave in their droves when faced with an influx of what can only be described as CBers. (How else can you describe a 6-year-old licensee who does not have the mathematical skill set to deal with decimals, let alone the elementary transpositions that are necessary to deal with Ohm's Law?). Do we wish to have a society that represents the technical aficionado that is the _REAL_ Radio Ham? In short, do we simply stand by whilst the Mongolian Hordes of Ne'er-Do-Wells destroy what we and out predecessors have setup? |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Reg:
Thank you for attempting to restore some sanity here... However, don't be disappointed if your logic, common sense and decades of experience is wasted here--seems these fellows won't take the psyche meds and are believing the "visions" occurring in their minds... John "Reg Edwards" wrote in message ... What's all this childish, long running fuss about? There's nothing whatever to prevent radio hams from carrying on in their traditional, relatively well-ordered, self-disciplined ways. There's plenty of room on the bands to share with a little more QRM. And CB-ers cannot possibly interfere with use of soldering irons on the kitchen table. There always has been obstruction by the XYL. Just give it time and the more unruly band users will either fall into line or change hobby to tropical fish. ---- Reg, G4FGQ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|