Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#31
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
My own comments
To the persons reading comments for the FCC greetings, With regard to main body of the NPRM I am a favor of dropping all code tests at once, however there are a few points concerning related matters I wish to discuss and respect insist that FCC made something on these points clear when the R&O is issued. The privileges of the entry class, Technician, after this action are frankly unclear to me. As perhaps one of the few members of that class making comments it is a subject near and dear to my heart. It is also a question vital to the future of the ARS, and thus in some degree the safety and future of the USA. I believe the privileges should be what was known as Before the 1998 NPRM as Tech plus, this si because I have frankly observed that many new Techs tend to get struck on FM repeaters, a fine mode but hard to break out of, and being hard to break out tends to depress the chances that they will, ( I refer the FCC to prices on allmode rigs with VHF frequencies compared to FM rigs) In addition to issues of cost with the propagation of VHF there are many times that there is no one out there that a novice operator can find and work. From personal experience, I can tell you that this is a hard thing to do, and thus tends to imped the progress of the Techs and separate them from the rest of the ARS. This separation is not god for the ARS or it abilities to serve in the public interest . |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
an_old_friend wrote:
My own comments To the persons reading comments for the FCC greetings, With regard to main body of the NPRM I am a favor of dropping all code tests at once, however there are a few points concerning related matters I wish to discuss and respect insist that FCC made something on these points clear when the R&O is issued. The privileges of the entry class, Technician, after this action are frankly unclear to me. As perhaps one of the few members of that class making comments it is a subject near and dear to my heart. It is also a question vital to the future of the ARS, and thus in some degree the safety and future of the USA. I believe the privileges should be what was known as Before the 1998 NPRM as Tech plus, this si because I have frankly observed that many new Techs tend to get struck on FM repeaters, a fine mode but hard to break out of, and being hard to break out tends to depress the chances that they will, ( I refer the FCC to prices on allmode rigs with VHF frequencies compared to FM rigs) In addition to issues of cost with the propagation of VHF there are many times that there is no one out there that a novice operator can find and work. From personal experience, I can tell you that this is a hard thing to do, and thus tends to imped the progress of the Techs and separate them from the rest of the ARS. This separation is not god for the ARS or it abilities to serve in the public interest . Where's that pool of typists when you really need it? Dave K8MN |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: My own comments To the persons reading comments for the FCC greetings, With regard to main body of the NPRM I am a favor of dropping all code tests at once, however there are a few points concerning related matters I wish to discuss and respect insist that FCC made something on these points clear when the R&O is issued. The privileges of the entry class, Technician, after this action are frankly unclear to me. As perhaps one of the few members of that class making comments it is a subject near and dear to my heart. It is also a question vital to the future of the ARS, and thus in some degree the safety and future of the USA. I believe the privileges should be what was known as Before the 1998 NPRM as Tech plus, this si because I have frankly observed that many new Techs tend to get struck on FM repeaters, a fine mode but hard to break out of, and being hard to break out tends to depress the chances that they will, ( I refer the FCC to prices on allmode rigs with VHF frequencies compared to FM rigs) In addition to issues of cost with the propagation of VHF there are many times that there is no one out there that a novice operator can find and work. From personal experience, I can tell you that this is a hard thing to do, and thus tends to imped the progress of the Techs and separate them from the rest of the ARS. This separation is not god for the ARS or it abilities to serve in the public interest . Where's that pool of typists when you really need it? Dave K8MN Dave, are you volunteering for 702 duty? |
#34
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an_old_friend wrote: b.b. wrote: an old friend wrote: b.b. wrote: an old friend wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: I sure hope you are kidding. If this is real ..... well, it staggers the imagination. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA I doubt it but then I suspect that He or Dave of another ProCoder submitted that coment, simliar stuff happen in the last round's NPRM It looks like the work of a disgruntled PCTA Extra, such as Bruce/WA8ULX. That Steve would be sucked in by it's idiotic simplicity speaks volumes. It is called "willing suspenion of Disbelief" stevie so wants to believe that is the general sort of person that opposes code testing and so he jumps at it It is sad realy but the FCC will see right though it Most of these not-so old-timers have lost it. Just like Dave can't understand that "OSOSOSOSOSOSOSOSOS" just might be a distress call. I pity the units that he supposedly served. wonder what they do with transmision "ayday...ayday ...ayday...b9wdy...lling...ayday" the dots being static, something liek sorry ole boy we migh help you when you fix your radio They walk down the hall to the vending machine and by a bag of chips. Indeed If truely stuck and needing help but with a big batery Id just send ...---...--- and hope for the best at interavals as long that battery would still make sparks but Dave and prehaps a good many other MMM would not help me Dave is special, but not unique. |
#35
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
b.b. wrote:
Dave Heil wrote: an_old_friend wrote: My own comments To the persons reading comments for the FCC greetings, With regard to main body of the NPRM I am a favor of dropping all code tests at once, however there are a few points concerning related matters I wish to discuss and respect insist that FCC made something on these points clear when the R&O is issued. The privileges of the entry class, Technician, after this action are frankly unclear to me. As perhaps one of the few members of that class making comments it is a subject near and dear to my heart. It is also a question vital to the future of the ARS, and thus in some degree the safety and future of the USA. I believe the privileges should be what was known as Before the 1998 NPRM as Tech plus, this si because I have frankly observed that many new Techs tend to get struck on FM repeaters, a fine mode but hard to break out of, and being hard to break out tends to depress the chances that they will, ( I refer the FCC to prices on allmode rigs with VHF frequencies compared to FM rigs) In addition to issues of cost with the propagation of VHF there are many times that there is no one out there that a novice operator can find and work. From personal experience, I can tell you that this is a hard thing to do, and thus tends to imped the progress of the Techs and separate them from the rest of the ARS. This separation is not god for the ARS or it abilities to serve in the public interest . Where's that pool of typists when you really need it? Dave K8MN Dave, are you volunteering for 702 duty? To assist Mark? No way. He had a pool of trained typists at his beck and call and has turned down a job paying nearly a quarter million per year. I'd have thought that he'd have run his comments through his staff. Dave K8MN |
#36
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
b.b. wrote:
an_old_friend wrote: b.b. wrote: an old friend wrote: b.b. wrote: an old friend wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: I sure hope you are kidding. If this is real ..... well, it staggers the imagination. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA I doubt it but then I suspect that He or Dave of another ProCoder submitted that coment, simliar stuff happen in the last round's NPRM It looks like the work of a disgruntled PCTA Extra, such as Bruce/WA8ULX. That Steve would be sucked in by it's idiotic simplicity speaks volumes. It is called "willing suspenion of Disbelief" stevie so wants to believe that is the general sort of person that opposes code testing and so he jumps at it It is sad realy but the FCC will see right though it Most of these not-so old-timers have lost it. Just like Dave can't understand that "OSOSOSOSOSOSOSOSOS" just might be a distress call. I pity the units that he supposedly served. wonder what they do with transmision "ayday...ayday ...ayday...b9wdy...lling...ayday" the dots being static, something liek sorry ole boy we migh help you when you fix your radio They walk down the hall to the vending machine and by a bag of chips. Indeed If truely stuck and needing help but with a big batery Id just send ...---...--- and hope for the best... Those who heard this transmission would no doubt think that things were so so. Dave K8MN |
#37
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave Heil wrote: To assist Mark? No way. He had a pool of trained typists at his beck and call and has turned down a job paying nearly a quarter million per year. I'd have thought that he'd have run his comments through his staff. thinking not realy your strong suit No staff I hire out of a pool when i choose to pay for the temps, I choose not to pay for the temps Dave K8MN |
#38
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave Heil wrote: b.b. wrote: an_old_friend wrote: b.b. wrote: an old friend wrote: b.b. wrote: an old friend wrote: Jim Hampton wrote: I sure hope you are kidding. If this is real ..... well, it staggers the imagination. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA I doubt it but then I suspect that He or Dave of another ProCoder submitted that coment, simliar stuff happen in the last round's NPRM It looks like the work of a disgruntled PCTA Extra, such as Bruce/WA8ULX. That Steve would be sucked in by it's idiotic simplicity speaks volumes. It is called "willing suspenion of Disbelief" stevie so wants to believe that is the general sort of person that opposes code testing and so he jumps at it It is sad realy but the FCC will see right though it Most of these not-so old-timers have lost it. Just like Dave can't understand that "OSOSOSOSOSOSOSOSOS" just might be a distress call. I pity the units that he supposedly served. wonder what they do with transmision "ayday...ayday ...ayday...b9wdy...lling...ayday" the dots being static, something liek sorry ole boy we migh help you when you fix your radio They walk down the hall to the vending machine and by a bag of chips. Indeed If truely stuck and needing help but with a big batery Id just send ...---...--- and hope for the best... Those who heard this transmission would no doubt think that things were so so. indeed proving the devotion of the Procoders to the aiding of others Dave K8MN |
#39
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an_old_friend wrote: My own comments To the persons reading comments for the FCC greetings, With regard to main body of the NPRM I am a favor of dropping all code tests at once, however there are a few points concerning related matters I wish to discuss and respect insist that FCC made something on these points clear when the R&O is issued. Started off strong, Mark. But then your mouth over ran common sense and you started rambling again. E N G L I S H C O M P O S I T I O N The privileges of the entry class, Technician, after this action are frankly unclear to me. I guess you missed the part where the FCC said it was dismissing all those other petitions and was focusing on the Code issue at the moment. As perhaps one of the few members of that class making comments it is a subject near and dear to my heart. Also guess you haven't been paying attention to some of the demographics of the respondents. You are far and away from being "...one of the few...", Mark... It is also a question vital to the future of the ARS, and thus in some degree the safety and future of the USA. Let's see if Lennie ahs the same Field Day with THAT as he does anytime any of the REST of us suggest even the remotest degree of importance or relevance of the Amateur Radio Service... I believe the privileges should be what was known as Before the 1998 NPRM as Tech plus, this si because I have frankly observed that many new Techs tend to get struck on FM repeaters, a fine mode but hard to break out of, and being hard to break out tends to depress the chances that they will, ( I refer the FCC to prices on allmode rigs with VHF frequencies compared to FM rigs) In addition to issues of cost with the propagation of VHF there are many times that there is no one out there that a novice operator can find and work. Congratulations. 104 words before you managed to get a period in there. And the FCC could care less about the price of radios. From personal experience...(SNIP) Goat sacrifice counts here? I can tell you that this is a hard thing to do, and thus tends to imped the progress of the Techs and separate them from the rest of the ARS. The only thing that impedes ANY licensee from operating on ANY band or mode is just DOING it. I know several NCT's who rarely touch a 2 meter rig. This separation is not god for the ARS or it abilities to serve in the public interest . Signing this comment with an Amateur Radio callsign will be even WORSE for the Amateur Service. Steve, K4YZ |
#40
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an old friend wrote: Dave Heil wrote: b.b. wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Indeed If truely stuck and needing help but with a big batery Id just send ...---...--- and hope for the best... Those who heard this transmission would no doubt think that things were so so. indeed proving the devotion of the Procoders to the aiding of others Whoa right there, Mark...... (1) Dave was, again, correct. What you typed was "SOSO" (2) You've already demonstrated that you WON'T help yourself despite having acknowledged that numerous resources are at your disposal and within your capabilites to use and implement. So why would Dave (or anyone else, for that matter..??) waste any time on you for anything? (3) As for "procoders" aiding others, I have "elmered" and/or proctored tests for dozens of folks and helped who-knows-how-many folks ON the radio...regardless of thier class of license. You've "helped"...how many...?!?! Steve, K4YZ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |