N9OGL wrote:
First off I'm not a "fag" nor do I live in my parent's basment.

I wouldn't use the word "fag"...That is to gay people like the "N"
word is to African-Americans. However you are gay AND living at home
with mommy and daddy at the age of 37.

Next
###hole, and I know it will be hard for you to understand with what
little to no brains you have, it was my LPTV applications that were
dismissed because they were not filed during the filing window. The
problem is I had a waiver with all my applications and there is no
filing windows for waivers. Waivers can be filed at anytime and the
courts have stated repeativly that the FCC MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS.

And I am sure they did. Rumour has it that they don't get too
many applications written in crayon with "GIMME MY ####ING LICENSE YOU
MOTHER####ING ###HOLES".

That they denied your license was in the best public interest on
soooooo many levels...

So believe what you and bitches want, the FCC are a bunch of lying
###holes. They go to court claiming all a person has to do is apply for
a license and ask for a waiver, but those SCUMBAGS AT THE FCC don't
consider waivers and as I've stated a BUNCH OF LYING ###HOLES!!!!!

And again, I bet they DID consider your license AND waiver, and
then came to the conclusion that all of us here have...That you're a
ranting, irresponsible, immature little punk who was NOT to be trusted
with the public interest.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
First off I'm not a "fag" nor do I live in my parent's basment.

I wouldn't use the word "fag"...That is to gay people like the "N"
word is to African-Americans. However you are gay AND living at home
with mommy and daddy at the age of 37.

and you are comiting Libel


Next
###hole, and I know it will be hard for you to understand with what
little to no brains you have, it was my LPTV applications that were
dismissed because they were not filed during the filing window. The
problem is I had a waiver with all my applications and there is no
filing windows for waivers. Waivers can be filed at anytime and the
courts have stated repeativly that the FCC MUST CONSIDER WAIVERS.

And I am sure they did. Rumour has it that they don't get too
many applications written in crayon with "GIMME MY ####ING LICENSE YOU
MOTHER####ING ###HOLES".

That they denied your license was in the best public interest on
soooooo many levels...

So believe what you and bitches want, the FCC are a bunch of lying
###holes. They go to court claiming all a person has to do is apply for
a license and ask for a waiver, but those SCUMBAGS AT THE FCC don't
consider waivers and as I've stated a BUNCH OF LYING ###HOLES!!!!!

And again, I bet they DID consider your license AND waiver, and
then came to the conclusion that all of us here have...That you're a
ranting, irresponsible, immature little punk who was NOT to be trusted
with the public interest

Steve, K4YZ

So they considered your waivers and turned you down, just like they
should have done.

no they didn't even look at it.

I wouldn't use the word "fag"...That is to gay people like the "N"
word is to African-Americans. However you are gay AND living at home
with mommy and daddy at the age of 37.

Stebie, my girlfriend would disagree with you there.

And I am sure they did. Rumour has it that they don't get too
many applications written in crayon with "GIMME MY ####ING LICENSE YOU
MOTHER####ING ###HOLES".

Don't believe everything you hear, because they weren't written in
crayon, nor was that statement on the application.

That they denied your license was in the best public interest on
soooooo many levels.

Well stebie, I know for a fact that you butt buddies (FCC) didn't even
look at my application. try again

And again, I bet they DID consider your license AND waiver, and
then came to the conclusion that all of us here have...That you're a
ranting, irresponsible, immature little punk who was NOT to be trusted
with the public interest.

Which raises the question how you got a ham license? a picece of
pondscum low life who sits on a newsgroup spreading his lies, harassing
people and threatening them

Todd N9OGL

K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
It seems to me that your one of those amateur operators who doesn't
like K1MAN; reason, you don't have a ####ING LIFE.

Ironic...Coming from a lifeless twit living in mommy and daddy's
basement, bombarding newsgroups with "inventions" and playing junior
disc jockey on the Amateur Bands.

And by the way...I didn't see where "Johnny Johnson" signed an
Amateur callsign to his name or tagline.

Your one of those pathetic licensed CB operators...(SNIP)

CB doesn't require a license anymore, Toiddie.

(UNSNIP)...who can get it through their ####ing head that IT'S A HOBBY.

No it's not.

It's a federally regulated radio service that many participate in
AS a hobby.

There are NO radio services in the United States chartered as a
"hobby radio service".

But no, instead you harass a person because
simply put, you don't like what that person says or does, your ####ing
life circle around ruining this person's life.


Glenn Baxter is ruining Glenn Baxter's life. No one else.

amusing that you claim that You may freely do what K1MAN is in some
trouble for doing

But hey after he's
gone you can go out back and blow your ####ing brains out. Because,
once he is gone you will no longer have anything to live for because
you're the one who is a LOSER.

So sayeth the basement dweller.

Steve, K4YZ

N9OGL wrote:
I wouldn't use the word "fag"...That is to gay people like the "N"
word is to African-Americans. However you are gay AND living at home
with mommy and daddy at the age of 37.

Stebie, my girlfriend would disagree with you there.

She shares you with a guy?

You and Markie DO have a lot in common!Q

And I am sure they did. Rumour has it that they don't get too
many applications written in crayon with "GIMME MY ####ING LICENSE YOU
MOTHER####ING ###HOLES".

Don't believe everything you hear, because they weren't written in
crayon, nor was that statement on the application.

But I am certain they've had plenty of opportunity to see your
other comments in other forums.

That they denied your license was in the best public interest on
soooooo many levels.

Well stebie, I know for a fact that you butt buddies (FCC) didn't even
look at my application. try again

First of all, other than speaking with Phil Kane in this forum, I
don't have ANY kind of "buddies" at the FCC.

Secondly, how do you know they didn't "look" at your application?

In order to have dismissed it as being out of the filing window,
they had to know when it was filed.

Maybe Carnac the Magnificent read it through the envelope?

And again, I bet they DID consider your license AND waiver, and
then came to the conclusion that all of us here have...That you're a
ranting, irresponsible, immature little punk who was NOT to be trusted
with the public interest.

Which raises the question how you got a ham license?

It certainly wasn't by calling the FCC names in public forums, nor
was it submitting an application in crayon with "GIMME MY ####ING
LICENSE YOU MOTHER####ING ###HOLES" written on it.

a picece of
pondscum low life who sits on a newsgroup spreading his lies, harassing
people and threatening them

I haven't lied, nor have I harrassed or threatened anyone.

You, on the otherhand, have threatened numerous lawsuits, acutally
threatened violence (Markie would be embarrassed...) used gross
profanity, defamed a deceased child, and otherwise have acted
irrationally and irresponsibly.

Not to mention your "inventions" were some of the silliest and
most idiotic concepts to hit the wire!

Steve, K4YZ

an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
N9OGL wrote:
First off I'm not a "fag" nor do I live in my parent's basment.

I wouldn't use the word "fag"...That is to gay people like the "N"
word is to African-Americans. However you are gay AND living at home
with mommy and daddy at the age of 37.

and you are comiting Libel

And you don't know what you're talking about.

Todd's 37.

Todd lives with mommy and daddy.

Todd's gay.

It's not libel if it's true.

Steve, K4YZ

N9OGL wrote:
So they considered your waivers and turned you down, just like they
should have done.


no they didn't even look at it.


How do you know?

it is libel YOU ****ING COCKSUCKING BITCH WHORE MOTHER ****ER I AM NOT
GAY YOU ****ING REDARDED MOTHBER ****ER, WHY DON'T YOU JUST EAT ****
AND ****ING DIE!!!!!!!!!!! YOU ****ING ASSHOLE COCKSUCKING
MOTHER****ING BITCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!

THE ****ING ******* STEVE SAID
She shares you with a guy?

NO YOU ****ING COCKING BITCHWHORE BECAUSE YOU ****ING ******* CAN'T GET
IT THROUG YOUR ****ING RETARDED HEAD THAT I'M NOT ****ING GAY.

But I am certain they've had plenty of opportunity to see your
other comments in other forums.

So, if there were here I would tell them exacally what I think of those
lying Cocksucking assholes known as the FCC!!!

First of all, other than speaking with Phil Kane in this forum, I
don't have ANY kind of "buddies" at the FCC.
Secondly, how do you know they didn't "look" at your application?

In order to have dismissed it as being out of the filing window,
they had to know when it was filed.
Maybe Carnac the Magnificent read it through the envelope?

A waiver must either granted or denied, if it is denied the FCC must in
writing explain why it was denied. All facts and finding must be shown
so the applicant if he waiver is denied can file in the US Court of
Appeal. there is a BIG difference between a dissmal and a denial. When
I file the application in the mail on one day and three day's later it
returned well, you get the hint. The MASS MEDIA section of the FCC has
had a long history of not looking at waivers. for example between 1978
to 2000 there was a ban on low power FM however the FCC repeatly stated
that a person can apply for a license and ask for a waiver. In the 22
years of the ban only 2 waivers were ever consider for low power FM,
and that was after the US Court of Appeal told the FCC to consider
them.

It certainly wasn't by calling the FCC names in public forums, nor
was it submitting an application in crayon with "GIMME MY ####ING
LICENSE YOU MOTHER####ING ###HOLES" written on it.

First off dickhead I didn't put that on the application secondly I
became very opinionated about the FCC LONG AFTER I HAD APPLIED FOR A
LOW POWER TV LICENSE.