K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
cut

On the bottle again, eh? Or just playing badmouth while mommy and
daddy have left you unsupervised one more..?!?!

more libel

Not if it's true...And by all counts of what you "cut", it
certainly appears so.....

not at all

no eveidence it is true

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Glenn Baxter is ruining Glenn Baxter's life. No one else.

amusing that you claim that You may freely do what K1MAN is in some
trouble for doing

Oh?

You've seen my name on an NAL for numerous violations of Part 97,
Markie?

THAT'S what K1MAN is in trouble for...

Unless someone bootlegs my call, you'll not hear K4YZ broadcasting
on ANY Amateur allocation.

Hey Markie...

Any reason you left THIS post unmolested...?!?!

of course

I missed it in all you ****

but it of course is mostly bull****

since the issue is not broadcasting but you claiming the right to
contact other other and "inform them" they are comiting a federal
crime, that landed Baxtae in hot water

and you are claiming the right to contact people tell them they are
comitting a crime, and claiming the right to contact people PERenat and
tell them they are comiting a federal crime by allowing thier sons to
transmit

and you deny that you are threatening Todd, you lying sack of ****


Any reason you can't explain to me the rationale for your last set
of answers? You've made others since.

just missed it that is Usenet for you

as I said before it is NOT rational for you to expect I am going to see
your post in the order you make them, and here in this thread you made
so many so close together I simply missed one

so sorry

Steve, K4YZ

AOF:

Don't get yer panties in a bunch, I only want to be helpful...

Why can't you see the posts in the order they are posted? Are you forced
to read the newsgroup off of a webpage? (I hate those damn pages, if they
are going to do them--they could at least do them correctly!)

Are you using webtv? I can't keep everyone organized as to what
software/hardware they are using, etc. (could be alzheimers frown)

John

On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:09:53 -0700, an_old_friend wrote:


K4YZ wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Glenn Baxter is ruining Glenn Baxter's life. No one else.

amusing that you claim that You may freely do what K1MAN is in some
trouble for doing

Oh?

You've seen my name on an NAL for numerous violations of Part 97,
Markie?

THAT'S what K1MAN is in trouble for...

Unless someone bootlegs my call, you'll not hear K4YZ broadcasting
on ANY Amateur allocation.

Hey Markie...

Any reason you left THIS post unmolested...?!?!

of course

I missed it in all you ****

but it of course is mostly bull****

since the issue is not broadcasting but you claiming the right to
contact other other and "inform them" they are comiting a federal
crime, that landed Baxtae in hot water

and you are claiming the right to contact people tell them they are
comitting a crime, and claiming the right to contact people PERenat and
tell them they are comiting a federal crime by allowing thier sons to
transmit

and you deny that you are threatening Todd, you lying sack of ****


Any reason you can't explain to me the rationale for your last set
of answers? You've made others since.

just missed it that is Usenet for you

as I said before it is NOT rational for you to expect I am going to see
your post in the order you make them, and here in this thread you made
so many so close together I simply missed one

so sorry

Steve, K4YZ

John Smith wrote:
AOF:

Don't get yer panties in a bunch, I only want to be helpful...

Why can't you see the posts in the order they are posted? Are you forced

well mostly becuase if you post as much as stevie you can lose one or
two thinking you have answered all his ****

to read the newsgroup off of a webpage? (I hate those damn pages, if they
are going to do them--they could at least do them correctly!)

I use google these days free and easy enough

Are you using webtv? I can't keep everyone organized as to what
software/hardware they are using, etc. (could be alzheimers frown)

John

On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 09:09:53 -0700, an_old_friend wrote:


K4YZ wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Glenn Baxter is ruining Glenn Baxter's life. No one else.

amusing that you claim that You may freely do what K1MAN is in some
trouble for doing

Oh?

You've seen my name on an NAL for numerous violations of Part 97,
Markie?

THAT'S what K1MAN is in trouble for...

Unless someone bootlegs my call, you'll not hear K4YZ broadcasting
on ANY Amateur allocation.

Hey Markie...

Any reason you left THIS post unmolested...?!?!

of course

I missed it in all you ****

but it of course is mostly bull****

since the issue is not broadcasting but you claiming the right to
contact other other and "inform them" they are comiting a federal
crime, that landed Baxtae in hot water

and you are claiming the right to contact people tell them they are
comitting a crime, and claiming the right to contact people PERenat and
tell them they are comiting a federal crime by allowing thier sons to
transmit

and you deny that you are threatening Todd, you lying sack of ****


Any reason you can't explain to me the rationale for your last set
of answers? You've made others since.

just missed it that is Usenet for you

as I said before it is NOT rational for you to expect I am going to see
your post in the order you make them, and here in this thread you made
so many so close together I simply missed one

so sorry

Steve, K4YZ

Is this one of your "opinions" that you claim you have a right to broadcast?

Dan/W4NTI

"N9OGL" wrote in message
ups.com...
It seems to me that your one of those amateur operators who doesn't
like K1MAN; reason, you don't have a ****ING LIFE. Your one of those
pathetic licensed CB operators who can get it through their ****ing
head that IT'S A HOBBY. But no, instead you harass a person because
simply put, you don't like what that person says or does, your ****ing
life circle around ruining this person's life. But hey after he's
gone you can go out back and blow your ****ing brains out. Because,
once he is gone you will no longer have anything to live for because
you're the one who is a LOSER.

Todd N9OGL

Dan/W4NTI wrote:
Is this one of your "opinions" that you claim you have a right to broadcast?

nope that he has the Right to transmit and informational bullitin same
as you do

Dan/W4NTI
pruning

"an_old_friend" wrote


nope that he has the Right to transmit and informational bullitin same
as you do


Here's a "bullitin" for you!

Frederick H. Kleber (K9VV) reported Baxter's interference to health and welfare
traffic handling during the Mexico City earthquake
disaster:

"During the third or fourth day of passing health and welfare traffic during the
Mexico City disaster, Mr. Baxter appeared on the primary net frequency and began
to disrupt communications. I vividly recall my frustration due to the
interference he created by insisting he speak with me, even though it was
evident that I was passing traffic. Baxter insisted that his station serve as
net control, in spite of being politely informed that his assistance was not
needed. Baxter's interference became so disruptive that I ultimately called him
on the telephone.

Carlos (XE1HC) and I were speaking in Spanish, and we discussed how to avoid
Baxter's interference. Baxter was insistent on gaining control of the frequency
and running net operations. In between Baxter's transmissions, Carlos and I
managed to communicate, and to change to another traffic frequency. Once we
moved to a new frequency, we were able to resume passing traffic. Baxter
followed us to our new frequency and interrupted us, just as he had before.
Carlos and I were forced to changed frequency several times in order to avoid
Baxter's interference. Each time, Baxter would show up shortly thereafter and
continue to try to gain control of net operations. Becoming increasingly
frustrated with Baxter's interference, I telephoned him again. I attempted to
explain to Baxter that he was interfering with a health and welfare operation.
He did not listen and he interrupted me frequently. In frustration, I finally
hung up and returned to handling health and welfare traffic.

The health and welfare traffic operation lasted approximately a week. During
that period, my partners and I (NJ7E, XE1HC, W9GIG and W7MY) were able to pass
approximately 7,000 pieces of health and welfare traffic. On numerous occasions
over this period, Mr. Baxter operated his radio station in a manner that created
interference to an established Mexico City earthquake relief health and welfare
net. Mr. Baxter was a constant hindrance to the operation and he later attempted
to leverage publicity from the disaster (often inaccurately reported) for his
personal gain. In subsequent "press releases," Mr. Baxter attacked the actual
participants of that health and welfare net."

K=D8HB wrote:
"an_old_friend" wrote


nope that he has the Right to transmit and informational bullitin same
as you do



finaly at least something that might be relavant

It would be nice to hear from others about the incident, but at least
this an allegation, no date given though which earthrquake are we
talking about here

If this is another old recylced charge

Here's a "bullitin" for you!

Frederick H. Kleber (K9VV) reported Baxter's interference to health and w=
elfare
traffic handling during the Mexico City earthquake
disaster:

"During the third or fourth day of passing health and welfare traffic dur=
ing the
Mexico City disaster, Mr. Baxter appeared on the primary net frequency an=
d began
to disrupt communications. I vividly recall my frustration due to the
interference he created by insisting he speak with me, even though it was
evident that I was passing traffic. Baxter insisted that his station serv=
e as
net control, in spite of being politely informed that his assistance was =
not
needed. Baxter's interference became so disruptive that I ultimately call=
ed him
on the telephone.

Carlos (XE1HC) and I were speaking in Spanish, and we discussed how to av=
oid
Baxter's interference. Baxter was insistent on gaining control of the fre=
quency
and running net operations. In between Baxter's transmissions, Carlos and=
I
managed to communicate, and to change to another traffic frequency. Once =
we
moved to a new frequency, we were able to resume passing traffic. Baxter
followed us to our new frequency and interrupted us, just as he had befor=
e=2E
Carlos and I were forced to changed frequency several times in order to a=
void
Baxter's interference. Each time, Baxter would show up shortly thereafter=
and
continue to try to gain control of net operations. Becoming increasingly
frustrated with Baxter's interference, I telephoned him again. I attempte=
d to
explain to Baxter that he was interfering with a health and welfare opera=
tion.
He did not listen and he interrupted me frequently. In frustration, I fin=
ally
hung up and returned to handling health and welfare traffic.

The health and welfare traffic operation lasted approximately a week. Dur=
ing
that period, my partners and I (NJ7E, XE1HC, W9GIG and W7MY) were able to=
pass
approximately 7,000 pieces of health and welfare traffic. On numerous occ=
asions
over this period, Mr. Baxter operated his radio station in a manner that =
created
interference to an established Mexico City earthquake relief health and w=
elfare
net. Mr. Baxter was a constant hindrance to the operation and he later at=
tempted
to leverage publicity from the disaster (often inaccurately reported) for=
his
personal gain. In subsequent "press releases," Mr. Baxter attacked the ac=
tual
participants of that health and welfare net."

an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Glenn Baxter is ruining Glenn Baxter's life. No one else.

amusing that you claim that You may freely do what K1MAN is in some
trouble for doing

Oh?

You've seen my name on an NAL for numerous violations of Part 97,
Markie?

THAT'S what K1MAN is in trouble for...

Unless someone bootlegs my call, you'll not hear K4YZ broadcasting
on ANY Amateur allocation.

Hey Markie...

Any reason you left THIS post unmolested...?!?!

of course

I missed it in all you ####

but it of course is mostly bull####

It's nothing of the sort.

since the issue is not broadcasting but you claiming the right to
contact other other and "inform them" they are comiting a federal
crime, that landed Baxtae in hot water

Again, you are misinformed.

Read the NAL, Markie.

THAT'S what he's in trouble for.

and you are claiming the right to contact people tell them they are
comitting a crime, and claiming the right to contact people PERenat and
tell them they are comiting a federal crime by allowing thier sons to
transmit

You're more confused than I thought.

You've got Toiddie's profanities, threats and other ONLINE
misbehaviour confused with Baxter's ON-THE-AIR high jinx, antics which
have now endangered his furture license status, not to mention possible
financial viability.

and you deny that you are threatening Todd, you lying sack of ####

Markie...Watch those "anger issues", boyo.

Any reason you can't explain to me the rationale for your last set
of answers? You've made others since.

just missed it that is Usenet for you

No...That was Markie not wanting to answer embarrassing questions.

as I said before it is NOT rational for you to expect I am going to see
your post in the order you make them, and here in this thread you made
so many so close together I simply missed one

so sorry

Yes. You are.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Glenn Baxter is ruining Glenn Baxter's life. No one else.

amusing that you claim that You may freely do what K1MAN is in some
trouble for doing

Oh?

You've seen my name on an NAL for numerous violations of Part 97,
Markie?

THAT'S what K1MAN is in trouble for...

Unless someone bootlegs my call, you'll not hear K4YZ broadcasting
on ANY Amateur allocation.

Hey Markie...

Any reason you left THIS post unmolested...?!?!

of course

I missed it in all you ####

but it of course is mostly bull####

It's nothing of the sort.

it sure is bull****

since the issue is not broadcasting but you claiming the right to
contact other other and "inform them" they are comiting a federal
crime, that landed Baxtae in hot water

Again, you are misinformed.

nope you are not reading


Read the NAL, Markie.

THAT'S what he's in trouble for.

and you are claiming the right to contact people tell them they are
comitting a crime, and claiming the right to contact people PERenat and
tell them they are comiting a federal crime by allowing thier sons to
transmit

You're more confused than I thought.

You've got Toiddie's profanities, threats and other ONLINE
misbehaviour confused with Baxter's ON-THE-AIR high jinx, antics which
have now endangered his furture license status, not to mention possible
financial viability.

Liar again

You have threaten to contact Todd perant and tell them their son in
violating federal law

one the thing that has people not happey with Baxter

and you deny that you are threatening Todd, you lying sack of ####

Markie...Watch those "anger issues", boyo.

why?

if you have any prove of your claims of mental illiness take to the
proper authorites

Put up or shut up


Any reason you can't explain to me the rationale for your last set
of answers? You've made others since.

just missed it that is Usenet for you

No...That was Markie not wanting to answer embarrassing questions.

no just missed it in you flood of ****


as I said before it is NOT rational for you to expect I am going to see
your post in the order you make them, and here in this thread you made
so many so close together I simply missed one

so sorry

Yes. You are.

put up or shut up

Steve, K4YZ