On 14 Aug 2005 16:05:44 GMT, "Alun L. Palmer"
wrote:

Now that the code test is on it's way to join the buggy whip, we need a new
issue to argue about. There are a lot of threads here devoted to personal
attacks on people I have never heard of. It's getting too much like 80m!

Certain high-profile members of the 80 meter crowd migrated here after
Riley sent a bunch of NALs a few years ago. I have never seen such a
group of people so obsessed with each other.

For some it's pills. For others, it's alcohol. But for this group,
chaos seems to be their drug of choice...

Ted:

Change is usually non-conformity, and may seem chaotic to those stuck in a
rut...

John

On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 19:32:14 -0400, Uncle Ted wrote:

On 14 Aug 2005 16:05:44 GMT, "Alun L. Palmer"
wrote:

Now that the code test is on it's way to join the buggy whip, we need a new
issue to argue about. There are a lot of threads here devoted to personal
attacks on people I have never heard of. It's getting too much like 80m!

Certain high-profile members of the 80 meter crowd migrated here after
Riley sent a bunch of NALs a few years ago. I have never seen such a
group of people so obsessed with each other.

For some it's pills. For others, it's alcohol. But for this group,
chaos seems to be their drug of choice...

On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 17:12:26 -0700, John Smith
wrote:

Ted:

Change is usually non-conformity, and may seem chaotic to those stuck in a
rut...

John

I fail to see what all of the current "non-conformists" are trying to
change. It's like they're so obsessed with insults that they've
forgotten what the original debate was about.

Ted:

Agreed.

John

"Uncle Ted" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 14 Aug 2005 17:12:26 -0700, John Smith
wrote:

Ted:

Change is usually non-conformity, and may seem chaotic to those stuck in a
rut...

John

I fail to see what all of the current "non-conformists" are trying to
change. It's like they're so obsessed with insults that they've
forgotten what the original debate was about.