Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "KØHB" wrote in message oups.com... Dave Heil wrote: Carl's race for the Atlantic Division Directorship should be interesting at the very least. Should he actually get elected, I'm sure the seasoned veterans of the League will welcome him with open arms. I was a tad surprised to see his candidacy announced, based on his somewhat negative casting of ARRL in the past. As, when I was ARRL Dakota Division Vice Director, and he sent this request to me..... "Now why don't you do us all a favor and take your lying, stagnated, ARRL apologist ass out of here ..." Hans, Please accept my public apology for my insult to you (a number of years past). Perhaps a leopard can change his spots. I have changed my view of the ARRL ... in fact, I became a Life Member. If you read my Candidate Statement (a 2 page .pdf) which is available via a link from my website at http://home.ptd.net/~wk3c, you'll see that I've come to believe that a strong and inclusive ARRL is important to the future of ham radio. I even have developed good relations with Dave Sumner, Ed Hare, and some of the other staffers and personally consider them to be a friends. Yes, my views towards the ARRL have changed *considerably* over the past years. 73, Carl - wk3c |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Carl R. Stevenson" wrote in message ... Hans, Please accept my public apology for my insult to you (a number of years past). Perhaps a leopard can change his spots. I have changed my view of the ARRL ... in fact, I became a Life Member. If you read my Candidate Statement (a 2 page .pdf) which is available via a link from my website at http://home.ptd.net/~wk3c, you'll see that I've come to believe that a strong and inclusive ARRL is important to the future of ham radio. I even have developed good relations with Dave Sumner, Ed Hare, and some of the other staffers and personally consider them to be a friends. Yes, my views towards the ARRL have changed *considerably* over the past years. 73, Carl - wk3c Thanks Carl. And thanks for the pleasant phone call this afternoon. Wish we could have talked longer, but we had just arrived at the MN State Fair, and needed the phone to coordinate arrival of two or three parties who were joining us there. I wish you success in your quest for a seat on the ARRL BoD, as whatever differences we've had in the past, we both passionately agree on the need to refurbish the tinkerer/experimenter/technical nature of our Amateur Radio Service. ARRL needs to lead that effort. Good luck es 73, de Hans, K0HB Grand Exhalted Liberator of the Fumes of Solder |
#23
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K=D8HB wrote: "Carl R. Stevenson" wrote in message ... Hans, Please accept my public apology for my insult to you (a number of years= past). Perhaps a leopard can change his spots. I have changed my view of the ARRL ... in fact, I became a Life Member. If you read my Candidate Statement (a 2 page .pdf) which is available v= ia a link from my website at http://home.ptd.net/~wk3c, you'll see that I've come to believe that a strong and inclusive ARRL is important to the future of ham radio. I even have developed good relations with Dave Sumner, Ed Hare, and som= e of the other staffers and personally consider them to be a friends. Yes, my views towards the ARRL have changed *considerably* over the past years. 73, Carl - wk3c Thanks Carl. And thanks for the pleasant phone call this afternoon. Wis= h we could have talked longer, but we had just arrived at the MN State Fair, a= nd needed the phone to coordinate arrival of two or three parties who were j= oining us there. I wish you success in your quest for a seat on the ARRL BoD, as whatever differences we've had in the past, we both passionately agree on the need= to refurbish the tinkerer/experimenter/technical nature of our Amateur Radio Service. ARRL needs to lead that effort. Good luck es 73, de Hans, K0HB Grand Exhalted Liberator of the Fumes of Solder I've got to get bifocals before I try to tinker with electronics anymore. But that's my problem. I do agree that tinkering is something that most amateurs can get behind, isn't controversial, and might close the abyss created by the Code Wars. What will the ARRL do with such an idea? That's anyones guess. bb |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Open Letter to K1MAN | Policy | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | General | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Info | |||
NCVEC Position on Code | Policy |