was chatching up on Stevie and noticed this post where Stevie admit AOL
found his stuff libelous (he denies it was but admits AOL thought so)

k4yz said on May 29 2004
Subject: CW Testing Question
From: (Len Over 21)
Date: 5/28/2004 9:56 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
If somethings true, it's not libelous.

AOL thought it was VERY libelous and cancelled that alternate
screen name you used then.


You went ballistic on that "home page" and were clearly deep
into libelous personal attack. AOL concurred.



AOL did what AOL always does...they took the path of least
resistance.


You DID misrepresent your intentions with an e-mail that
contained OTHER than what you attested to it being.

Poor baby. A simple mistake and you go BALLISTIC!

cut the rest

From: an_old_friend on Aug 22, 10:07 pm

was chatching up on Stevie and noticed this post where Stevie admit AOL
found his stuff libelous (he denies it was but admits AOL thought so)

k4yz said on May 29 2004

Subject: CW Testing Question
From: (Len Over 21)
Date: 5/28/2004 9:56 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
If somethings true, it's not libelous.
AOL thought it was VERY libelous and cancelled that alternate
screen name you used then.
You went ballistic on that "home page" and were clearly deep
into libelous personal attack. AOL concurred.

AOL did what AOL always does...they took the path of least
resistance.

Mark, that happened when you were away from the newsgroup for
a while. Leading up to this posting was Stebie "challenging"
me to provide "proof" of my First "Phone license. No problem,
I scanned it in color with enough resolution to make even the
filligree on the edges nicely visible. I labeled that scanned
image "Attachment."

At about the same time, a hometown (and school days) friend
sent me some images in e-mail and one was labeled "Attach."
That image was a high-quality image of an airborne B-26
converted to firebomber, good shot of the forward part from
above. In the plexiglas nose, one crewmember was "mooning"
the photo plane and camera. Funny!

So, when I got back on line later, I sent Stebie an e-mail
with an attachment. On AOL that I was using then, one can
select attachments from a series of overlay menus. I grabbed
the file "Attach" with the mouse, saw it got attached, and
sent the e-mail. Very quickly (I was still on line) Stebie
sent me a nice e-mail in return thanking me and saying "he
knew he could count on me..." :-)

Obviously, I didn't check file names, separating "Attach"
from "Attachment." You can guess which one got sent the
first time. :-)

A day went by till I got on-line again, only to find a
TOTALLY BERSERK Stebie going absolutely ballistic, cussing me
out, and saying he made a denunciatory Home Page on AOL to
show what a terrible person I am. In the newsgroup I posted
my error explanation but that was NOT ENOUGH. Stebie wanted
more than a "pound of flesh," he wanted a whole meat market
full. :-)

The new Home Page created by Stebie under some alternate
screen name of "NeverTrustLennie" or something like that was
pure, utter LIBEL, so much that it could be spelled out all-caps.
Geezus, Stebie had gone NUTS with all that libelous snit.

I messaged AOL Member Services after making a copy of that page
and had to wait another day for a reply. I let AOL know that
I was considering retaining a lawyer on that matter. No sweat,
I could pay retainer and court cost fees for civil court action
on that. It would have been a sure winner for me had it come to
that. No problem. AOL simply erased that Home Page, notified
Stebie, and erased his new alternate screen name. OK, that was
fair and I said so to AOL Member Services.

During the three days for all that to happen, I re-checked my
directory used for In/Out files, renamed them after making sure
which one was which, and RESENT in e-mail the proper scanned
image of my first First 'Phone (front and back, the back having
had four signatures from the Chief Engineers of WBEL, WRRR,
WREX-TV, and WMCW, all indicating "satisfactory service").
Stebie replied in both e-mail and newsgroup posting that he
"refused to look at it." It was a good scan...I have a good one
...and Adobe PhotoShop made it easy enough to scratch out enough
of my signature to prevent forgery of that yet remain legible
(my name was typed in on the certificate by the FCC).

I sent copies of that scan to some others, the "air moon" image
to some others (Brian Burke thought it was funny). Stebie
stayed ballistic, perhaps in orbit, and has yet to re-enter
the atmosphere of reality.

You DID misrepresent your intentions with an e-mail that
contained OTHER than what you attested to it being.
Poor baby. A simple mistake and you go BALLISTIC!

That Stebie did. Surprising outburst of total ANGER and un-
thinking clearly-libelous prose on that Home Page. Stebie is
an uncontrolled volatile emotionally-driven sociopath when he
doesn't get his way OR if he perceives he was "deceived."
He hasn't changed one bit since...

wrote:
From: an_old_friend on Aug 22, 10:07 pm

was chatching up on Stevie and noticed this post where Stevie admit AOL
found his stuff libelous (he denies it was but admits AOL thought so)

cut
A day went by till I got on-line again, only to find a
TOTALLY BERSERK Stebie going absolutely ballistic, cussing me
out, and saying he made a denunciatory Home Page on AOL to
show what a terrible person I am. In the newsgroup I posted
my error explanation but that was NOT ENOUGH. Stebie wanted
more than a "pound of flesh," he wanted a whole meat market
full. :-)
I know what you mean

I choose to flumox Stevie when he threatened when I wasn't even home to
deal with him if did carry through, explained later when it was safe to
do so, but stevie is still ranting about that Today 7 years later
cut
I sent copies of that scan to some others, the "air moon" image
to some others (Brian Burke thought it was funny). Stebie
stayed ballistic, perhaps in orbit, and has yet to re-enter
the atmosphere of reality.

Was he ever realy in the same reality as you and I

You DID misrepresent your intentions with an e-mail that
contained OTHER than what you attested to it being.
Poor baby. A simple mistake and you go BALLISTIC!

That Stebie did. Surprising outburst of total ANGER and un-
thinking clearly-libelous prose on that Home Page. Stebie is
an uncontrolled volatile emotionally-driven sociopath when he
doesn't get his way OR if he perceives he was "deceived."
He hasn't changed one bit since...

He does frighten me somewhat, just gald Todd and brain are closer than
I am and he doesn't like them any better than me or you

an_old_friend wrote:
was chatching (catching) up on Stevie and noticed this post where Stevie admit AOL
found his stuff libelous (he denies it was but admits AOL thought so)

Here's YOUR post, intact, Markie.

YOU said that I "admit(ed)" that AOL "found (my) stuff libelous".

WHERE in that post, Markie, did I "admit" that AOL found my stuff
libelous?

AOL's letter to me only stated that there was a "complaint" and
they removed the page due to "controversy".

LENNIE said it was libelous...but then Lennie also chides others
for being "thin skinned", but clearly can't stand having his own deciet
and misdeeds fed back to him.

MY comment was that AOL took the path of least resistance. No
more...no less...

k4yz said on May 29 2004
Subject: CW Testing Question
From: (Len Over 21)
Date: 5/28/2004 9:56 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
If somethings true, it's not libelous.

AOL thought it was VERY libelous and cancelled that alternate
screen name you used then.

You went ballistic on that "home page" and were clearly deep
into libelous personal attack. AOL concurred.

AOL did what AOL always does...they took the path of least
resistance.

You DID misrepresent your intentions with an e-mail that
contained OTHER than what you attested to it being.

Poor baby. A simple mistake and you go BALLISTIC!

cut the rest

Of course you "cut the rest".

You usually do when it portends embarrasment.

Steve, K4YZ

OK Markie...You Said I Admitted Libel...Now Show us WHERE...

another lie stevie I never said you admitted to libel I said you
admitted to getting you access cut becuase of libel. I also said youd
deny it was libel

so buzz another lie on your part

K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
was chatching (catching) up on Stevie and noticed this post where Stevie admit AOL
found his stuff libelous (he denies it was but admits AOL thought so)

Here's YOUR post, intact, Markie.

YOU said that I "admit(ed)" that AOL "found (my) stuff libelous".

WHERE in that post, Markie, did I "admit" that AOL found my stuff
libelous?

AOL's letter to me only stated that there was a "complaint" and
they removed the page due to "controversy".

LENNIE said it was libelous...but then Lennie also chides others
for being "thin skinned", but clearly can't stand having his own deciet
and misdeeds fed back to him.

MY comment was that AOL took the path of least resistance. No
more...no less...

k4yz said on May 29 2004
Subject: CW Testing Question
From: (Len Over 21)
Date: 5/28/2004 9:56 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
If somethings true, it's not libelous.

AOL thought it was VERY libelous and cancelled that alternate
screen name you used then.

You went ballistic on that "home page" and were clearly deep
into libelous personal attack. AOL concurred.

AOL did what AOL always does...they took the path of least
resistance.

You DID misrepresent your intentions with an e-mail that
contained OTHER than what you attested to it being.

Poor baby. A simple mistake and you go BALLISTIC!

cut the rest

Of course you "cut the rest".

You usually do when it portends embarrasment.

Steve, K4YZ

nobodys_old_friend wrote:
wrote:
From: nobodys_old_friend on Aug 22, 10:07 pm

was chatching up on Stevie and noticed this post where Stevie admit AOL
found his stuff libelous (he denies it was but admits AOL thought so)

cut
A day went by till I got on-line again, only to find a
TOTALLY BERSERK Stebie going absolutely ballistic, cussing me
out, and saying he made a denunciatory Home Page on AOL to
show what a terrible person I am. In the newsgroup I posted
my error explanation but that was NOT ENOUGH. Stebie wanted
more than a "pound of flesh," he wanted a whole meat market
full. :-)
I know what you mean

I choose to flumox Stevie when he threatened when I wasn't even home to
deal with him if did carry through, explained later when it was safe to
do so, but stevie is still ranting about that Today 7 years later

You didn't "flumox" anyone, Markie...If you THINK you did and it
makes you feel better to think you did something, that's one thing.

I sent copies of that scan to some others, the "air moon" image
to some others (Brian Burke thought it was funny). Stebie
stayed ballistic, perhaps in orbit, and has yet to re-enter
the atmosphere of reality.

Was he ever realy in the same reality as you and I

Absolutely not.

I'd never be allowed to be a licensed healthcare person if I was
even remotely like you.

The "air moon" was sent under false colors.

A "lie".

You DID misrepresent your intentions with an e-mail that
contained OTHER than what you attested to it being.
Poor baby. A simple mistake and you go BALLISTIC!

That Stebie did. Surprising outburst of total ANGER and un-
thinking clearly-libelous prose on that Home Page. Stebie is
an uncontrolled volatile emotionally-driven sociopath when he
doesn't get his way OR if he perceives he was "deceived."
He hasn't changed one bit since...

He does frighten me somewhat, just gald Todd and brain are closer than
I am and he doesn't like them any better than me or you

It wouldn't matter if you lived next door, Markie.

You'd just have to contend with the laughing in person, rather
than in print...

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
nobodys_old_friend wrote:
wrote:
From: nobodys_old_friend on Aug 22, 10:07 pm

was chatching up on Stevie and noticed this post where Stevie admit AOL
found his stuff libelous (he denies it was but admits AOL thought so)

cut
A day went by till I got on-line again, only to find a
TOTALLY BERSERK Stebie going absolutely ballistic, cussing me
out, and saying he made a denunciatory Home Page on AOL to
show what a terrible person I am. In the newsgroup I posted
my error explanation but that was NOT ENOUGH. Stebie wanted
more than a "pound of flesh," he wanted a whole meat market
full. :-)
I know what you mean

I choose to flumox Stevie when he threatened when I wasn't even home to
deal with him if did carry through, explained later when it was safe to
do so, but stevie is still ranting about that Today 7 years later

You didn't "flumox" anyone, Markie...If you THINK you did and it
makes you feel better to think you did something, that's one thing.

well you claimed to have called the DoD so I did something to you


I sent copies of that scan to some others, the "air moon" image
to some others (Brian Burke thought it was funny). Stebie
stayed ballistic, perhaps in orbit, and has yet to re-enter
the atmosphere of reality.

Was he ever realy in the same reality as you and I

Absolutely not.

I'd never be allowed to be a licensed healthcare person if I was
even remotely like you.

wrong

another Stevie lie


The "air moon" was sent under false colors.

it was a mistake


A "lie".

mistake

not evrything you don't like is a lie


You DID misrepresent your intentions with an e-mail that
contained OTHER than what you attested to it being.
Poor baby. A simple mistake and you go BALLISTIC!

That Stebie did. Surprising outburst of total ANGER and un-
thinking clearly-libelous prose on that Home Page. Stebie is
an uncontrolled volatile emotionally-driven sociopath when he
doesn't get his way OR if he perceives he was "deceived."
He hasn't changed one bit since...

He does frighten me somewhat, just gald Todd and brain are closer than
I am and he doesn't like them any better than me or you

It wouldn't matter if you lived next door, Markie.

It sure would one or both of us would be dead right now


You'd just have to contend with the laughing in person, rather
than in print...

nope

Steve, K4YZ

nobodys_old_friend wrote:
OK Markie...You Said I Admitted Libel...Now Show us WHERE...

another lie stevie

No, it's not.

I never said you admitted to libel I said you
admitted to getting you access cut becuase of libel. I also said youd
deny it was libel

"because" "you'd"

S T I L L not true, Markie!

I N E V E R said AOL "cut" my "access".

And it wasn't libel. Read the post YOU quoted.

so buzz another lie on your part

S T I L L no lie from me, Markie!

WHY do you insist on making posts that are, in-and-of-themselves,
patently false, Markie...?!?!

I left the entire previous post intact below...

SHOW ME where the admission of having my AOL access cut was made,
Markie...?!?!

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
nobodys_old_friend wrote:
was chatching (catching) up on Stevie and noticed this post where Stevie admit AOL
found his stuff libelous (he denies it was but admits AOL thought so)

Here's YOUR post, intact, Markie.

YOU said that I "admit(ed)" that AOL "found (my) stuff libelous".

WHERE in that post, Markie, did I "admit" that AOL found my stuff
libelous?

AOL's letter to me only stated that there was a "complaint" and
they removed the page due to "controversy".

LENNIE said it was libelous...but then Lennie also chides others
for being "thin skinned", but clearly can't stand having his own deciet
and misdeeds fed back to him.

MY comment was that AOL took the path of least resistance. No
more...no less...

k4yz said on May 29 2004
Subject: CW Testing Question
From: (Len Over 21)
Date: 5/28/2004 9:56 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:
If somethings true, it's not libelous.

AOL thought it was VERY libelous and cancelled that alternate
screen name you used then.

You went ballistic on that "home page" and were clearly deep
into libelous personal attack. AOL concurred.

AOL did what AOL always does...they took the path of least
resistance.

You DID misrepresent your intentions with an e-mail that
contained OTHER than what you attested to it being.

Poor baby. A simple mistake and you go BALLISTIC!

cut the rest

Of course you "cut the rest".

You usually do when it portends embarrasment.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
nobodys_old_friend wrote:
OK Markie...You Said I Admitted Libel...Now Show us WHERE...

another lie stevie

No, it's not.

yes it is lie

I never said you admited to the libel

there your title was and is a lie


I never said you admitted to libel I said you
admitted to getting you access cut becuase of libel. I also said youd
deny it was libel

"because" "you'd"

S T I L L not true, Markie!

I N E V E R said AOL "cut" my "access".

sure did

And it wasn't libel. Read the post YOU quoted.

I read it it was libelous


so buzz another lie on your part

S T I L L no lie from me, Markie!

sure was


WHY do you insist on making posts that are, in-and-of-themselves,
patently false, Markie...?!?!

I have not
cuting stevie efforts to waste bandwidth