Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Here you have a true picture of the sorry state of amateur radio. A bunch of ancient, silly old men lying about military service, and arguing about such... all which has nothing to do with the amateur hobby in this century, in this millennium... These subjects, which the vast majority of amateurs have no interest in, do nothing to assist amateur radio, indeed, they only further aids its' decay. CW is as important to the future as the model A, the steam engine, the the horse and buggy, etc... and yet you have the greatest expenditure of energy revolving around it. There are no men with the vision, courage and skills to be able to step in and move focus on points which would move amateur radio ahead... Only old gossipers using ancient technology to further their own self-serving interests are the problem, sane men have fled for other frontiers... It is ridiculous to watch... John |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: John Smith on Aug 29, 8:08 am
Here you have a true picture of the sorry state of amateur radio. A bunch of ancient, silly old men lying about military service, and arguing about such... all which has nothing to do with the amateur hobby in this century, in this millennium... These subjects, which the vast majority of amateurs have no interest in, do nothing to assist amateur radio, indeed, they only further aids its' decay. CW is as important to the future as the model A, the steam engine, the the horse and buggy, etc... and yet you have the greatest expenditure of energy revolving around it. There are no men with the vision, courage and skills to be able to step in and move focus on points which would move amateur radio ahead... Actually, there ARE those. Only one of them has been in this newsgroup (Carl Stevenson)...and has been roundly booed or snubbed by those "ancient, silly old men" you mentioned. Only old gossipers using ancient technology to further their own self-serving interests are the problem, sane men have fled for other frontiers... It is ridiculous to watch... I find it morbidly fascinating! :-) |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote Actually, there ARE those. Only one of them has been in this newsgroup (Carl Stevenson)...and has been roundly booed or snubbed by those "ancient, silly old men" you mentioned. "Only one"? Present company excepted, how about these representative examples just for starters.... ....W1RFI ....KE4ZV ....KA9Q ....WB9IVR(SK) ....KE3Z |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
He is talking about you.....Lennie.
Dan/W4NTI wrote in message oups.com... From: John Smith on Aug 29, 8:08 am Here you have a true picture of the sorry state of amateur radio. A bunch of ancient, silly old men lying about military service, and arguing about such... all which has nothing to do with the amateur hobby in this century, in this millennium... These subjects, which the vast majority of amateurs have no interest in, do nothing to assist amateur radio, indeed, they only further aids its' decay. CW is as important to the future as the model A, the steam engine, the the horse and buggy, etc... and yet you have the greatest expenditure of energy revolving around it. There are no men with the vision, courage and skills to be able to step in and move focus on points which would move amateur radio ahead... Actually, there ARE those. Only one of them has been in this newsgroup (Carl Stevenson)...and has been roundly booed or snubbed by those "ancient, silly old men" you mentioned. Only old gossipers using ancient technology to further their own self-serving interests are the problem, sane men have fled for other frontiers... It is ridiculous to watch... I find it morbidly fascinating! :-) |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: K0HB on Aug 29, 12:20 pm
wrote Actually, there ARE those. Only one of them has been in this newsgroup (Carl Stevenson)...and has been roundly booed or snubbed by those "ancient, silly old men" you mentioned. "Only one"? YES. Are you running for anything now, Hans? :-) Present company excepted, how about these representative examples just for starters.... ...W1RFI ...KE4ZV ...KA9Q ...WB9IVR(SK) ...KE3Z Have those listed individuals been here in the last year? Last two years? Ed Hare (W1RFI) and Jon Bloom (KE3Z) are both EMPLOEES of the ARRL. [Jon makes more than Ed] I suppose either or both could run for some League office, but, to avoid obvious conflict of interest charges and finger-pointing, they would have to quit. Gary Coffman (KE4ZV) USED to post in here on a fairly regular basis. If he is running for some kind of post, I don't know it and will civilly accept a correction. He hasn't been here lately. Phil Karn (KA9Q) is vice-president for technology of Qualcomm. I remember only one posting from him in THIS newsgroup. Remember that "cell phones 'always' fail in an emergency" and can't ever be used for emergency communications according to some amateur mythologists. :-) [Qualcomm makes cell phone stuff for those too iggorant to keep up with raddio things] Hiram Percy Maxim (W1AW) is reputed to have "done a lot for amateur radio" but he passed on before the electronic computer became reality, well before the PC and the Internet existed. Don Stoner did a lot for advancing the state of the (HF) amateur radio art and he and Pierre Goral formed a company in WA state called SGC (the Stoner-Goral Company). I don't think either one has been here, much less lately. They are both SK now. All sorts of names come to mind. What else would you like to be corrected on? :-) |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "John Smith" wrote in message news ![]() Here you have a true picture of the sorry state of amateur radio. A bunch of ancient, silly old men lying about military service, and arguing about such... all which has nothing to do with the amateur hobby in this century, in this millennium... These subjects, which the vast majority of amateurs have no interest in, do nothing to assist amateur radio, indeed, they only further aids its' decay. CW is as important to the future as the model A, the steam engine, the the horse and buggy, etc... and yet you have the greatest expenditure of energy revolving around it. There are no men with the vision, courage and skills to be able to step in and move focus on points which would move amateur radio ahead... Only old gossipers using ancient technology to further their own self-serving interests are the problem, sane men have fled for other frontiers... It is ridiculous to watch... John Actually John the boys on 75 meters will have much to talk about over the comming days with Hurrican Katrina and it's effects on New Orleans. Last night I was listening up on 3.9-- and heard conversations going on like.......... "..hey Clem, did you just see the bigassed black woman complaining on MS-NBC because shes been waiting for 3 hours to get into the Superdome with her 4 nigglets and how that it ain't right keeping needy families out in the rain.... HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!" (to which Clem -name changed- replies ![]() "naw I'm watchin CNN ain't interested, those ni-gers can all drown for what I care" It's great to see that Ham Radio still has it's monopoly on racist 4-land rednecks like it had back in 1950. Then I went to tuning across the band and the hurricane was the topic of conversation with comments like tihis: "I saw a pix of the bros packing in there a few min ago.. can U imagine the stench when the toilets back up from the flooding??? Ughhhh.... Think about the smell of the food wrappers and food leftovers in the trash cans, the dregs of New Orleans without showers. Unless they let people cycle through the dressing room showers. It will be funky enough with the sewers working. The really sad part is the foreigners who were caught in all this. They will be stuck in the Superdome with the very worst America has to offer." |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
All,
I am a somewhat younger person (43 yrs) and I still see a use for CW. 1) Since it has the narrowest bandwidth of any mode, you can squeeze it in between massive amounts of QRM on the 40 meter band and still manage to get heard. 2) Again, since it has the narrowest bandwidth of any mode, you can get more kilometers per watt out of the signal... basically you get reach the furtherest across the world with it. 3) It is the only digital mode that does not require computer machinery to interpret. 4) It the mode that requiring the simplest of equipment to implement. Worst case, one could use crystal oscillator and a crystal receiver to make a contact one state away. Try that with SSB or packet! To me, CW is to communication as a lightsaber is to combat: both are archaic, elegant, and extremely effective ways of getting your point made. There might not be Jedi in this galaxy, but in my mind CW operation is the next best thing. The Eternal Squire |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From: on Aug 30, 3:15 pm
All, I am a somewhat younger person (43 yrs) and I still see a use for CW. 1) Since it has the narrowest bandwidth of any mode, you can squeeze it in between massive amounts of QRM on the 40 meter band and still manage to get heard. 2) Again, since it has the narrowest bandwidth of any mode, you can get more kilometers per watt out of the signal... basically you get reach the furtherest across the world with it. ONLY if the ionosphere is "kind" to you and you stay BELOW VHF. Get below MF and them lil QRP things will go dead. 3) It is the only digital mode that does not require computer machinery to interpret. The "digital" label is incorrect. Since OOK CW morse has only two states, carrier-on or carrier-off, it is BINARY. The Morse-Vail "code" is so simple in technology that it can be done with wires and a battery, NO radio required. Why are you doing the ex deus machina thing? What are you using to get your posting out to the rest of the Internet? 4) It the mode that requiring the simplest of equipment to implement. Worst case, one could use crystal oscillator and a crystal receiver to make a contact one state away. Try that with SSB or packet! In 1844 the Morse-Vail Telegraph successfully demonstrated wired communications between Baltimore, MD, and Washington, DC. WITHOUT any radio whatsoever! That should "qualify" as "contact one state away." If "contacting another state" is so important, I need only drive a day or two to another state...where I can stand in that state and TALK to three other states! No radio of any kind needed! :-) To me, CW is to communication as a lightsaber is to combat: both are archaic, elegant, and extremely effective ways of getting your point made. There might not be Jedi in this galaxy, but in my mind CW operation is the next best thing. Obi-wannabe, a "lightsaber" is a FICTIONAL thing out of the imaginary world of George Lucas' creativity. It does NOT exist. Neither do "Jedi Knights." Such is FICTION. Don't tell me you are going to drag out the 1996 movie "Independence Day" as a "documentary?!?" :-) |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... All, I am a somewhat younger person (43 yrs) and I still see a use for CW. 1) Since it has the narrowest bandwidth of any mode, you can squeeze it in between massive amounts of QRM on the 40 meter band and still manage to get heard. 2) Again, since it has the narrowest bandwidth of any mode, you can get more kilometers per watt out of the signal... basically you get reach the furtherest across the world with it. 3) It is the only digital mode that does not require computer machinery to interpret. 4) It the mode that requiring the simplest of equipment to implement. Worst case, one could use crystal oscillator and a crystal receiver to make a contact one state away. Try that with SSB or packet! To me, CW is to communication as a lightsaber is to combat: both are archaic, elegant, and extremely effective ways of getting your point made. There might not be Jedi in this galaxy, but in my mind CW operation is the next best thing. The Eternal Squire CW is not the narrowest bandwidth mode; currently, psk-31 is. With something like a 32 Hz bandwidth, cw pales in comparison with its' 100 to 200 Hz bandwidth. That said, it is easy to grab a key (or keyer) and have an intelligent conversation (yes, the cw gang can and does rag-chew) with simple equipment. It should be noted that PSK takes its' cue from CW in that it is a variable-length encoded mode. Like CW, the most common characters are the shortest (and CW is worthless? Folks learned and built upon the earlier mode). PSK-31 can send/receiver far faster than the best cw operator can send/receive. However, there are some folks that argue that keyboards are obsolete. I suspect they simply want no tests LOL. CW can be a most effective way of communicating your message. One guy on a local repeater was screaming "cw forever". Fortunately, the repeater owner was in the group so ..... int f2? And .... 40 words per minute mcw was sent over the repeater. The owner had no problem. I had no problem. Yes, I can stir the pot a bit LOL The guy pushing for cw only? My point was made ![]() 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
eScrew OWNS YOU!!! | CB | |||
eScrew OWNS YOU!!! | Policy | |||
eScrew zen story | Antenna | |||
Now that's funny. Sad...but funny. | CB |