Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() John Smith wrote: AOF: Did I understand Dee's question correctly? Isn't what she asked, and I paraphrase here, "Where are your rose colored glasses?" John IMO No what she said was "trust the ARRL they know what they are doing" that takes more than Rose colored glasses, more like CGI imaging glasses |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
From the FCC Rule Book: Complete Guide to the FCC Regulations Governing
Amateur Radio; edited by Norm Bliss,WA1CCQ, Published by the ARRL Chapter 4, Page 4-2 Direct and Indirect Payment "You must never accept any money or other consideration for operating your station [97.113(a)(2)]. this is consistent with one of the prime directives of our serice: "Recognition and enhancement of the value of the amateur service to the public as a voluntary, noncommercial communication service, particularly with respect providing emergency communication" (emphasis added) [97.1(a)] If you club is providing communications support to the town of Needham for a parade, you cannot accept their offer of payment for your work. You are volunteers, providing a community service on a non-commercial basis, period You should never accept anything for your Amateur Radio operating. The FCC prohibits operation of an amateur station "for hire, or material compensation, direct or indirect, paid or promised" [97.113(a)(2)] This includes direct payment (money, goods, food, and so on) and indirect payment (publicity, advertising, and so on)." -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It rather funny that K1MAN get's fined $21,000 for Pecuniary Interest and the ARRL is allowed to do this. What go for one person should apply to all. The ARRL should be fined by the FCC for doing this! Todd N9OGL |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "N9OGL" wrote "You must never accept any money or other consideration for operating your station [97.113(a)(2)]. this is consistent with one of the prime directives of our serice: I understand your concern, but the grant does not provide payment for operating; it provides reimbursement for expenses. The distinction isn't all that subtle --- consider this: If the government gave you a plane ticket, lodged you in a hotel, and provided your meals so you could operate a station in the disaster area, would you consider this "compensation"? In this case, rather than provide those items "in kind", the government has made a grant which covers exactly those same expenses after the fact. I personally wish the money was spent on grants to actual victims, but I can't find anyone being paid "any money or other consideration for operating". 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K=D8HB wrote: "N9OGL" wrote "You must never accept any money or other consideration for operating your station [97.113(a)(2)]. this is consistent with one of the prime directives of our serice: I understand your concern, but the grant does not provide payment for ope= rating; it provides reimbursement for expenses. but you cut the perant paragraph Hans being re qutoed below 97.113(a)(2)] This includes direct payment (money, goods, food, and so on) and indirect payment (publicity, advertising, and so on)." The distinction isn't all that subtle --- consider this: If the governme= nt gave you a plane ticket, lodged you in a hotel, and provided your meals so you= could operate a station in the disaster area, would you consider this "compensa= tion"? In this case, rather than provide those items "in kind", the government h= as made a grant which covers exactly those same expenses after the fact. based on what has been published by the ARRL for years yes I would say it was compensation. I have never thought that type of rule was proper, but I have and do feel that those are the rules I personally wish the money was spent on grants to actual victims, but I = can't find anyone being paid "any money or other consideration for operating". =20 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() K=D8HB wrote: "N9OGL" wrote "You must never accept any money or other consideration for operating your station [97.113(a)(2)]. this is consistent with one of the prime directives of our serice: I understand your concern, but the grant does not provide payment for ope= rating; it provides reimbursement for expenses. My radios are expenses. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() an_old_friend wrote: wrote: K=D8HB wrote: "N9OGL" wrote "You must never accept any money or other consideration for operati= ng your station [97.113(a)(2)]. this is consistent with one of the pri= me directives of our serice: I understand your concern, but the grant does not provide payment for= operating; it provides reimbursement for expenses. My radios are expenses. as are My drill bits For punching hole in the walls A Better set of rules would allow some reasonable comp, and I would support it but that isn't the rules NOW People have been paying to have their 2M and 440 transmissions repeated for years, and all the OFs here are good with it. None are asking for a rules change. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Mike Coslo wrote: wrote: K=D8HB wrote: "N9OGL" wrote "You must never accept any money or other consideration for operating your station [97.113(a)(2)]. this is consistent with one of the prime directives of our serice: I understand your concern, but the grant does not provide payment for o= perating; it provides reimbursement for expenses. My radios are expenses. You might be able to make a case for that if you purchased them for emergency use, and only used them for Emergency use. Expect a challenge, tho' =20 - Mike KB3EIA - As if I'd use them any other time. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "N9OGL" wrote in message oups.com... : From the FCC Rule Book: Complete Guide to the FCC Regulations Governing : Amateur Radio; edited by Norm Bliss,WA1CCQ, Published by the ARRL : : Chapter 4, Page 4-2 Direct and Indirect Payment : : : "You must never accept any money or other consideration for operating : your station [97.113(a)(2)]. this is consistent with one of the prime : directives of our serice: : : "Recognition and enhancement of the value of the amateur service : to the public as a voluntary, noncommercial communication service, : particularly with respect providing emergency communication" (emphasis : added) [97.1(a)] : : If you club is providing communications support to the town of Needham : for a parade, you cannot accept their offer of payment for your work. : You are volunteers, providing a community service on a non-commercial : basis, period : You should never accept anything for your Amateur Radio operating. : The FCC prohibits operation of an amateur station "for hire, or : material compensation, direct or indirect, paid or promised" : [97.113(a)(2)] This includes direct payment (money, goods, food, and so : on) and indirect payment (publicity, advertising, and so on)." : : -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------ As a matter of practical curiousness from an outside view, have you ability to afford to go there with your station for several weeks and pay your own life expenses? If so, why you have not done so? If not, would you volunteer to go if your government provided travel and food and shelter expenses? BGO -- "I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord, make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it." - Voltaire |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Pecuniary Interest???? | General | |||
K1MAN The crap has hit the fan. | Policy | |||
Here's Your Answer, Todd.... | Policy | |||
Pecuniary Interest | Policy |