Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old September 5th 05, 01:54 AM
an_old_friend
 
Posts: n/a
Default


John Smith wrote:
AOF:

Did I understand Dee's question correctly? Isn't what she asked, and I
paraphrase here, "Where are your rose colored glasses?"

John


IMO No what she said was "trust the ARRL they know what they are doing"
that takes more than Rose colored glasses, more like CGI imaging glasses

  #2   Report Post  
Old September 4th 05, 10:40 PM
N9OGL
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From the FCC Rule Book: Complete Guide to the FCC Regulations Governing
Amateur Radio; edited by Norm Bliss,WA1CCQ, Published by the ARRL

Chapter 4, Page 4-2 Direct and Indirect Payment


"You must never accept any money or other consideration for operating
your station [97.113(a)(2)]. this is consistent with one of the prime
directives of our serice:

"Recognition and enhancement of the value of the amateur service
to the public as a voluntary, noncommercial communication service,
particularly with respect providing emergency communication" (emphasis
added) [97.1(a)]

If you club is providing communications support to the town of Needham
for a parade, you cannot accept their offer of payment for your work.
You are volunteers, providing a community service on a non-commercial
basis, period
You should never accept anything for your Amateur Radio operating.
The FCC prohibits operation of an amateur station "for hire, or
material compensation, direct or indirect, paid or promised"
[97.113(a)(2)] This includes direct payment (money, goods, food, and so
on) and indirect payment (publicity, advertising, and so on)."

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It rather funny that K1MAN get's fined $21,000 for Pecuniary Interest
and the ARRL is allowed to do this. What go for one person should apply
to all. The ARRL should be fined by the FCC for doing this!


Todd N9OGL

  #3   Report Post  
Old September 4th 05, 10:50 PM
KØHB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"N9OGL" wrote


"You must never accept any money or other consideration for operating
your station [97.113(a)(2)]. this is consistent with one of the prime
directives of our serice:


I understand your concern, but the grant does not provide payment for operating;
it provides reimbursement for expenses.

The distinction isn't all that subtle --- consider this: If the government gave
you a plane ticket, lodged you in a hotel, and provided your meals so you could
operate a station in the disaster area, would you consider this "compensation"?
In this case, rather than provide those items "in kind", the government has made
a grant which covers exactly those same expenses after the fact.

I personally wish the money was spent on grants to actual victims, but I can't
find anyone being paid "any money or other consideration for operating".

73, de Hans, K0HB




  #4   Report Post  
Old September 4th 05, 11:42 PM
an_old_friend
 
Posts: n/a
Default


K=D8HB wrote:
"N9OGL" wrote


"You must never accept any money or other consideration for operating
your station [97.113(a)(2)]. this is consistent with one of the prime
directives of our serice:


I understand your concern, but the grant does not provide payment for ope=

rating;
it provides reimbursement for expenses.


but you cut the perant paragraph Hans being re qutoed below

97.113(a)(2)] This includes direct payment (money, goods, food, and so
on) and indirect payment (publicity, advertising, and so on)."



The distinction isn't all that subtle --- consider this: If the governme=

nt gave
you a plane ticket, lodged you in a hotel, and provided your meals so you=

could
operate a station in the disaster area, would you consider this "compensa=

tion"?
In this case, rather than provide those items "in kind", the government h=

as made
a grant which covers exactly those same expenses after the fact.


based on what has been published by the ARRL for years yes I would say
it was compensation. I have never thought that type of rule was proper,
but I have and do feel that those are the rules

I personally wish the money was spent on grants to actual victims, but I =

can't
find anyone being paid "any money or other consideration for operating".
=20
73, de Hans, K0HB


  #5   Report Post  
Old September 5th 05, 01:19 AM
 
Posts: n/a
Default


K=D8HB wrote:
"N9OGL" wrote

"You must never accept any money or other consideration for operating
your station [97.113(a)(2)]. this is consistent with one of the prime
directives of our serice:


I understand your concern, but the grant does not provide payment for ope=

rating;
it provides reimbursement for expenses.


My radios are expenses.



  #10   Report Post  
Old September 4th 05, 11:08 PM
Grümwîtch thë Ünflãppåblê
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"N9OGL" wrote in message
oups.com...
: From the FCC Rule Book: Complete Guide to the FCC Regulations Governing
: Amateur Radio; edited by Norm Bliss,WA1CCQ, Published by the ARRL
:
: Chapter 4, Page 4-2 Direct and Indirect Payment
:
:
: "You must never accept any money or other consideration for operating
: your station [97.113(a)(2)]. this is consistent with one of the prime
: directives of our serice:
:
: "Recognition and enhancement of the value of the amateur service
: to the public as a voluntary, noncommercial communication service,
: particularly with respect providing emergency communication" (emphasis
: added) [97.1(a)]
:
: If you club is providing communications support to the town of Needham
: for a parade, you cannot accept their offer of payment for your work.
: You are volunteers, providing a community service on a non-commercial
: basis, period
: You should never accept anything for your Amateur Radio operating.
: The FCC prohibits operation of an amateur station "for hire, or
: material compensation, direct or indirect, paid or promised"
: [97.113(a)(2)] This includes direct payment (money, goods, food, and so
: on) and indirect payment (publicity, advertising, and so on)."
:
: --------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------


As a matter of practical curiousness from an outside view, have you ability
to afford to go there with your station for several weeks and pay your own
life expenses?

If so, why you have not done so?

If not, would you volunteer to go if your government provided travel and
food and shelter expenses?


BGO
--
"I have never made but one prayer to God, a very short one: "O Lord,
make my enemies ridiculous." And God granted it."
- Voltaire




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pecuniary Interest???? N9OGL General 63 September 9th 05 12:14 AM
K1MAN The crap has hit the fan. Dan/W4NTI Policy 11 June 21st 05 05:28 AM
Here's Your Answer, Todd.... K4YZ Policy 104 May 9th 05 09:43 AM
Pecuniary Interest FTIV Policy 7 January 19th 05 12:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:56 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017