an old friend wrote:
wrote:
The only thing sadder is that you weren't aborted.

such hate

Marky = such stupidity.

On 17 Oct 2005 03:44:01 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:

Does anyone know what the callsign(s) of the Edmund Fitzgerald
were? (I am asking because I don't know...Not to quiz others...)

That would be Special Event Station N8F, according to the news release
below:

Special Events - November 2005
Remembering the Edmund Fitzgerald

For the 9th consecutive year, members of the Stu Rockafellow Amateur
Radio Society will be in Whitefish Point and Paradise, MI, to put
Special Event station N8F, “Remembering the Edmund Fitzgerald” on the
air 03-06 Nov 2005. On 10 Nov 1975 the Fitzgerald and her crew of 29
went down in Lake Superior approximately 17 miles from Whitefish
Point, MI. Target frequencies are 3.860, 7.260, 14.260, 18.160*,
21.360, and 28.360* kHz (*secondary). No CW operations because of ARRL
CW Sweepstakes. Also, teaming up with SRARS this year are The
Stillwater Amateur Radio Association from Stillwater, MN, using their
club call sign, WØJH, operating from The Split Rock Lighthouse State
Park at the West end of Lake Superior (Lighthouse #USA783), and The
Arrowhead Radio Amateur Club from Duluth, MN, using their club call
sign, WØGKP, operating from the Duluth area. N8F contacts send a 9x12
SASE (60¢ return postage) for certificate to W8VS/N8F, Richard Barker,
264 N. East St., Brighton, MI 48116; ;
http://www.qsl.net/w8njh. WØJH contacts send 9x12 SASE ($0.60 return
postage) to WØJH, 1618 West Pine St., Stillwater, MN 55082. WØGKP
contacts send 9x12 SASE ($0.60 return postage) to WØGKP, c/o KCØNFB,
115 Eden Lane, Duluth, MN 55805-1533;



73

Steve, K4YZ

73, Leo

Leo wrote:
On 17 Oct 2005 03:44:01 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:

Does anyone know what the callsign(s) of the Edmund Fitzgerald
were? (I am asking because I don't know...Not to quiz others...)

That would be Special Event Station N8F, according to the news release
below:

taking the chance of speaking for Steve I think he meant the Ship Call
in maritime service

Special Events - November 2005
Remembering the Edmund Fitzgerald
cut

Try a query to this website. http://www.edmundfitzgerald.com/

On 17 Oct 2005 15:12:21 -0700, "an Old friend"
wrote:


Leo wrote:
On 17 Oct 2005 03:44:01 -0700, "K4YZ" wrote:

Does anyone know what the callsign(s) of the Edmund Fitzgerald
were? (I am asking because I don't know...Not to quiz others...)

That would be Special Event Station N8F, according to the news release
below:

taking the chance of speaking for Steve I think he meant the Ship Call
in maritime service

Could be - if so, I have no idea where one would look for that info!


Special Events - November 2005
Remembering the Edmund Fitzgerald
cut


73, Leo

an old friend wrote:

gee and Stevie for one of the few times in his miserable existance on
here started a non flame thread sad really

Full of the contradictions, aren't we, Mark?

You make mention of a "non flame" thread, yet you respond to it as
above. It's just begging to get fed back to you, but I realize you're
at a disadvantage...

BTW...I see you have the same problems as Lennie and Brain...THEY
claim that if they weren't called diminutives that they wouldn't do
it...I went almost 3 weeks restraining my tone with Brain, and seems he
never picked up on it...Same-ole-same-o. I just mention those two
since it's routine for them to say one thing, yet do another...Witness
Lennie's on-going use of dimunutives for people who never address him
as anything but "Len".

YOU claimed the same some time ago (that you treat others as
you're treated)...And HERE again you make mention of a "non flame
thread", yet it's "business as usual" for you, ie: "Stevie". Guess you
missed the lack of "Markie" for some time now...

Don't know what I was expecting...........

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:

gee and Stevie for one of the few times in his miserable existance on
here started a non flame thread sad really

Full of the contradictions, aren't we, Mark?

You make mention of a "non flame" thread, yet you respond to it as
above.

yes of course I respond to flame

It's just begging to get fed back to you, but I realize you're
at a disadvantage...

BTW...I see you have the same problems as Lennie and Brain...THEY
claim that if they weren't called diminutives that they wouldn't do
it...I went almost 3 weeks restraining my tone with Brain, and seems he
never picked up on it...Same-ole-same-o.

Not at all You will not be treated with more than the least bits of
respect by me till you earn it from me. ( not you are likely to want
given your history but if you did change your mind and wish my repect
or just to be treated with respect youd have to earn it of course


OTOH you can't even in non flame thread keep from flaming everyone in
sight. typical Stevie

I just mention those two
since it's routine for them to say one thing, yet do another...Witness
Lennie's on-going use of dimunutives for people who never address him
as anything but "Len".

YOU claimed the same some time ago (that you treat others as
you're treated)..


As I did in the post to which you refer I gues you only read miy post
and not the **** posted ahead of it

.And HERE again you make mention of a "non flame
thread", yet it's "business as usual" for you, ie: "Stevie". Guess you
missed the lack of "Markie" for some time now...

if you want to call me Markie I don't really mind. caling me Mark and
still making your standard attacks otherwise make no difference to me.

If by some miracle you did want to achieve an imporved tone you could
do something that mattered to me. if you are interested I will
elaborate, feel free to ask.


Don't know what I was expecting...........

Steve, K4YZ

an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:

gee and Stevie for one of the few times in his miserable existance on
here started a non flame thread sad really

Full of the contradictions, aren't we, Mark?

You make mention of a "non flame" thread, yet you respond to it as
above.

yes of course I respond to flame

It's just begging to get fed back to you, but I realize you're
at a disadvantage...

BTW...I see you have the same problems as Lennie and Brain...THEY
claim that if they weren't called diminutives that they wouldn't do
it...I went almost 3 weeks restraining my tone with Brain, and seems he
never picked up on it...Same-ole-same-o.

Not at all You will not be treated with more than the least bits of
respect by me till you earn it from me. ( not you are likely to want
given your history but if you did change your mind and wish my repect
or just to be treated with respect youd have to earn it of course


OTOH you can't even in non flame thread keep from flaming everyone in
sight. typical Stevie

I wasn't "flaming everyone in sight", Markie.

But you again respond with an expectation of getting "respect" as
if you were the disciplinarian father, due all respect no matter
what...

Sorry...it doesn't work that way...

You've got YEARS worth of lies and deceit of your OWN to
overcome...Guess you'll NEVER get what you're expecting then...

I just mention those two
since it's routine for them to say one thing, yet do another...Witness
Lennie's on-going use of dimunutives for people who never address him
as anything but "Len".

YOU claimed the same some time ago (that you treat others as
you're treated)..

As I did in the post to which you refer I gues you only read miy post
and not the #### posted ahead of it

"guess" "my"

Because the author of "the post ahead of it" wasn't dropping my
name or talking about me.

You were.

.And HERE again you make mention of a "non flame
thread", yet it's "business as usual" for you, ie: "Stevie". Guess you
missed the lack of "Markie" for some time now...

if you want to call me Markie I don't really mind. caling me Mark and
still making your standard attacks otherwise make no difference to me.

You haven't been paying attention.

But then when do you ever?

If by some miracle you did want to achieve an imporved tone you could
do something that mattered to me. if you are interested I will
elaborate, feel free to ask.

"improved"

I am not interested in dancing to your tune, Markie. I held the
branch out and you swatted me with it...That was enough.

Don't know what I was expecting...........

As I said...

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:

gee and Stevie for one of the few times in his miserable existance on
here started a non flame thread sad really

Full of the contradictions, aren't we, Mark?

You make mention of a "non flame" thread, yet you respond to it as
above.

yes of course I respond to flame

It's just begging to get fed back to you, but I realize you're
at a disadvantage...

BTW...I see you have the same problems as Lennie and Brain...THEY
claim that if they weren't called diminutives that they wouldn't do
it...I went almost 3 weeks restraining my tone with Brain, and seems he
never picked up on it...Same-ole-same-o.

Not at all You will not be treated with more than the least bits of
respect by me till you earn it from me. ( not you are likely to want
given your history but if you did change your mind and wish my repect
or just to be treated with respect youd have to earn it of course


OTOH you can't even in non flame thread keep from flaming everyone in
sight. typical Stevie

I wasn't "flaming everyone in sight", Markie.

more lies Stevie

But you again respond with an expectation of getting "respect" as
if you were the disciplinarian father, due all respect no matter
what...

another lie Stevie


Sorry...it doesn't work that way...

yes it does Stevie if you want to be treated with respect by me you
have to earn it, from me. if you want to be treated with respect by
some one else you must earn it from them. That is EXACTLY the way it
works.

BTW your remark is another lie in saying you are sorry

you of course as I said are free not to even try earning my respect,
but if you want you must pay the piper

You've got YEARS worth of lies and deceit of your OWN to
overcome...Guess you'll NEVER get what you're expecting then...

I always get what I expect from you. lies, evasions, fraud, bulling
andd threatening behavoir

that I what I expect from you and you almost never disapoint

I just mention those two
since it's routine for them to say one thing, yet do another...Witness
Lennie's on-going use of dimunutives for people who never address him
as anything but "Len".

YOU claimed the same some time ago (that you treat others as
you're treated)..

As I did in the post to which you refer I gues you only read miy post
and not the #### posted ahead of it

"guess" "my"

Because the author of "the post ahead of it" wasn't dropping my
name or talking about me.

meaning that you are paranoid about what I say

meaning further that you are obsessed about what i might say about you

meaning going still further you have lied when you say you don't care
what i say or do

and going still further menaing you are lying when you say you don't
lie


You were.

.And HERE again you make mention of a "non flame
thread", yet it's "business as usual" for you, ie: "Stevie". Guess you
missed the lack of "Markie" for some time now...

if you want to call me Markie I don't really mind. caling me Mark and
still making your standard attacks otherwise make no difference to me.

You haven't been paying attention.

another lie

I have been

but you are not incontrol of what I do

you started the Markie bit years ago, i repsonded with Stevie,

however if you stopp using markie that does require me to stop calling
you Stevie

it is a sign of your mental problems that you think anyone is pupet on
your strings but as I said "if you want to call me Markie I don't
really mind. caling me Mark and still making your standard attacks
otherwise make no difference to me." your calling me Markie, is amoug
the least of your sins, as long as you conitue to spew your hate filled
**** (such as you allusions to the effect that BLGT people are
pedophiles and child abusers) I'll call you Stevie or worse

But then when do you ever?

If by some miracle you did want to achieve an imporved tone you could
do something that mattered to me. if you are interested I will
elaborate, feel free to ask.

"improved"

I am not interested in dancing to your tune, Markie. I held the
branch out and you swatted me with it...That was enough.

more lies you held out no branch call me Mark while calling me a child
abuser and impling I am a pedophile is not improvement over calling me
Markie and still calling me a child abuser and pedophile

Don't know what I was expecting...........

As I said...

I left it the first time but since you inists

You know what you expecting so you were lying when you claimed
otherwise

you were expecting that I would not care much about the slight
defference in your bull****

Steve, K4YZ